Sonohysterography versus transvaginal sonography for screening of patients with abnormal uterine bleeding
other
OA: closed
public-domain-us
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the accuracy of saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS) with transvaginal sonography (TVS) for the screening of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) in out-patients.
METHODS: 81 patients with AUB were studied. All cases who were examined with TVS, were further investigated with SIS using saline as contrast medium, finally hysteroscopy was used as the gold standard.
RESULTS: TVS had sensitivity of 72%, specificity of 92%, positive predictive value of 94% and negative predictive value of 65%, while SIS had sensitivity of 94.1%, specificity of 95%, positive predictive value of 96% and negative predictive value of 90%. TVS had kappa measure of agreement of 0.60 while 0.86 was reported for SIS.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study SIS was more sensitive and specific in diagnosing polyp, myoma and adenomyosis with high positive and negative predictive value. Furthermore, results obtained by SIS demonstrate more agreement with that obtained by hysteroscopy than TVS.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-18T06:15:08.409253+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:15:06.633332+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine