Results
To investigate the potential contribution of CTH to the aggressive phenotype of CCOC, we first generated CTH KO cells using CRISPR/Cas9 in four well‐characterized CCOC cell lines [ 19 , 20 ] (Figure 1A ). No significant morphological changes were observed in cells with or without CTH KO under ambient conditions. However, CTH KO cells exhibited a tendency toward increased proliferation, enhanced cell death (as shown for OVISE cells in supplementary material, Figure S1A,B ), and reduced viability (Figure 1B ). Moreover, CTH KO cells showed significantly reduced migratory and invasion capacity in vitro as measured by Boyden chamber migration and invasion assays (supplementary material, Figure S1C,D ). In addition, cells grown on Matrigel 3D matrices exhibited an enhanced outspreading growth pattern in control cells, in contrast to the confined growth pattern observed in CTH KO cells (supplementary material, Figure S1E ). These findings strongly support a role for CTH in CCOC aggressiveness. To assess the impact of CTH KO on CCOC cell invasiveness, we utilized two murine animal models: subcapsular renal implantation (SRI) and tail‐vein injection. These models were selected based on growing evidence that hematogenous spread plays an important role in epithelial ovarian cancer and in particular CCOC metastasis, which has been previously overlooked [ 21 , 22 ]. The SRI model is a well‐established model of cancer progression [ 17 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. OVISE cells with or without CTH KO were implanted under the renal capsules of immunocompromised 6‐ to 8‐week‐old NRG female mice to assess local growth and metastasis. In contrast to CTH ‐competent OVISE control cells, CTH KO OVISE cells either did not grow or formed very small tumors in the kidney, which failed to infiltrate intra‐abdominal structures or distantly invade lungs (Figure 1C–F , and supplementary material, Figure S1F ). CTH KO OVISE xenografts showed no evidence of reduced proliferation; instead, there was clear evidence of elevated cell death, as indicated by increased expression of cleaved caspase‐3 (supplementary material, Figure S1G,H ). CTH expression in OVISE tumor xenografts was validated using IHC (supplementary material, Figure S1I , left panels). Moreover, the CCOC marker hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 beta (HNF1β) [ 26 ] showed similar expression in OVISE tumor xenografts with or without CTH KO, suggesting histotypic preservation (supplementary material, Figure S1I , right panels). Furthermore, we also investigated the effects of CTH loss on the later phase of the metastatic cascade by intravenous tail‐vein injection of RMG‐I cells with or without CTH KO into NRG female mice. In contrast to control cells that formed substantial lung metastases, CTH KO RMG‐I cells formed either small solitary lung lesions or grew no lung metastatic lesions (Figure 1G–J , and supplementary material, Figure S1J ). As with the OVISE xenografts, CTH and HNF1β expression were validated using IHC (supplementary material, Figure S1K ). Together, these data highlight CTH's key role in CCOC progression.
CTH facilitates CCOC metastatic progression. (A) Western blotting of CTH protein expression in CCOC cell lines transduced with negative‐control sgRNA or two independent sgRNAs targeting CTH . GAPDH was used as a loading control. (B) MTT cell viability assay conducted on OVISE and OVMANA cells, with or without CTH KO ( n = 3). (C and D) Representative photomicrographs of H&E‐stained tissue sections of primary tumor xenografts and metastatic lesions developed in mice with renal subcapsular implantation (RSI) of OVISE cells, with or without CTH KO, at low (scale bars, 500 μm) and high (scale bars, 50 μm) magnifications. (E) Average tumor size (in millimeters), measured as the maximum dimension, of OVISE tumor xenografts with or without CTH KO described in panels (C and D). (F) Total number of mice bearing xenografts of OVISE CCOC cells, with or without CTH KO, which developed lung metastases, analyzed using Fisher's exact test. (G) H&E‐stained sections of metastatic lesions developed in mice bearing RMG‐I CCOC cells, with or without CTH KO. Scale bars, 500 μm. (H) Graph illustrating total number of mice that developed lung metastases, analyzed using Fisher's exact test. (I) Box plot showing size of lung metastases, measured as maximum dimension (in millimeters) developed in mice bearing tail‐vein injection of RMG‐I cells, with or without CTH KO. In panel (I), data, mean values, and 10th–90th percentile. (J) Graph representing the average number of lung metastases developed in mice bearing RMG‐I CCOC cells, with or without CTH KO. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using unpaired two‐tailed Student's t ‐test in all panels, except for panel (F) and panel (H) where Fisher's exact test was used. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005, *** p < 0.0005; n.s., nonsignificant. See also Supplementary materials and methods, supplementary material, Figure S1 .
CTH plays a crucial role in de novo cysteine synthesis, which is essential for GSH synthesis [ 16 ]. GSH is critical for cellular adaptation to increased levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [ 27 ]. CCOC develops from ovarian endometrioma or endometriotic cysts containing degraded blood and cellular debris, a ROS‐rich microenvironment [ 8 , 28 ]. CTH protein expression increased under oxidative stress induced by the ROS‐inducing agent Piperlongumine (PL) [ 29 ] (Figure 2A ). Consistent with its protective role against elevated ROS, treatment of CCOC cells with or without CTH KO with PL resulted in significant cell death of CTH KO cells (supplementary material, Figure S2A,B ). This was associated with increased ROS levels as measured by the ROS assay 2’,7’‐dichlorofluorescin diacetate (CM‐H 2 DCFDA) (Figure 2B and supplementary material, Figure S2C ), as well as a decrease in reduced‐to‐oxidized glutathione ratios (GSH/GSSG) (Figure 2C and supplementary material, Figure S2D ). Since redox imbalance is significantly associated with ferroptosis [ 30 ], we considered if CTH might protect CCOC cells from ferroptosis. CTH KO cells exhibited increased basal expression of the ferroptosis marker transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1) [ 31 ], indicating increased lipid peroxidation. This effect was intensified by the ferroptosis inducer erastin [ 32 ] and partially reversed by ferrostatin‐1 (Fer‐1) [ 33 ]. Notably, re‐expression of CTH in KO cells, using a previously described shRNA‐resistant plasmid that is also CRISPR‐insensitive and contains the coding sequence (CDS) region while lacking the 3’ and 5’ untranslated regions (UTRs) [ 34 ], resulted in reduced basal ROS levels and a significant decrease in ROS levels upon erastin treatment (Figure 2D,E , and supplementary material, Figure S2E ). In addition, the BODIPY™ 581/591 C11 (another well‐known lipid peroxidation sensor) [ 35 ] confirmed a significant increase in lipid peroxidation in CTH KO cells (Figure 2F,G , and supplementary material, Figure S2F,G ). Moreover, IHC analysis of 4‐hydroxy‐2‐nonenal (4‐HNE), an additional indicator of lipid peroxidation [ 36 ], showed higher expression levels in CTH KO OVISE xenografts (supplementary material, Figure S2H ). These data support a crucial role for CTH in redox regulation and protection against ferroptosis in CCOC.
CTH protects CCOC cells against oxidative stress. (A) CTH protein induction in CCOC cells in response to 10 μm Piperlongumine (PL) treatment, determined by immunoblotting analysis, with GRB2 used as a loading control. (B) ROS levels in OVISE cells, with or without CTH KO, treated with vehicle (0.1% DMSO) or with 10 μ m PL for 24 h, assessed using CM‐H2DCFDA with ROS levels normalized to protein content ( n = 3). (C) OVISE cells, with or without CTH KO, treated with either vehicle or 10 μ m PL for 24 h. Reduced/oxidized glutathione (GSH/GSSG) ratios were measured as a readout for redox stress ( n = 3). (D) Immunofluorescence (IF) detection of TfR1 expression in OVISE cells, with or without CTH KO, or with CTH KO rescued with CRISPR‐insensitive CTH expressing vector, treated with vehicle alone (0.1% DMSO), 5 μmol/l erastin, or combined erastin and 2 μmol/l Fer‐1 for 12 h. Scale bar, 20 μm. (E) Quantification of 12 fields of view (FOVs) representing n = 3 using ImageJ software. Data are presented as mean values and 10th–90th percentile. (F) Representative images of C11‐BODIPY™ (581/591) staining for lipid peroxidation in OVISE cells, with and without CTH KO, treated with either vehicle or 2 μm PL for 24 h. Cumene hydroperoxide was used as a positive control. (G) Quantification of lipid peroxidation in OVISE cells using a microplate reader for n = 2, each performed in quadruplicate. Error bars represent the SD. Scale bar, 20 μm. Statistical analysis was conducted using an unpaired two‐tailed Student's t ‐test. Error bars represent the SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005, *** p < 0.0005; n.s., nonsignificant. See also Supplementary materials and methods, supplementary material, Figures S2 and S3 .
Next, we investigated whether the observed decrease in cell viability and motility in CTH KO cells could be rescued by restoring redox balance. Using the cell‐permeable GSH monoethyl ester (GSH‐MEE), as previously described [ 34 ], we found that while GSH‐MEE completely suppressed the induction of NFR2, a key regulator of the antioxidative response, indicative of its activity, it only partially rescued the viability of CTH KO cells under PL stress (supplementary material, Figure S3A,B ). Since high ROS levels are known to impede tumor migratory and invasive phenotype [ 37 , 38 ], we investigated whether antioxidants could rescue the motility of CTH KO cells. CTH‐deficient OVISE cells demonstrated significantly reduced cell motility as assessed by scratch assays (supplementary material, Figure S3C,D ), which could not be fully rescued by the commonly used antioxidant N‐acetyl cysteine (NAC) [ 39 , 40 ] or Trolox [ 41 ]. Together, these data suggest that CTH plays a critical role in CCOC that extends beyond redox regulation.
Among epithelial ovarian cancer subtypes, CCOC is distinguished by a strong hypoxic signature and elevated expression of HIF1α protein, which drives its aggressive behavior [ 42 ]. However, the link between CTH, hypoxia, and HIF1α in CCOC remains insufficiently explored. We first examined CTH protein expression under hypoxia, which revealed enhanced expression (Figure 3A ), in line with previous studies indicating hypoxia‐induced upregulation of CTH [ 43 , 44 ]. Unlike CCOC cells, CTH protein expression levels remained unchanged under hypoxia in non‐CCOC cells, including the high‐grade carcinoma (HGCS) cells, OVCAR3, and HEY (Figure 3B ), highlighting the histotype‐specific role of CTH in CCOC. Additionally, we investigated whether other TSS pathway enzymes, including cystathionine beta‐synthase (CBS) and 3‐mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (MPST), were altered under hypoxia, similar to CTH. Indeed, neither CBS nor MPST was induced under hypoxia in CCOC (Figure 3C ), highlighting that this response was specific to CTH. Next, we examined the effects of HIF1α inhibition on CTH protein expression. Silencing HIF1A using siRNAs was observed to have no effect on CTH protein expression in CCOC cells (supplementary material, Figure S4A ).
CTH facilitates HIF1α expression. (A) Western blotting shows CTH protein induction in OVISE and OVMANA cells incubated under hypoxia (1% O 2 , 2 h), with GRB2 used as a loading control. (B) Western blotting showing CTH protein expression in nonclear ovarian cancer cell lines OVCAR3 and HEY, incubated under 1% O 2 for 2 h. Vinculin was used as a loading control. (C) Western blotting shows effects of hypoxia (1% O 2 , 2 h) on protein expression levels of cystathionine beta‐synthase (CBS) and 3‐mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (MPST) in CCOC cell lines. Vinculin was used as a loading control. (D) Western blotting shows effects of CTH KO on HIF1α protein expression levels in OVISE cells, incubated under −/+ hypoxia (1% O 2 , 4 h). GAPDH was used as a loading control. (E) Left panels: IHC of HIF1α expression in lung metastases of RMG‐I cells with or without CTH KO. Right panel: quantification of HIF1α staining intensity for six fields of view (FOVs), representing n = 3 lungs with metastases per group. (F) Left panels: IHC of HIF1α expression in tumor xenografts of OVISE cells with or without CTH KO. Right panel: quantification of HIF1α staining intensity in 12 FOVs representing n = 3 tumors per group. (G) Left panels: IHC of VEGFA in OVISE tumor xenografts with or without CTH KO. Right panels: quantification of staining intensity in six representative images ( n = 3 tumors per group) was performed using ImageJ with the color deconvolution plug‐in. (H) Left panels: IHC of CD31 expression in tumor xenografts of OVISE cells with or without CTH KO. Right panel: quantification of tumor microvessel density in 12 FOVs representing n = 3 tumors per group. Scale bar, 50 μm for panels (E–H). (I) CTH and HIF1A mRNA expression in indicated cells determined by RT‐qPCR. Data were normalized against GAPDH and expressed as fold change ± SD, in n = 3 experiments. (J) Hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) levels in OVISE cells, with or without CTH KO, or with CTH KO rescued with CRISPR‐insensitive CTH ‐expressing vector, detected using the H 2 S fluorescence probe, P3 ( n = 3 experiments, each performed in quadruplicate). (K) Western blotting analysis of CTH, CBS, and MPST protein expression levels in CTH KO OVISE cells transduced with either shCTRL or shRNA targeting CBS . Vinculin was used as a loading control. (L) H 2 S levels, detected using H 2 S fluorescence probe HSip‐1, in CTH KO OVISE cells transduced with either shCTRL or shRNA targeting CBS , normalized to protein content. Data are presented as mean ± SD of n = 3 experiments. (M) CBS activity, measured using CBS assay kit in OVISE cells with and without CTH KO, normalized to protein content. Data are presented as mean ± SD of n = 3 experiments. (N) Western blotting shows HIF1α protein restoration in CTH KO OVISE cells transfected with plasmid expressing arginine (R) to alanine (A) CTH mutant (R62A). GAPDH was used as loading control. Statistical analysis was conducted using unpaired two‐tailed Student's t ‐test. Data are presented as mean ± SD. a.u. = arbitrary units, kd = knockdown. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005, *** p < 0.0005. See also Supplementary materials and methods, supplementary material, Figure S4 .
Examination of HIF1α expression in cells with or without CTH KO revealed that hypoxia‐induced HIF1α upregulation was significantly attenuated in CTH KO cell lines (Figure 3D ). Consistent with in vitro data, HIF1α protein levels were also significantly downregulated in CTH KO RMG‐I lung metastases, as assessed by IHC (Figure 3E ), and in CTH KO OVISE xenografts (Figure 3F ). In the latter, this downregulation was associated with reduced VEGFA expression and decreased blood vessel formation (Figure 3G,H ).
To investigate whether other enzymes in the TSS pathway contributed to HIF1α regulation, we used siRNAs to target CBS (three individual siRNAs) and MPST (two individual siRNAs). As shown in supplementary material, Figure S4B , silencing of CBS or MPST did not affect HIF1α protein expression under hypoxia in OVISE and RMG‐I cells, highlighting a specific link between CTH and HIF1α in CCOC.
To gain further insights into how CTH facilitates HIF1α expression, we compared total HIF1A mRNA levels in OVISE cells with or without CTH KO grown under hypoxia by reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT‐qPCR). Total HIF1A mRNA levels in hypoxic OVISE cells were relatively higher in CTH KO cells, though this was not statistically significant (Figure 3I ), arguing against a transcriptional mechanism for CTH‐mediated HIF1α expression. Furthermore, HIF1A mRNA decay assay, using a well‐known transcriptional inhibitor actinomycin D [ 45 ] showed no significant difference between OVISE cells with and without CTH KO (supplementary material, Figure S4C ). In addition, investigation of four publicly available datasets [ 8 , 46 , 47 , 48 ] did not reveal a correlation between HIF1A mRNA and CTH mRNA expression (supplementary material, Figure S4D ). Together, these data suggest a post‐transcriptional mechanism is involved in the regulation of CTH‐mediated HIF1α protein expression.
Next, we investigated whether CTH loss affected HIF1α protein stability, as HIF1α stability is a critical post‐transcriptional regulatory mechanism and a key step in cellular adaptation to hypoxia [ 49 , 50 ]. Neither the proteasome inhibitor MG132 [ 51 ] nor the prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor DMOG [ 52 ] was able to restore HIF1α in CTH KO cells to comparable levels to CTH ‐competent cells (supplementary material, Figure S4E,F ), arguing against enhanced degradation being the mechanism involved. We further assessed the effects of CTH on HIF1α protein stability by treating OVISE cells with or without CTH KO with cycloheximide (CHX) to block translation [ 53 ] and measuring HIF1α protein degradation rates. As shown in supplementary material, Figure S4G,H , the degradation rates were almost comparable between CTH‐competent and CTH‐lacking cells, arguing against CTH regulating HIF1α protein stability. Together, these data strongly suggest that a post‐transcriptional process, neither involving degradation nor stability mechanisms, contributes to CTH‐mediated HIF1α expression.
Traditional views of CTH as a key TSS pathway enzyme attribute its effects to cysteine and hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) production [ 54 , 55 ]. H 2 S was previously reported to play an important role in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) angiogenesis through the activation of HIF1α [ 56 ]. Furthermore, multiple studies have linked H 2 S to HIF1α expression, with evidence suggesting that H 2 S can either enhance [ 57 , 58 , 59 ] or inhibit HIF1α expression [ 60 ]. To explore this further, we measured H 2 S levels using a previously described P3 probe [ 61 ] in OVISE cells with and without CTH KO. Unexpectedly, CTH KO cells exhibited relatively higher H 2 S levels compared to control cells, which were reduced upon rescue with CRISPR‐insensitive CTH ‐expressing plasmid (Figure 3J ). This unexpected increase in H 2 S levels may be attributed to elevated CBS protein expression, likely a compensatory response, observed in CTH KO OVISE cells (Figure 3K ). Silencing CBS in these CTH KO OVISE cells using shRNA significantly reduced H 2 S levels, as assessed by H 2 S fluorescence probe HSip‐1, as previously described [ 62 , 63 ] (Figure 3L ). Additionally, the increased CBS protein levels in CTH KO cells (Figure 3K ) were associated with enhanced CBS activity, as measured using a CBS activity assay (Figure 3M ). These findings suggest that CBS plays a predominant role in H 2 S production in CCOC cells under conditions of CTH deficiency.
Next, we investigated whether the reduced HIF1α protein levels observed in CTH KO cells could be attributed to elevated H 2 S, given previous reports that H 2 S inhibited HIF1α expression [ 60 ]. Treatment of CCOC cells with a high dose (1 m m ) of the slow‐releasing H 2 S donor GYY4137 or a sublethal dose (10 μ m ) of the fast‐releasing H 2 S donor sodium sulfide (Na 2 S) did not alter HIF1α expression, ruling out this possibility (supplementary material, Figure S4I,J ). Finally, arginine 62 (R62) has been reported to be essential for the enzymatic activity of CTH [ 64 ]. Therefore, we hypothesized that this activity might be essential for CTH‐driven HIF1α expression. Introduction of arginine (R) to alanine (A) CTH mutant (R62A) into CTH KO OVISE cells significantly restored HIF1α expression (Figure 3N ), providing strong evidence for potential nonenzymatic functions of CTH. Taken together, our findings suggest that CTH regulates HIF1α expression through an H 2 S‐independent post‐transcriptional mechanism.
We next assessed whether HIF1α was important for CTH‐driven invasion and metastasis of CCOC cells. Similar to CTH KO, HIF1A knockdown (kd) with two independent siRNAs in CTH‐competent OVISE cells significantly inhibited in vitro cell motility. Furthermore, rescuing CTH KO cells with a previously reported WT HIF1A ‐expressing plasmid [ 17 ] effectively restored cell motility (supplementary material, Figure S5A–D ). Notably, these effects were observed under normoxic conditions, aligning with previous reports that support the role of HIF1α in normoxia [ 65 , 66 , 67 ]. We then expressed WT HIF1A in CTH KO RMG‐I cells and used tail‐vein injection to monitor lung metastatic progression, which revealed that the metastatic burden of CTH KO cells was completely rescued, highlighting HIF1α as a critical contributor to CTH‐mediated CCOC metastasis (Figure 4A,B ). Expression levels of HIF1α and CTH were determined by IHC, showing reduced HIF1α in CTH KO lung mets and its restoration in mets formed by RMG‐I cells transfected with a HIF1A ‐expressing plasmid. CTH loss was maintained in both CTH KO and CTH KO/HIF1α rescue groups (Figure 4C,D and supplementary material, Figure S5E ). Together, these data highlight HIF1α as a significant contributor to CTH‐mediated metastatic progression of CCOC cells. To further assess whether CTH regulates HIF1α in human CCOC, a small tissue microarray (TMA) consisting of 84 CCOC tumors was immunostained for CTH and HIF1α. CTH expression was found to be significantly correlated with HIF1α expression (Figure 4E,F ). These data provide strong evidence that CTH positively regulates HIF1α protein expression in CCOC.
HIF1α restoration in CTH KO cells restores their metastatic phenotype. (A) H&E‐stained sections of metastatic lesions developed in mice bearing RMG‐I CCOC cells, with or without CTH KO or with CTH KO combined with HIF1α rescue. Scale bar, 500 μm. (B) Graphical representation of metastatic burden in the three groups described in panel (A), calculated as percentage of lung occupied by metastases, using the following formula: (lung metastasis area / total lung area) × 100. Values are presented as mean ± SD. (C) Representative low‐ (scale bar, 100 μm) and high‐magnification (scale bar, 50 μm) images of IHC staining for HIF1α expression in lung metastases of RMG‐I cells, with or without CTH KO or with CTH KO combined with HIF1α rescue. (D) Quantification of HIF1α staining intensity for nine fields of view, representing n = 3 lungs with metastases per group. Staining intensity was quantified with ImageJ using the color deconvolution plug‐in. (E) Representative images of IHC analysis of CTH and HIF1α proteins in clinical samples, shown at low (×4) and high magnification (×20). The 20× objective images are subsets of the 4× objective images. Scale bar, 100 μm. (F) Correlation between CTH and HIF1α protein expression in CCOC primary tumors using IHC on tissue microarrays ( n = 84 cases). Pearson correlation estimate (R) is shown at the top of the right panel graph (with 95% confidence intervals shown in brackets). The black line shows a linear regression model fit. (G) MTT cell viability assay shows the effects of cisplatin treatment (10 −9 mg/ml, 96 h) on OVISE and OVMANA cells, with or without CTH KO, for n = 3 experiments. CTH KO increases CCOC cell sensitivity to cisplatin chemotherapy. Statistical analysis was conducted using an unpaired two‐tailed Student's t ‐test. Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005, *** p < 0.0005. See also Supplementary materials and methods, supplementary material, Figures S5 and S6 .
To test whether CTH‐mediated HIF1α expression occurs in other systems, we assessed Ewing sarcoma (EwS) xenografts, with or without CTH kd, since CTH was recently implicated in EwS metastasis [ 34 ]. CTH‐deficient EwS xenografts, generated using two independent shRNAs [ 34 ], showed significant downregulation of HIF1α, VEGF, and CD31, similar to CCOC (supplementary material, Figure S6A–E ), all of which were rescued by CTH re‐expression using shRNA‐resistant CTH ‐expressing plasmid. We noted that CTH‐deficient EwS xenografts showed reduced expression of carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX), a well‐established HIF1α transcriptional target [ 68 ], but CTH re‐expression significantly rescued its expression [supplementary material, Figure S6A (right panels) and S6F ]. In contrast, CAIX was not expressed in either control or CTH KO RMG‐I xenografts (supplementary material, Figure S6G ). This suggests that hypoxia response components are tailored to specific cell context. Furthermore, the clear cell renal cell carcinoma cell line RCC4, which is known to stabilize HIF1α expression due to inactivation of ECV E3 ligase through loss‐of‐function mutations in VHL [ 49 , 69 ], still showed a significant reduction of HIF1α expression upon CTH inhibition using siRNA. This reduction occurred despite low CTH protein expression levels (supplementary material, Figure S6H ), suggesting that CTH‐mediated HIF1α expression is not through protein stability but instead highlights a general role for CTH in regulating HIF1α expression.
Lastly, our finding that lack of CTH induces cell death, notably under stress, raised the question as to whether these features could be exploited therapeutically. OVISE and OVMANA cells with or without CTH KO treated with cisplatin for 96 h showed significantly enhanced cell death in CTH KO cells (Figure 4G ), consistent with other reports [ 70 , 71 ], highlighting the therapeutic utility of co‐targeting CTH in CCOC.
Endometriosis of the ovary is associated with an increased risk of transformation and development of CCOC. We previously showed that CTH was highly expressed in CCOC and adjacent endometriosis [ 7 ]. Therefore, to investigate whether CTH played a critical role in normal endometrial cells, we examined normal Müllerian tract‐derived cells, including endometrial cells. This study revealed that these cells expressed low levels of CTH, except for the ciliated cells, where CTH was abundantly expressed (Figure 5A,B ). Similarly, CTH expression levels were high in the remnant ectopic endometrial epithelium of ovarian endometriotic cyst walls (Figure 5C ). Using an organoid modeling system, established from benign endometrial tissues obtained from patients who underwent surgery for noncancerous lesions (e.g. fibroids) [ 7 , 14 , 72 ], we found that CTH was induced under hypoxia (Figure 5D ), similar to CCOC, further highlighting the critical role for CTH in adaptation to hypoxia. Next, endometriotic cyst content, known to contain elevated levels of ROS [ 28 ], was obtained from ovarian endometrioma patients who underwent surgery and processed as previously described [ 73 ], with minor modifications (Figure 5E ). The post‐centrifugation supernatants, free from blood and cellular debris that could interfere with the culture process, were used for treatment. CCOC cells treated with cyst supernatants showed enhanced CTH expression, suggesting a link between cyst content and CTH functionality (Figure 5F ). To further investigate the effects of CTH on endometrial organoid growth under ambient conditions or stress conditions, primary endometrial cells were transduced with Cas9‐expressing lentiviral vectors co‐expressing egfp and either a nontargeting single guide RNA (sgRNA) (NTCA1) or CTH sgRNAs ( CTH KO). Cells were then grown in 3D cultures with Matrigel to produce organoids, as previously described [ 7 ]. After 1 week, organoids were exposed to vehicle (0.1% DMSO) or cyst content treatments for a further week. In contrast to well‐formed, CTH ‐competent organoids, CTH KO organoids displayed a stunted growth pattern and insufficiently viable morphology (Figure 5G–I ). Cyst content treatment of control organoids enriched cells with enhanced CTH expression, as assessed by IHC, whereas CTH KO organoids showed stressed and crumbled morphologies (Figure 5J–L ). Induction of CTH under cyst content treatment (Figure 5K ), further supports its role in stress adaptation. In this system, CTH was expressed in all epithelial cells, not just ciliated cells, a pattern described previously by our team in atypical epithelial cells within endometriosis adjacent to CCOC [ 7 ].
CTH role in CCOC's precursor cells. (A) Left panels: H&E‐stained human fallopian tube (FT) and endometrial tissue sections. Scale bar, 50 μm. Right panels: IHC staining of CTH shows high expression in Mullerian tract‐derived ciliated cells. Scale bars, 50 and 10 μm, respectively. (B) Western blotting of CTH expression in the CCOC cells, OVISE and OVMANA, compared to primary endometrial cells. GAPDH was used as a loading control. (C) H&E‐stained and CTH‐stained ovarian endometriosis tissue sections show endometrial gland surrounded with endometrial stroma within ovarian tissue positively stained for CTH. Scale bars, 50 μm for left and middle panels and 10 μm for right panels. (D) Left top panels: brightfield (BF) photomicrographs of patient‐derived endometrial organoids grown under normoxia for 7 days, then subjected to normoxia or hypoxia conditions for 7 days. Scale bar, 200 μm. Left middle panels: H&E‐stained sections of organoids grown under normoxia or hypoxia, as described in top panels. Left lower panels: IHC detection of CTH. For left middle and lower panels, scale bar, 50 μm. Right panels: quantification of CTH staining in left lower panels of (D) was assessed in 12 fields of view per condition using ImageJ software and presented graphically. In panel (D), data are expressed as mean values and 10th–90th percentile. (E) Schematic representation of processing of endometriotic cyst content to produce the supernatant used for treatment of endometrial and CCOC cells grown in 2D or 3D cultures. Created with BioRender.com . (F) Western blotting of CTH expression in CCOC OVMANA cells treated with different samples of endometriotic cyst content, collected from different patients (cases 1–4), with vinculin and GAPDH used as loading controls. (G) Organoids derived from normal endometrium with −/+ CRISPR‐mediated CTH loss (labeled with Enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein) as detected using fluorescent microscopy. Scale bar, 200 μm. (H) Left panels: H&E‐stained sections of organoids described in (G). Right panels: IHC staining of CTH in organoids with or without CTH KO. Organoids with CTH loss displayed a significantly stunted formation pattern (asterisk). Scale bar, 50 μm. (I) Graph representing size of organoids with or without CTH KO, described in panel (G) ( n = 51–52), assessed using ImageJ. (J) Organoids derived from normal endometrium with −/+ CRISPR‐mediated CTH loss, grown for 1 week and then treated with vehicle (0.1% DMSO), are shown in panels (G) and (H), or processed endometriotic cyst content for an additional week. Organoids were then visualized and assessed using fluorescent microscopy. Scale bar, 200 μm. (K) Left panels: H&E‐stained sections of organoids as described in panel (J). Right panels: IHC staining of CTH in organoids with or without CTH KO. CTH expression showed upregulation in control organoids [compared to panel (H), top right]. (L) Graph representing size of organoids with or without CTH KO, as described in panel (J) ( n = 49–76), assessed using ImageJ. For panels (I) and (L), data represent mean values and 10th–90th percentiles, with statistical analysis performed using unpaired two‐tailed Student's t ‐test. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.0005.
Taken together, these findings suggest that CTH plays a crucial role in the development and aggressiveness of CCOC by regulating redox balance through GSH synthesis and enhancing HIF1α expression to promote angiogenesis. This in turn facilitates metastatic growth, ensuring cell survival in potentially lethal microenvironments (Figure 6 ).
Proposed mechanism of CTH‐mediated progression in CCOC. Schematic depicting critical roles of CTH in CCOC. CTH is induced under stress of endometriotic cyst content, replenishing cellular GSH pool to protect against oxidative stress and ferroptosis. Independent of H 2 S production, CTH enhances HIF1α protein expression, defining CCOC cell state manifested by hypoxic signature, which in turn enhances VEGF expression and promotes angiogenesis and cancer progression. Created with Adobe Illustrator and Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Inc., https://www.adobe.com ), and Jmol ( http://jmol.sourceforge.net/ ).