Could the load of carbapenemase genes in hospital wastewater be a proxy for the epidemiology of emerging resistance to carbapenems in humans?

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a growing threat to global public health and is a key concern for infection control teams in hospitals. However, AMR surveillance is time-consuming and limited in most countries, resulting in incomplete findings. In several high-income countries, infection control teams ensure the contact tracing of every patient carrying an emerging extremely resistant bacterium which is very time-consuming. Wastewater surveillance (WWS) has been proposed as an alternative approach for the surveillance of infectious diseases. This study aims to investigate the dynamics of endemic ( bla CTX-M ) and emerging AMR genes ( bla OXA-48 , bla NDM , bla KPC and vanA ) in wastewater under real-world hospital conditions, and to compare results from two hospital buildings with contrasting resistance epidemiology, haematology building versus traumatology / orthopaedic building. Methods The sampling programmes were adapted according to the sampling sites and patient flow for each hospital building. Genes were quantified in the effluent using qPCR and dPCR. Cultivable carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria were characterised using MALDI-TOF MS and PCR. Results The feasibility of AMR monitoring in wastewater in real hospital conditions was demonstrated by dPCR and qPCR, which produced correlated results. The presence of peaks and the low load of the vanA and bla NDM genes in wastewater (compared to bla CTX-M ) were consistent with their known emerging status, as indicated by national and local epidemiological data. However, the constant presence of bla OXA-48 and bla KPC at levels often higher than those of bla CTX-M in wastewater did not reflect the known epidemiology of these emerging resistances, particularly in the case of bla KPC . Bacterial culture also revealed discrepancies with known epidemiology, with a majority of Citrobacter spp. carrying bla KPC and bla OXA-48 in wastewater, whereas Escherichia coli and bla OXA-48 dominated in patients. Quantifying carbapenemase genes in wastewater was able to differentiate between buildings housing patients with a high or standard risk of emerging AMR. Conclusion Alongside the encouraging findings regarding patient populations and the potential predictive power of AMR WWS, this study identified obstacles that need to be overcome before it can be used for routine surveillance in an infection control hospital context.
Full text 4,344 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a growing threat to global public health and is a key concern for infection control teams in hospitals. However, AMR surveillance is time-consuming and limited in most countries, resulting in incomplete findings. In several high-income countries, infection control teams ensure the contact tracing of every patient carrying an emerging extremely resistant bacterium which is very time-consuming. Wastewater surveillance (WWS) has been proposed as an alternative approach for the surveillance of infectious diseases. This study aims to investigate the dynamics of endemic (blaCTX-M) and emerging AMR genes (blaOXA-48, blaNDM, blaKPC and vanA) in wastewater under real-world hospital conditions, and to compare results from two hospital buildings with contrasting resistance epidemiology, haematology building versus traumatology / orthopaedic building.

Methods

The sampling programmes were adapted according to the sampling sites and patient flow for each hospital building. Genes were quantified in the effluent using qPCR and dPCR. Cultivable carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria were characterised using MALDI-TOF MS and PCR.

Results

The feasibility of AMR monitoring in wastewater in real hospital conditions was demonstrated by dPCR and qPCR, which produced correlated results. The presence of peaks and the low load of the vanA and blaNDM genes in wastewater (compared to blaCTX-M) were consistent with their known emerging status, as indicated by national and local epidemiological data. However, the constant presence of blaOXA-48 and blaKPC at levels often higher than those of blaCTX-M in wastewater did not reflect the known epidemiology of these emerging resistances, particularly in the case of blaKPC. Bacterial culture also revealed discrepancies with known epidemiology, with a majority of Citrobacter spp. carrying blaKPC and blaOXA-48 in wastewater, whereas Escherichia coli and blaOXA-48 dominated in patients. Quantifying carbapenemase genes in wastewater was able to differentiate between buildings housing patients with a high or standard risk of emerging AMR.

Conclusion

Alongside the encouraging findings regarding patient populations and the potential predictive power of AMR WWS, this study identified obstacles that need to be overcome before it can be used for routine surveillance in an infection control hospital context. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Funding Statement The study was funded by the PHySE-HSM project (university of Montpellier), the Mi2H platform and the Tremplin programme of the Montpellier Academic Hospital. Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: ICTeams provided us only epidemiological data i.e., the number of patients carrying XDR bacteria but no clinical data from individual patients. Only aggregated epidemiological data were used in the study. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Data, scripts, code, and supplementary information availability The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00