Introduction
Endometriosis is a common gynaecologic disorder,
affecting 2% of the population and 10% of women in
fourth decade (1, 2). It is characterized by the presence
and proliferation of endometrial tissue in ectopic sites
(2, 3). It may affect any of the abdominal or pelvic or-
gans, but groin involvement is rare (1).
The first case of inguinal endometriosis was descri-
bed by Cullen in 1896 (1, 4). Since then 40 cases have
SUMMARY: Isolated inguinal endometriosis. Case report with ul-
trasonographic preoperative diagnosis.
P. G . CALÒ, F . ESU, A. TATTI, L. P ILLONI, F . MEDAS, G. P ISANO,
A. NICOLOSI
Inguinal endometriosis is rare and accounts for 0.3-0.6% of pa-
tients affected by endometriosis. A correct preoperative diagnosis is rare.
Diagnosis is frequently made by histologic examination.
A 36-year-old nulliparous woman presented with a painful mass
in her right groin of 2 years duration. The pain fluctuated according to
the menstrual period. Physical examination revealed an elastic hard
mobile mass measuring 2x2 cm in the right inguinal region. Ultra-
sound examination confirmed a hypoechoic tumor in the right ingui-
nal region with poorly defined boundaries and perilesional and intra-
lesional vascular flow suspect for endometriosis.
Wide excision of the lump with a part of the round ligament was
carried out. Histology showed endometrial glands and stroma within
the fibrous tissue.
The patient had an uneventful recovery and was discharged the
next day. After surgery, the pain disappeared completely. No signs of re-
currence occurred at approximately 16 months after the surgery.
Although rare, extrapelvic endometriosis should be considered in
the differential diagnosis in women of reproductive age presenting with
an inguinal mass, especially if the groin mass is associated in size and
tenderness with menstrual variability. US appearance is very useful in
diagnosis so ultrasonography can be considered the examination of choi-
ce.
RIASSUNTO: Endometriosi inguinale isolata. Descrizione di un caso
clinico con diagnosi preoperatoria ecografica.
P. G . CALÒ, F . ESU, A. TATTI, L. P ILLONI, F . MEDAS, G. P ISANO,
A. NICOLOSI
L ’endometriosi inguinale è rara e rappresenta lo 0.3-0.6% delle
forme di endometriosi. Una diagnosi preoperatoria corretta è rara e la
diagnosi emerge frequentemente dall’esame istologico.
Una donna nullipara di 36 anni si presentò all’osservazione con
una massa dolente in regione inguinale destra presente da 2 anni. Il do-
lore si modificava di intensità in relazione al ciclo mestruale. L ’esame
obiettivo mise in evidenza una tumefazione duro-elastica, mobile, in
regione inguinale destra, delle dimensioni di 2 x 2 cm. L ’esame ecogra-
fico evidenziò una tumefazione ipoecogena in regione inguinale destra
a limiti scarsamente definiti e vascolarizzazione peri e intralesionale,
sospetta per endometriosi.
Fu praticata una ampia asportazione della massa insieme a una
parte del legamento rotondo. L ’istologia confermò la presenza di tessuto
endometriale misto a tessuto fibroso. La paziente ebbe un decorso po-
stoperatorio regolare e fu dimessa il giorno successivo all’intervento. Do-
po l’intervento il dolore scomparve completamente. Non vi sono segni
di recidiva 16 mesi circa dopo il trattamento chirurgico.
Sebbene rara, l’endometriosi extrapelvica deve essere considerata
nella diagnosi differenziale nelle donne in età riproduttiva con una tu-
mefazione inguinale, specialmente se varia nelle dimensioni e nella
consistenza durante il ciclo mestruale. L ’aspetto ecografico è molto uti-
le nella diagnosi e di fatto rende l’ecografia l’indagine di scelta.
KEY WORDS: Endometriosis - Groin - Round ligament - Diagnosis.
Endometriosi - Regione inguinale - Legamento rotondo - Diagnosi.
Isolated inguinal endometriosis. Case report with ultrasonographic
preoperative diagnosis
P .G. CALÒ, F . ESU, A. TATTI, L. PILLONI1, F . MEDAS, G. PISANO, A. NICOLOSI
G Chir Vol. 32 - n. 5 - pp. 263-265
May 2011
263
University of Cagliari, Italy
“Monserrato” Hospital
Department of Surgery and Odontostomatological Sciences
1 ”San Giovanni di Dio “ Hospital
Unit of Pathology
© Copyright 2011, CIC Edizioni Internazionali, Roma
0199 6 Isolated_Calo:- 14-04-2011 15:48 Pagina 263
264
P .G. Calò et al.
been reported in the literature (4, 5). A correct preope-
rative diagnosis is rare. Diagnosis is frequently made by
histologic examination (2, 6).
We report a case of a patient in which inguinal en-
dometriosis was suspected by clinical presentation and
ultrasound.
Case report
A 36-year-old nulliparous woman presented with a painful mass
in her right groin lasting 2 years. She denied dysmenorrhea. Her past
medical history was unremarkable. The pain fluctuated according to
the menstrual period.
Physical examination revealed an elastic hard mobile 2x2 cm mass
in the right inguinal region. The swelling was not reducible and had
no evident cough impulse. Skin over the mass was normal.
Ultrasound examination revealed a complex hypoechoic mass in
the right inguinal region with poorly defined boundaries and peri-
lesional and intralesional vascular flow suspect for endometriosis (Fig.
1).
At surgery a 5 cm longitudinal skin incision was made over the
mass. The mass was attached to the extraperitoneal portion of the
right round ligament. Wide excision of the lump with a part of the
round ligament was carried out. No hernial sac was detected. Posterior
abdominal wall and trasversalis fascia appeared solid. Histology showed
endometrial glands and stroma within the fibrous tissue (Fig. 2). No
malignant cells were identified.
The patient had an uneventful recovery and was discharged the
next day. After surgery, the pain disappeared completely. A diagno-
stic pelvic laparoscopy showed no intraperitoneal or pelvic endo-
metriosis. Patient was submitted to hormonal therapy.
No signs of recurrence occurred at 16 months after the surgery.
Discussion
Endometriosis is a common gynaecological condition,
occurring in 8-15% of fertile women (1, 4, 5, 7, 8). In-
guinal endometriosis is rare and accounts for 0.3-0.6%
of patients affected by endometriosis (1, 8). The right
side is much more commonly involved than the left (90-
94%), while bilateral involvement is exceptional (only
one case described) (1, 4, 8, 9, 10). The right-sided pre-
ponderance may be explained by the theory that the sig-
moid colon relatively protects the left groin (1, 4, 5, 10).
In our case, the patient also presented with the more com-
mon right-sided inguinal endometriosis.
The most common complaint of patients with in-
guinal endometriosis is an inguinal mass, followed by pain
and enlargement of the mass near menses (4). In 30-37%
of patients, inguinal endometriosis is associated with a
groin hernia (6, 8). Pelvic endometriosis is found in most
patients with inguinal endometriosis (4). Though rare,
malignant degeneration is possible (8). Our patient did
not have any intraperitoneal or pelvic endometriosis, nor
a groin hernia.
The imaging appearance, particularly on CT , is non-
specific (4). Magnetic resonance imaging has been de-
monstrated as particularly useful in diagnosing extra-
peritoneal localizations. T o evaluate the mass sonography
is also a very handy and a beneficial tool (1). In many
prior cases, patients had undergone surgery after a preo-
perative diagnosis of inguinal hernia (4). In our case, ul-
trasonography detected an irregular solid hypoechoic no-
dule in the groin region with perilesional and intralesional
vascular flow. This picture contributed to confirm the
suspicion of endometriosis. We did not use magnetic re-
sonance or computed tomography in our case. In our opi-
nion CT and MR should be limited to the few cases in
which other diseases (expecially malignant) are to be ex-
cluded. Cytology also can aid in distinguish endometriosis
from inflammatory, neoplastic, or lymphoproliferative
processes (4). We have no experience in using citology
in such cases.
Surgical excision of inguinal endometriosis is repor-
Fig. 1 - Ultrasonographic finding: complex hypoechoic mass with poorly defi-
ned boundaries.
Fig. 2 - Histological finding: endometrial glands and stroma within the fibrous
tissue.
0199 6 Isolated_Calo:- 14-04-2011 15:48 Pagina 264
ted to be curative (11). Hormonal therapy has also been
recommended (5). In our case surgery was curative too
and patient is currently disease free.
Conclusion
We present an unusual case of inguinal endometriosis
involving the extraperitoneal portion of the round li-
gament. The appearance on US supported the clinical
diagnosis of endometriosis.
Although rare, extrapelvic endometriosis should be
considered in the differential diagnosis in women of re-
productive age presenting with an inguinal mass, espe-
cially if the groin mass is associated in size and tender-
ness with menstrual variability. US appearance is very use-
ful in diagnosis, so ultrasonography can be considered
the examination of choice.
265
Isolated inguinal endometriosis. Case report with ultrasonographic preoperative diagnosis
1. Hagiwara Y, Hatori M, Moriya T , T erada Y, Yaegashi N, Ehara
S, Kokubun S. Inguinal endometriosis attaching to the round
ligament. Australas Radiol 2007; 51: 91-4.
2. Miranda L, Settembre A, Capasso P , Piccolboni D, De Rosa N,
Corcione F . Inguinal endometriosis or irreducibile hernia? A dif-
ficult preoperative diagnosis. Hernia 2001; 5: 47-9.
3. La Gamma A, Kunin N, Letoquart JP , Mambrini A. Endomé-
triose du ligament rond de l’utérus dans le canal inguinal: A pro-
pos d’une nouvelle observation. J Chir 1994; 131: 162.
4. Freed KS, Granke DS, Tyre LL, Williams VL, Omert LA. En-
dometriosis of the Extraperitoneal Portion of the Round Liga-
ment: US and CT Findings. J Clin Ultrasound 1996; 24: 540-
2.
5. Mashfiqul MAS, Tan YM, Chintana CW . Endometriosis of the
inguinal canal mimicking a hernia. Singapore Med J 2007; 48:
157-9.
6. Baccoli A, Mais V , Pani C, Musu S, Milesi M, Farina GP . En-
dometriosi del canale inguinale. Contributo clinico. Giorn It Ost
Gin 1999; 12: 579-82.
7. Calò PG, Piludu M, Catani G, Piga G, Malloci A, Nicolosi A.
Endometriosi ombelicale. Descrizione di un caso clinico. Chir
Ital 2005; 57: 535-7.
8. Licheri S, Pisano G, Erdas E, Ledda S, Casu B, Cherchi MV , Po-
mata M, Daniele GM. Endometriosis of the round ligament: de-
scription of a clinical case and review of the literature. Hernia
2005; 9: 294-7.
9. Candiani GB, Vercellini P , Fedele L, Vendola N, Carinelli S, Sca-
glione V . Inguinal Endometriosis: Pathogenetic and Clinical Im-
plications. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 191-4.
10 Mascaretti G, Patacchiola F , Di Berardino C, Moscarini M. En-
dometriosi inguinale isolata. Descrizione di un caso clinico. Mi-
nerva Ginecol 2000; 52: 249-52.
11. Kapan M, Kapan S, Durgun AV , Goksoy E. Inguinal endome-
triosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2005; 271: 76-8.
References
0199 6 Isolated_Calo:- 14-04-2011 15:48 Pagina 265
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
is the canonical version.