Abstract
Tail heaviness is an important characteristic of probability distributions. Effectively quantifying tail heaviness is crucial for constructing statistical models and comparing different distributions. Traditionally, kurtosis is employed as a metric for measuring tail heaviness; however, it suffers from several well-known limitations or drawbacks. Although several alternative measures have been proposed in the literature, how to appropriately quantify tail heaviness remains an unresolved issue. This paper proposes a novel method for measuring tail weight and introduces a new metric for quantifying tail heaviness, termed the “Tail Heaviness Index.” Our analysis of tail weight focuses primarily on the downside tail (i.e., the right tail) of unimodal distributions. First, we define the “Tail Probability Function” (TPF) as the normalized exceedance probability function. Subsequently, we define the tail weight as the product of the area under the TPF curve and the average density of the tail region. Furthermore, we define the tail heaviness index as the ratio of the tail weight of a given distribution to the tail weight of the benchmark exponential distribution. This paper presents closed-form expressions for the tail heaviness index for seven well-known distributions and compares them with the tail weight coefficient (TWC) proposed by Ortega[1].
Full text
621 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version
{{ publication.field_name }}
{{ publication.subfield_name }}
Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information.
Listen on
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.