On the cognitive dimension of metaphors and their role in education: a response to Molina Rodelo (2021)

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

This paper offers an alternative reading of the cognitive dimension of metaphors. In contrast to Molina Rodelo’s analysis (2021), the present model opposes the views held by the Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT) and The Mental Spaces Theory. I argue that metaphors are part of broader cognitive phenomena (embodied cognition) issued from the speakers’ experience with the world. In other words, metaphors are not a by-product of sensorimotor experience, a simulation, as CMT claims. As a result, metaphors are construed as embodied units of sense for the shared reconstruction of experience.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00