Exploring the acceptance of robotic assisted surgery among the Indian population: An empirical investigation

Exploring the acceptance of robotic assisted... | F1000Research "use strict";function _typeof(t){return(_typeof="function"==typeof Symbol&&"symbol"==typeof Symbol.iterator?function(t){return typeof t}:function(t){return t&&"function"==typeof Symbol&&t.constructor===Symbol&&t!==Symbol.prototype?"symbol":typeof t})(t)}!function(){var t=function(){var t,e,o=[],n=window,r=n;for(;r;){try{if(r.frames.__tcfapiLocator){t=r;break}}catch(t){}if(r===n.top)break;r=r.parent}t||(!function t(){var e=n.document,o=!!n.frames.__tcfapiLocator;if(!o)if(e.body){var r=e.createElement("iframe");r.style.cssText="display:none",r.name="__tcfapiLocator",e.body.appendChild(r)}else setTimeout(t,5);return!o}(),n.__tcfapi=function(){for(var t=arguments.length,n=new Array(t),r=0;r 3&&2===parseInt(n[1],10)&&"boolean"==typeof n[3]&&(e=n[3],"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]("set",!0)):"ping"===n[0]?"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]({gdprApplies:e,cmpLoaded:!1,cmpStatus:"stub"}):o.push(n)},n.addEventListener("message",(function(t){var e="string"==typeof t.data,o={};if(e)try{o=JSON.parse(t.data)}catch(t){}else o=t.data;var n="object"===_typeof(o)&&null!==o?o.__tcfapiCall:null;n&&window.__tcfapi(n.command,n.version,(function(o,r){var a={__tcfapiReturn:{returnValue:o,success:r,callId:n.callId}};t&&t.source&&t.source.postMessage&&t.source.postMessage(e?JSON.stringify(a):a,"*")}),n.parameter)}),!1))};"undefined"!=typeof module?module.exports=t:t()}(); dataLayer = dataLayer || []; // Standard GTM initialization - Google Consent Mode handles consent automatically (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start': new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0], j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src= 'https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl+ '>m_auth=hzk0Vc3qFsQYhCrIoHz68A>m_preview=env-1>m_cookies_win=x';f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f); })(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-MWFK8L5J'); ;window.NREUM||(NREUM={});NREUM.init={distributed_tracing:{enabled:true},privacy:{cookies_enabled:true},ajax:{deny_list:["bam.nr-data.net"]}}; ;NREUM.loader_config={accountID:"438030",trustKey:"438030",agentID:"772317073",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073"} ;NREUM.info={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073",sa:1} ;/*! For license information please see nr-loader-spa-1.236.0.min.js.LICENSE.txt */ (()=>{"use strict";var e,t,r={5763:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P_:()=>l,Mt:()=>g,C5:()=>s,DL:()=>v,OP:()=>T,lF:()=>D,Yu:()=>y,Dg:()=>h,CX:()=>c,GE:()=>b,sU:()=>_});var n=r(8632),i=r(9567);const o={beacon:n.ce.beacon,errorBeacon:n.ce.errorBeacon,licenseKey:void 0,applicationID:void 0,sa:void 0,queueTime:void 0,applicationTime:void 0,ttGuid:void 0,user:void 0,account:void 0,product:void 0,extra:void 0,jsAttributes:{},userAttributes:void 0,atts:void 0,transactionName:void 0,tNamePlain:void 0},a={};function s(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");if(!a[e])throw new Error("Info for ".concat(e," was never set"));return a[e]}function c(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");a[e]=(0,i.D)(t,o),(0,n.Qy)(e,a[e],"info")}var u=r(7056);const d=()=>{const e={blockSelector:"[data-nr-block]",maskInputOptions:{password:!0}};return{allow_bfcache:!0,privacy:{cookies_enabled:!0},ajax:{deny_list:void 0,enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},distributed_tracing:{enabled:void 0,exclude_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_tracecontext_headers:void 0,allowed_origins:void 0},session:{domain:void 0,expiresMs:u.oD,inactiveMs:u.Hb},ssl:void 0,obfuscate:void 0,jserrors:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},metrics:{enabled:!0},page_action:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30},page_view_event:{enabled:!0},page_view_timing:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30,long_task:!1},session_trace:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},harvest:{tooManyRequestsDelay:60},session_replay:{enabled:!1,harvestTimeSeconds:60,sampleRate:.1,errorSampleRate:.1,maskTextSelector:"*",maskAllInputs:!0,get blockClass(){return"nr-block"},get ignoreClass(){return"nr-ignore"},get maskTextClass(){return"nr-mask"},get blockSelector(){return e.blockSelector},set blockSelector(t){e.blockSelector+=",".concat(t)},get maskInputOptions(){return e.maskInputOptions},set maskInputOptions(t){e.maskInputOptions={...t,password:!0}}},spa:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10}}},f={};function l(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");if(!f[e])throw new Error("Configuration for ".concat(e," was never set"));return f[e]}function h(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");f[e]=(0,i.D)(t,d()),(0,n.Qy)(e,f[e],"config")}function g(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");var r=l(e);if(r){for(var n=t.split("."),i=0;i {r.d(t,{D:()=>i});var n=r(50);function i(e,t){try{if(!e||"object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires an object as input");if(!t||"object"!=typeof t)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires a model to set its initial properties");const r=Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(t),Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)),o=0===Object.keys(r).length?e:r;for(let a in o)if(void 0!==e[a])try{"object"==typeof e[a]&&"object"==typeof t[a]?r[a]=i(e[a],t[a]):r[a]=e[a]}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occurred while setting a property of a Configurable",e)}return r}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting a Configurable",e)}}},6818:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Re:()=>i,gF:()=>o,q4:()=>n});const n="1.236.0",i="PROD",o="CDN"},385:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{FN:()=>a,IF:()=>u,Nk:()=>f,Tt:()=>s,_A:()=>o,il:()=>n,pL:()=>c,v6:()=>i,w1:()=>d});const n="undefined"!=typeof window&&!!window.document,i="undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator),o=n?window:"undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis),a=""+o?.location,s=/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(navigator.userAgent),c=s&&"undefined"==typeof SharedWorker,u=(()=>{const e=navigator.userAgent.match(/Firefox[/\s](\d+\.\d+)/);return Array.isArray(e)&&e.length>=2?+e[1]:0})(),d=Boolean(n&&window.document.documentMode),f=!!navigator.sendBeacon},1117:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{w:()=>o});var n=r(50);const i={agentIdentifier:"",ee:void 0};class o{constructor(e){try{if("object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("shared context requires an object as input");this.sharedContext={},Object.assign(this.sharedContext,i),Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,r]=e;Object.keys(i).includes(t)&&(this.sharedContext[t]=r)}))}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting SharedContext",e)}}}},8e3:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{L:()=>d,R:()=>c});var n=r(2177),i=r(1284),o=r(4322),a=r(3325);const s={};function c(e,t){const r={staged:!1,priority:a.p[t]||0};u(e),s[e].get(t)||s[e].set(t,r)}function u(e){e&&(s[e]||(s[e]=new Map))}function d(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:"",t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:"feature";if(u(e),!e||!s[e].get(t))return a(t);s[e].get(t).staged=!0;const r=[...s[e]];function a(t){const r=e?n.ee.get(e):n.ee,a=o.X.handlers;if(r.backlog&&a){var s=r.backlog[t],c=a[t];if(c){for(var u=0;s&&u {let[t,r]=e;return r.staged}))&&(r.sort(((e,t)=>e[1].priority-t[1].priority)),r.forEach((e=>{let[t]=e;a(t)})))}function f(e,t){var r=e[1];(0,i.D)(t[r],(function(t,r){var n=e[0];if(r[0]===n){var i=r[1],o=e[3],a=e[2];i.apply(o,a)}}))}},2177:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{c:()=>f,ee:()=>u});var n=r(8632),i=r(2210),o=r(1284),a=r(5763),s="nr@context";let c=(0,n.fP)();var u;function d(){}function f(e){return(0,i.X)(e,s,l)}function l(){return new d}function h(){u.aborted=!0,u.backlog={}}c.ee?u=c.ee:(u=function e(t,r){var n={},c={},f={},g=!1;try{g=16===r.length&&(0,a.OP)(r).isolatedBacklog}catch(e){}var p={on:b,addEventListener:b,removeEventListener:y,emit:v,get:x,listeners:w,context:m,buffer:A,abort:h,aborted:!1,isBuffering:E,debugId:r,backlog:g?{}:t&&"object"==typeof t.backlog?t.backlog:{}};return p;function m(e){return e&&e instanceof d?e:e?(0,i.X)(e,s,l):l()}function v(e,r,n,i,o){if(!1!==o&&(o=!0),!u.aborted||i){t&&o&&t.emit(e,r,n);for(var a=m(n),s=w(e),d=s.length,f=0;fn,p:()=>i});var n=r(2177).ee.get("handle");function i(e,t,r,i,o){o?(o.buffer([e],i),o.emit(e,t,r)):(n.buffer([e],i),n.emit(e,t,r))}},4322:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>o});var n=r(5546);o.on=a;var i=o.handlers={};function o(e,t,r,o){a(o||n.E,i,e,t,r)}function a(e,t,r,i,o){o||(o="feature"),e||(e=n.E);var a=t[o]=t[o]||{};(a[r]=a[r]||[]).push([e,i])}},3239:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{bP:()=>s,iz:()=>c,m$:()=>a});var n=r(385);let i=!1,o=!1;try{const e={get passive(){return i=!0,!1},get signal(){return o=!0,!1}};n._A.addEventListener("test",null,e),n._A.removeEventListener("test",null,e)}catch(e){}function a(e,t){return i||o?{capture:!!e,passive:i,signal:t}:!!e}function s(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;window.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}function c(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;document.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}},4402:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Ht:()=>u,M:()=>c,Rl:()=>a,ky:()=>s});var n=r(385);const i="xxxxxxxx-xxxx-4xxx-yxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx";function o(e,t){return e?15&e[t]:16*Math.random()|0}function a(){const e=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let t,r=0;return e&&e.getRandomValues&&(t=e.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31))),i.split("").map((e=>"x"===e?o(t,++r).toString(16):"y"===e?(3&o()|8).toString(16):e)).join("")}function s(e){const t=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let r,i=0;t&&t.getRandomValues&&(r=t.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31)));const a=[];for(var s=0;s {r.d(t,{Bq:()=>n,Hb:()=>o,oD:()=>i});const n="NRBA",i=144e5,o=18e5},7894:(e,t,r)=>{function n(){return Math.round(performance.now())}r.d(t,{z:()=>n})},7243:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{e:()=>o});var n=r(385),i={};function o(e){if(e in i)return i[e];if(0===(e||"").indexOf("data:"))return{protocol:"data"};let t;var r=n._A?.location,o={};if(n.il)t=document.createElement("a"),t.href=e;else try{t=new URL(e,r.href)}catch(e){return o}o.port=t.port;var a=t.href.split("://");!o.port&&a[1]&&(o.port=a[1].split("/")[0].split("@").pop().split(":")[1]),o.port&&"0"!==o.port||(o.port="https"===a[0]?"443":"80"),o.hostname=t.hostname||r.hostname,o.pathname=t.pathname,o.protocol=a[0],"/"!==o.pathname.charAt(0)&&(o.pathname="/"+o.pathname);var s=!t.protocol||":"===t.protocol||t.protocol===r.protocol,c=t.hostname===r.hostname&&t.port===r.port;return o.sameOrigin=s&&(!t.hostname||c),"/"===o.pathname&&(i[e]=o),o}},50:(e,t,r)=>{function n(e,t){"function"==typeof console.warn&&(console.warn("New Relic: ".concat(e)),t&&console.warn(t))}r.d(t,{Z:()=>n})},2587:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>c,T:()=>u});var n=r(2177),i=r(5546),o=r(8e3),a=r(3325);const s={stn:[a.D.sessionTrace],err:[a.D.jserrors,a.D.metrics],ins:[a.D.pageAction],spa:[a.D.spa],sr:[a.D.sessionReplay,a.D.sessionTrace]};function c(e,t){const r=n.ee.get(t);e&&"object"==typeof e&&(Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,n]=e;void 0===u[t]&&(s[t]?s[t].forEach((e=>{n?(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,e,r):(0,i.p)("block-"+t,[],void 0,e,r),(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+t,[Boolean(n)],void 0,e,r)})):n&&(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,void 0,r),u[t]=Boolean(n))})),Object.keys(s).forEach((e=>{void 0===u[e]&&(s[e]?.forEach((t=>(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+e,[!1],void 0,t,r))),u[e]=!1)})),(0,o.L)(t,a.D.pageViewEvent))}const u={}},2210:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>i});var n=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty;function i(e,t,r){if(n.call(e,t))return e[t];var i=r();if(Object.defineProperty&&Object.keys)try{return Object.defineProperty(e,t,{value:i,writable:!0,enumerable:!1}),i}catch(e){}return e[t]=i,i}},1284:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n});const n=(e,t)=>Object.entries(e||{}).map((e=>{let[r,n]=e;return t(r,n)}))},4351:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P:()=>o});var n=r(2177);const i=()=>{const e=new WeakSet;return(t,r)=>{if("object"==typeof r&&null!==r){if(e.has(r))return;e.add(r)}return r}};function o(e){try{return JSON.stringify(e,i())}catch(e){try{n.ee.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}}},3960:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{K:()=>a,b:()=>o});var n=r(3239);function i(){return"undefined"==typeof document||"complete"===document.readyState}function o(e,t){if(i())return e();(0,n.bP)("load",e,t)}function a(e){if(i())return e();(0,n.iz)("DOMContentLoaded",e)}},8632:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{EZ:()=>u,Qy:()=>c,ce:()=>o,fP:()=>a,gG:()=>d,mF:()=>s});var n=r(7894),i=r(385);const o={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net"};function a(){return i._A.NREUM||(i._A.NREUM={}),void 0===i._A.newrelic&&(i._A.newrelic=i._A.NREUM),i._A.NREUM}function s(){let e=a();return e.o||(e.o={ST:i._A.setTimeout,SI:i._A.setImmediate,CT:i._A.clearTimeout,XHR:i._A.XMLHttpRequest,REQ:i._A.Request,EV:i._A.Event,PR:i._A.Promise,MO:i._A.MutationObserver,FETCH:i._A.fetch}),e}function c(e,t,r){let i=a();const o=i.initializedAgents||{},s=o[e]||{};return Object.keys(s).length||(s.initializedAt={ms:(0,n.z)(),date:new Date}),i.initializedAgents={...o,[e]:{...s,[r]:t}},i}function u(e,t){a()[e]=t}function d(){return function(){let e=a();const t=e.info||{};e.info={beacon:o.beacon,errorBeacon:o.errorBeacon,...t}}(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.init||{};e.init={...t}}(),s(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.loader_config||{};e.loader_config={...t}}(),a()}},7956:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>i});var n=r(3239);function i(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1],r=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,i=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;return void(0,n.iz)("visibilitychange",(function(){if(t)return void("hidden"==document.visibilityState&&e());e(document.visibilityState)}),r,i)}},1214:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{em:()=>v,u5:()=>N,QU:()=>S,_L:()=>I,Gm:()=>L,Lg:()=>M,gy:()=>U,BV:()=>Q,Kf:()=>ee});var n=r(2177);const i="nr@original";var o=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty,a=!1;function s(e,t){return e||(e=n.ee),r.inPlace=function(e,t,n,i,o){n||(n="");var a,s,c,u="-"===n.charAt(0);for(c=0;c 2?n-2:0),o=2;o {r(A[T],e,w),r(E[T],e,w)})),r(l._A,"fetch",y),t.on(y+"end",(function(e,r){var n=this;if(r){var i=r.headers.get("content-length");null!==i&&(n.rxSize=i),t.emit(y+"done",[null,r],n)}else t.emit(y+"done",[e],n)})),t}const O={},j=["pushState","replaceState"];function S(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("history")}(e);return!l.il||O[t.debugId]++||(O[t.debugId]=1,s(t).inPlace(window.history,j,"-")),t}var P=r(3239);const C={},R=["appendChild","insertBefore","replaceChild"];function I(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("jsonp")}(e);if(!l.il||C[t.debugId])return t;C[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=/[?&](?:callback|cb)=([^&#]+)/,o=/(.*)\.([^.]+)/,a=/^(\w+)(\.|$)(.*)$/;function c(e,t){var r=e.match(a),n=r[1],i=r[3];return i?c(i,t[n]):t[n]}return r.inPlace(Node.prototype,R,"dom-"),t.on("dom-start",(function(e){!function(e){if(!e||"string"!=typeof e.nodeName||"script"!==e.nodeName.toLowerCase())return;if("function"!=typeof e.addEventListener)return;var n=(a=e.src,s=a.match(i),s?s[1]:null);var a,s;if(!n)return;var u=function(e){var t=e.match(o);if(t&&t.length>=3)return{key:t[2],parent:c(t[1],window)};return{key:e,parent:window}}(n);if("function"!=typeof u.parent[u.key])return;var d={};function f(){t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}function l(){t.emit("jsonp-error",[],d),t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}r.inPlace(u.parent,[u.key],"cb-",d),e.addEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.addEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1)),t.emit("new-jsonp",[e.src],d)}(e[0])})),t}var k=r(5763);const H={};function L(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("mutation")}(e);if(!l.il||H[t.debugId])return t;H[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=k.Yu.MO;return i&&(window.MutationObserver=function(e){return this instanceof i?new i(r(e,"fn-")):i.apply(this,arguments)},MutationObserver.prototype=i.prototype),t}const z={};function M(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("promise")}(e);if(z[t.debugId])return t;z[t.debugId]=!0;var r=n.c,o=s(t),a=k.Yu.PR;return a&&function(){function e(r){var n=t.context(),i=o(r,"executor-",n,null,!1);const s=Reflect.construct(a,[i],e);return t.context(s).getCtx=function(){return n},s}l._A.Promise=e,Object.defineProperty(e,"name",{value:"Promise"}),e.toString=function(){return a.toString()},Object.setPrototypeOf(e,a),["all","race"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){let i=!1;[...e||[]].forEach((e=>{this.resolve(e).then(a("all"===r),a(!1))}));const o=n.apply(this,arguments);return o;function a(e){return function(){t.emit("propagate",[null,!i],o,!1,!1),i=i||!e}}}})),["resolve","reject"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){const r=n.apply(this,arguments);return e!==r&&t.emit("propagate",[e,!0],r,!1,!1),r}})),e.prototype=a.prototype;const n=a.prototype.then;a.prototype.then=function(){var e=this,i=r(e);i.promise=e;for(var a=arguments.length,s=new Array(a),c=0;c e())),t};function m(e,t){i.inPlace(t,["onreadystatechange"],"fn-",E)}function b(){var e=this,t=r.context(e);e.readyState>3&&!t.resolved&&(t.resolved=!0,r.emit("xhr-resolved",[],e)),i.inPlace(e,f,"fn-",E)}if(function(e,t){for(var r in e)t[r]=e[r]}(o,p),p.prototype=o.prototype,i.inPlace(p.prototype,J,"-xhr-",E),r.on("send-xhr-start",(function(e,t){m(e,t),function(e){h.push(e),a&&(y?y.then(A):u?u(A):(w=-w,x.data=w))}(t)})),r.on("open-xhr-start",m),a){var y=c&&c.resolve();if(!u&&!c){var w=1,x=document.createTextNode(w);new a(A).observe(x,{characterData:!0})}}else t.on("fn-end",(function(e){e[0]&&e[0].type===d||A()}));function A(){for(var e=0;e {r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.ajax},6660:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{A:()=>i,t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.jserrors,i="nr@seenError"},3081:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{gF:()=>o,mY:()=>i,t9:()=>n,vz:()=>s,xS:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.metrics,i="sm",o="cm",a="storeSupportabilityMetrics",s="storeEventMetrics"},4649:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageAction},7633:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Dz:()=>i,OJ:()=>a,qw:()=>o,t9:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewEvent,i="firstbyte",o="domcontent",a="windowload"},9251:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewTiming},3614:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BST_RESOURCE:()=>i,END:()=>s,FEATURE_NAME:()=>n,FN_END:()=>u,FN_START:()=>c,PUSH_STATE:()=>d,RESOURCE:()=>o,START:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.sessionTrace,i="bstResource",o="resource",a="-start",s="-end",c="fn"+a,u="fn"+s,d="pushState"},7836:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BODY:()=>A,CB_END:()=>E,CB_START:()=>u,END:()=>x,FEATURE_NAME:()=>i,FETCH:()=>_,FETCH_BODY:()=>v,FETCH_DONE:()=>m,FETCH_START:()=>p,FN_END:()=>c,FN_START:()=>s,INTERACTION:()=>l,INTERACTION_API:()=>d,INTERACTION_EVENTS:()=>o,JSONP_END:()=>b,JSONP_NODE:()=>g,JS_TIME:()=>T,MAX_TIMER_BUDGET:()=>a,REMAINING:()=>f,SPA_NODE:()=>h,START:()=>w,originalSetTimeout:()=>y});var n=r(5763);const i=r(3325).D.spa,o=["click","submit","keypress","keydown","keyup","change"],a=999,s="fn-start",c="fn-end",u="cb-start",d="api-ixn-",f="remaining",l="interaction",h="spaNode",g="jsonpNode",p="fetch-start",m="fetch-done",v="fetch-body-",b="jsonp-end",y=n.Yu.ST,w="-start",x="-end",A="-body",E="cb"+x,T="jsTime",_="fetch"},5938:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{W:()=>o});var n=r(5763),i=r(2177);class o{constructor(e,t,r){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.aggregator=t,this.ee=i.ee.get(e,(0,n.OP)(this.agentIdentifier).isolatedBacklog),this.featureName=r,this.blocked=!1}}},9144:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{j:()=>m});var n=r(3325),i=r(5763),o=r(5546),a=r(2177),s=r(7894),c=r(8e3),u=r(3960),d=r(385),f=r(50),l=r(3081),h=r(8632);function g(){const e=(0,h.gG)();["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease","addPageAction","setCurrentRouteName","setPageViewName","setCustomAttribute","interaction","noticeError","setUserId"].forEach((t=>{e[t]=function(){for(var r=arguments.length,n=new Array(r),i=0;i 1?r-1:0),i=1;i {e.exposed&&e.api[t]&&o.push(e.api[t](...n))})),o.length>1?o:o[0]}(t,...n)}}))}var p=r(2587);function m(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:{},m=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,v=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0,{init:b,info:y,loader_config:w,runtime:x={loaderType:m},exposed:A=!0}=t;const E=(0,h.gG)();y||(b=E.init,y=E.info,w=E.loader_config),(0,i.Dg)(e,b||{}),(0,i.GE)(e,w||{}),(0,i.sU)(e,x),y.jsAttributes??={},d.v6&&(y.jsAttributes.isWorker=!0),(0,i.CX)(e,y),g();const T=function(e,t){t||(0,c.R)(e,"api");const h={};var g=a.ee.get(e),p=g.get("tracer"),m="api-",v=m+"ixn-";function b(t,r,n,o){const a=(0,i.C5)(e);return null===r?delete a.jsAttributes[t]:(0,i.CX)(e,{...a,jsAttributes:{...a.jsAttributes,[t]:r}}),x(m,n,!0,o||null===r?"session":void 0)(t,r)}function y(){}["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease"].forEach((e=>h[e]=x(m,e,!0,"api"))),h.addPageAction=x(m,"addPageAction",!0,n.D.pageAction),h.setCurrentRouteName=x(m,"routeName",!0,n.D.spa),h.setPageViewName=function(t,r){if("string"==typeof t)return"/"!==t.charAt(0)&&(t="/"+t),(0,i.OP)(e).customTransaction=(r||"http://custom.transaction")+t,x(m,"setPageViewName",!0)()},h.setCustomAttribute=function(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2];if("string"==typeof e){if(["string","number"].includes(typeof t)||null===t)return b(e,t,"setCustomAttribute",r);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nNon-null value must be a string or number type, but a type of was provided."))}else(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nName must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.setUserId=function(e){if("string"==typeof e||null===e)return b("enduser.id",e,"setUserId",!0);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setUserId.\nNon-null value must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.interaction=function(){return(new y).get()};var w=y.prototype={createTracer:function(e,t){var r={},i=this,a="function"==typeof t;return(0,o.p)(v+"tracer",[(0,s.z)(),e,r],i,n.D.spa,g),function(){if(p.emit((a?"":"no-")+"fn-start",[(0,s.z)(),i,a],r),a)try{return t.apply(this,arguments)}catch(e){throw p.emit("fn-err",[arguments,this,"string"==typeof e?new Error(e):e],r),e}finally{p.emit("fn-end",[(0,s.z)()],r)}}}};function x(e,t,r,i){return function(){return(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/"+t+"/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),i&&(0,o.p)(e+t,[(0,s.z)(),...arguments],r?null:this,i,g),r?void 0:this}}function A(){r.e(439).then(r.bind(r,7438)).then((t=>{let{setAPI:r}=t;r(e),(0,c.L)(e,"api")})).catch((()=>(0,f.Z)("Downloading runtime APIs failed...")))}return["actionText","setName","setAttribute","save","ignore","onEnd","getContext","end","get"].forEach((e=>{w[e]=x(v,e,void 0,n.D.spa)})),h.noticeError=function(e,t){"string"==typeof e&&(e=new Error(e)),(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/noticeError/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),(0,o.p)("err",[e,(0,s.z)(),!1,t],void 0,n.D.jserrors,g)},d.il?(0,u.b)((()=>A()),!0):A(),h}(e,v);return(0,h.Qy)(e,T,"api"),(0,h.Qy)(e,A,"exposed"),(0,h.EZ)("activatedFeatures",p.T),T}},3325:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n,p:()=>i});const n={ajax:"ajax",jserrors:"jserrors",metrics:"metrics",pageAction:"page_action",pageViewEvent:"page_view_event",pageViewTiming:"page_view_timing",sessionReplay:"session_replay",sessionTrace:"session_trace",spa:"spa"},i={[n.pageViewEvent]:1,[n.pageViewTiming]:2,[n.metrics]:3,[n.jserrors]:4,[n.ajax]:5,[n.sessionTrace]:6,[n.pageAction]:7,[n.spa]:8,[n.sessionReplay]:9}}},n={};function i(e){var t=n[e];if(void 0!==t)return t.exports;var o=n[e]={exports:{}};return r[e](o,o.exports,i),o.exports}i.m=r,i.d=(e,t)=>{for(var r in t)i.o(t,r)&&!i.o(e,r)&&Object.defineProperty(e,r,{enumerable:!0,get:t[r]})},i.f={},i.e=e=>Promise.all(Object.keys(i.f).reduce(((t,r)=>(i.f[r](e,t),t)),[])),i.u=e=>(({78:"page_action-aggregate",147:"metrics-aggregate",242:"session-manager",317:"jserrors-aggregate",348:"page_view_timing-aggregate",412:"lazy-feature-loader",439:"async-api",538:"recorder",590:"session_replay-aggregate",675:"compressor",733:"session_trace-aggregate",786:"page_view_event-aggregate",873:"spa-aggregate",898:"ajax-aggregate"}[e]||e)+"."+{78:"ac76d497",147:"3dc53903",148:"1a20d5fe",242:"2a64278a",317:"49e41428",348:"bd6de33a",412:"2f55ce66",439:"30bd804e",538:"1b18459f",590:"cf0efb30",675:"ae9f91a8",733:"83105561",786:"06482edd",860:"03a8b7a5",873:"e6b09d52",898:"998ef92b"}[e]+"-1.236.0.min.js"),i.o=(e,t)=>Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,t),e={},t="NRBA:",i.l=(r,n,o,a)=>{if(e[r])e[r].push(n);else{var s,c;if(void 0!==o)for(var u=document.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=0;d {s.onerror=s.onload=null,clearTimeout(h);var i=e[r];if(delete e[r],s.parentNode&&s.parentNode.removeChild(s),i&&i.forEach((e=>e(n))),t)return t(n)},h=setTimeout(l.bind(null,void 0,{type:"timeout",target:s}),12e4);s.onerror=l.bind(null,s.onerror),s.onload=l.bind(null,s.onload),c&&document.head.appendChild(s)}},i.r=e=>{"undefined"!=typeof Symbol&&Symbol.toStringTag&&Object.defineProperty(e,Symbol.toStringTag,{value:"Module"}),Object.defineProperty(e,"__esModule",{value:!0})},i.j=364,i.p="https://js-agent.newrelic.com/",(()=>{var e={364:0,953:0};i.f.j=(t,r)=>{var n=i.o(e,t)?e[t]:void 0;if(0!==n)if(n)r.push(n[2]);else{var o=new Promise(((r,i)=>n=e[t]=[r,i]));r.push(n[2]=o);var a=i.p+i.u(t),s=new Error;i.l(a,(r=>{if(i.o(e,t)&&(0!==(n=e[t])&&(e[t]=void 0),n)){var o=r&&("load"===r.type?"missing":r.type),a=r&&r.target&&r.target.src;s.message="Loading chunk "+t+" failed.\n("+o+": "+a+")",s.name="ChunkLoadError",s.type=o,s.request=a,n[1](s)}}),"chunk-"+t,t)}};var t=(t,r)=>{var n,o,[a,s,c]=r,u=0;if(a.some((t=>0!==e[t]))){for(n in s)i.o(s,n)&&(i.m[n]=s[n]);if(c)c(i)}for(t&&t(r);u {i.r(o);var e=i(3325),t=i(5763);const r=Object.values(e.D);function n(e){const n={};return r.forEach((r=>{n[r]=function(e,r){return!1!==(0,t.Mt)(r,"".concat(e,".enabled"))}(r,e)})),n}var a=i(9144);var s=i(5546),c=i(385),u=i(8e3),d=i(5938),f=i(3960),l=i(50);class h extends d.W{constructor(e,t,r){let n=!(arguments.length>3&&void 0!==arguments[3])||arguments[3];super(e,t,r),this.auto=n,this.abortHandler,this.featAggregate,this.onAggregateImported,n&&(0,u.R)(e,r)}importAggregator(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:{};if(this.featAggregate||!this.auto)return;const r=c.il&&!0===(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"privacy.cookies_enabled");let n;this.onAggregateImported=new Promise((e=>{n=e}));const o=async()=>{let t;try{if(r){const{setupAgentSession:e}=await Promise.all([i.e(860),i.e(242)]).then(i.bind(i,3228));t=e(this.agentIdentifier)}}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("A problem occurred when starting up session manager. This page will not start or extend any session.",e)}try{if(!this.shouldImportAgg(this.featureName,t))return void(0,u.L)(this.agentIdentifier,this.featureName);const{lazyFeatureLoader:r}=await i.e(412).then(i.bind(i,8582)),{Aggregate:o}=await r(this.featureName,"aggregate");this.featAggregate=new o(this.agentIdentifier,this.aggregator,e),n(!0)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Downloading and initializing ".concat(this.featureName," failed..."),e),this.abortHandler?.(),n(!1)}};c.il?(0,f.b)((()=>o()),!0):o()}shouldImportAgg(r,n){return r!==e.D.sessionReplay||!1!==(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"session_trace.enabled")&&(!!n?.isNew||!!n?.state.sessionReplay)}}var g=i(7633),p=i(7894);class m extends h{static featureName=g.t9;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];if(super(r,n,g.t9,i),("undefined"==typeof PerformanceNavigationTiming||c.Tt)&&"undefined"!=typeof PerformanceTiming){const n=(0,t.OP)(r);n[g.Dz]=Math.max(Date.now()-n.offset,0),(0,f.K)((()=>n[g.qw]=Math.max((0,p.z)()-n[g.Dz],0))),(0,f.b)((()=>{const t=(0,p.z)();n[g.OJ]=Math.max(t-n[g.Dz],0),(0,s.p)("timing",["load",t],void 0,e.D.pageViewTiming,this.ee)}))}this.importAggregator()}}var v=i(1117),b=i(1284);class y extends v.w{constructor(e){super(e),this.aggregatedData={}}store(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,r,i);return o.metrics=function(e,t){t||(t={count:0});return t.count+=1,(0,b.D)(e,(function(e,r){t[e]=w(r,t[e])})),t}(n,o.metrics),o}merge(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,n,i);if(o.metrics){var a=o.metrics;a.count+=r.count,(0,b.D)(r,(function(e,t){if("count"!==e){var n=a[e],i=r[e];i&&!i.c?a[e]=w(i.t,n):a[e]=function(e,t){if(!t)return e;t.c||(t=x(t.t));return t.min=Math.min(e.min,t.min),t.max=Math.max(e.max,t.max),t.t+=e.t,t.sos+=e.sos,t.c+=e.c,t}(i,a[e])}}))}else o.metrics=r}storeMetric(e,t,r,n){var i=this.getBucket(e,t,r);return i.stats=w(n,i.stats),i}getBucket(e,t,r,n){this.aggregatedData[e]||(this.aggregatedData[e]={});var i=this.aggregatedData[e][t];return i||(i=this.aggregatedData[e][t]={params:r||{}},n&&(i.custom=n)),i}get(e,t){return t?this.aggregatedData[e]&&this.aggregatedData[e][t]:this.aggregatedData[e]}take(e){for(var t={},r="",n=!1,i=0;i t.max&&(t.max=e),e 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,r,j.t,n),c.il&&((0,t.OP)(e).initHidden=Boolean("hidden"===document.visibilityState),(0,N.N)((()=>(0,s.p)("docHidden",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee)),!0),(0,O.bP)("pagehide",(()=>(0,s.p)("winPagehide",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee))),this.importAggregator())}}var P=i(3081);class C extends h{static featureName=P.t9;constructor(e,t){let r=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,P.t9,r),this.importAggregator()}}var R,I=i(2210),k=i(1214),H=i(2177),L={};try{R=localStorage.getItem("__nr_flags").split(","),console&&"function"==typeof console.log&&(L.console=!0,-1!==R.indexOf("dev")&&(L.dev=!0),-1!==R.indexOf("nr_dev")&&(L.nrDev=!0))}catch(e){}function z(e){try{L.console&&z(e)}catch(e){}}L.nrDev&&H.ee.on("internal-error",(function(e){z(e.stack)})),L.dev&&H.ee.on("fn-err",(function(e,t,r){z(r.stack)})),L.dev&&(z("NR AGENT IN DEVELOPMENT MODE"),z("flags: "+(0,b.D)(L,(function(e,t){return e})).join(", ")));var M=i(6660);class B extends h{static featureName=M.t;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,M.t,i),this.skipNext=0;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}const o=this;o.ee.on("fn-start",(function(e,t,r){o.abortHandler&&(o.skipNext+=1)})),o.ee.on("fn-err",(function(t,r,n){o.abortHandler&&!n[M.A]&&((0,I.X)(n,M.A,(function(){return!0})),this.thrown=!0,(0,s.p)("err",[n,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee))})),o.ee.on("fn-end",(function(){o.abortHandler&&!this.thrown&&o.skipNext>0&&(o.skipNext-=1)})),o.ee.on("internal-error",(function(t){(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee)})),this.origOnerror=c._A.onerror,c._A.onerror=this.onerrorHandler.bind(this),c._A.addEventListener("unhandledrejection",(t=>{const r=function(e){let t="Unhandled Promise Rejection: ";if(e instanceof Error)try{return e.message=t+e.message,e}catch(t){return e}if(void 0===e)return new Error(t);try{return new Error(t+(0,D.P)(e))}catch(e){return new Error(t)}}(t.reason);(0,s.p)("err",[r,(0,p.z)(),!1,{unhandledPromiseRejection:1}],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}),(0,O.m$)(!1,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),(0,k.gy)(this.ee),(0,k.BV)(this.ee),(0,k.em)(this.ee),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}onerrorHandler(t,r,n,i,o){"function"==typeof this.origOnerror&&this.origOnerror(...arguments);try{this.skipNext?this.skipNext-=1:(0,s.p)("err",[o||new F(t,r,n),(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(t){try{(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(e){}}return!1}}function F(e,t,r){this.message=e||"Uncaught error with no additional information",this.sourceURL=t,this.line=r}let U=1;const q="nr@id";function G(e){const t=typeof e;return!e||"object"!==t&&"function"!==t?-1:e===c._A?0:(0,I.X)(e,q,(function(){return U++}))}function V(e){if("string"==typeof e&&e.length)return e.length;if("object"==typeof e){if("undefined"!=typeof ArrayBuffer&&e instanceof ArrayBuffer&&e.byteLength)return e.byteLength;if("undefined"!=typeof Blob&&e instanceof Blob&&e.size)return e.size;if(!("undefined"!=typeof FormData&&e instanceof FormData))try{return(0,D.P)(e).length}catch(e){return}}}var X=i(7243);class W{constructor(e){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.generateTracePayload=this.generateTracePayload.bind(this),this.shouldGenerateTrace=this.shouldGenerateTrace.bind(this)}generateTracePayload(e){if(!this.shouldGenerateTrace(e))return null;var r=(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier);if(!r)return null;var n=(r.accountID||"").toString()||null,i=(r.agentID||"").toString()||null,o=(r.trustKey||"").toString()||null;if(!n||!i)return null;var a=(0,_.M)(),s=(0,_.Ht)(),c=Date.now(),u={spanId:a,traceId:s,timestamp:c};return(e.sameOrigin||this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useTraceContextHeadersForCors())&&(u.traceContextParentHeader=this.generateTraceContextParentHeader(a,s),u.traceContextStateHeader=this.generateTraceContextStateHeader(a,c,n,i,o)),(e.sameOrigin&&!this.excludeNewrelicHeader()||!e.sameOrigin&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useNewrelicHeaderForCors())&&(u.newrelicHeader=this.generateTraceHeader(a,s,c,n,i,o)),u}generateTraceContextParentHeader(e,t){return"00-"+t+"-"+e+"-01"}generateTraceContextStateHeader(e,t,r,n,i){return i+"@nr=0-1-"+r+"-"+n+"-"+e+"----"+t}generateTraceHeader(e,t,r,n,i,o){if(!("function"==typeof c._A?.btoa))return null;var a={v:[0,1],d:{ty:"Browser",ac:n,ap:i,id:e,tr:t,ti:r}};return o&&n!==o&&(a.d.tk=o),btoa((0,D.P)(a))}shouldGenerateTrace(e){return this.isDtEnabled()&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)}isAllowedOrigin(e){var r=!1,n={};if((0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"distributed_tracing")&&(n=(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier).distributed_tracing),e.sameOrigin)r=!0;else if(n.allowed_origins instanceof Array)for(var i=0;i 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,Z.t,i),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(this.dt=new W(r),this.handler=(e,t,r,n)=>(0,s.p)(e,t,r,n,this.ee),(0,k.u5)(this.ee),(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),function(r,n,i,o){function a(e){var t=this;t.totalCbs=0,t.called=0,t.cbTime=0,t.end=E,t.ended=!1,t.xhrGuids={},t.lastSize=null,t.loadCaptureCalled=!1,t.params=this.params||{},t.metrics=this.metrics||{},e.addEventListener("load",(function(r){_(t,e)}),(0,O.m$)(!1)),c.IF||e.addEventListener("progress",(function(e){t.lastSize=e.loaded}),(0,O.m$)(!1))}function s(e){this.params={method:e[0]},T(this,e[1]),this.metrics={}}function u(e,n){var i=(0,t.DL)(r);i.xpid&&this.sameOrigin&&n.setRequestHeader("X-NewRelic-ID",i.xpid);var a=o.generateTracePayload(this.parsedOrigin);if(a){var s=!1;a.newrelicHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("newrelic",a.newrelicHeader),s=!0),a.traceContextParentHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("traceparent",a.traceContextParentHeader),a.traceContextStateHeader&&n.setRequestHeader("tracestate",a.traceContextStateHeader),s=!0),s&&(this.dt=a)}}function d(e,t){var r=this.metrics,i=e[0],o=this;if(r&&i){var a=V(i);a&&(r.txSize=a)}this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.listener=function(e){try{"abort"!==e.type||o.loadCaptureCalled||(o.params.aborted=!0),("load"!==e.type||o.called===o.totalCbs&&(o.onloadCalled||"function"!=typeof t.onload)&&"function"==typeof o.end)&&o.end(t)}catch(e){try{n.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}};for(var s=0;s 1?e[1]=i:e.push(i)}else e[0]&&e[0].headers&&s(e[0].headers,n)&&(this.dt=n);function s(e,t){var r=!1;return t.newrelicHeader&&(e.set("newrelic",t.newrelicHeader),r=!0),t.traceContextParentHeader&&(e.set("traceparent",t.traceContextParentHeader),t.traceContextStateHeader&&e.set("tracestate",t.traceContextStateHeader),r=!0),r}}function x(e,t){this.params={},this.metrics={},this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.dt=t,e.length>=1&&(this.target=e[0]),e.length>=2&&(this.opts=e[1]);var r,n=this.opts||{},i=this.target;"string"==typeof i?r=i:"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof Y?r=i.url:c._A?.URL&&"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof URL&&(r=i.href),T(this,r);var o=(""+(i&&i instanceof Y&&i.method||n.method||"GET")).toUpperCase();this.params.method=o,this.txSize=V(n.body)||0}function A(t,r){var n;this.endTime=(0,p.z)(),this.params||(this.params={}),this.params.status=r?r.status:0,"string"==typeof this.rxSize&&this.rxSize.length>0&&(n=+this.rxSize);var o={txSize:this.txSize,rxSize:n,duration:(0,p.z)()-this.startTime};i("xhr",[this.params,o,this.startTime,this.endTime,"fetch"],this,e.D.ajax)}function E(t){var r=this.params,n=this.metrics;if(!this.ended){this.ended=!0;for(var o=0;o 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,we.t,r),this.importAggregator()}}new class{constructor(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:(0,_.ky)(16);c._A?(this.agentIdentifier=t,this.sharedAggregator=new y({agentIdentifier:this.agentIdentifier}),this.features={},this.desiredFeatures=new Set(e.features||[]),this.desiredFeatures.add(m),Object.assign(this,(0,a.j)(this.agentIdentifier,e,e.loaderType||"agent")),this.start()):(0,l.Z)("Failed to initial the agent. Could not determine the runtime environment.")}get config(){return{info:(0,t.C5)(this.agentIdentifier),init:(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier),loader_config:(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier),runtime:(0,t.OP)(this.agentIdentifier)}}start(){const t="features";try{const r=n(this.agentIdentifier),i=[...this.desiredFeatures];i.sort(((t,r)=>e.p[t.featureName]-e.p[r.featureName])),i.forEach((t=>{if(r[t.featureName]||t.featureName===e.D.pageViewEvent){const n=function(t){switch(t){case e.D.ajax:return[e.D.jserrors];case e.D.sessionTrace:return[e.D.ajax,e.D.pageViewEvent];case e.D.sessionReplay:return[e.D.sessionTrace];case e.D.pageViewTiming:return[e.D.pageViewEvent];default:return[]}}(t.featureName);n.every((e=>r[e]))||(0,l.Z)("".concat(t.featureName," is enabled but one or more dependent features has been disabled (").concat((0,D.P)(n),"). This may cause unintended consequences or missing data...")),this.features[t.featureName]=new t(this.agentIdentifier,this.sharedAggregator)}})),(0,T.Qy)(this.agentIdentifier,this.features,t)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Failed to initialize all enabled instrument classes (agent aborted) -",e);for(const e in this.features)this.features[e].abortHandler?.();const r=(0,T.fP)();return delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.api,delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.[t],delete this.sharedAggregator,r.ee?.abort(),delete r.ee?.get(this.agentIdentifier),!1}}}({features:[J,m,S,class extends h{static featureName=oe;constructor(t,r){if(super(t,r,oe,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;const n=this.ee;let i;(0,k.QU)(n),this.eventsEE=(0,k.em)(n),this.eventsEE.on(se,(function(e,t){this.bstStart=(0,p.z)()})),this.eventsEE.on(ae,(function(t,r){(0,s.p)("bst",[t[0],r,this.bstStart,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),n.on(ce+ne,(function(e){this.time=(0,p.z)(),this.startPath=location.pathname+location.hash})),n.on(ce+ie,(function(t){(0,s.p)("bstHist",[location.pathname+location.hash,this.startPath,this.time],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)}));try{i=new PerformanceObserver((t=>{const r=t.getEntries();(0,s.p)(te,[r],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),i.observe({type:re,buffered:!0})}catch(e){}this.importAggregator({resourceObserver:i})}},C,xe,B,class extends h{static featureName=de;constructor(e,r){if(super(e,r,de,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;if(!(0,t.OP)(e).xhrWrappable)return;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}let n,i=0;const o=this.ee.get("tracer"),a=(0,k._L)(this.ee),s=(0,k.Lg)(this.ee),u=(0,k.BV)(this.ee),d=(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),f=this.ee.get("events"),l=(0,k.u5)(this.ee),h=(0,k.QU)(this.ee),g=(0,k.Gm)(this.ee);function m(e,t){h.emit("newURL",[""+window.location,t])}function v(){i++,n=window.location.hash,this[ve]=(0,p.z)()}function b(){i--,window.location.hash!==n&&m(0,!0);var e=(0,p.z)();this[pe]=~~this[pe]+e-this[ve],this[ye]=e}function y(e,t){e.on(t,(function(){this[t]=(0,p.z)()}))}this.ee.on(ve,v),s.on(be,v),a.on(be,v),this.ee.on(ye,b),s.on(ge,b),a.on(ge,b),this.ee.buffer([ve,ye,"xhr-resolved"],this.featureName),f.buffer([ve],this.featureName),u.buffer(["setTimeout"+le,"clearTimeout"+fe,ve],this.featureName),d.buffer([ve,"new-xhr","send-xhr"+fe],this.featureName),l.buffer([me+fe,me+"-done",me+he+fe,me+he+le],this.featureName),h.buffer(["newURL"],this.featureName),g.buffer([ve],this.featureName),s.buffer(["propagate",be,ge,"executor-err","resolve"+fe],this.featureName),o.buffer([ve,"no-"+ve],this.featureName),a.buffer(["new-jsonp","cb-start","jsonp-error","jsonp-end"],this.featureName),y(l,me+fe),y(l,me+"-done"),y(a,"new-jsonp"),y(a,"jsonp-end"),y(a,"cb-start"),h.on("pushState-end",m),h.on("replaceState-end",m),window.addEventListener("hashchange",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("load",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("popstate",(function(){m(0,i>1)}),(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}}],loaderType:"spa"})})(),window.NRBA=o})(); window.jQuery || document.write(' ') CKEDITOR_BASEPATH='https://f1000research.com/js/vendor/ckeditor/' window.reactTheme = 'research'; window.MathJax = { CommonHTML: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, 'HTML-CSS': { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, SVG: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, AuthorInit: function() { MathJax.Hub.Register.MessageHook('End Process', function () { let timeout = false; // holder for timeout id const delay = 250; // delay after event is "complete" to run callback const reflowMath = function() { const dispFormulas = document.querySelectorAll('.disp-formula.panel'); if (!dispFormulas) { return; } for (const dispFormula of dispFormulas) { const child = dispFormula.querySelector('.MathJax_Preview').nextSibling.firstChild; const isMultiline = MathJax.Hub.getAllJax(dispFormula)[0].root.isMultiline; if (dispFormula.offsetWidth < child.offsetWidth || isMultiline) { MathJax.Hub.Queue(['Rerender', MathJax.Hub, dispFormula]); } } }; window.addEventListener('resize', function() { clearTimeout(timeout); // clear the timeout timeout = setTimeout(reflowMath, delay); // start timing for event "completion" }); }); }, }; if (window.location.hash == '#_=_'){ window.location = window.location.href.split('#')[0] } !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function() {n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)} ;if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n; n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script','https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq('init', '1641728616063202'); fbq('track', "PixelInitialized", {}); (function(h,o,t,j,a,r){ h.hj=h.hj||function(){(h.hj.q=h.hj.q||[]).push(arguments)}; h._hjSettings={hjid:2318163,hjsv:6}; a=o.getElementsByTagName('head')[0]; r=o.createElement('script');r.async=1; r.src=t+h._hjSettings.hjid+j+h._hjSettings.hjsv; a.appendChild(r); })(window,document,'https://static.hotjar.com/c/hotjar-','.js?sv='); search file_upload Submit your research search menu close search Browse Gateways & Collections How to Publish Submit your Research My Submissions Article Guidelines Article Guidelines (New Versions) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines Open Data and Accessible Source Materials Guidelines (HSS) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines (PSE) Prepublication Checks Production Process Posters and Slides Guidelines Document Guidelines Article Processing Charges Peer Review Finding Article Reviewers About How it Works For Reviewers Our Advisors Policies Glossary FAQs For Developers Newsroom Contact My Research Submissions Content and Tracking Alerts My Details Sign In file_upload Submit your research { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/13-544" }, "headline": "Exploring the acceptance of robotic assisted surgery among the Indian population: An empirical investigation", "datePublished": "2024-05-28T15:48:08", "dateModified": "2024-08-20T15:48:03", "author": [ { "@type": "Person", "name": "Smitha Nayak" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Vinod C. Nayak" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Sathvika G. S." } ], "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "F1000Research", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 480, "width": 60 } }, "image": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 1200, "width": 150 }, "description": " Background Technology has completely transformed healthcare, starting with X-ray machines and MRIs to telehealth and robotic surgeries to e-health records. The launch of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) serves as a milestone in medical history, offering benefits such as smaller incisions, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery, making it a preferred surgical option. This study mainly explores patients’ willingness to adopt robot-assisted surgery (RAS) technology in a surgical intervention and is assessed in the backdrop of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Methods This research project employs a post-positivist research philosophy and a cross-sectional research design. A structured, pre-tested questionnaire was used to collect data from 280 respondents. Results The results revealed that trust had a significant impact on Perceived Usefulness (β = 0.099) and Perceived Ease of Use (β = .157), and eHealth literacy had a significant impact on Perceived Ease of Use (β = 0.438) and Perceived Usefulness (β = 0.454). Additionally, Perceived Usefulness partially influenced behavioral intention (β = 0.123), and attitude had a significant influence on behavioral intention (β = 0.612). The analysis revealed an insignificant impact of eHealth literacy on Perceived Usefulness (β = 0.067). The Standard Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) value was <0.8. Mediation analysis also revealed partial mediation between the constructs. The SRMR rating of this model is 0.067, indicating that it fits the data well. Conclusion This study revealed that a patient's intention will be high if he or she believes that RAS is beneficial in treating his or her ailment. In comparison, information related to RAS is clearly known, and it does not directly affect selection intention. eHealth literacy is a significant antecedent to patients’ behavioral intention. Hence, the healthcare industry must devise strategies to promote the acceptance of RAS at all levels. " } { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "1", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/", "name": "Home" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "2", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/browse/articles", "name": "Browse" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "3", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/13-544", "name": "Exploring the acceptance of robotic assisted surgery among the Indian..." } } ] } Home Browse Exploring the acceptance of robotic assisted surgery among the Indian... ALL Metrics - Views Downloads Get PDF Get XML Cite How to cite this article Nayak S, Nayak VC and G. S. S. Exploring the acceptance of robotic assisted surgery among the Indian population: An empirical investigation [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :544 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.145052.3 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. Close Copy Citation Details Export Export Citation Sciwheel EndNote Ref. Manager Bibtex ProCite Sente EXPORT Select a format first Track Share ▬ ✚ Research Article Revised Exploring the acceptance of robotic assisted surgery among the Indian population: An empirical investigation [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] Smitha Nayak https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7171-2580 1 , Vinod C. Nayak https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4614-235X 2 , Sathvika G. S. 3 Smitha Nayak https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7171-2580 1 , Vinod C. Nayak https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4614-235X 2 , Sathvika G. S. 3 PUBLISHED 20 Aug 2024 Author details Author details 1 Department of Humanities and Management, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India 2 Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India 3 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India Smitha Nayak Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Vinod C. Nayak Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing Sathvika G. S. Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation OPEN PEER REVIEW DETAILS REVIEWER STATUS This article is included in the Health Services gateway. This article is included in the Manipal Academy of Higher Education gateway. Abstract Background Technology has completely transformed healthcare, starting with X-ray machines and MRIs to telehealth and robotic surgeries to e-health records. The launch of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) serves as a milestone in medical history, offering benefits such as smaller incisions, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery, making it a preferred surgical option. This study mainly explores patients’ willingness to adopt robot-assisted surgery (RAS) technology in a surgical intervention and is assessed in the backdrop of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Methods This research project employs a post-positivist research philosophy and a cross-sectional research design. A structured, pre-tested questionnaire was used to collect data from 280 respondents. Results The results revealed that trust had a significant impact on Perceived Usefulness (β = 0.099) and Perceived Ease of Use (β = .157), and eHealth literacy had a significant impact on Perceived Ease of Use (β = 0.438) and Perceived Usefulness (β = 0.454). Additionally, Perceived Usefulness partially influenced behavioral intention (β = 0.123), and attitude had a significant influence on behavioral intention (β = 0.612). The analysis revealed an insignificant impact of eHealth literacy on Perceived Usefulness (β = 0.067). The Standard Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) value was <0.8. Mediation analysis also revealed partial mediation between the constructs. The SRMR rating of this model is 0.067, indicating that it fits the data well. Conclusion This study revealed that a patient's intention will be high if he or she believes that RAS is beneficial in treating his or her ailment. In comparison, information related to RAS is clearly known, and it does not directly affect selection intention. eHealth literacy is a significant antecedent to patients’ behavioral intention. Hence, the healthcare industry must devise strategies to promote the acceptance of RAS at all levels. READ ALL READ LESS Keywords robotic-assisted surgery, technology acceptance model, eHealth Literacy, intention, mediation Corresponding Author(s) Vinod C. Nayak ( [email protected] ) Close Corresponding author: Vinod C. Nayak Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Copyright: © 2024 Nayak S et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. How to cite: Nayak S, Nayak VC and G. S. S. Exploring the acceptance of robotic assisted surgery among the Indian population: An empirical investigation [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :544 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.145052.3 ) First published: 28 May 2024, 13 :544 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.145052.1 ) Latest published: 20 Aug 2024, 13 :544 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.145052.3 ) Revised Amendments from Version 2 The introduction section of the manuscript has been updated with statistics pertaining to RAS in India. The latest statistics documented, have been incorporated in the manuscript. Direction for future research is also strengthened as suggested by the second reviewer. The introduction section of the manuscript has been updated with statistics pertaining to RAS in India. The latest statistics documented, have been incorporated in the manuscript. Direction for future research is also strengthened as suggested by the second reviewer. See the authors' detailed response to the review by Kalayarasan Raja See the authors' detailed response to the review by Nripesh Kumar Nrip READ REVIEWER RESPONSES Introduction Since its inception, technology has gradually merged with the medical industry. Beginning with inventions like x-ray machines and MRIs and expanding to include telehealth, robotic surgery, and electronic health data, it has radically transformed healthcare. Technology has become an essential component of the medical industry and is responsible for patient diagnosis, treatment, and data administration. The substantial impact of technology on surgical techniques has caused a significant revolution in the field of medicine. Modern technology has improved patient outcomes ( Kim et al ., 2017 ), increased precision, decreased invasiveness, and increased the number of therapeutic alternatives ( Prasad, 2013 ). Technological advancements in surgery have also been embraced. The launch of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has served as a milestone in medical history, offering benefits such as shorter hospital stays, minor incisions, and faster recovery, making it a preferred surgical option ( Irani et al ., 2016 ). Further technological advancements in MIS have led to the evolution of robotic-assisted surgeons (RAS), which have displayed tremendous advantages to the economy, healthcare system, doctors, and patients ( Bora et al ., 2020 ). The All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, received India's first urologic robotic installation in 2006, following the US FDA's approval of the da Vinci system in 2000. Over the next two decades, robotic surgery in India has seen unprecedented progress. As of July 2023, our country has 100 robotic installations, and more than 800 skilled robotic surgeons. Over the past 12 years, more than 12,800 surgeries have been performed with robotic assistance ( Bora et al ., 2020 ). At present, 30 percentage of surgeries undertaken in India use minimal invasive technique. As per this trend, RAS is expected to expand in India and revolutionize the healthcare system. Even though there is an increasing trend in the number of RAS globally ( Xue & Liu, 2022 ) and in India, research reveals that patients’ perceptions of RAS are unclear. Research undertaken by Irani et al . (2016) revealed that 34 percent of the participants had a vague understanding of the differences between laparoscopic and open surgery. Furthermore, 46 percent of the participants were not clear regarding the differences between laparoscopic intervention and RAS. Inconsistency in patients’ awareness of the modes of technological interventions was also observed in another study undertaken among female gynecological patients, and Ahn et al . (2014) . Similar research findings have been documented by Ammer et al . (2022) and Chan et al . (2022) . Differences in understanding and acceptance of RAS were also observed between genders ( McDermott et al . 2020 ). There has been an increased focus on the co-production of health, because health outcomes are influenced by a complex interplay between physicians, patients, and healthcare systems, rather than being solely determined by medical staff or hospitals ( Puja Turakhia, 2017 ). There is a need to ensure that patients make informed decisions, which the healthcare system is bound to facilitate. Knowledge of patient preferences and awareness are needed to create an ecosystem that facilitates patients to make informed decisions. This is of paramount importance in the context of RAS and LS, as despite research evidence on the benefits of these interventions, they have gained poor patient acceptance. This could be attributed to the apprehensions that technology has created among patients who traditionally view healthcare as isolated from technology ( Buabbas et al ., 2020 ). Against this backdrop, it is important to explore the factors that would explain patients’ intentions to adopt RAS or LS. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) proposed by Davis (1989) serves as the theoretical underpinning for this research endeavor. The “Technology Acceptance Model” (TAM), which sheds light on the crucial roles of perceived usefulness and ease of use in influencing an individual's tendency towards embracing emerging technological breakthroughs, forms an essential component in understanding the dynamics of technology adoption. The importance of TAM lies in its simple explanation of how a person's assessment of a technology's prospective advantages and how user-friendly it is has a significant impact on their preparedness to interact with and employ new technological tools. TAM provides helpful insights into developing and directing the development of user-centric technologies that connect with users and pave the way for their effective adoption and integration into their lives by highlighting the underlying interplay between these aspects. Research has shown ( Xie et al ., 2022 ; Xu et al ., 2021 ) demonstrates a positive influence of eHealth literacy among patients on health outcomes. A new era has begun in India, thanks to the quick and broad adoption of the Internet, which has given the populace unparalleled access to a massive library of health-related knowledge ( Parija et al ., 2020 ). The increase in digital connectedness has been crucial in enabling people to make wise choices regarding their health and well-being. People throughout the country can now easily access a multitude of medical information, from symptoms and treatments to health tips and preventive measures. In addition to raising awareness, the democratization of health information has made it possible for people to actively participate in their healthcare, have informed conversations with healthcare professionals, and promote their well-being. Thus, the Internet’s quick spread has shown to be an effective catalyst for creating a culture in which people are empowered to take control of their health through informed decision-making. Finding reliable and accurate insights from a sea of knowledge requires a detailed eye. People are more likely to make wise health decisions when they have access to digital literacy ( McCray, 2004 ). Hence, to ascertain the population’s ability to obtain and utilize health information, this research endeavor has integrated eHealth literacy ( Norman & Skinner, 2006 ) into the conceptual framework ( Figure 1 ). Figure 1. Proposed research framework. The healthcare environment is significantly shaped by patient trust in doctors, which has implications for patient happiness and medical outcomes. The development of an effective doctor-patient trust connection is important for improving treatment adherence, increasing patient engagement, and eventually improving health outcomes ( Hall et al ., 2001 ). Therefore, fostering and preserving patient trust serves as the foundation for efficient and patient-centered medical treatment in an era characterized by increased patient empowerment and information availability ( Krot & Rudawska, 2016 ). Hence, the patient's trust in the doctor is included as an external construct in the TAM to explore its influence on a person’s intention to opt for RAS. We explored whether patients' trust in the physician influences their beliefs about perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of RAS. Methods Study design This research endeavor was quantitative and used a cross-sectional research methodology. "Post-positivism" is the research philosophy that was taken into account in this study; it deals with the development of empirical approaches to understanding and exploring human behavior. This study considered that surgeons with RAS training would perform the surgery and was founded on a thorough examination of the literature and the theoretical underpinnings of the TAM ( Davis, 1989 ). Therefore, trust was included as an antecedent in this study. This new era of digital evolution has enhanced e-health literacy, enabling patients to make informed health decisions. Hence, e-health literacy was incorporated into this framework to assess its influence on attitudes towards and intention to adopt RAS. Study setting There is significant research confirmation indicating a compelling association between lower socioeconomic status and health literacy, healthcare use, and health outcomes ( Diez Roux, 2012 ). This research study was undertaken in Bangalore Urban, Udupi, and Dakshina districts of Karnataka state in India, which are ranked in the top three based on the “Human Development Index Report” published by the Government of Karnataka. Purposive sampling was used to enroll participants from various backgrounds to explore their perceptions of the RAS. Participants were recruited only if they were older than 18 years of age and knew English. Snowball sampling was used to recruit the participants. Respondents were contacted in person and explained by the researchers the purpose of the study and assured that their data would only be used for academic purpose, and if they consented to participate in the survey orally, to the researcher, the questionnaire was given to them in hard copy or in soft copy format. The participants had two options. They could record their response in the hard copy of the questionnaire or using the Google form. As the participants had access to the internet and WhatsApp, all chose to record their responses using the Google form. Hence, the Google form link was shared with the participants, and they were requested to submit their responses. The estimated sample size was 260 ( Hair Jr. et al ., 2019 ). Data from 280 participants were collected for the study. Data collection This marketing study was exempt from submission to the Institutional Ethics Committee of Manipal Academy of Higher Education as per clause 6 of the circular titled “Project exemption from submission to IEC” issued by the Institutional Ethical Committee dated 14/1/2021 and hence approval from the department level committee was obtained. Approval was obtained from the Department Review. Committee of the Department of Bio-Medical Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India, on June 14 th , 2023. Approval on the research gap, conceptual framework, scales to be adopted in the study and research design to be adopted to by the research team was obtained only after a detailed presentation and proposal submission. After this approval, the research project was implemented. A structured questionnaire was designed to capture the responses. The research instrument was divided into two sections. The first section documented the demographic details of the respondents and the second section captured responses on the research constructs (Perceived Usefulness (PU), Perceived Ease of Use (PEU), Trust, Attitude, Behavioural intention) adapted form ( Kao et al ., 2022 ) and eHealth Literacy Scale (eHLS) ( van der Vaart et al ., 2011 ). The participants’ responses in the second section were captured on a Likert scale, where 1= strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree. Data were gathered from July 2023 to August 2023 ( Nayak et al., 2023a , b ). IBM SPSS Statistics 27 (RRID: SCR_016479; Armonk, NY: IBM Corp) was used to perform the descriptive analysis, and the results are presented in the subsequent section. SmartPLS 4 (RRID: SCR 022040) was used to evaluate the proposed hypotheses and perform the mediation analysis. Research Project completion approval was obtained from the department on August 15, 2023. Results A total of 280 individuals participated in the study, 126 of whom were men and 154 were women. Only 5% of the respondents had experienced RAS scenarios, while 43% had already undergone surgical operations. Notably, 70% of the participants were aware of RAS ( Table 1 ). Table 1. Descriptive analysis (N = 280). Characteristics Component N = 280 (%) Sex Male 126 (45.2) Female 154 (54.8) Age Group 18-22 66 (23.3) 23-42 92 (33) 43 and above 122 (43.7) Field of Education Tech & Engineering 112 (39.7) Management 89 (31.9) Medicine & Health Science 32 (11.5) Social Science 29 (10.4) Pure Science 18 (6.5) Surgical Experience Yes 121 (43.01) No 159(56.99) Robotic-Assisted Surgery Experience Yes 14 (5.01) No 266 (94.99) Aware of Robotic Surgery Yes 199 (70.96) No 81 (29.04) The measurement model was assessed to establish the reliability and validity of the constructs ( Table 2 ). In the structural model ( Figure 2 ), the factor loading of the items was examined to ensure that they exceeded 0.5 ( Hair et al ., 2010 ). Although ( Vinzi et al ., 2010 ) recommended a minimum factor loading of 0.7, it has been noted that researchers frequently run into lower outer loadings in social science studies. It would be better to consider how the removal of indicators might impact the improvement of the reliability and validity of the constructs rather than doing so right away. Additionally, only if doing so increases composite dependability (Average Variance Extracted) above a certain threshold value can one consider deleting indicators with factor loadings ranging from 0.4 and 0.7 ( Sarstedt et al ., 2017 ). In the present study, eHLs1 (loading = 0.116) was eliminated because it was far below the threshold value. Table 2. Construct reliability and validity. Construct Indicators Outer loadings Cronbach’s Alpha Composite Reliability (rho_a) Composite reliability (rho_c) AVE Outer weights VIF Attitude A1 0.822 0.734 0.773 0.831 0.556 0.402 *** 1.706 A2 0.845 0.399 *** 1.811 A3 0.636 0.247 *** 1.326 A4 0.656 0.268 *** 1.311 eHLs E2 0.673 0.868 0.876 0.898 0.558 0.143 *** 2.010 E3 0.696 0.176 *** 2.134 E4 0.752 0.178 *** 2.035 E5 0.832 0.190 *** 2.718 E6 0.794 0.230 *** 2.217 E7 0.752 0.230 *** 1.728 E8 0.715 0.187 *** 1.629 PEoU-1 0.824 0.854 0.854 0.871 0.657 0.252 *** 3.050 PEoU-2 0.859 0.237 *** 2.986 PEoU-3 0.603 0.165 *** 3.448 PEoU-4 0.662 0.174 *** 1.385 PEoU-5 0.836 0.227 *** 1.510 PEoU-6 0.769 0.239 *** 2.283 PU-1 0.844 0.826 0.827 0.884 0.657 0.312 *** 2.025 PU-2 0.803 0.288 *** 1.828 PU-3 0.801 0.305 *** 1.688 PU-4 0.793 0.329 *** 1.594 T-1 0.833 0.802 0.808 0.883 0.715 0.447 *** 1.511 T-2 0.868 0.361 *** 2.137 T-3 0.836 0.376 *** 1.895 I-1 0.896 0.903 0.912 0.932 0.775 0.283 *** 2.914 I-2 0.812 0.243 *** 1.980 I-3 0.908 0.291 *** 3.228 I-4 0.903 0.316 *** 3.050 *** p<0.01. ** <0.1. Figure 2. Structural model. Construct reliability and validity were established using Cronbach's alpha, rho_a, and composite reliability ( Table 2 ). The computed rho_a value above the cutoff of 0.7 ( Wasko & Faraj, 2005 ), which is a sign of strong reliability according to ( Henseler et al ., 2016 ), fell between the composite reliability as defined by ( Sarstedt et al ., 2017 ) and Cronbach's alpha. The “Average Variance Extracted” (AVE) value of more than 0.5 was required to show convergent validity. The Fornell and Larcker methodology was used to confirm discriminant validity in this research ( Table 3 ). Table 3. Discriminant validity. Constructs Attitude BI PEoU PU Trust eHLt Attitude 0.746 BI 0.695 0.881 PEoU 0.433 0.265 0.765 PU 0.672 0.535 0.515 0.810 Trust 0.319 0.385 0.281 0.246 0.846 eHLt 0.375 0.339 0.482 0.314 0.283 0.747 The R 2 and Q 2 path coefficients obtained in the structural model enabled researchers to evaluate the proposed relationships within the research framework. The R 2 establishes that the predictive capacity of the model should be above 0.1( Falk and Miller, 1992 ). Q 2 determines the predictive relevance of the model and should be greater than 0. In the current model, both the R 2 and Q 2 values were above the threshold values, showing the effectiveness of the model ( Table 4 ). "Standard Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) was used to measure model fitness. The threshold estimate of SRMR was <0.8 ( Sarstedt et al ., 2017 ). This model had a good fit for the data, as indicated by its SRMR value of 0.067. Furthermore, Q 2 was calculated if the endogenous construct was more than zero; hence, predictive relevance was established. Table 4. Testing direct relationships. Hypothesis Path coefficient Standard deviation (STDEV) t value (bootstrap) P values F 2 BI H1:Trust -> PU 0.099 ** 0.047 2.111 0.035 0.012 (0.003, 0.189) H2: Trust -> PEoU- 0.157 *** 0.050 3.107 0.002 0.030 (0.057, 0.254) H3: eHLt -> PU 0.067 0.063 1.064 0.288 0.005 (0.524, 0.706) H4: eHLt -> PEoU- 0.438 *** 0.047 9.263 0.000 0.236 (0.349, 0.532) H5: PEoU- -> PU 0.454 *** 0.053 8.525 0.000 0.213 (0.347, 0.556) H6: PU -> Attitude 0.611 *** 0.050 12.166 0.000 0.511 (0.510, 0.707) H7: PEoU- -> Attitude 0.119 ** 0.051 2.323 0.020 0.019 (0.018, 0.217) H8: PU -> BI 0.123 ** 0.057 2.159 0.031 0.016 (0.009, 0.235) H9: Attitude -> BI 0.612 *** 0.047 13.161 0.000 0.403 (0.524, 0.706) R 2 Attitude = 0.463 Q 2 Attitude = 0.155 R 2 BI = 0.491 Q 2 BI = 0.137 R 2 PEoU = 0.255 Q 2 PEoU = 0.239 R 2 PU = 0.279 Q 2 PU = 0.112 *** p<0.01. ** <0.05. * <0.1. The hypothesis-testing results are presented in Table 4 . The results revealed that trust had a significant impact on PU (β = 0.099, t = 2.111, p = 0.035) and PEoU (β = .157, t = 3.107, p = 0.002). eHLt had a significant impact on PEoU (β = 0.438, t = 9.263, p = 0.000), and PEoU had a significant impact on PU (β = 0.454, t = 8.525, p = 0.000). PU (β = 0.611, t = 12.166, p = 0.000) and PEoU (β = 0.199, t = 2.323, p = 0.020) influenced attitude. PU partially influenced BI (β = 0.123, t = 2.159, p = 0.031) and attitude had a significant influence on BI (β = 0.612, t = 13.161, p = 0.000). The analysis revealed an insignificant impact of eHLt on Perceived Usefulness (β = 0.067, t = 1.064, p = 0.288). Mediation analysis In this study, two mediators were proposed and assessed. In the first case, mediation analysis was conducted to assess the mediating role of attitude towards RAS in the relationship between PU and BI ( Table 5 ). The results revealed a complementary partial mediation of PU (β = 0.413, t = 9.579, p = 0.000) through RAS attitude on behavior intention. The effects of trust and eHLt on PU were assessed using the PEoU. Complementary patrial mediation was observed for trust in PU (β = 0.138, t = 4.162, p = 0.000) through PEoU. Full mediation was observed between eHLt and PU (Î 2 = 0.230, t = 6.1919.579, p = 0.000) through PEoU. Table 5. Mediation analysis. Path Indirect Effect, p-value Direct Effect, p-value Specific Indirect Effect SD T Value p Value BI (2.5%, 97.5%) Mediation PU -> Attitude -> BI 0.536, 0.000 0.123, 0.000 0.413, 0.000 0.043 9.579 0.000 0.334, 0.502 Complementary Partial Trust -> PEoU -> PU 0.245, 0.000 0.108, 0.017 0.138 0.033 4.162 0.000 0.079, 0.208 Complementary Partial eHLt -> PEoU -> PU 0.312, 0.000 0.082, 0.198 0.230 0.037 6.191 0.000 0.165, 0.301 Full mediation Important-Performance Matrix Analysis (IPMA) The outcome of IPMA is presented as bootstrapping with 5,000 subsamples, demonstrating that some of the path coefficients are statistically significant and that all conditions for using the IPMA approach are satisfied. IPMA elucidates the relative significance and performance of exogenous (trust, eHLt, PU, PEoU, and Attitude) and endogenous constructs (behavior intention) about each other. Their significance and efficacy are shown by their aggregate impacts and index values. The impact on the endogenous variables is significant. The intrinsic potential of the latent variable scores is demonstrated through effectiveness. Along the X- and Y-axes, the significance and efficacy were quantified. The entire effect is shown on the x-axis, and the effectiveness is represented on the y-axis. A construct performed better when it had a higher mean value ( Sarstedt et al ., 2017 ). The results for the IMPA ( Figure 3 and Table 6 ). All construct performances ranged from 50 to 70. Furthermore, Attitude (Importance = 0.612 Performance = 51.257), Perceived Usefulness (Importance = 0.498 Performance = 50.165), and Perceived Ease of Use (Importance = 0.299, Performance = 51.748) must be given priority as their importance and performance ( Table 6 , Figure 3 ). Figure 3. Important-performance matrix analysis. Table 6. Important-performance matrix analysis of behavior intention. Latent construct Importance (Total effect) Performance (Index value) Attitude 0.612 51.257 PEoU 0.299 51.748 PU 0.498 50.165 Trust 0.096 73.724 eHLt 0.164 58.770 Discussion and Conclusion The results of this research suggest that patients' understanding of RAS information and subsequent decisions about medical procedures are influenced by the degree of trust they have developed with their doctors . “ Trust” embedded in their relationship enables patients to comprehend the benefits of PEoU and PU of RAS and enables them to take a rational decision. This is in line with the research evidence presented by Yang & Wu (2018) and, Petrocchi et al . (2019) who state that a strong relationship between the healthcare service provider/doctor and patient strengthens health outcomes and enables the patient to make better-informed health decisions. In addition, eHLt was observed to significantly influence PEoU, which is in line with the results of previous studies McCray (2004) ; Kao et al . (2022) ; Yuan et al . (2022) . The ease with which a person can use and understand Internet health information can have a significant impact on their perception of medical care. eHealth literate people are better able to obtain accurate and pertinent health information and make wise decisions regarding their well-being. This competency also improves patients' capacity to interact effectively with healthcare professionals, encouraging meaningful dialogue and group decision making. PEoU was observed to positively influence the PU of the RAS. It is evident from this result that if patients can clearly comprehend the benefits of RAS, it will enable them to determine the benefits themselves. The PU construct is borrowed and altered from Kao et al . (2022) and Davis (1989) . The term originally refers to an information technology system that the user uses personally, and it states that user acceptance will grow for systems that are simple to use. However, in this case, it was a doctor managing RAS. Hence, the construct indicators were altered to suit the study for a better interpretation of the results. In addition, the findings demonstrate that there is no association between eHLt and PU of RAS, even if patients can easily acquire knowledge about RAS and comprehend its function. Although eHLt does not directly affect willingness to use, it still has an impact through PEoU. The impact of eHealth literacy on the PEoU of RAS has significant effects on the Indian population's acceptance and utilization of advanced medical technologies. In this context, eHealth literacy, which encompasses the ability to comprehend and navigate digital health information, is a critical factor in determining individuals' ability to appreciate and accept this mode of surgical intervention. The relationship between eHealth literacy and the perceived ease of use of robot-assisted surgery highlights the importance of tailored educational initiatives to equip people with awareness of RAS. The healthcare industry and its specialists should take advantage of India's extensive digital integration to raise awareness and encourage acceptance among the population. This proactive strategy could substantially impact how people view robot-assisted surgery (RAS), change their attitudes, and increase their willingness to opt for this technology. It was also observed that PU indirectly influences BI through attitude, which is in line with previously documented literature ( Kao et al . 2022 ; Beldad & Hegner, 2018 ; Horowitz & Kahn, 2021 ). It is interesting to note that attitude towards RAS is a significant antecedent to BI; hence, building a positive attitude among the population is necessary for the adoption of RAS. In conclusion, the use of Robot-Assisted Surgery (RAS) has increased noticeably recently and offers obvious advantages over traditional surgical techniques or endoscopic procedures, especially in complex surgeries at difficult anatomical sites. Since its introduction in India in 2006, a minimum of 12,800 surgeries have been successfully completed using RAS technology. Given the advantages of the RAS mode, the healthcare system should design and implement strategies to enhance awareness and, hence, acceptance among the Indian population. The penetration of the Internet in India has opened up a plethora of means for channelizing communication with the audience ( AlMuammar et al ., 2021 ). The healthcare system and healthcare professionals must use different forms of social media to educate the population on the benefits of RAS, enabling them to build a positive attitude toward RAS and, hence, BI. As documented by MINI Tejaswi (2021) RAS is gaining acceptance among patients and healthcare professionals in India, there is a need to further promote positive attitudes among the Indian population to build acceptance of RAS in India. This study makes two contributions to the literature. Unlike earlier research that primarily concentrated on the efficiency of RAS surgical equipment, this study employed the TAM to evaluate the actions and intentions of RAS among the Indian population. According to this study, an individual's perceptions regarding whether they believe surgery would be useful or whether they have access to enough information to make informed decisions are influenced by their level of trust. In addition, this study aids in the investigation of variables influencing an individual's readiness to undergo sophisticated surgical procedures. This research also investigates the influence of eHLt, which is a significant antecedent to mold positive attitudes, thereby influencing their acceptance of RAS. Doctors play a crucial and essential role in successfully explaining the benefits of robotic-assisted surgery in patients. Beyond their medical knowledge, they play an important role in converting difficult technical information into clear and understandable language. Doctors may explain how robot-assisted surgery may improve surgical results, reduce invasiveness, speed up recovery, and improve patient experiences by having open and compassionate conversations with patients. This open communication encourages confidence and cooperation between healthcare professionals and patients being treated by them by empowering them to make knowledgeable healthcare decisions. Clinicians act as both advocates and educators, ensuring that patients understand the advantages of this novel surgical approach and may influence their care. This will strengthen the trust a patient displays in the doctor and, hence, influence their behavior. The literature also identifies important criticisms, such as TAM's shortcomings in identifying issues outside of its purview, such as costs and underlying structural pressures driving users to adopt an invention. The continued adoption and evolution of TAM will depend on how well it is implemented in cutting-edge medical technologies. It is important to note that this early cross-sectional study did not account for differences among other medical specialties, which calls for attention in future research frameworks. Such frameworks could also compare and contrast the preferences and tendencies of patients who had prior experience with robotic surgery (RSS) and those who did not. Future research can provide more thorough insights, producing findings that more accurately reflect heterogeneous patient groups. The moderating impact of demographic factors, like income and age, on the intention to opt for minimal invasive surgery could be explored. A longitudinal study can document change in the awareness and intention to adopt minimal invasive surgery after a series of awareness camps or workshops. These studies will enable researchers to explore patient behaviour further and will contribute to the body of research in the domain of health care management. Data availability Underlying data Figshare: Exploring the acceptance of robotic assisted surgery among the Indian population: An empirical investigation. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24131124.v1 ( Nayak et al. , 2023c ) This project contains the following underlying data: - Data file Extended data Figshare: RAS Paper. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25256833.v1 ( Nayak et al. , 2024 ) This project contains the following extended data: - RAS_Questionnaire Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0) References Ahn KH, Donnellan N, Lee TTM: Patient Perception of Robotic Surgery in Gynecology. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2014; 21 (6): S71. Publisher Full Text AlMuammar SA, Noorsaeed AS, Alafif RA, et al. : The Use of Internet and Social Media for Health Information and Its Consequences Among the Population in Saudi Arabia. Cureus. 2021; 13 : e18338. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Ammer E, Mandt LS, Silbersdorff IC, et al. : Robotic Anxiety—Parents’ Perception of Robot-Assisted Pediatric Surgery. Children. 2022; 9 (3): 399. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Beldad AD, Hegner SM: Expanding the Technology Acceptance Model with the Inclusion of Trust, Social Influence, and Health Valuation to Determine the Predictors of German Users’ Willingness to Continue using a Fitness App: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2018; 34 (9): 882–893. Publisher Full Text Bora G, Narain T, Sharma A, et al. : Robot-assisted surgery in India: A SWOT analysis. Indian J. Urol. 2020; 36 (1): 1–3. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Buabbas AJ, Aldousari S, Shehab AA: An exploratory study of public awareness about robotics-assisted surgery in Kuwait. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2020; 20 (1): 140. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Chan KS, Kwan JR, Shelat VG: Awareness, perception, knowledge, and attitude toward robotic surgery in a general surgical outpatient clinic in Singapore, Asia. J. Clin. Transl. Res. 2022; 8 (3): 224–233. PubMed Abstract Davis FD: Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Q. 1989; 13 (3): 319. Publisher Full Text Diez Roux AV: Conceptual Approaches to the Study of Health Disparities. Annu. Rev. Public Health. 2012; 33 (1): 41–58. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Falk RF, Miller NB: A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press; 1992. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, et al. : Multivariate Data Analysis.2010. Hair JF Jr, Hult M, Ringle CM, et al. : Manual de Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (Segunda Edición). OmniaScience; 2019. Publisher Full Text Hall MA, Dugan E, Zheng B, et al. : Trust in Physicians and Medical Institutions: What Is It, Can It Be Measured, and Does It Matter? Milbank Q. 2001; 79 (4): 613–639. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Henseler J, Hubona G, Ray PA: Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2016; 116 (1): 2–20. Publisher Full Text Horowitz MC, Kahn L: What influences attitudes about artificial intelligence adoption: Evidence from U.S. local officials. PLoS One. 2021; 16 (10): e0257732. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Irani M, Prabakar C, Nematian S, et al. : Patient Perceptions of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Gynecological Surgeries. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016; 2016 : 1–6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Kao H-Y, Yang Y-C, Hung Y-H, et al. : When Does Da Vanci Robotic Surgical Systems Come Into Play? Front. Public Health. 2022; 10 . PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Kim MO, Coiera E, Magrabi F: Problems with health information technology and their effects on care delivery and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2017; 24 (2): 246–250. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Krot K, Rudawska I: The Role of Trust in Doctor-Patient Relationship: Qualitative Evaluation of Online Feedback from Polish Patients. Econ. Soc. 2016; 9 (3): 76–88. Publisher Full Text McCray AT: Promoting Health Literacy. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2004; 12 (2): 152–163. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text McDermott H, Choudhury N, Lewin-Runacres M, et al. : Gender differences in understanding and acceptance of robot-assisted surgery. J. Robot. Surg. 2020; 14 (1): 227–232. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Norman CD, Skinner HA: eHEALS: The eHealth Literacy Scale. J. Med. Internet Res. 2006; 8 (4): e27. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Nayak S, Nayak VC, Sathvika S: DATA File. Dataset. figshare. 2023a. Publisher Full Text Nayak S, Sathvika S, Nayak V: RAS Paper: Figures. figshare. Figure. 2023b. Publisher Full Text Nayak S, Nayak VC, Kamath R, et al. : DATA File. [Dataset]. figshare. 2023c. Publisher Full Text Nayak S, Nayak VC, Sathvika S: RAS_Questionnaire. figshare. [Dataset]. Journal contribution. 2024. Publisher Full Text Parija P, Tiwari P, Sharma P, et al. : Determinants of online health information-seeking behavior: A cross-sectional survey among residents of an urban settlement in Delhi. J. Educ. Health Promot. 2020; 9 (1): 344. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Petrocchi S, Iannello P, Lecciso F, et al. : Interpersonal trust in doctor-patient relation: Evidence from dyadic analysis and association with quality of dyadic communication. Soc. Sci. Med. 2019; 235 : 112391. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Prasad A: Robotic Surgery in India. J. Young Med. Res. 2013; 1 (1). Publisher Full Text Puja Turakhia M: Using Principles of Co-Production to Improve Patient Care and Enhance Value. AMA J. Ethics. 2017; 19 (11): 1125–1131. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Hair JF: Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Handbook of Market Research. Springer International Publishing; 2017; pp. 1–40. Publisher Full Text Tejaswi M: Robotic surgeries gaining acceptance among patients, surgeons in India. The Hindu. 2021. van der Vaart R , van Deursen AJ , Drossaert CH, et al. : Does the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) Measure What it Intends to Measure? Validation of a Dutch Version of the eHEALS in Two Adult Populations. J. Med. Internet Res. 2011; 13 (4): e86. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Vinzi VE, Chin WW, Henseler J, et al. : Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Vinzi VE, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H, editors. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2010. Publisher Full Text Wasko, Faraj: Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice. MIS Q. 2005; 29 (1): 35. Publisher Full Text Xie L, Zhang S, Xin M, et al. : Electronic health literacy and health-related outcomes among older adults: A systematic review. Prev. Med. 2022; 157 : 106997. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Xu RH, Zhou L-M, Wong EL-Y, et al. : The Association Between Patients’ eHealth Literacy and Satisfaction With Shared Decision-making and Well-being: Multicenter Cross-sectional Study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2021; 23 (9): e26721. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Xue R, Liu R: Statistical analysis of da Vinci procedure volumes of 2021 in the Chinese Mainland. Int. Surg. 2022; 4 : 18–22. Publisher Full Text Yang T, Wu Y: A Study on the Influence of Patient Participation on Patient Trust-Based on Sample Survey in China. Front. Psychol. 2018; 9 . PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Yuan T, Li XD, Zhang M, et al. : Impact of the eHealth literacy, knowledge, and attitudes on COVID-19 prevention behavior among residents in the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study in Anhui Province, China. Front. Public Health. 2022; 10 . PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Comments on this article Comments (1) Version 3 VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 20 Aug 2024 Revised Comment ADD YOUR COMMENT Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 28 May 2024 Discussion is closed on this version, please comment on the latest version above. Author Response 13 Aug 2024 smitha nayak , Department of Humanities and Management, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India 13 Aug 2024 Author Response Dear Editorial Team, There is no conflict of interest that I can cite. This article is an original research article. The recommended review process has been adhered to. ... Continue reading Dear Editorial Team, There is no conflict of interest that I can cite. This article is an original research article. The recommended review process has been adhered to. Thanks, Dr Smitha Nayak Dear Editorial Team, There is no conflict of interest that I can cite. This article is an original research article. The recommended review process has been adhered to. Thanks, Dr Smitha Nayak Competing Interests: Dear Editorial Team, There is no competing interest that I can cite. Thanks, Dr Smitha Nayak Close Report a concern Discussion is closed on this version, please comment on the latest version above. Author details Author details 1 Department of Humanities and Management, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India 2 Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India 3 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India Smitha Nayak Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Vinod C. Nayak Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing Sathvika G. S. Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation Competing interests No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Article Versions (3) version 3 Revised Published: 20 Aug 2024, 13:544 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.145052.3 version 2 Revised Published: 27 Jun 2024, 13:544 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.145052.2 version 1 Published: 28 May 2024, 13:544 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.145052.1 Copyright © 2024 Nayak S et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Download Export To Sciwheel Bibtex EndNote ProCite Ref. Manager (RIS) Sente metrics Views Downloads F1000Research - - PubMed Central info_outline Data from PMC are received and updated monthly. - - Citations open_in_new 0 open_in_new 0 open_in_new SEE MORE DETAILS CITE how to cite this article Nayak S, Nayak VC and G. S. S. Exploring the acceptance of robotic assisted surgery among the Indian population: An empirical investigation [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :544 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.145052.3 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS track receive updates on this article Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article. TRACK THIS ARTICLE Share Open Peer Review Current Reviewer Status: ? Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Version 2 VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 27 Jun 2024 Revised Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Raja K. Reviewer Report For: Exploring the acceptance of robotic assisted surgery among the Indian population: An empirical investigation [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :544 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168235.r309499 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-544/v2#referee-response-309499 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 09 Aug 2024 Kalayarasan Raja , Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, , Puducherry,, India Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168235.r309499 The present review analyzed patients’ willingness to adopt robot-assisted surgery for surgical intervention using the Technology Acceptance Model. Results were based on the data from 280 respondents. Authors found that perceived Usefulness is an important factor in choosing RAS. My comments ... Continue reading READ ALL The present review analyzed patients’ willingness to adopt robot-assisted surgery for surgical intervention using the Technology Acceptance Model. Results were based on the data from 280 respondents. Authors found that perceived Usefulness is an important factor in choosing RAS. My comments 1. In the Introduction authors have quoted the data of robotic platforms and surgeries till 2019. If available, they can use the updated data for India. 2. Discussion and limitations of the study included in the discussion were appropriate. 3. Authors have proposed the focus of future studies. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Robotic and laparosocpic gastrointestinal surgery I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Raja K. Reviewer Report For: Exploring the acceptance of robotic assisted surgery among the Indian population: An empirical investigation [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :544 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168235.r309499 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-544/v2#referee-response-309499 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 20 Aug 2024 smitha nayak , Department of Humanities and Management, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India 20 Aug 2024 Author Response Dear Reviewer, Thank you for the comments. We have incorporated the changes in the manuscript, wherever possible and the updated version is uploaded for your approval. The introduction section ... Continue reading Dear Reviewer, Thank you for the comments. We have incorporated the changes in the manuscript, wherever possible and the updated version is uploaded for your approval. The introduction section and the direction for future research have been updated as suggested by you. Thank you, Research team Dear Reviewer, Thank you for the comments. We have incorporated the changes in the manuscript, wherever possible and the updated version is uploaded for your approval. The introduction section and the direction for future research have been updated as suggested by you. Thank you, Research team Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 20 Aug 2024 smitha nayak , Department of Humanities and Management, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India 20 Aug 2024 Author Response Dear Reviewer, Thank you for the comments. We have incorporated the changes in the manuscript, wherever possible and the updated version is uploaded for your approval. The introduction section ... Continue reading Dear Reviewer, Thank you for the comments. We have incorporated the changes in the manuscript, wherever possible and the updated version is uploaded for your approval. The introduction section and the direction for future research have been updated as suggested by you. Thank you, Research team Dear Reviewer, Thank you for the comments. We have incorporated the changes in the manuscript, wherever possible and the updated version is uploaded for your approval. The introduction section and the direction for future research have been updated as suggested by you. Thank you, Research team Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Nrip NK. Reviewer Report For: Exploring the acceptance of robotic assisted surgery among the Indian population: An empirical investigation [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :544 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168235.r296301 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-544/v2#referee-response-296301 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 28 Jun 2024 Nripesh Kumar Nrip , Department of Computer Application, Bharati Vidyapeeth Institute of Management, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India; Department of Computer Applications, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, Maharashtra, India Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168235.r296301 No major corrections ware suggested in the first review and the authors ... Continue reading READ ALL No major corrections ware suggested in the first review and the authors have amended their article with minute suggested changes. Approved from Reviewer's view. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Multidisciplinary, Specially Information Technology in various domain of Human and Society like Agriculture, Health care, Education etc. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Nrip NK. Reviewer Report For: Exploring the acceptance of robotic assisted surgery among the Indian population: An empirical investigation [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :544 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168235.r296301 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-544/v2#referee-response-296301 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 28 May 2024 Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Nrip NK. Reviewer Report For: Exploring the acceptance of robotic assisted surgery among the Indian population: An empirical investigation [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :544 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.158938.r285902 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-544/v1#referee-response-285902 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 11 Jun 2024 Nripesh Kumar Nrip , Department of Computer Application, Bharati Vidyapeeth Institute of Management, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India; Department of Computer Applications, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, Maharashtra, India Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.158938.r285902 Title: Exploring the acceptance of robotic-assisted surgery among the Indian population: An empirical investigation Authors: Smitha Nayak, Vinod C. Nayak, Sathvika G. S. Abstract and Introduction: The abstract provides a concise summary of the study, highlighting the key ... Continue reading READ ALL Title: Exploring the acceptance of robotic-assisted surgery among the Indian population: An empirical investigation Authors: Smitha Nayak, Vinod C. Nayak, Sathvika G. S. Abstract and Introduction: The abstract provides a concise summary of the study, highlighting the key findings and significance of the research. The introduction effectively sets the stage by discussing the integration of technology in healthcare and the specific advancements brought by robotic-assisted surgery (RAS). It frames the research within the context of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and emphasizes the importance of understanding patient perceptions and eHealth literacy in the adoption of RAS. Comments: The background information is comprehensive and well-researched. The rationale for the study is clearly articulated. The objectives are well-defined and relevant Methods: The methodology section is detailed, describing the cross-sectional research design and the use of a structured questionnaire to gather data from 280 respondents. The incorporation of TAM and eHealth literacy into the conceptual framework is well-explained. Comments: The sample size is appropriate for the study. The use of both hard copy and digital questionnaires is commendable for flexibility. The inclusion criteria and recruitment process are clearly described. The statistical tools and techniques used (IBM SPSS and SmartPLS) are appropriate for the analysis. Results: The results are presented with clarity, supported by tables and figures. The study successfully establishes the reliability and validity of the constructs. The findings on the impact of trust, perceived ease of use (PEoU), perceived usefulness (PU), and eHealth literacy on behavioral intention are well-documented. Comments: The use of structural modeling to evaluate the hypotheses is appropriate and well-executed. The results are statistically significant and contribute to the understanding of factors influencing the acceptance of RAS. The mediation analysis adds depth to the findings. Discussion: The discussion section effectively interprets the results, linking them back to the theoretical framework and previous research. The emphasis on the role of trust and eHealth literacy in shaping patient attitudes and behavioral intentions is insightful. Comments: The discussion is thorough and provides practical implications for the healthcare industry. The recommendations for promoting RAS acceptance through enhanced communication and education are well-founded. The potential influence of digital literacy on the adoption of advanced medical technologies is well-articulated. Conclusion: The conclusion succinctly summarizes the key findings and underscores the importance of trust and eHealth literacy in the acceptance of RAS. The study’s contributions to the literature and practical applications are clearly stated. Comments: The conclusion is concise and effectively wraps up the study. The emphasis on the role of healthcare professionals in educating patients about RAS is a valuable insight. Overall Assessment: This study makes significant contributions to the understanding of factors influencing the acceptance of robotic-assisted surgery among the Indian population. The integration of TAM and eHealth literacy provides a robust framework for analyzing patient behavior. The findings are well-supported by rigorous data analysis and offer practical recommendations for healthcare practitioners and policymakers. Minor Suggestions: Ensure consistency in the use of abbreviations (e.g., PU, PEoU, RAS) throughout the manuscript. Final Decision: Accept with minor revisions. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Multidisciplinary, Specially Information Technology in various domain of Human and Society like Agriculture, Health care, Education etc. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Nrip NK. Reviewer Report For: Exploring the acceptance of robotic assisted surgery among the Indian population: An empirical investigation [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :544 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.158938.r285902 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-544/v1#referee-response-285902 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 27 Jun 2024 smitha nayak , Department of Humanities and Management, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India 27 Jun 2024 Author Response Thank you for reviewing the article. Your suggestions have indeed added value to the manuscript. I will respond to the review comments and as per your suggestions, I will resubmit ... Continue reading Thank you for reviewing the article. Your suggestions have indeed added value to the manuscript. I will respond to the review comments and as per your suggestions, I will resubmit the article after incorporating the suggested changes. I will ensure uniformity is maintained. Regards, Prof. Smitha Nayak Thank you for reviewing the article. Your suggestions have indeed added value to the manuscript. I will respond to the review comments and as per your suggestions, I will resubmit the article after incorporating the suggested changes. I will ensure uniformity is maintained. Regards, Prof. Smitha Nayak Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 27 Jun 2024 smitha nayak , Department of Humanities and Management, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India 27 Jun 2024 Author Response Thank you for reviewing the article. Your suggestions have indeed added value to the manuscript. I will respond to the review comments and as per your suggestions, I will resubmit ... Continue reading Thank you for reviewing the article. Your suggestions have indeed added value to the manuscript. I will respond to the review comments and as per your suggestions, I will resubmit the article after incorporating the suggested changes. I will ensure uniformity is maintained. Regards, Prof. Smitha Nayak Thank you for reviewing the article. Your suggestions have indeed added value to the manuscript. I will respond to the review comments and as per your suggestions, I will resubmit the article after incorporating the suggested changes. I will ensure uniformity is maintained. Regards, Prof. Smitha Nayak Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Comments on this article Comments (1) Version 3 VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 20 Aug 2024 Revised Comment ADD YOUR COMMENT Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 28 May 2024 Discussion is closed on this version, please comment on the latest version above. Author Response 13 Aug 2024 smitha nayak , Department of Humanities and Management, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India 13 Aug 2024 Author Response Dear Editorial Team, There is no conflict of interest that I can cite. This article is an original research article. The recommended review process has been adhered to. ... Continue reading Dear Editorial Team, There is no conflict of interest that I can cite. This article is an original research article. The recommended review process has been adhered to. Thanks, Dr Smitha Nayak Dear Editorial Team, There is no conflict of interest that I can cite. This article is an original research article. The recommended review process has been adhered to. Thanks, Dr Smitha Nayak Competing Interests: Dear Editorial Team, There is no competing interest that I can cite. Thanks, Dr Smitha Nayak Close Report a concern Discussion is closed on this version, please comment on the latest version above. keyboard_arrow_left keyboard_arrow_right Open Peer Review Reviewer Status info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Reviewer Reports Invited Reviewers 1 2 Version 3 (revision) 20 Aug 24 Version 2 (revision) 27 Jun 24 read read Version 1 28 May 24 read Nripesh Kumar Nrip , Bharati Vidyapeeth Institute of Management, Kolhapur, India; Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, India Kalayarasan Raja , Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, , Puducherry,, India Comments on this article All Comments (1) Add a comment Sign up for content alerts Sign Up You are now signed up to receive this alert Browse by related subjects keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2024 Raja K. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 09 Aug 2024 | for Version 2 Kalayarasan Raja , Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, , Puducherry,, India 0 Views copyright © 2024 Raja K. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (1) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions The present review analyzed patients’ willingness to adopt robot-assisted surgery for surgical intervention using the Technology Acceptance Model. Results were based on the data from 280 respondents. Authors found that perceived Usefulness is an important factor in choosing RAS. My comments 1. In the Introduction authors have quoted the data of robotic platforms and surgeries till 2019. If available, they can use the updated data for India. 2. Discussion and limitations of the study included in the discussion were appropriate. 3. Authors have proposed the focus of future studies. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Robotic and laparosocpic gastrointestinal surgery I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (1) Author Response 20 Aug 2024 smitha nayak, Department of Humanities and Management, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India Dear Reviewer, Thank you for the comments. We have incorporated the changes in the manuscript, wherever possible and the updated version is uploaded for your approval. The introduction section and the direction for future research have been updated as suggested by you. Thank you, Research team View more View less Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. reply Respond Report a concern Raja K. Peer Review Report For: Exploring the acceptance of robotic assisted surgery among the Indian population: An empirical investigation [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :544 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168235.r309499) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-544/v2#referee-response-309499 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2024 Nrip N. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 28 Jun 2024 | for Version 2 Nripesh Kumar Nrip , Department of Computer Application, Bharati Vidyapeeth Institute of Management, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India; Department of Computer Applications, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, Maharashtra, India 0 Views copyright © 2024 Nrip N. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions No major corrections ware suggested in the first review and the authors have amended their article with minute suggested changes. Approved from Reviewer's view. Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Multidisciplinary, Specially Information Technology in various domain of Human and Society like Agriculture, Health care, Education etc. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Nrip NK. Peer Review Report For: Exploring the acceptance of robotic assisted surgery among the Indian population: An empirical investigation [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :544 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168235.r296301) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-544/v2#referee-response-296301 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2024 Nrip N. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 11 Jun 2024 | for Version 1 Nripesh Kumar Nrip , Department of Computer Application, Bharati Vidyapeeth Institute of Management, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India; Department of Computer Applications, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, Maharashtra, India 0 Views copyright © 2024 Nrip N. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (1) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Title: Exploring the acceptance of robotic-assisted surgery among the Indian population: An empirical investigation Authors: Smitha Nayak, Vinod C. Nayak, Sathvika G. S. Abstract and Introduction: The abstract provides a concise summary of the study, highlighting the key findings and significance of the research. The introduction effectively sets the stage by discussing the integration of technology in healthcare and the specific advancements brought by robotic-assisted surgery (RAS). It frames the research within the context of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and emphasizes the importance of understanding patient perceptions and eHealth literacy in the adoption of RAS. Comments: The background information is comprehensive and well-researched. The rationale for the study is clearly articulated. The objectives are well-defined and relevant Methods: The methodology section is detailed, describing the cross-sectional research design and the use of a structured questionnaire to gather data from 280 respondents. The incorporation of TAM and eHealth literacy into the conceptual framework is well-explained. Comments: The sample size is appropriate for the study. The use of both hard copy and digital questionnaires is commendable for flexibility. The inclusion criteria and recruitment process are clearly described. The statistical tools and techniques used (IBM SPSS and SmartPLS) are appropriate for the analysis. Results: The results are presented with clarity, supported by tables and figures. The study successfully establishes the reliability and validity of the constructs. The findings on the impact of trust, perceived ease of use (PEoU), perceived usefulness (PU), and eHealth literacy on behavioral intention are well-documented. Comments: The use of structural modeling to evaluate the hypotheses is appropriate and well-executed. The results are statistically significant and contribute to the understanding of factors influencing the acceptance of RAS. The mediation analysis adds depth to the findings. Discussion: The discussion section effectively interprets the results, linking them back to the theoretical framework and previous research. The emphasis on the role of trust and eHealth literacy in shaping patient attitudes and behavioral intentions is insightful. Comments: The discussion is thorough and provides practical implications for the healthcare industry. The recommendations for promoting RAS acceptance through enhanced communication and education are well-founded. The potential influence of digital literacy on the adoption of advanced medical technologies is well-articulated. Conclusion: The conclusion succinctly summarizes the key findings and underscores the importance of trust and eHealth literacy in the acceptance of RAS. The study’s contributions to the literature and practical applications are clearly stated. Comments: The conclusion is concise and effectively wraps up the study. The emphasis on the role of healthcare professionals in educating patients about RAS is a valuable insight. Overall Assessment: This study makes significant contributions to the understanding of factors influencing the acceptance of robotic-assisted surgery among the Indian population. The integration of TAM and eHealth literacy provides a robust framework for analyzing patient behavior. The findings are well-supported by rigorous data analysis and offer practical recommendations for healthcare practitioners and policymakers. Minor Suggestions: Ensure consistency in the use of abbreviations (e.g., PU, PEoU, RAS) throughout the manuscript. Final Decision: Accept with minor revisions. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Multidisciplinary, Specially Information Technology in various domain of Human and Society like Agriculture, Health care, Education etc. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (1) Author Response 27 Jun 2024 smitha nayak, Department of Humanities and Management, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India Thank you for reviewing the article. Your suggestions have indeed added value to the manuscript. I will respond to the review comments and as per your suggestions, I will resubmit the article after incorporating the suggested changes. I will ensure uniformity is maintained. Regards, Prof. Smitha Nayak View more View less Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. reply Respond Report a concern Nrip NK. Peer Review Report For: Exploring the acceptance of robotic assisted surgery among the Indian population: An empirical investigation [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :544 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.158938.r285902) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-544/v1#referee-response-285902 Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Adjust parameters to alter display View on desktop for interactive features Includes Interactive Elements View on desktop for interactive features Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Stay Updated Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles Register with F1000Research Already registered? Sign in Not now, thanks close PLEASE NOTE If you are an AUTHOR of this article, please check that you signed in with the account associated with this article otherwise we cannot automatically identify your role as an author and your comment will be labelled as a “User Comment”. If you are a REVIEWER of this article, please check that you have signed in with the account associated with this article and then go to your account to submit your report, please do not post your review here. If you do not have access to your original account, please contact us . All commenters must hold a formal affiliation as per our Policies . The information that you give us will be displayed next to your comment. User comments must be in English, comprehensible and relevant to the article under discussion. We reserve the right to remove any comments that we consider to be inappropriate, offensive or otherwise in breach of the User Comment Terms and Conditions . Commenters must not use a comment for personal attacks. When criticisms of the article are based on unpublished data, the data should be made available. I accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions Please confirm that you accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions. Affiliation ✕ refresh Please enter your institution. Note: To add your institution or organisation, start typing the name and then select the correct name from the list. Where applicable, the name will appear in both the original language and in English. Do not paste in the name. If the name does not appear in the drop-down list, we will display the information you have entered. ✕ refresh Country/Region * USA UK Canada China France Germany Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Federated States of Micronesia Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kosovo (Serbia and Montenegro) Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Minor Outlying Islands of the United States Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island North Korea North Macedonia Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Is South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The Gambia The Netherlands Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu UK USA Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United States Virgin Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Wallis and Futuna West Bank and Gaza Strip Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Please select your country/region. You must enter a comment. Competing Interests Please disclose any competing interests that might be construed to influence your judgment of the article's or peer review report's validity or importance. Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Please state your competing interests The comment has been saved. An error has occurred. Please try again. Cancel Post var lTitle = "Exploring the acceptance of robotic assisted...".replace("'", ''); var linkedInUrl = "http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/13-544/v3" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle) + "&summary=" + encodeURIComponent('Read the article by '); var deliciousUrl = "https://del.icio.us/post?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/13-544/v3&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); var redditUrl = "http://reddit.com/submit?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/13-544/v3" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); linkedInUrl += encodeURIComponent('Nayak S et al.'); var offsetTop = /chrome/i.test( navigator.userAgent ) ? 4 : -10; var addthis_config = { ui_offset_top: offsetTop, services_compact : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_expanded : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_custom : [ { name: "LinkedIn", url: linkedInUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_linkedin.svg" }, { name: "Mendeley", url: "http://www.mendeley.com/import/?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/13-544/v3/mendeley", icon:"/img/icon/at_mendeley.svg" }, { name: "Reddit", url: redditUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_reddit.svg" }, ] }; var addthis_share = { url: "https://f1000research.com/articles/13-544", templates : { twitter : "Exploring the acceptance of robotic assisted surgery among the.... Nayak S et al., published by " + "@F1000Research" + ", https://f1000research.com/articles/13-544/v3" } }; if (typeof(addthis) != "undefined"){ addthis.addEventListener('addthis.ready', checkCount); addthis.addEventListener('addthis.menu.share', checkCount); } $(".f1r-shares-twitter").attr("href", "https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=" + addthis_share.templates.twitter); $(".f1r-shares-facebook").attr("href", "https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=" + addthis_share.url); $(".f1r-shares-linkedin").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[0].url); $(".f1r-shares-reddit").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[2].url); $(".f1r-shares-mendelay").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[1].url); function checkCount(){ setTimeout(function(){ $(".addthis_button_expanded").each(function(){ var count = $(this).text(); if (count !== "" && count != "0") $(this).removeClass("is-hidden"); else $(this).addClass("is-hidden"); }); }, 1000); } close How to cite this report {{reportCitation}} Cancel Copy Citation Details $(function(){R.ui.buttonDropdowns('.dropdown-for-downloads');}); $(function(){R.ui.toolbarDropdowns('.toolbar-dropdown-for-downloads');}); $.get("/articles/acj/145052/170297") new F1000.Clipboard(); new F1000.ThesaurusTermsDisplay("articles", "article", "170297"); $(document).ready(function() { $( "#frame1" ).on('load', function() { var mydiv = $(this).contents().find("div"); var h = mydiv.height(); console.log(h) }); var tooltipLivingFigure = jQuery(".interactive-living-figure-label .icon-more-info"), titleLivingFigure = tooltipLivingFigure.attr("title"); tooltipLivingFigure.simpletip({ fixed: true, position: ["-115", "30"], baseClass: 'small-tooltip', content:titleLivingFigure + " " }); tooltipLivingFigure.removeAttr("title"); $("body").on("click", ".cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); var ref = $(this).attr("data-ref"); $(this).closest(".living-figure-list-container").find("#" + ref).fadeIn(200); }); $("body").on("click", ".close-cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $(this).closest(".popup-window-wrapper").fadeOut(200); }); $(document).on("mouseup", function(e) { var metricsContainer = $(".article-metrics-popover-wrapper"); if (!metricsContainer.is(e.target) && metricsContainer.has(e.target).length === 0) { $(".article-metrics-close-button").click(); } }); var articleId = $('#articleId').val(); if($("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics) { $("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics(articleId, { articleMetricsView: true }); } }); var figshareWidget = $(".new_figshare_widget"); if (figshareWidget.length > 0) { window.figshare.load("f1000", function(Widget) { // Select a tag/tags defined in your page. In this tag we will place the widget. _.map(figshareWidget, function(el){ var widget = new Widget({ articleId: $(el).attr("figshare_articleId") //height:300 // this is the height of the viewer part. [Default: 550] }); widget.initialize(); // initialize the widget widget.mount(el); // mount it in a tag that's on your page // this will save the widget on the global scope for later use from // your JS scripts. This line is optional. //window.widget = widget; }); }); } close Error Close Add Reset F1000.MICROSERVICES.AFFILIATION = ''; $(document).ready(function () { $('.js-affiliations-form').each((index, form) => { new AffiliationForm({ formId: form.id, institutionErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-institution', departmentErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-department', placeSelector: '.js-add-comment-place', stateSelector: '.js-add-comment-state', zipCodeSelector: '.js-add-comment-zipcode', countrySelector: '.js-add-comment-country', countryErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-country', }); }); }); $(document).ready(function () { var reportIds = { "304644": 0, "292741": 0, "304645": 0, "292742": 0, "304646": 0, "292743": 0, "309504": 0, "309505": 0, "292748": 0, "292749": 0, "292750": 0, "292744": 0, "304648": 0, "292745": 0, "292746": 0, "304650": 0, "292747": 0, "304651": 0, "300204": 0, "300200": 0, "300201": 0, "300202": 0, "300203": 0, "300215": 0, "300216": 0, "300217": 0, "300218": 0, "285893": 0, "285894": 0, "285895": 0, "285900": 0, "285901": 0, "285902": 98, "285896": 0, "285897": 0, "285898": 0, "285899": 0, "315477": 0, "315478": 0, "296301": 16, "309500": 0, "309501": 0, "309502": 0, "309503": 0, "304632": 0, "309496": 0, "309497": 0, "304633": 0, "309498": 0, "309499": 11, }; $(".referee-response-container,.js-referee-report").each(function(index, el) { var reportId = $(el).attr("data-reportid"), reportCount = reportIds[reportId] || 0; $(el).find(".comments-count-container,.js-referee-report-views").html(reportCount); }); var uuidInput = $("#article_uuid"), oldUUId = uuidInput.val(), newUUId = "9ec5eddd-b54c-406a-9f83-70657d6c62a5"; uuidInput.val(newUUId); $("a[href*='article_uuid=']").each(function(index, el) { var newHref = $(el).attr("href").replace(oldUUId, newUUId); $(el).attr("href", newHref); }); }); An innovative open access publishing platform offering rapid publication and open peer review, whilst supporting data deposition and sharing. Browse Gateways Collections How it Works Contact For Developers Cookie Notice Privacy Notice RSS Submit Your Research Follow us © 2012-2026 F1000 Research Ltd. ISSN 2046-1402 | Legal | Partner of Research4Life • CrossRef • ORCID • FAIRSharing R.templateTests.simpleTemplate = R.template(' $text $text $text $text $text '); R.templateTests.runTests(); var F1000platform = new F1000.Platform({ name: "f1000research", displayName: "F1000Research", hostName: "f1000research.com", id: "1", editorialEmail: "[email protected]", infoEmail: "[email protected]", usePmcStats: true }); $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-authors, .dropdown-for-about, .dropdown-for-myresearch');}); // $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-referees');}); $(document).ready(function () { if ($(".cookie-warning").is(":visible")) { $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "35px"); $(".devices").addClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); } $(".cookie-warning .close-button").click(function (e) { $(".devices").removeClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "0"); }); $("#tweeter-feed .tweet-message").each(function (i, message) { var self = $(message); self.html(linkify(self.html())); }); $(".partner").on("mouseenter mouseleave", function() { $(this).find(".gray-scale, .colour").toggleClass("is-hidden"); }); }); Sign In Remember me Forgotten your password? Sign In Cancel Email or password not correct. Please try again Please wait... $(function(){ // Note: All the setup needs to run against a name attribute and *not* the id due the clonish // nature of facebox... $("a[id=googleSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("GOOGLE"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=facebookSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("FACEBOOK"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=orcidSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("ORCID"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); }); If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password. The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000. Email address not valid, please try again You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here . You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here . Code not correct, please try again Reset password Cancel Email us for further assistance. Server error, please try again. If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password. If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance. Please wait... Register $(document).ready(function () { signIn.createSignInAsRow($("#sign-in-form-gfb-popup")); $(".target-field").each(function () { var uris = $(this).val().split("/"); if (uris.pop() === "login") { $(this).val(uris.toString().replace(",","/")); } }); });