Does health investment matter for productivity growth in Sub-Saharan Africa? Empirical insights from income and regional economic grouping perspectives

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates whether investment in the health sector matters for achieving sustainable growth via the Dumitrescu-Hurlin heterogeneous panel non-granger causality test and the dynamic panel threshold model for 26 Sub-Saharan African countries (SSA). We report evidence of a bidirectional causality between health investment and productivity growth in the panel of SSA and find that investing a substantial part of GDP (about 7.96%) into the health sector is necessary to increase productivity growth levels in SSA. When we control heterogeneity in our sample using the regional economic grouping, we report unidirectional causality across the panels and variations in the estimated threshold with higher values for all groups except ECOWAS with 5.82%. Using the World Bank income classification, we also find varying evidence of unidirectional causal relationships between health investment and productivity growth in different income groups. Generally, above the threshold level, health investment has positive effects on productivity growth for all groups. We report other significant findings that are instructive to policymaking and future research and conclude that SSA countries should increase investment in the health sector to ensure greater productivity, and should deepen growth-oriented policies to further stimulate investment in the health sector. JEL Classification: H51, I15, O47

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00