Introduction
Endometriosis is a benign disease defined by the presence of
endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterus. Examination
of the ovaries at caesarean section is a normal practice as ovarian
pathology may be found. The incidence of an adnexal mass found
at caesarean section ranges from 1 in 1231 to 3292. About 20-25%
of women have asymptomatic endometriosis. 1 Endometriosis affects
6% to 10% of reproductive age women6. Approximately 1% to 4%
of pregnant women are diagnosed with an ovarian mass. Of all the
adnexal masses reported during pregnancy the incidence of ovarian
endometriosis varies widely from 5% to 30%. 2,3 We are reporting
a case of incidentally found atypical endometriosis at emergency
caesarean section.
Case report
A 32-year-old primigravida, married for one year, conceived
spontaneously without any history of infertility was registered with us
for antenatal care. At 39+2 weeks of gestation she came with h/o pain
abdomen and headache and was admitted in labor room. BP at admission
was 140/90 and headache was persistent even after analgesics and
antihypertensives. She was taken up for emergency lower segment
cesarean section (LSCS) in view of imminent eclampsia and bad
bishop score after giving a loading dose of MgSO4. After the delivery
of fetus, intraoperatively left ovary was adherent to posterior uterine
wall and a highly vascular cauliflower like growth was seen extending
from posterior part of left mesosalphinx, left ovary, posterior uterine
wall upto pouch of douglas (Figure 1). Left fallopian tube was free
and right side ovary and tube were normal. Biopsy was taken from the
growth and its histopathological examination was reported as atypical
endometriosis (Figure 2). Markers for ovarian carcinoma (Beta HCG,
LDH,CA-125, CEA, AFP) were within normal limits. Ultrasonogram
done on post operative day 7, reported it as an echogenic lesion,
could be endometriosis. Her course in the ward postoperatively was
uneventful. Patient was discharged on postoperative day 8.
Figure 1 Incidental detection of left ovarian atypical endometriosis during
LSCS extending over posterior uterine wall upto the pouch of Douglas
Figure 2 Left tube is free from the polypoid atypical endometriosis
Discussion
Endometriosis is a benign disease defined by the presence of
endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterus and is associated
with both pelvic pain and infertility. The prevalence of endometriosis
Endocrinol Metab Int J. 2018;6(5):324‒326. 324
© 2018 Tejaswini et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.
Incidental detection of atypical endometriosis during
caesarean section suspicious of malignancy-a case
report
Volume 6 Issue 5 - 2018
T ejaswini B, Chandushree, Ashok Kumar,
Bharathi, Sumayya, Shruthi K, Sreelatha S
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, ESIC-MC & PGIMSR,
India
Correspondence: Sreelatha S, Professor, Department of
Obstetrics & Gynaecology, ESIC-MC & PGIMSR, Bangalore,
India, T el 9448915477, Email
[email protected]
Received: August 23, 2018 | Published: October 30, 2018
Abstract
Endometriosis is defined as presence of endometrium including glands and stroma at
locations other than the uterine cavity. Atypical endometriosis is rarely seen, accounting
for 4.38% amongst endometriosis cases and is reported to possess a precancerous
potential. We are reporting a case of primigravida with term gestation, taken up for
emergency caesarean section in view of severe preeclampsia with imminent signs of
eclampsia. Intraoperatively left ovary was adherent to posterior uterine wall and a
cauliflower like growth was seen extending from posterior part of left mesosalphinx,
left ovary, posterior uterine wall upto pouch of douglas. Biopsy was taken from the
growth and its histopathological examination was reported as atypical endometriosis.
Postoperatively patient was stable and was discharged on postoperative day 8.
Keywords
atypical endometriosis, pregnancy, ceasaeean section, imminent
eclampsia, malignant potential
Endocrinology & Metabolism International Journal
Case Report
Open Access
Incidental detection of atypical endometriosis during caesarean section suspicious of malignancy-a case
report
325
Copyright:
©2018 T ejaswini et al.
Citation: T ejaswini B, Chandushree, Kumar A, et al. Incidental detection of atypical endometriosis during caesarean section suspicious of malignancy-a case
report. Endocrinol Metab Int J. 2018;6(5):324‒326. DOI: 10.15406/emij.2018.06.00206
is 6-10% in women of reproductive age group. 4,5 Nearly 20-25% of
patients are asymptomatic.1
Risk factors are early menarche, short menstrual cycles, 6,7
nulliparity, 1st degree relative, drug exposure to DES, Dioxin
and in younger age group it is usually associated with müllerian
anomalies and cervical or vaginal obstruction. 8 In the recent years
the etiopathogenesis is also attributed to autoimmune disorder. 5
Prolonged lactation and multiparity are protective. 4 The clinical
features of endometriosis are varied, and the presentation depends
on the site of growth and severity of disease. Although usual
presentation being six D’s: dysmenorrheal (most common symptom),
disorders of menstruation, dyspareunia, dyschezia, dysuria and
dull aching chronic pain abdomen. Three types of endometriosis
have been described: peritoneal superficial endometriosis, ovarian
endometriomas, and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). DIE
usually involves the uterosacral ligaments, the rectovaginal space,
and the upper third of the posterior vaginal wall, the bowel, and
the urinary tract. 6 Endometriosis is primarily found in the pelvis:
on the ovaries most commonly, uterus, fallopian tubes, uterosacral
ligaments, broad ligaments, round ligaments, cul-de-sac or ovarian
fossa, as well as on the appendix, large bowel, ureters, bladder, or
rectovaginal septum. Extra-pelvic locations of endometriosis are rare,
but can include the upper abdomen, diaphragm, abdominal wall or
abdominal scar tissue. Peritoneal implants of endometriosis and the
presence of endometriomas are more common on the left side of
the pelvis than the right. The position of the sigmoid colon creates
a sequestered microenvironment around the left adnexa, which
facilitates implantation of endometrial cells regurgitated through the
left tube.4
Laparoscopy with histologic examination of excised lesions is
the gold standard for the diagnosis of endometriosis. The classic
peritoneal implant is a blue-black “powder burn” lesion with varying
amounts of surrounding fibrosis, typically observed on the ovaries
and on peritoneal surfaces in the cul-de-sac, uterosacral ligaments,
and ovarian fossa.11 Less commonly, disease may be found in ovarian
adhesions, yellow- brown patches, in peritoneal defects, or involving
the appendix. 11 Red lesions are highly vascular, proliferative, and
represent an early stage of disease. Pigmented lesions represent more
established or advanced disease.
Endometriosis is biologically the same as basal endometrial tissue.
Microscopically foci of endometriosis consist of glands, stroma cells,
and smooth muscle; they are supplied by nerves, lymphatic vessels,
and blood vessels.12,13 Endometriosis cells express estrogen receptors
(ER α/β) and progesterone receptors (PR A/B) and therefore respond
to endocrine treatment.14–17
Treatment can be medical or surgical depending on the symptoms
and time of presentation. In a young woman with minimal symptoms
medical line of management can be tried, similarly a patient who
has presented in the perimenopausal age group, we can wait till
menopause because the symptoms regress after menopause due to
withdrawal of estrogen and progesterone. Surgical line of treatment
will suffice for such patients who are infertile or young and
symptomatic. The hormonal therapy counteracts only the stimulus
of endometriotic tissue proliferation. The overall recurrence rate is
about 30% for combined therapies and about 35% for the hormonal
treatment alone 19.Medical treatment for pelvic pain and suspected
endometriosis involve trial of NSAIDS or oral contraceptive, if failed
empirical GnRH agonist therapy plus estrogen-progestin add-back
therapy or danazol is used. In case of above medical management
failure and associated infertility, operative laparoscopy is done for
removal of endometriosis and restoration of pelvic anatomy. In our
case, the patient who was neither symptomatic nor infertile, it was an
accidental diagnosis.
Approximately 0.7% to 1.0% of patients with endometriosis
have lesions that undergo malignant transformation. 4 Atypical
glandular changes have been found in 3% to 6% of cases of ovarian
endometriosis. Endometroid adenocarcinomas account for 69% of
reported lesions, with the ovary being the primary site in most cases.4
So the further plan of management for the patient is to follow up with
serial ultrasonography scans and markers for ovarian carcinoma for
early detection and management for malignant transformation of
endometriosis.
Conclusion
Atypical endometriosis was incidentally found during the
caesarean section in a patient with no previous clear symptoms, which
adds this case to the small number of similar cases described. In our
case we decided to take biopsy of the tissue as it was highly vascular
and malignancy had to be ruled out.
Acknowledgments
None.
Conflict of interest
The author declares there is no conflict of interest.
References
1. Bulletti C, Elisabetta M, Battistoni CS, et al. Endometriosis and
Infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27(8):441–447.
2. White KC. Ovarian tumors in pregnancy: a private hospital ten
year survey. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
1973;116(4):544–550.
3. Raffi F, Amer S. Endometriosis. Obstetrics, Gynaecology and
Reproductive Medicine. 2011;21(4):112–117.
4. Ueda Y , Enomoto T, Miyatake T, et al. A retrospective analysis of ovarian
endometriosis during pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 201094(1):78–84.
5. Cramer DW, Missmer SA. The epidemiology of endometriosis. Ann NY
Acad Sci. 2002;955:34–36.
6. Missmer SA, Hankinson SE, Spiegelman D, et al. Incidence
of laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis by demographic,
anthropometric, and lifestyle factors. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;160(8):784–
796.
7. Troncon JK, Zani AC, Vieira AD, et al. Endometriosis in a patient with
mayer-rokitansky-küster-hauser syndrome. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol .
2014;164:218–219.
8. Barrier BF. Immunology of endometriosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol .
2010;57(3):397–402.
9. Stegmann BJ, Sinaii N, Liu S, et al. Using location, color, size, and depth
to characterize and identify endometriosis lesions in a cohort of 133
women. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(6):1632–1636.
10. Gylfason JT, Kristjansson KA, Sverrisdottir G, et al. Pelvic endometriosis
diagnosed in an entire nation over 20 years. Am J Epidemiol.
2010;172(3):237–243.
11. Meyer R, Stoeckel W. Die Pathologie der Bindegewebe . Geschwülste
und der Mischgeschwülste. Handbuch der Gynäkologie, München JF,
editors, Bergmann. 1930;211–853.
Incidental detection of atypical endometriosis during caesarean section suspicious of malignancy-a case
report
326
Copyright:
©2018 T ejaswini et al.
Citation: T ejaswini B, Chandushree, Kumar A, et al. Incidental detection of atypical endometriosis during caesarean section suspicious of malignancy-a case
report. Endocrinol Metab Int J. 2018;6(5):324‒326. DOI: 10.15406/emij.2018.06.00206
12. Mechsner S, Schwarz J, Thode J, et al. Growth-associated protein
43-positive sensory nerve fibers accompanied by immature vessels
are located in or near peritoneal endometriotic lesions. Fertil Steril .
2007;88(3):581–587.
13. Leyendecker G, Wildt L, Mall G. The pathophysiology of endometriosis
and adenomyosis: tissue injury and repair. Arch Gynecol Obstet.
2009;280(4):529–538.
14. Roman H, Vassilieff M, Gourcerol G, et al. Surgical management of deep
infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum: pleading for a symptom-guided
approach. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(2):274–281.
15. Dede M, Yenen MC, Yilmaz A, et al. Treatment of incidental adnexal
masses at caesarean section: a retrospective study. Int J Gynecol Cancer.
2007;17(2):339–341.
16. Ulker V , Gedikbasi A, Numanoglu C, et al. Incidental adnexal masses
at caesarean section and review of the literature. J Obstet Gynecol
Research. 2010;36(3):502–505.
17. Howard W, Jones, John A Rock. Ti Linde’ s operative gynecology. 11th
edn. Endometriosis: 402–444.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.