https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-023-01341-z
EDITORIAL
Pelvic congestion needs attention in infertile women with Budd‑Chiari
syndrome
Anand Sharma1 · C. E. Eapen2
© Indian Society of Gastroenterology 2023
The advances in our understanding of the interplay between
Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) and pregnancy have trans -
lated into improved survival. Earlier reports documented
BCS occurring in pregnant women as a sinister combination
resulting in deaths in up to 50% of the mothers [ 1, 2]. It is
indeed remarkable to note 100% maternal survival in recent
reports of BCS in pregnancy (Table 1).
Many of the reports of BCS in pregnancy are from
India. The largest series of patients with BCS in pregnancy
reported to date features in this issue of this journal [ 6].
The authors of this study document remarkable improve -
ment in maternal survival with no complications related
to pregnancy or liver disease in any of the study patients.
The authors also did not find significant delay in diagnosis
of BCS in their cohort, contrary to older studies of BCS
patients [8]. It is likely that increasing awareness of this con-
dition among clinicians, improved diagnostic modalities and
appropriate treatments all have contributed to the excellent
maternal survival now reported in these patients.
BCS presenting as acute liver failure or acute-on-chronic
liver failure is uncommon and has poorer outcomes. In a
previous report from the same center, clinical presentation
as acute-on-chronic liver failure was noted in 5% of BCS
patients [9]. The current paper on BCS in pregnancy reports
acute presentation of BCS in five out of the 121 (4%) study
patients [6]. Endovascular therapies may improve survival
in these uncommon presentations of BCS [ 9].
In contrast to the success achieved in maternal outcomes
in pregnant women with BCS, fetal outcomes still remain
sub-optimal (Table 1). In addition, infertility continues to
be a problem in women with BCS.
Primary infertility rates of 19.8% 6–25% 4 have been
reported in women with BCS. Metabolic and hormonal
alterations associated with liver dysfunction may contribute
to infertility in women with chronic liver diseases.
Another proposed mechanism of infertility or fetal
losses in BCS may be pelvic congestion. Obstruction of
inferior vena cava (IVC) resulting in congestion of pel -
vic organs, evidenced by dilated pelvic veins, has been
described [ 10]. An analogy to this hypothesis may be
drawn from the link between IVC obstruction and vari -
cocele, which is associated with male infertility. Surgery
to correct varicocele improves male fertility by improving
sperm count and quality [ 11].
One study reported 12 women in whom pelvic congestion
syndrome was considered the only cause for infertility. Ovar-
ian varices noted on transvaginal ultrasound or pelvic veno-
gram were treated by endovascular means. Subsequently,
eight out of the 12 women went on to become pregnant. All
patients experienced complete or partial relief of pelvic pain.
The authors concluded that embolization of ovarian varices
is a safe and effective treatment in women with infertility
linked to ovarian varices, who are trying to conceive [12].
A recent study has highlighted increased risk of new-
onset heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection
fraction in infertile women [13]. However, congestive heart
failure causing pelvic congestion, in turn contributing to
infertility, has not been well studied.
Chronic pelvic pain and presence of atypical varicose
veins are features of pelvic congestion syndrome. Endovas-
cular treatment is being considered for this condition [ 14].
Future studies need to focus on symptoms of pelvic con -
gestion and imaging for varices in ovaries and other pelvic
organs in patients with BCS who are infertile or have had
prior pregnancy losses. Infertility caused by pelvic con -
gestion may be expected to be seen more often in patients
with BCS caused by obstruction at the level of IVC than
of hepatic veins. Studies are needed to see if treatments to
relieve pelvic congestion, if present, will help women with
BCS who are infertile or have had prior fetal loss.
* C. E. Eapen
[email protected]
1 Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute
of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh 249 203, India
2 Department of Hepatology, Christian Medical College,
Vellore, Tamil Nadu 632 004, India
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology (January–February 2023) 42(1):14–16
Published online: 10 February 2023
1 3
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology (January–February 2023) 42(1):14–16
Hormonal pills are used to treat female infertility and
their thrombogenic potential can also lead to exacerbation
of underlying hepatic venous thrombosis in BCS [ 15].
The thrombophilic tendency associated with pregnancy
may predispose to venous thromboembolism. In a study of
72 pregnant women, venous thromboembolism developed
during the first trimester of pregnancy in 29 (40%) women,
in the second trimester in 13 women (18%), and in the
third trimester in 30 women (42%) [ 16]. A population-
based study conducted over 30 years identified postpartum
period as the time with maximal risk for venous throm -
boembolism and pulmonary embolism during pregnancy
[17]. Acute presentation of BCS during pregnancy is
uncommon. Analysis of the clinical features (for exam -
ple, is this more common in any particular trimester of
pregnancy or in postpartum period) may improve our
understanding of this uncommon presentation and lead to
improved treatment outcomes. Being uncommon, multi-
center studies are needed to address this issue.
The use of oral anticoagulants in the first trimester of
pregnancy raises the concern of fetal neural tube defects.
Hence, low molecular weight heparin is recommended dur-
ing the first trimester in women who need anticoagulation
during pregnancy. As low molecular weight heparin is an
expensive parenteral drug, many patients in resource-con -
strained settings opt for oral anticoagulants to treat BCS
during pregnancy. However, teratogenic effects of oral anti-
coagulants are not predictable [ 18].
In conclusion, while the exciting advances achieved in
treating BCS during pregnancy are laudable, there is scope
for further improvement, especially of fetal outcomes in this
scenario.
Declarations
Conflict of interest AS, and CEE declare no competing interests.
Disclaimer The authors are solely responsible for the data and the con-
tents of the paper. In no way, the Honorary Editor-in-Chief, Editorial
Board Members, the Indian Society of Gastroenterology or the printer/
publishers are responsible for the results/findings and content of this
article.
References
1. Khuroo MS, Datta DV. Budd-Chiari syndrome following pregnancy.
Report of 16 cases, with roentgenologic, hemodynamic and histologic
studies of the hepatic outflow tract. Am J Med. 1980;68:113–21.
2. Dilawari JB, Bambery P, Chawla Y, et al. Hepatic outflow obstruc-
tion (Budd-Chiari syndrome) experience with 177 patients and a
review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 1994;73:21–36.
3. Rautou PE, Angermayr B, Garcia-Pagan JC, et al. Pregnancy in
women with known and treated Budd-Chiari syndrome: maternal
and fetal outcomes. J Hepatol. 2009;51:47–54.
4. Shukla A, Sadalage A, Gupta D, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in
women with Budd Chiari Syndrome before onset of symptoms
and after treatment. Liver Int. 2018:754–9.
5. Khan F, Rowe I, Martin B, et al. Outcomes of pregnancy in
patients with known Budd-Chiari syndrome. World J Hepatol.
2017;9:945–52.
6. Biswas S, Sheikh S, Vaishnav M, et al. Pregnancy outcomes
in patients with Budd Chiari syndrome: A tertiary care experi -
ence. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2023;42. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/
s12664- 022- 01307-7.
7. Wiegers H, Hamulyák E, Damhuis S, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in
women with Budd-Chiari syndrome or portal vein thrombosis – a
multicentre retrospective cohort study. BJOG. 2022;129:608–17.
8. Sharma A, Goel A, Moses V, et al. Anticoagulating Budd-Chiari
syndrome patients presenting with variceal bleed: a retrospective
study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;35:1397–1403.
9. Shalimar, Sharma S, Gamanagatti SR, et al. Acute on chronic
liver failure in Budd Chiari syndrome: profile and predictors of
outcome. Dig Dis Sci. 2020;65:2719–29.
10. Priyanka S, Parveen M, Unmesh S. Budd Chiari syndrome pre -
senting as pelvic congestion syndrome : a rare case report. IOSR
J Dent Med Sci. 2016;15:76–7.
11. Jensen CFS, Østergren P, Dupree JM, Ohl DA, Sønksen J, Fode
M. Varicocele and male infertility. Nat Rev Urol. 2017;14:523–33.
12. Liu J, Han L, Han X. The effect of a subsequent pregnancy after
ovarian vein embolization in patients with infertility caused by
pelvic congestion syndrome. Acad Radiol. 2019;26:1373–7.
Table 1 Some of the reported series of Budd-Chiari syndrome and pregnancy
MTP medical termination of pregnancy
Years of study Number of pregnant
women enrolled
Maternal survival Fetal outcome Reference no
1963–1978 16 50% Intrauterine death: 5 (including MTP: 3) [1]
1967–1991 38 48% Data not available [2]
1985–2005 16 100% < 20 weeks gestation: 7, stillbirth: 1 [3]
2012–2015 60 100% < 20 weeks: 59 (including MTP: 5), stillbirth: 10 [4]
2001–2015 7 100% < 20 weeks: 6 [5]
2017–2020 121 100% < 24 weeks: 16, stillbirth: 1, preterm: 5 [6]
2008–2021 12 100% < 24 weeks: 8 [7]
15
1 3
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology (January–February 2023) 42(1):14–16
13. Lau ES, Wang D, Roberts M, et al. Infertility and risk of heart failure in
the Women’s Health Initiative. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79:1594–603.
14. Bałabuszek K, Toborek M, Pietura R. Comprehensive overview
of the venous disorder known as pelvic congestion syndrome. Ann
Med. 2022;54:22–36.
15. Sharma A, Keshava SN, Eapen A, Elias E, Eapen CE. An
update on the management of Budd-Chiari syndrome. Dig Dis
Sci. 2021;66:1780–90.
16. Blanco-Molina A, Trujillo-Santos J, Criado J, et al. Venous throm-
boembolism during pregnancy or postpartum: findings from the
RIETE Registry. Thromb Haemost. 2007;97:186–90.
17. Heit JA, Kobbervig CE, James AH, Petterson TM, Bailey KR,
Melton LJ 3rd. Trends in the incidence of venous thromboembo-
lism during pregnancy or postpartum: a 30-year population-based
study. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:697–706.
18. Dhillon SK, Edwards J, Wilkie J, Bungard TJ. High-versus low-
dose warfarin-related teratogenicity: a case report and systematic
review. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018;40:1348–57
Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to
jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
16
1 3
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.