Protocol for assessing the impacts of the insecticide Mospilan SG (acetamiprid) and the fungicide Folicur (tebuconazole) and their combination on the solitary bees Osmia bicornis and O. brevicornis under semi-field conditions

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Pesticide effect studies on pollinators focus predominantly on the Western honeybee, Apis mellifera , which is also the only species for which EU regulations require risk assessment. Reliance on A. mellifera as the only model species for pollinators has been widely criticized, as its life history traits may lead to differences in pesticide sensitivity and exposure compared to other species. Therefore, current guidelines by EFSA recommend testing also on bumblebees and solitary bees, which has been done in practice almost exclusively on the generalist species Bombus terrestris and Osmia bicornis . Oligolectic bee species remain largely overlooked, which is concerning as they have experienced greater range reductions than generalist species. In addition, pesticide risk to pollinators is typically assessed for individual compounds or products, even though in reality pollinators are exposed to a mixture of several pesticides where synergistic effects may occur. Here, we present a protocol for a semi-field experiment that assesses the effects of two pesticides and their combination on the oligolectic Osmia brevicornis and the generalist O. bicornis . Conducted as part of the EU project WildPosh, the experiment builds on laboratory studies investigating pesticide impacts on pollinator health and is designed to test the effects of realistic exposure levels. Specifically, the experiment, for which we detail the methodology here, tests the insecticide Mospilan SG (a.i. acetamiprid), the fungicide Folicur (a.i. tebuconazole), and their combination. The study follows a full-factorial design using 40 flight cages across four spray treatments—Mospilan SG, Folicur, their combination, and a negative control — with 10 cages per treatment. Adult bees of both species will be exposed to the spray treatments for a minimum of 7 days and various endpoints regarding fitness (i.e., survival and reproduction) as well as foraging behavior of the two species and pollination success will be assessed. The results of this experiment will provide information on whether the spray treatments differentially affect the generalist species O. bicornis and the closely related oligolectic species O. brevicornis , and on any interactions between the insecticide and the fungicide at realistic exposure levels.
Full text 1,150 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Preprint ARPHA Preprints https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e159590 (21 May 2025) https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e159590 (21 May 2025) Submitted to Research Ideas and Outcomes Other versions: - Preprint InfoPreprint Info - CiteCite - MetricsMetrics - CommentComment - RelatedRelated - CitedCited ARPHA Preprints doi: 10.3897/arphapreprints.e159590 First posted 21 May 2025 Authors Alicia Kling - Corresponding author University of Freiburg, Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, Freiburg, Germany Julia Osterman - Corresponding author University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden Tomasz Kiljanek - Corresponding author National Veterinary Research Institute, Puławy, Poland Dimitry Wintermantel - Corresponding author University of Freiburg, Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, Freiburg, Germany Conflict of interest The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. This is an open access preprint distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00