Abstract
Background To assess the efficacy of dysdrogesterone in the treatment of chronic endometritis (CE) treated with
antibiotic in premenopausal women with endometrial polyps (EPs).
Methods
Routine detection of endometrium was simultaneously conducted to determine whether there was CE by
syndecan-1 (CD138), while women underwent hysteroscopic polypectomy in our hospital. Antibiotic was given for
the treatment of CE. A total of 235 premenopausal women with CE who underwent hysteroscopic polypectomy were
enrolled in the retrospective observational study. In the control group, single antibiotic was given for the treatment
of CE form January 2016 to December 2018, and in the treatment group additional dydrogesterone was used from
January 2019 to November 2020. Comparison of cure rates of CE with different treatment regimens was performed.
Results
The cure rates of CE in dydrogesterone and antibiotic combination group and the single antibiotic group
were 85.2% and 74.3%, respectively, with overall cure rate of 80.0% (188/235). The combination group showed better
effects regarding the cure rate of CE (P < .05). Multivariate analysis confirmed that the cure rate of CE was not affected
by age, body mass index, number of EPs, the status of estrogen receptor and the status of progesterone receptor.
Conversely, dydrogesterone and endometrial scratching were beneficial factors for cure rate increase with antibiotic
treatment.
Conclusion
Combination of dydrogesterone and antibiotic was more effective for cure rate of CE than antibiotic
alone in premenopausal women after hysteroscopic polypectomy. Endometrial scratching also contributed to the
cure rate increase with antibiotic treatment.
Keywords
Antibiotic, Chronic endometritis, Combination, Dydrogesterone, Endometrial scratching
Additional dydrogesterone for the treatment
of chronic endometritis treated with antibiotic
in premenopausal women with endometrial
polyps: a retrospective cohort study
Yue Liu1,2†, Xin Yu3†, Jing Huang1, Chengchao Du1, Honggui Zhou1,2, Yamei Yang1 and Dacheng Qu1,2*
Page 2 of 7
Liu et al. BMC Women's Health (2022) 22:435
Background
Endometrial polyps (EPs) is common benign gynecologi -
cal protrusions which represent a localized hyperplastic
overgrowth of stroma and endometrial glands; the preva -
lence of EPs ranges from 7.8 to 34.9% across different
populations [1]. Previous studies have indicated that EPs
is the result of hormonal dysfunction, although inflam -
matory factors such as chronic endometritis (CE) are also
thought to play important roles in the development of
EPs [2]. The prevalence of CE in premenopausal women
with abnormal bleeding or reproductive failure on EPs
was 28.7% [3].
CE is a persistent localized inflammatory condition of
endometrium characterized by the presence of plasma
cell infiltrate in the stroma [ 4, 5]. CE is usually asymp -
tomatic or presents only with subtle symptoms such as
abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic pain, dyspareunia, and
leucorrhea; which are very similar to the symptoms of
EPs [ 6]. CE is associated with infertility, recurrent mis -
carriage and recurrent implantation failure [ 7, 8]. How -
ever, the spontaneous cure rate of CE was very low, 12.7%
reported in a randomized clinical trial [ 9]. Many studies
have shown that the cure rate of CE ranged widely from
27.9 to 92.3% with one course antibiotic because of differ-
ent treatment regimens and different diagnostic creteria
[10– 13].
Dydrogesterone is a selective progesterone receptor
agonist with excellent oral bioavailability and potent pro -
gestogenic activity, while having no androgenic, gluco -
corticoid or estrogenic activity, making it a good option
for progestin therapy [ 14]. The safety of dydrogester -
one has been confirmed in previous literature [ 15]. The
transformation dose of dydrogesterone required for the
secretory transformation of estrogenized human endo -
metrium was 140 mg, leading to effective shedding of
endometrium [ 16]. It can theoretically remove plasma
cells and pathogenic bacteria in superficial layer. Our pre-
vious study had showed that addition of dydrogesterone
was effective for the treatment of chronic endometritis
with antibiotic treatment in premenopausal women [ 17].
Hysteroscopic resection has long been considered as the
gold standard for the treatment of EPs [18]. Post hystero-
scopic progesterone hormone therapy, dydrogesterone of
10 mg twice a day, from day 15 to day 24 of the menstrual
cycle, had favorable clinical effect in treating EPs as it can
effectively prevent the recurrence of EPs, relieve the level
of hemoglobin and reduce endometrial thickness [19].
In the retrospective study we investigated whether
addition of dydrogesterone with antibiotic treatment
increases the cure rate of CE in premenopausal women
who underwent hysteroscopic polypectomy.
Methods
Participants
This retrospective study was conducted from January
2016 to November 2020 in the Department of Obstet -
rics and Gynecology of the Affiliated Hospital of North
Sichuan Medical College in Nanchong, China. Women
diagnosed with CE by CD138 while underwent hystero -
scopic polypectomy in proliferative phase were enrolled
in this study. The study was approved by the Institutional
Review Board of the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan
Medical College. All patients signed the written informed
consent form before participation in the study.
The inclusion criteria were EPs with CE diagnosed by
CD138; agreement to undergo hysteroscopy, hystero -
scopic resection, and endometrial biopsy; no contrain -
dications to dydrogesterone or doxycycline; no severe
systemic diseases. The exclusion criteria were history
or presence of endometrial carcinoma; use of hormone
replacement therapy or hormonal therapy in the preced -
ing 3 months.
Procedure
In the retrospective observational study, single antibiotic
was given for the treatment of CE previously, and addi -
tion of dydrogesterone was used to prevent recurrence
of EPs in women with CE with antibiotic treatment. The
assignment of the medical intervention is not at the dis -
cretion of the investigator. From January 2016 to Decem-
ber 2018, women with CE who underwent hysteroscopic
polypectomy were given single antibiotic for the treat -
ment of CE, oral doxycycline 200 mg daily for 14 days.
From January 2019 to November 2020, women with CE
who underwent hysteroscopic polypectomy were given
one course of dydrogesterone to prevent recurrence of
EPs, oral dydrogesterone of 10 mg twice a day, from day
15 to day 24 of the menstrual cycle, except for the above
antibiotic, oral doxycycline 200 mg daily for 14 days. In
both groups, antibiotic was given once CE was diagnosed
by CD138. A second look hysteroscopy was performed
and endometrial biopsy sample was obtained after com -
pletion of therapy in the next proliferative phase to assess
the response to treatment. Comparison of cure rates of
CE with different treatment regimens was performed.
Hysteroscopic polypectomy, hysteroscopy and
endometrial biopsy
Hysteroscopic polypectomy was conducted in the prolif -
erative phase under intravenous anesthesia using a bipo -
lar resection system, containing a 3-mm 15° inside rigid
hysteroscope and an 8.5-mm outside sheath (Olympus,
Tokyo, Japan). Endometrial biopsies were performed to
exclude endometrial lesions using a unelectrified plasma
cutting ring away from the local polyps. Second look out -
patient hysteroscopy was conducted in the proliferative
Page 3 of 7
Liu et al. BMC Women's Health (2022) 22:435
phase without any anesthesia using a 3-mm 30° inside
rigid hysteroscope and an 4.5-mm outside sheath (Olym -
pus, Tokyo, Japan). Endometrial biopsies were obtained
with the use of a metal curette, from the hysteroscopic
features area, if not, from the upper uterine cavity blindly.
Endometrial scratching
Endometrial scratching was performed in women with
childbearing desire, using a unelectrified plasma cutting
ring while hysteroscopic polypectomy. The scratching
was performed once in each quadrant of the endome -
trium, away from the local EPs.
Diagnosis of CE and immunohistochemistry
Currently, there is no consensus on the diagnostic cri -
teria of CE. CD138 was the preferred immunohisto -
chemical stain to identify plasma cells [ 3, 17, 20– 22].
Pathologists have different views on the diagnosis of
CE: how many CD 138 + cells/HPF [ 21]. However, CE
decreased the pregnancy rate and the live birth rate when
CE was diagnosed as the presence of ≥ 1 plasma cells in
10 high-power fields [22]. In the present study, according
to the clinically relevant CE, CE was diagnosed by CD138
with one or more plasma cell identified per 10 high
power fields (Fig. 1), as widely used in other studies [ 3,
17, 20– 22]. At least 50 high-power fields were examined
per specimen. Endometrial samples for routine histologic
analysis and immunohistochemistry were conducted
as previously described [ 20]. The anti-CD138 monoclo -
nal antibody used in our study was MI15 Cell Marque
(Fuzhou Maixin Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Fuzhou, China).
Slides immunostained for ER (estrogen receptor) and
PR (progesterone receptor) were scored using the Allred
Score [23, 24]. The clone of anti-ER and anti-PR mono -
clonal antibody used in our study were SP1 and SP2
(Fuzhou Maixin Biotechnology Co., Ltd.). ER and PR
were classified as being positive if Allred score equal or
more than 3.
Statistical analyses
All analyses were conducted with the use of SPSS version
22.0 and a P value of < 0.05 was considered to be repre -
sent statistical significance. After analyzing the distribu -
tion of our data and confirming that age and body mass
index (BMI) in the population were not normally distrib -
uted, we adopted a nonparametric method to analyze the
age and BMI. Data are expressed as median (interquartile
range) or percentage. The other intergroup differences
were compared using Chi-squared test. Chi-square test
was used to compare the conversion of CD138 between
groups and subgroups. Logistic regression was carried
out to investigate the factors associated with cure rate of
CE.
Results
Comparison of general and clinical features of patients
During the 5-year study period, A total of 251 premeno -
pausal women with CE who underwent hysteroscopic
polypectomy were enrolled in this study. Sixteen cases
were excluded for various reasons. Finally, 235 cases were
enrolled in the statistical analysis, including 122 cases
with dydrogesterone and doxycycline, and 113 cases with
doxycycline alone (Fig. 2). The demographic details and
clinical features of the two groups are shown in Table 1.
The demographic details and clinical features of the two
groups were not statistically significant (P > .05).
Comparison of cure rate of CE between the two groups
The conversion of CD138 from positive to negative indi -
cated the cure rate of CE. After treatment, the overall
cure rate of CE in the population was 80.0% (188/235).
The dydrogesterone and antibiotic group showed bet -
ter effects regarding the cure rate of CE (Fig. 3, P < .05).
The cure rate of CE was 85.2% (104/122) in the dydro -
gesterone and antibiotic combination group vs. 74.3%
(84/113) in the single antibiotic group (Fig. 3, P = .037).
Among patients with endometrial scratching, the cure
rate of CE was 88.2% (67/76) in the dydrogesterone and
antibiotic combination group vs. 80.3% (53/66) in the
single antibiotic group (P = .197), while without endome -
trial scratching, the cure rate of CE was 80.4% (37/46) in
the dydrogesterone and antibiotic combination group vs.
66.0% (31/47) in the single antibiotic group (P = .115).
Comparison of cure rate of CE between subgroups in the
treatment group
In the treatment group, the cure rates of CE were 83.9%
(73/87) in women with solitary EP and 88.6% (31/35) in
women with multiple EPs, respectively (Fig. 3, P = .586).
Fig. 1 Diagnostic criteria of CE. CE was diagnosed by CD138 with one
or more plasma cell identified per 10 high power fields. At least 50 high-
power fields were examined per specimen
Page 4 of 7
Liu et al. BMC Women's Health (2022) 22:435
This may suggest that the effect of dydrogesterone was
not associated with the number of EPs. The cure rates
of CE were 84.6% (88/104) in women with ER positive
and 88.9% (16/18) in women with ER negative, respec -
tively (Fig. 3). The cure rates of CE were 84.6% (88/104)
in women with PR positive and 88.9% (16/18) in women
with PR negative, respectively (Fig. 3). The influence of
status of ER or PR was undefined because of high expres -
sion of ER and PR in women with CE and EPs.
Factors associated with cure rate of chronic endometritis
Multivariate analysis confirmed that addition of dydro -
gesterone was a beneficial factor for cure rate increase
with antibiotic treatment (Table 2; OR, 2.10 [95% CI,
1.06–4.15]; P = .032). In addition, endometrial scratch -
ing also contributed to cure rate increase with antibi -
otic treatment (Table 2; OR, 2.24 [95% CI, 1.14–4.39];
P = .019). The cure rates of CE with and without endo -
metrial scratching were 84.5% (120/142) and 71.8%
(68/93), respectively (P = .033). endometrial scratching
Table 1 Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the
enrolled patients
Characteristics Dydroges-
terone and an-
tibiotic group
(n = 122)
Antibi-
otic group
(n = 113)
P
value
Age, y (median (Q3-Q1)) 32 (6) 34 (8) 0.081
BMI, kg/m2 (median (Q3-Q1)) 22.0 (3.7) 22.3 (4.6) 0.673
Polyp number, n (%) 0.714
One 35 (28.7%) 30 (26.5%)
Two or more 87 (71.3%) 83 (73.5%)
Endometrial scratching, n (%) 0.543
Yes 76 (62.3%) 66 (58.4%)
No 46 (37.7%) 47 (41.6%)
ER status, n (%) 0.061
Positive 104 (85.2%) 105 (92.9%)
Negative 18 (14.8%) 8 (7.1%)
PR status, n (%) 0.462
Positive 104 (85.2%) 100 (88.5%)
Negative 18 (14.8%) 13 (11.5%)
Note: BMI - body mass index; ER - estrogen receptor; PR - progesterone receptor
Fig. 2 Flow diagram
Page 5 of 7
Liu et al. BMC Women's Health (2022) 22:435
was effective for the treatment of CE. However, in the
treatment group, the cure rates of CE with and without
endometrial scratching were 88.2% (67/76) and 80.4%
(37/46), respectively (Fig. 3, P = .244). This finding may
Fig. 3 Comparison of the cure rate of CE between the treatment and control groups as well as subgroups in each group. (A) Comparison of the cure rate
of CE between the treatment and control groups (*P .05). C and D. Comparison of the cure rate of CE in according to ER and PR status of patients in each group (#P > .05 and #P > .05, respectively).
E. Comparison of the cure rate of CE with or without endometrial scratching in each group (#P > .05)
Page 6 of 7
Liu et al. BMC Women's Health (2022) 22:435
indicate that endometrial scratching did not function in
women using dydrogesterone for CE. Conversely, multi -
variate analysis showed that the cure rate of CE was not
affected by age, BMI, number of EPs, ER status and PR
status.
Discussion
In this retrospective trial of 235 participants with CE
who underwent hysteroscopic polypectomy, combined
administration of dydrogesterone and antibiotic had a
higher cure rate of CE compared with the treatment of
antibiotic alone. The finding supported a beneficial role
of co-treatment with dydrogesterone and antibiotic in
premenopausal patients with CE who underwent hys -
teroscopic polypectomy.
Many studies have shown that impaired inflammatory
state of the endometrium (IISE) is the main cause of most
intrauterine diseases, such as EPs, unexplained infertil -
ity and endometrial cancer [25]. Unlike CE, IISE contains
infectious and non-infectious etiology [ 25]. Dydrogester-
one is effective in the treatment of EPs in premenopausal
women [ 26]. Furthermore, it can effectively prevent the
recurrence of EPs after hysteroscopic polypectomy [ 19].
To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the
treatment of CE after hysteroscopic polypectomy with
combination of dydrogesterone and antibiotic.
In this study, women with combination of dydroges -
terone and antibiotic had a higher cure rate of CE in one
course compared with women with antibiotic alone. The
overall cure rate of CE in premenopausal women was
80.0%. The cure rate of CE with single doxycycline was
74.3%, which is consistent with previous studies [ 10, 12,
17]. With the use of dydrogesterone, the cure rate of CE
reached to an elevated level of 85.2%. Multivariate analy -
sis confirmed that dydrogesterone was a beneficial factor
for cure rate increase with antibiotic treatment (OR, 2.10
[95% CI, 1.06–4.15]; P = .032). The potential mechanisms
underlying the beneficial effect of dydrogesterone is cur -
rently unknown. One of the possible explanation is that
dydrogesterone application can remove plasma cells and
pathogenic bacteria in the superficial layer [ 16]. Syner -
gistic effect occurred with the effect of dydrogesterone
to reduce the severity of CE. In addition, dydrogesterone
may improve the local immune status within the endo -
metrium [14]. Furthermore, progesterone has been found
to function in cell apoptosis of endometrium [27– 29].
It remains unclear if endometrial scratching improves
the chance of pregnancy and, if so, for whom [ 30]. The
procedure is painful, with patients reporting pain scores
of 3–7 out of 10, causes bleeding, and carries a risk of
infection, it entails the inconvenience of attending an
additional clinic and additional charge [31]. In the current
study, endometrial scratching was conducted while hys -
teroscopic polypectomy under intravenous anesthesia, it
can ovoid the above hazard factors. Multivariate analysis
confirmed that endometrial scratching was a beneficial
factor for cure rate increase with antibiotic treatment
(OR, 2.24 [95% CI, 1.14–4.39]; P = .019). This may be the
explanation that endometrial scratching improves the
chance of pregnancy by curing the concealed CE. How -
ever, with the use of dydrogesterone, the cure rates of
CE with and without endometrial scratching were 88.2%
(67/76) and 80.4% (37/46), respectively (P = .244). There
was no additive function with dydrogesterone and endo -
metrial scratching for the treatment of CE.
There are limitations in this study which should be con-
sidered. For example, in the retrospective review, we can
not cover plentiful enough impact factors for cure rate of
CE, concealed factors need to be explored. Furthermore,
only women with CE on EPs were enrolled, women with
CE on other diseases are needed for widely application.
Large, prospective studies will be necessary to confirm
the beneficial role of co-treatment with dydrogester -
one and antibiotic in patients with CE and the potential
mechanisms.
Conclusion
In conclusion, combination of dydrogesterone and anti -
biotic was more effective for CE than antibiotic alone in
premenopausal women after hysteroscopic polypectomy.
Synergistic effect occurred with the effect of dydrogester-
one to reduce the severity of CE. With the same reason,
endometrial scratching also contributed to the cure rate
increase with antibiotic treatment. However, there was
no duplicate effect.
Abbreviations
Eps endometrial polyps
CE chronic endometritis
ER estrogen receptor
PR progesterone receptor
BMI body mass index
IISE impaired inflammatory state of the endometrium
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Wei Xu for processing statistical data.
Author contributions
Conception and design: DQ; Acquisition of data: XY; Analysis and
Interpretation of data: DQ; Drafting of the manuscript: DQ, YL; Critical revision
of the manuscript for important intellectual content: DQ, JH; Statistical
analysis: DQ, CD; Obtaining funding: DQ; Administrative technical or material
support: DQ, YY; Supervision: DQ; HZ. All authors read and approved the final
manuscript.
Table 2 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors
associated with cure rate of chronic endometritis
Variables Cure rate of CE
OR (95% CI)
P
value
Treatment (dydrogesterone and antibiotic) 2.10 (1.06–4.15) 0.032
Endometrial scratching 2.24 (1.14–4.39) 0.019
Page 7 of 7
Liu et al. BMC Women's Health (2022) 22:435
Funding
The work was supported by the Sichuan Science and Technology Program
(2018SZ0264) and Bureau of Science and Technology Nanchong City
(19SXHZ0338).
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from
the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Affiliated
Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College [2019ER(R)017]. All patients signed
the written informed consent form before participation in the study. All
Methods
were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and
regulations.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Received: 26 April 2022 / Accepted: 27 October 2022
References
1. Clark TJ, Stevenson H. Endometrial Polyps and Abnormal Uterine Bleeding
(AUB-P): What is the relationship, how are they diagnosed and how are they
treated? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;40:89–104.
2. Indraccolo U, Di Iorio R, Matteo M, Corona G, Greco P , Indraccolo SR. The
pathogenesis of endometrial polyps: a systematic semi-quantitative review.
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2013;34:5–22.
3. Song D, Feng X, Zhang Q, Xia E, Xiao Y, Xie W, et al. Prevalence and confound-
ers of chronic endometritis in premenopausal women with abnormal bleed-
ing or reproductive failure. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;36:78–83.
4. Kitaya K, Takeuchi T, Mizuta S, Matsubayashi H, Ishikawa T. Endometritis: new
time, new concepts. Fertil Steril. 2018;110:344–50.
5. Puente E, Alonso L, Laganà AS, Ghezzi F, Casarin J, Carugno J. Chronic Endo-
metritis: Old Problem, Novel Insights and Future Challenges. Int J Fertil Steril.
2020;13:250–6.
6. Kasius JC, Fatemi HM, Bourgain C, Sie-Go DM, Eijkemans RJ, Fauser BC, et al.
The impact of chronic endometritis on reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril.
2011;96:1451–6.
7. Cicinelli E, Matteo M, Trojano G, Mitola PC, Tinelli R, Vitagliano A, et al. Chronic
endometritis in patients with unexplained infertility: Prevalence and effects
of antibiotic treatment on spontaneous conception. Am J Reprod Immunol.
2018;79.
8. Li Y, Yu S, Huang C, Lian R, Chen C, Liu S, et al. Evaluation of peripheral and
uterine immune status of chronic endometritis in patients with recurrent
reproductive failure. Fertil Steril. 2020;113:187 – 96.e1.
9. Song D. RCT(Randomized Clinical Trial) of Antibiotic Therapy in Chronic
Endometritis - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov. NIH: U.S. National Library of
Medicine; 2016.
10. Cicinelli E, Matteo M, Tinelli R, Lepera A, Alfonso R, Indraccolo U, et al.
Prevalence of chronic endometritis in repeated unexplained implanta-
tion failure and the IVF success rate after antibiotic therapy. Hum Reprod.
2015;30:323–30.
11. Johnston-MacAnanny EB, Hartnett J, Engmann LL, Nulsen JC, Sanders
MM, Benadiva CA. Chronic endometritis is a frequent finding in women
with recurrent implantation failure after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril.
2010;93:437–41.
12. McQueen DB, Bernardi LA, Stephenson MD. Chronic endometritis in
women with recurrent early pregnancy loss and/or fetal demise. Fertil Steril.
2014;101:1026–30.
13. Kitaya K, Matsubayashi H, Takaya Y, Nishiyama R, Yamaguchi K, Takeuchi T, et
al. Live birth rate following oral antibiotic treatment for chronic endometritis
in infertile women with repeated implantation failure. Am J Reprod Immunol.
2017;78.
14. Schindler AE. Progestational effects of dydrogesterone in vitro, in vivo and on
the human endometrium. Maturitas. 2009;65(Suppl 1):3–11.
15. Trivedi N, Chauhan N, Vaidya V. Effectiveness and safety of dydrogesterone in
regularization of menstrual cycle: a post-marketing study. Gynecol Endocri-
nol. 2016;32:667–71.
16. Kuhl H. Pharmacology of estrogens and progestogens: influence of different
routes of administration. Climacteric. 2005;8(Suppl 1):3–63.
17. Qu D, Yang M, Tong L, Yu X, Jing Q, Yang Y, et al. Combination of Dydroges-
terone and Antibiotic Versus Antibiotic Alone for Chronic Endometritis: a
Randomized Controlled Trial Study. Reprod Sci. 2021;28:3073–80.
18. ADSS NC. State-of-the-art hysteroscopic approaches to pathologies of the
genital tract. Tuttlingen (Germany): Endo Press; 2014.
19. Li F, Wei S, Yang S, Liu Z, Nan F. Post hysteroscopic progesterone hor-
mone therapy in the treatment of endometrial polyps. Pak J Med Sci.
2018;34:1267–71.
20. Song D, Li TC, Zhang Y, Feng X, Xia E, Huang X, et al. Correlation between
hysteroscopy findings and chronic endometritis. Fertil Steril. 2019;111:772–9.
21. Margulies SL, Dhingra I, Flores V, Hecht JL, Fadare O, Pal L, et al. The Diagnostic
Criteria for Chronic Endometritis: A Survey of Pathologists. Int J Gynecol
Pathol. 2021;40:556–62.
22. Hirata K, Kimura F, Nakamura A, Kitazawa J, Morimune A, Hanada T, et al. His-
tological diagnostic criterion for chronic endometritis based on the clinical
outcome. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21:94.
23. Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, Allred DC, Hagerty KL, Badve S, et al.
American Society of Clinical Oncology/College Of American Pathologists
guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen
and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2784–95.
24. Phillips T, Murray G, Wakamiya K, Askaa J, Huang D, Welcher R, et al. Develop-
ment of standard estrogen and progesterone receptor immunohistochemi-
cal assays for selection of patients for antihormonal therapy. Appl Immuno-
histochem Mol Morphol. 2007;15:325–31.
25. Drizi A, Djokovic D, Laganà AS, van Herendael B. Impaired inflammatory state
of the endometrium: a multifaceted approach to endometrial inflammation.
Current insights and future directions. Prz Menopauzalny. 2020;19:90–100.
26. Chen Q, Zhang D, Wang S, Lang JH, Chao XP , Fan QB. A prospective, open-
label, single-arm study to evaluate the efficacy of dydrogesterone in the
treatment of endometrial polyps. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2021;37:152–6.
27. Feng M, Zhang T, Ma H. Progesterone ameliorates the endometrial polyp by
modulating the signaling pathway of Wnt and β-catenin via regulating the
expression of H19 and miR-152. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120:10164–74.
28. Xie YL, Yang YJ, Tang C, Sheng HJ, Jiang Y, Han K, et al. Estrogen combined
with progesterone decreases cell proliferation and inhibits the expression
of Bcl-2 via microRNA let-7a and miR-34b in ovarian cancer cells. Clin Transl
Oncol. 2014;16:898–905.
29. Taylor LJ, Jackson TL, Reid JG, Duffy SR. The differential expression of oestro-
gen receptors, progesterone receptors, Bcl-2 and Ki67 in endometrial polyps.
BJOG. 2003;110:794–8.
30. van Hoogenhuijze NE, Kasius JC, Broekmans FJM, Bosteels J, Torrance HL.
Endometrial scratching prior to IVF; does it help and for whom? A systematic
review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Open. 2019;2019:hoy025.
31. Lensen S, Venetis C, Ng EHY, Young SL, Vitagliano A, Macklon NS, et al. Should
we stop offering endometrial scratching prior to in vitro fertilization? Fertil
Steril. 2019;111:1094–101.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affiliations.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.