Prevalence of Infections After In-Office Hysteroscopy in Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Women
other
OA: closed
public-domain-us
AI-generated summary
This observational study found a 0.06% infection rate after in-office hysteroscopies in nearly 43,000 women, suggesting routine antibiotic prophylaxis is not required.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence of infection after diagnostic and operative hysteroscopic procedures performed in an in-office setting with different distension media (saline solution or CO2).
DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, observational study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
SETTING: Tertiary women's health centers.
PATIENTS: A total of 42,934 women who underwent hysteroscopy between 2015 and 2017.
INTERVENTIONS: Of the 42,934 patients evaluated, 34,248 underwent a diagnostic intervention and 8686 underwent an operative intervention; 17,973 procedures used CO2 and 24,961 used saline solution as a distension medium. Patients were contacted after the procedure to record postprocedure symptoms suggestive of infection, including 2 or more of the following signs occurring within the 3 weeks after hysteroscopy: fever; lower abdominal pain; uterine, adnexal, or cervical motion tenderness; purulent leukorrhea; vaginal discharge or itchiness; and dysuria. Vaginal culture, clinical evaluation, transvaginal ultrasound, and histological evaluation were completed to evaluate symptoms.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Operative hysteroscopies comprised polypectomies (n = 7125; 82.0%), metroplasty (n = 731; 15.0%), myomectomy (n = 378; 7.8%), and tubal sterilization (n = 194; 4.0%). Twenty-five of the 42,934 patients (0.06%) exhibited symptoms of infection, including 24 patients (96%) with fever, 11 (45.8%) with fever as a single symptom, 7 (29.2%) with fever with pelvic pain, and 10 (41.7%) with fever with dysuria. In 5 patients with fever and pelvic pain, clinical examination and transvaginal ultrasound revealed monolateral or bilateral tubo-ovarian abscess. In these patients, histological examination from surgical specimens revealed the presence of endometriotic lesions.
CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that routine antibiotic prophylaxis is not necessary before hysteroscopy because the prevalence of infections following in-office hysteroscopy is low (0.06%).
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-08-23T09:30:01.253652+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:19:37.156494+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine