Decorrelation by gain control in the mouse olfactory bulb

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Classifying sensory stimuli requires neural circuits to transform overlapping inputs into representations that are more distinct and decodable. Odour representations in the olfactory bulb (OB) have been reported to decorrelate from sensory input to output, a transformation thought to enhance odour separability. What has been missing is a systematic quantification of this transformation across odours, and a mechanistic account of how it can be implemented by OB circuitry. Using in vivo two-photon calcium imaging, we recorded glomerular input and output responses to a chemically diverse panel of 47 odours in mice. We observed a robust decorrelation of odour-evoked activity patterns from input to output: correlations between odour representations were consistently reduced, while overall response variance was preserved. This transformation increased the dimensionality of the population code and improved the separability of odour representations. Consistent with this, classification analyses showed that odour identity could be decoded with significantly higher accuracy at the output. To understand the mechanisms underlying this transformation, we developed a linear model of the OB with different levels of connectivity. Models in which each channel underwent only self-gain modulation reproduced the observed decorrelation nearly as well as models with fully unconstrained lateral connectivity. Analysis revealed that channels contributing unique information were selectively amplified, while redundant channels were attenuated. Together, our results show that the OB implements a measurable input–output transformation that enhances odour separability. By combining systematic recordings with computational modelling, we found that feedforward gain modulation serves as a simple and scalable mechanism capable of explaining the observed decorrelation, reframing how we understand the functional architecture of early olfactory processing.
Full text 2,040 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Classifying sensory stimuli requires neural circuits to transform overlapping inputs into representations that are more distinct and decodable. Odour representations in the olfactory bulb (OB) have been reported to decorrelate from sensory input to output, a transformation thought to enhance odour separability. What has been missing is a systematic quantification of this transformation across odours, and a mechanistic account of how it can be implemented by OB circuitry. Using in vivo two-photon calcium imaging, we recorded glomerular input and output responses to a chemically diverse panel of 47 odours in mice. We observed a robust decorrelation of odour-evoked activity patterns from input to output: correlations between odour representations were consistently reduced, while overall response variance was preserved. This transformation increased the dimensionality of the population code and improved the separability of odour representations. Consistent with this, classification analyses showed that odour identity could be decoded with significantly higher accuracy at the output. To understand the mechanisms underlying this transformation, we developed a linear model of the OB with different levels of connectivity. Models in which each channel underwent only self-gain modulation reproduced the observed decorrelation nearly as well as models with fully unconstrained lateral connectivity. Analysis revealed that channels contributing unique information were selectively amplified, while redundant channels were attenuated. Together, our results show that the OB implements a measurable input–output transformation that enhances odour separability. By combining systematic recordings with computational modelling, we found that feedforward gain modulation serves as a simple and scalable mechanism capable of explaining the observed decorrelation, reframing how we understand the functional architecture of early olfactory processing. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00