Interpretable Machine Learning for Life Expectancy Prediction: A Comparative Study of Linear Regression, Decision Tree, and Random Forest

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Life expectancy is a fundamental indicator of population health and socio-economic well-being, yet accurately forecasting it remains challenging due to the interplay of demographic, environmental, and healthcare factors. This study evaluates three machine learning models—Linear Regression (LR), Re- gression Decision Tree (RDT), and Random Forest (RF), using a real-world da- taset drawn from World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations (UN) sources. After extensive preprocessing to address missing values and inconsist- encies, each model’s performance was assessed with R2, Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). Results show that RF achieves the highest predictive accuracy (R2 = 0.9423), significantly outperforming LR and RDT. Interpretability was prioritized through p-values for LR and feature- importance metrics for the tree-based models, revealing immunization rates (diphtheria, measles) and demographic attributes (HIV/AIDS, adult mortality) as critical drivers of life-expectancy predictions. These insights underscore the syn- ergy between ensemble methods and transparency in addressing public-health challenges. Future research should explore advanced imputation strategies, alter- native algorithms (e.g., neural networks), and updated data to further refine pre- dictive accuracy and support evidence-based policymaking in global health con- texts.
Full text 11,352 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Interpretable Machine Learning for Life Expectancy Prediction: A Comparative Study of Linear Regression, Decision Tree, and Random Forest | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Interpretable Machine Learning for Life Expectancy Prediction: A Comparative Study of Linear Regression, Decision Tree, and Random Forest Roman Dolgopolyi, Ioanna Amaslidou, Agrippina Margaritou This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6968809/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Life expectancy is a fundamental indicator of population health and socio-economic well-being, yet accurately forecasting it remains challenging due to the interplay of demographic, environmental, and healthcare factors. This study evaluates three machine learning models—Linear Regression (LR), Re- gression Decision Tree (RDT), and Random Forest (RF), using a real-world da- taset drawn from World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations (UN) sources. After extensive preprocessing to address missing values and inconsist- encies, each model’s performance was assessed with R2, Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). Results show that RF achieves the highest predictive accuracy (R2 = 0.9423), significantly outperforming LR and RDT. Interpretability was prioritized through p-values for LR and feature- importance metrics for the tree-based models, revealing immunization rates (diphtheria, measles) and demographic attributes (HIV/AIDS, adult mortality) as critical drivers of life-expectancy predictions. These insights underscore the syn- ergy between ensemble methods and transparency in addressing public-health challenges. Future research should explore advanced imputation strategies, alter- native algorithms (e.g., neural networks), and updated data to further refine pre- dictive accuracy and support evidence-based policymaking in global health con- texts. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Bioinformatics Machine learning interpretability healthcare life expectancy value linear regression decision regression tree random forest Full Text Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6968809","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":475948405,"identity":"e1723624-7cea-4559-93b5-26d217484e18","order_by":0,"name":"Roman Dolgopolyi","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9884-8386","institution":"The American College of Greece","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Roman","middleName":"","lastName":"Dolgopolyi","suffix":""},{"id":475948406,"identity":"09f6179c-45a0-4fb7-aaab-ea0d54346069","order_by":1,"name":"Ioanna Amaslidou","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The American College of Greece","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ioanna","middleName":"","lastName":"Amaslidou","suffix":""},{"id":475948407,"identity":"8cb59f39-184a-40bc-886c-03175684e2f8","order_by":2,"name":"Agrippina Margaritou","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The American College of Greece","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Agrippina","middleName":"","lastName":"Margaritou","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-06-24 20:50:04","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6968809/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6968809/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":85447282,"identity":"f274f081-0a23-4663-b520-db1323645534","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-06-26 03:15:07","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1092295,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"InterpretableMachineLearning.LifeExpectancyPrediction.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6968809/v1_covered_37d1a04f-edcb-4dac-b34a-427a295fb49c.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInterpretable Machine Learning for Life Expectancy Prediction: A Comparative Study of Linear Regression, Decision Tree, and Random Forest\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"The American College of Greece","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Machine learning, interpretability, healthcare, life expectancy value, linear regression, decision regression tree, random forest","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6968809/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6968809/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eLife expectancy is a fundamental indicator of population health and socio-economic well-being, yet accurately forecasting it remains challenging due to the interplay of demographic, environmental, and healthcare factors. This study evaluates three machine learning models—Linear Regression (LR), Re- gression Decision Tree (RDT), and Random Forest (RF), using a real-world da- taset drawn from World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations (UN) sources. After extensive preprocessing to address missing values and inconsist- encies, each model’s performance was assessed with R2, Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). Results show that RF achieves the highest predictive accuracy (R2 = 0.9423), significantly outperforming LR and RDT. Interpretability was prioritized through p-values for LR and feature- importance metrics for the tree-based models, revealing immunization rates (diphtheria, measles) and demographic attributes (HIV/AIDS, adult mortality) as critical drivers of life-expectancy predictions. These insights underscore the syn- ergy between ensemble methods and transparency in addressing public-health challenges. Future research should explore advanced imputation strategies, alter- native algorithms (e.g., neural networks), and updated data to further refine pre- dictive accuracy and support evidence-based policymaking in global health con- texts.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Interpretable Machine Learning for Life Expectancy Prediction: A Comparative Study of Linear Regression, Decision Tree, and Random Forest","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-06-26 03:07:00","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6968809/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"51572a6c-aa98-4e0b-be34-4e701eb19673","owner":[],"postedDate":"June 26th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":50540852,"name":"Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning"},{"id":50540853,"name":"Bioinformatics"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-06-26T03:07:00+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-06-26 03:07:00","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6968809","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6968809","identity":"rs-6968809","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00