Beyond the vaginal route: successful oocyte retrieval using a transabdominally adapted transvaginal ultrasound probe in a frozen pelvis: a case report

In: International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026 · vol. 15(8) , pp. 3312–3318 · doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20262582 · W7171694325
article OA: diamond CC0
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-08-06

This case report details successful transabdominal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval using an adapted transvaginal probe in a patient with severely distorted pelvic anatomy precluding conventional transvaginal access.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-17 · read from full text

This case report describes a 38-year-old woman with primary infertility, diminished ovarian reserve, and diffuse uterine adenomyosis who presented with complex pelvic adhesions from prior surgeries. Conventional transvaginal oocyte retrieval was deemed anatomically precluded due to distorted adnexal structures, prompting the use of a high-frequency transvaginal ultrasound probe applied transabdominally to guide follicular aspiration. The procedure successfully yielded five oocytes without procedural morbidity, demonstrating that this adapted technique is a safe and effective alternative when standard access is impossible. This paper is centrally about adenomyosis — specifically, it illustrates how severe adenomyosis and associated adhesions can complicate assisted reproductive technology procedures by distorting pelvic anatomy.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicular aspiration constitutes the gold standard for oocyte retrieval in assisted reproductive technology (ART). However, complex pelvic pathology including severe adhesive disease, adenomyosis, and sequelae of prior pelvic surgery may profoundly distort adnexal anatomy, rendering conventional transvaginal access technically hazardous or anatomically precluded. We present a 38-year-old woman with primary infertility of 12 years’ duration, diminished ovarian reserve (DOR), diffuse uterine adenomyosis, and a complex surgical history encompassing open myomectomy and adenomyomectomy, referred for in vitro fertilization (IVF). Baseline ultrasonography disclosed markedly distorted adnexal anatomy with bilateral ovarian adhesion to adjacent pelvic structures. Following controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) via a clomiphene citrate–GnRH antagonist protocol, bilateral ovarian inaccessibility via the transvaginal route was confirmed intraoperatively. Transabdominal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval was therefore performed using a high-frequency transvaginal transducer repositioned and applied abdominally. Five dominant follicles were successfully aspirated without procedural morbidity, yielding five oocytes. Transabdominal oocyte retrieval employing an abdominally applied transvaginal ultrasound transducer is a technically feasible, safe, and clinically effective alternative in patients in whom conventional transvaginal retrieval is anatomically precluded. This approach may avert cycle cancellation and optimise cumulative oocyte yield in poor ovarian responders with complex adnexal anatomy.
Full text 4,741 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Beyond the vaginal route: successful oocyte retrieval using a transabdominally adapted transvaginal ultrasound probe in a frozen pelvis: a case report DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20262582Keywords: Transabdominal oocyte retrieval, Transvaginal ultrasound probe, In vitro fertilization, Inaccessible ovaries, Pelvic adhesions, Diminished ovarian reserve, Assisted reproductive technologyAbstract Transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicular aspiration constitutes the gold standard for oocyte retrieval in assisted reproductive technology (ART). However, complex pelvic pathology including severe adhesive disease, adenomyosis, and sequelae of prior pelvic surgery may profoundly distort adnexal anatomy, rendering conventional transvaginal access technically hazardous or anatomically precluded. We present a 38-year-old woman with primary infertility of 12 years’ duration, diminished ovarian reserve (DOR), diffuse uterine adenomyosis, and a complex surgical history encompassing open myomectomy and adenomyomectomy, referred for in vitro fertilization (IVF). Baseline ultrasonography disclosed markedly distorted adnexal anatomy with bilateral ovarian adhesion to adjacent pelvic structures. Following controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) via a clomiphene citrate–GnRH antagonist protocol, bilateral ovarian inaccessibility via the transvaginal route was confirmed intraoperatively. Transabdominal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval was therefore performed using a high-frequency transvaginal transducer repositioned and applied abdominally. Five dominant follicles were successfully aspirated without procedural morbidity, yielding five oocytes. Transabdominal oocyte retrieval employing an abdominally applied transvaginal ultrasound transducer is a technically feasible, safe, and clinically effective alternative in patients in whom conventional transvaginal retrieval is anatomically precluded. This approach may avert cycle cancellation and optimise cumulative oocyte yield in poor ovarian responders with complex adnexal anatomy. Metrics References Wikland M, Enk L, Hammarberg K, Nilsson L. Use of a vaginal transducer for oocyte retrieval in an IVF/ET program. J Clin Ultrasound. 1987;15(4):245-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.1870150405 Barton SE, Politch JA, Benson CB, Ginsburg ES, Gargiulo AR. Transabdominal follicular aspiration for oocyte retrieval in patients with ovaries inaccessible by transvaginal ultrasound. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(5):1773-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.006 Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L. ESHRE Working Group on Poor Ovarian Response Definition. ESHRE consensus on the definition of ‘poor response’ to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(7):1616-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der092 Drakopoulos P, Bardhi E, Boudry L, Vaiarelli A, Makrigiannakis A, Esteves SC, et al. Update on the management of poor ovarian response in IVF: the shift from Bologna criteria to the Poseidon concept. Ther Adv Reprod Health. 2020;14:2633494120941480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2633494120941480 Melado L, Lawrenz B, Fatemi H. Rethinking the route of oocyte retrieval: when one procedure does not fit all. Reprod Biomed Online. 2026;53(2):105739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2026.105739 Sönmezer M, Saçıntı KG, Gülümser Ç, Özkavukçu S, Atabekoğlu C, Şükür YE, et al. Transabdominal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval for oocyte cryopreservation using a vaginal probe: a comparison of applicability, effectiveness, and safety with conventional transvaginal approach. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023;40(2):399-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02705-8 Jia R, Li Z, Guan Y, Zhang W, Wang K, Yao Z. Transabdominal and transvaginal egg retrieval guided by a vaginal ultrasound probe in an adenomyosis patient: a case report. Curr Med Res Opin. 2023;39(5):797-801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2023.2192609 Yang G, Wang S, Lin H, Yuan P, Zhang Q, Chen H. Modified transabdominal oocyte retrieval guided by vaginal ultrasound probe: a case report and literature review. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2025;2025:5530041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/crog/5530041 Vercellini P, Consonni D, Dridi D, Bracco B, Frattaruolo MP, Somigliana E. Uterine adenomyosis and in vitro fertilization outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(5):964-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu041 Cozzolino M, Tartaglia S, Pellegrini L, Troiano G, Rizzo G, Petraglia F, et al. The effect of uterine adenomyosis on IVF outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Sci. 2022;29(11):3177-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00818-6

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (3)

References (10)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-09-22T06:03:52.055327+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK