Abstract
Background Lower socioeconomic position (SEP) is associated with adverse pregnancy and
perinatal outcomes and with less favourable metabolic profile in nonpregnant adults.
However, socioeconomic differences in pregnancy metabolic profile are unknown. We
investigated association between a composite measure of SEP and pregnancy metabolic
profile in White European (WE) and South Asian (SA) women.
Methods
We included 3,905 WE and 4,404 SA pregnant women from a population-based
UK cohort. Latent class analysis was applied to nineteen individual, household, and area-
based SEP indicators (collected by questionnaires or linkage to residential address) to derive
a composite SEP latent variable. Targeted nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy was used
to determine 148 metabolic traits from mid-pregnancy serum samples. Associations between
SEP and metabolic traits were examined using linear regressions adjusted for gestational age
and weighted by latent class probabilities. An interactive application was developed for
exploring all association results (https://aelhak.shinyapps.io/SEP_NMR_BiB/
).
Results
Five SEP sub-groups were identified and labelled ‘Highest SEP’ (48% WE and 52%
SA), ‘High-Medium SEP’ (77% and 23%), ‘Medium SEP’ (56% and 44%) ‘Low-Medium
SEP’ (21% and 79%), and ‘Lowest SEP’ (52% and 48%). Lower SEP was associated with
more adverse levels of 113 metabolic traits, including lower high-density lipoprotein (HDL)
and higher triglycerides and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) traits. For example, mean
standardized difference (95%CI) in concentration of small VLDL particles (vs. Highest SEP)
was 0.12 standard deviation (SD) units (0.05 to 0.20) for ‘Medium SEP’ and 0.25SD (0.18 to
0.32) for ‘Lowest SEP’. There was statistical evidence of ethnic differences in associations of
SEP with 31 traits, primarily characterised by stronger associations in WE women e.g., mean
difference in HDL cholesterol in WE and SA women respectively (vs. Highest-SEP) was -
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
3
0.30SD (-0.41 to -0.20) and -0.16SD (-0.27 to -0.05) for ‘Medium SEP’, and -0.62SD (-0.72
to -0.52) and -0.29SD (-0.40 to -0.20) for ‘Lowest SEP’.
Conclusions
We found widespread socioeconomic differences in metabolic traits in pregnant
WE and SA women residing in the UK, and clearer socioeconomic gradient for some traits in
WE women. Supporting all pregnant women in the most disadvantaged socioeconomic
groups may provide the greatest benefit for perinatal health.
Keywords
ethnicity, metabolomics, pregnancy, socioeconomic
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
4
Background
Extensive changes in maternal circulating metabolites occur during pregnancy, which are
likely to be important for maternal health and normal fetal development1-3, with some of
these metabolites associating with adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes4-6. Studies
indicate that lower socioeconomic position (SEP) associates with adverse pregnancy and
perinatal outcomes, including gestational diabetes, preterm birth, and small-for-gestational-
age
7-9. Lower SEP (indicated by a lower educational level and occupational class) has also
been associated with worse metabolic profile in adolescents and adults10 however, to the best
of our knowledge, SEP differences in pregnancy metabolic profile have not been examined.
Besides SEP, ethnicity differences in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes9,11-13 and metabolic
traits have been reported14. For example, evidence from the Born in Bradford (BiB) cohort
shows that South Asian pregnant women had higher levels of amino acids, fatty acids, and
glucose, and lower levels of cholesterol and lipoproteins than White Europeans14. Findings
from BiB also show differences in SEP between White European and South Asian women15,
and studies report differences between ethnic groups in associations of SEP with pregnancy
and perinatal outcomes7,8. Understanding socioeconomic differences in pregnancy metabolic
profiles, including across ethnic groups, may help inform public health interventions. Further,
studies often relate only one or a small number of indicators of SEP to an outcome, and so
rarely acknowledge that SEP is multidimensional and reflects different but related factors
including education, occupation, income, wealth, assets, and area deprivation16,17.
The aim of this study was to examine the associations between a composite measure of SEP,
that should better reflect its multidimensional nature, and mid-pregnancy metabolic profiles
in White European and South Asian women.
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
5
Methods
This study was done according to a pre-specified and publicly available analysis plan18 and is
reported in line with the STROBE guidelines.
Cohort description
BiB is a population-based prospective pregnancy cohort that included 12,453 women who
experienced 13,776 pregnancies between 2007 and 2011
19. Most women were recruited at
approximately 26–28 weeks gestation at their oral glucose tolerance test, which is offered to
all women booked for delivery at Bradford Royal Infirmary. BiB has almost an equal split of
White European and South Asian women, all residing in Bradford, UK, a city in the North of
England with high levels of socioeconomic deprivation (the BiB study was started due to a
high prevalence of poor child health in the city). Mothers, and their partners, recruited into
the study provided detailed interview questionnaire data, measurements, and biological
samples. The study website gives further information, including protocols, information on
data access, and a list of all data (https://borninbradford.nhs.uk/research/documents-data/
).
For this study, we included all first enrolled pregnancies to White European and South Asian
women (the two main ethnic groups in BiB). After excluding other ethnicities, and those with
missing data on SEP, metabolic traits, and gestational age at measurement of metabolic traits,
our analysis sample comprised of 3,905 White Europeans and 4,404 South Asians (Figure 1).
Ethnicity assessment and groups
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
6
Ethnicity was reported by the mother at the recruitment questionnaire interview or abstracted
from medical records (for those missing questionnaire data) and defined according to the UK
Office for National Statistics guidelines. For our main analysis, ethnicity groups were defined
as White European or South Asian. White European ethnicity included women that indicated
they were White British (n=4,489) or other White European (n=306). South Asian ethnicity
included women that indicated they were Pakistani (n=5,128), Indian (n=439), Bangladeshi
(n=263) or other South Asian heritage (n=63).
Indicators of SEP
A total of 19 individual-, household- and area-based indicators of SEP were used to derive a
composite SEP latent variable (Table 1). All individual- and household-based indicators were
reported by the mother using questionnaires in pregnancy, and the area-based indicator was
based on linkage to residential address.
Area SEP was based on the English Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) Score in 2007 (i.e.,
at the time of pregnancy). IMD is a relative composite measure of multiple deprivation at
small area level across England (mean population size in each area is 1500 residents). The
domains used to derive IMD in 2007 were income deprivation; employment deprivation;
health deprivation and disability; education deprivation; crime deprivation; barriers to
housing and services deprivation; and living environment deprivation.
Individual-based indicators reflect educational attainment, occupation, need for financial
benefits, and financial circumstances. The highest educational qualification obtained by the
woman and the baby’s father was recorded along with the country it was obtained in. We
equivalised the highest educational qualifications (based on qualification received and the
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
7
country obtained) into one of seven categories using the UK National Academic Recognition
Information Center. Those with equivalised education coded as other, foreign unknown, or do
not know were excluded from each education variable. Because over 25% of women reported
that they had never been employed, women’s employment was coded as currently employed,
previously employed, or never employed. The baby’s father’s occupation was coded based on
the National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification. Those coded as student, unemployed,
or don’t know were excluded from this variable.
Women were coded as being in receipt of means tested benefits if they reported receiving any
of income support, income tested jobs seekers allowance, working families tax credit, or
housing benefit. Women were asked how well they are managing financially with responses
being either living comfortably, doing alright, just about getting by, or quite difficult or very
difficult. Women were also asked how they are doing financially compared to a year ago,
with responses coded as better off, worse off, about the same, or does not wish to answer.
Those coded as does not wish to answer were excluded from this variable. Women also
reported if they were able to have two pairs of all-weather shoes, money to make regular
savings of £10 a month, and a small amount of money to spend each week on themselves.
Household-based indicators reflected questions about housing tenure, overcrowding, and
ownership of material items and goods based on questions from the Households Below
Average Income Survey. Housing tenure was reported as one of seven groups; owns outright,
owns with a mortgage, lives rent free, owned by a private landlord, living in social housing,
other and don’t know. Those coded as living rent free, other, or don’t know were excluded
from this variable. Responses to questions on numbers of household members and bedrooms
were used to derive an indicator of overcrowding based on the person per room approach
20 by
dividing the number of persons by the number of bedrooms in this household. Women were
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
8
also asked whether they were up to date with household bills, if they had contents insurance,
enough money to keep the home in a decent state of repair, money to replace any worn out
furniture, money to replace or repair major electrical goods, and if they were able to keep
their home warm enough in winter. For each of these variables, women that responded as
don't want/need, doesn't wish to answer, or don't know were excluded.
Pregnancy metabolic traits
Full details of all metabolomic measurements undertaken in BiB have been published21. In
this study we focus on maternal pregnancy nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) metabolic
traits measured in mid-pregnancy. Women had a fasting mid-pregnancy serum sample taken
by trained phlebotomists working in the antenatal clinic of Bradford Royal Infirmary (92%
were obtained between 26–28 weeks gestation). Samples were processed within 2.5 hours
and placed in -80° freezers. There were no sample freeze-thaw events prior to their use for
metabolomic profiling. In total, 227 metabolic traits were measured using a high-throughput
targeted NMR platform (Nightingale Health©, Helsinki, Finland). The metabolic traits were
quantified in absolute concentration units or ratios and included circulating lipoprotein lipids
and subclasses, fatty acids, fatty acid compositions, amino acids, traits related to glycolysis,
ketone bodies, fluid balance, and an inflammatory marker
22,23. In this study, derived measures
and ratios were excluded, leaving 148 metabolic traits for analysis (Additional File 1: Data
Set 1). Gestational age at serum sample collection was recorded.
Statistical analysis
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
9
Latent class analysis (LCA) was applied to all 19 SEP indicators to derive a composite SEP
latent variable consisting of SEP sub-groups (latent classes). LCA is a finite mixture model
that classifies individuals into unobserved sub-groups (called latent classes) based on their
responses to two or more indicator variables, with the aim of identifying subgroups where
individuals are more similar within groups than between groups
24. LCA was done in White
European and South Asian women (combined) with at least one SEP indicator and data on
pregnancy metabolic traits, and gestational age at metabolic traits’ sample collection. To
avoid local maxima solutions, we used 1500 random sets of starting values for the initial
stage, 150 final stage optimizations, and 15 initial stage iterations. Models with two to six
latent classes were compared and the optimal number of classes was identified based on a
combination of BIC, entropy statistic, and Lo-Mendell-Rubin adjusted likelihood ratio test
(Additional File 2: Table S1). Where these indicators disagreed, the more interpretable
model was selected.
Linear regression models with robust standard errors were then used to examine associations
between SEP latent class sub-groups (versus a reference SEP sub-group) and each metabolic
trait. Models were weighted by the sum of latent class probabilities to allow for uncertainty in
SEP latent class membership assignments and were adjusted for gestational age to control for
gestational age-related differences in metabolic traits. A SEP by ethnicity (i.e., White
European, or South Asian) interaction term was included in all models to investigate ethnic
differences in associations between SEP and metabolic traits. All metabolic traits were
standardised (by ethnicity group to mean=0, SD=1) to aid comparison of results between
different metabolic traits
25. In sensitivity analysis, we repeated the LCA and regression
modelling separately in White European and South Asian women and separately in the White
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
10
British and Pakistani women (the two biggest groups within the White European and South
Asian ethnic groups).
To avoid overloading the main paper, here we present results for selected groups of metabolic
trait and sub-particles regardless of P-values, and provide all results with exact P-values and
false discovery rate (FDR) corrected P-values26 in additional files. All the results can also be
viewed on the accompanying interactive app (https://aelhak.shinyapps.io/SEP_NMR_BiB/).
LCA was done in Mplus version 6, and all other analyses were done in R version 4.2.2.
Missing data
LCA handled missing data on SEP indicators using full information maximum likelihood
estimation, with all women with ≥ 1 SEP indicator variable included in the LCA, under the
missing at random assumption (i.e., that the probability of a missing SEP indicator can be
entirely explained by other observed SEP indicators and so is not related its value). For the
regression analysis, women with missing data on metabolic traits and gestational age were
excluded. To explore the potential impact of missing data, we compared characteristics of
included women with those excluded due to missing data (Additional File 3: Table S2).
Deviations from pre-specified analysis plan
Following feedback on previous versions of this work presented at scientific conferences and
scientific meetings, we decided to make the combined LCA analysis our focus instead of the
ethnicity-specific analyses. We decided to analyse traits in SD units instead of perfuming log
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
11
transformation because virtually all pregnancy metabolic traits were normally distributed
(Additional File 4: Figure S1). No other changes were made to the analysis plan18.
Results
Participant characteristics
A total of 3,905 White European and 4,404 South Asian pregnant women with at least one
SEP indicator and data on metabolic traits and gestational age at collection of serum samples
for the assessment of metabolic traits were included in the study (Figure 1). Mean gestational
age was 26.6 weeks (SD=1.8) in White Europeans and 26.7 weeks (SD=1.9) in South Asians,
and mean age was 26.6 (SD=6.0) and 27.9 (SD=5.2) years respectively. When compared with
included women, those excluded due to missing data on metabolic traits and gestational age
(n=1,407) had higher proportion of South Asian ethnicity (63% versus 53%) and broadly
similar socioeconomic circumstances as indicated by similar levels across most SEP
indicators (Additional File 3: Table S2).
SEP sub-groups
LCA (in the combined sample of White Europeans and South Asians) identified five SEP
sub-groups which we have labelled ‘Highest SEP’, ‘High-Medium SEP’, ‘Medium SEP’,
‘Low-Medium SEP’, and ‘Lowest SEP’. The proportions of White Europeans and South
Asians in the Lowest SEP, Medium SEP, and the Highest SEP groups were broadly similar,
but there were fewer White Europeans than South Asians in the Low-Medium SEP group
(29% vs. 79%) and more in the High-Medium SEP group (77% vs. 23%) (Figure 2). The
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
12
differentiation into SEP sub-groups was driven largely by five SEP indicators (mother’s
educational level and employment status, partner’s educational level and occupational class,
and means tested benefits). There was little difference between SEP sub-groups in whether
women reported being able to keep the home warm enough in winter and being able to afford
to afford two pairs of all-weather shoes. The remaining 12 indicators each contributed with
modest differences. When compared with High-Medium SEP subgroup, the Low-Medium
SEP sub-group was more likely to own a house outright without a mortgage (Figure 2).
SEP sub-groups and pregnancy metabolic traits
Lower SEP was associated with (mostly ) less favourable levels of 113 metabolic traits at the
FDR corrected P<0.05 threshold (Additional File 5: Data Set 2, Additional File 6: Data
Set 3). This included associations between lower SEP and higher VLDL cholesterol, total
triglycerides (Figure 3), glycoprotein acetyls, and VLDL concentration, lower levels of
cholines (Figure 4), and higher VLDL and lower HDL in cholesterol and phospholipids
(Figure 5). Conversely, there was less evidence of associations with LDL particles and no
differences in albumin, glycine, histidine, or lactate (Additional File 6: Data Set 3).
There was a statistical interaction between SEP and ethnicity (at the FDR corrected P < 0.1
threshold) for 31 metabolic traits (Additional File 5: Data Set 2). For most of these traits,
differences by SEP group were larger and showed a clearer gradient in White European than
South Asian women (Additional File 7: Data Set 4). This included stronger association with
omega−3 fatty acids, cholesterol and triglycerides in large HDL, docosahexaenoic acid, and
degree of unsaturation in White Europeans (Figure 6). Differences in HDL and VLDL
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
13
particle size were larger in White Europeans but the difference in LDL particle size was
larger in South Asians (Additional File 7: Data Set 4).
Ethnicity-specific SEP sub-groups and pregnancy metabolic traits
Ethnicity-specific LCA identified five sub-groups in White Europeans and three in South
Asians. SEP sub-groups in White Europeans were labelled ‘Highest SEP’, ‘High-Medium
SEP’, ‘Medium SEP’, ‘Low-Medium SEP’, and ‘Lowest SEP’, and SEP sub-groups in South
Asians were labelled ‘Highest SEP’, ‘Medium SEP’, ‘and ‘Lowest SEP’ (Figure 7). As seen
for the combined SEP sub-groups, differentiation into sub-groups was driven by a few SEP
indicators and there was little difference between sub-groups in whether being able to keep
the home warm enough in winter or able to afford two pairs of all-weather shoes (Figure 7).
Ethnicity-specific SEP was associated with 115 and 98 metabolic traits at the FDR corrected
P<0.05 threshold in White Europeans and South Asians, respectively (Additional File 8:
Data Set 5). Results were consistent with those in the combined SEP analysis and included
associations in both White Europeans and South Asians between lower SEP and lower HDL-
cholesterol and cholines, and higher triglycerides (Figure 8). Analyses in White British and
Pakistani women identified similar SEP groups, and similar differences in metabolic traits to
those found in White Europeans and South Asians, respectively (Additional File 8: Data Set
5, Additional File 9: Figure S2).
Discussion
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
14
We examined the association between a composite measure of SEP that should better reflect
its multidimensional nature and 148 serum metabolic traits in pregnant White European and
South Asian women. We found substantial socioeconomic differences across most metabolic
traits characterized by more adverse levels of traits in lower SEP subgroups. These included
SEP differences across most medium, large, and very large HDL lipoprotein subclasses, and
small, medium, large, and very large VLDL subclasses. There was statistical evidence that
association with some traits were larger in White Europeans than South Asians, including
omega−3 fatty acids, cholesterol and triglycerides in large HDL, docosahexaenoic acid,
pyruvate, apolipoprotein A1, degree of unsaturation, and HDL and VLDL particle size.
Our findings are consistent with results from 30 000 adults and 4000 children across 10 UK
and Finnish cohort studies which found associations between lower educational attainment
and occupational class and more adverse (NMR-derived) metabolic traits including lower
HDL traits
10. We found that lower SEP associated with higher levels of the inflammatory
marker glycoprotein acetyls corroborates findings from a study of 605 women showing that
higher educational level was associated with lower inflammatory biomarkers in pregnancy
27.
Given that SEP and NMR metabolic traits can inform on adverse pregnancy and perinatal
outcomes4-9, our findings suggest SEP might influence adverse pregnancy and perinatal
outcomes via effects on metabolic traits.
There are complex and multi-factorial factors contributing to socioeconomic differences in
health outcomes28-30. Individual-level attributes including diet, physical activity, BMI, and
smoking are strongly socially patterned and can influence metabolic profiles and therefore are
likely to explain some of the socioeconomic differences observed
31-34. For example, BMI,
smoking, HDL-cholesterol and blood pressure have been shown to explain a considerable
amount of the association between SEP and adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes
35.
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
15
Features of the built environment might also contribute to socioeconomic differences in
pregnancy metabolic profiles36-39. Socioeconomic differences in metabolic traits might also
be attributable to differential developmental trajectories shaped by early life experiences and
cumulative allostatic load over the life course40
We found statistical evidence to suggest that around 25% of the associations between SEP
and metabolic traits were stronger and showed clearer socioeconomic gradient in the White
Europeans than South Asians. Given evidence that distributions of most pregnancy NMR
metabolic traits differed between White European and South Asians
14, it is possible that SEP
contributes to differences in pregnancy metabolic traits and differences in adverse pregnancy
and perinatal outcomes between White Europeans and South Asians. Less variation in risk
factors, including health behaviours, between SEP sub-groups among South Asian women
might be one explanation for the stronger socioeconomic differences in White Europeans
found in our study. For example, South Asian women in the lower SEP groups might have
healthier dietary habits, e.g., higher home-prepared food consumption and lower snack
consumption
41-43, and lower smoking rates44 than lower SEP White European women. Our
ethnicity specific LCA identified fewer SEP sub-groups in South Asians indicating lesser
variability in SEP in South Asians, which might also contribute to ethnic differences in
associations. One reason for the lower variability in SEP in South Asians might be due to
them being mostly first-generation immigrants. New immigrants from the same geographic
area tend to be more homogenous in their socioeconomic background and would have not yet
established the inequality patterns and socioeconomic gradients of the local population since
these require time and acculturation before they emerge in subsequent generations
45. Finally,
difference in perceived adversities and the way to face social adversities could also contribute
to explaining these ethnic group difference in how SEP influences metabolic traits46
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
16
Limitations
Our study only included White Europeans and South Asians and therefore findings may not
generalise to other ethnic groups. The participants were from a high-income country and so
findings might not generalise to Whites and South Asians in low-income countries. Women
with incomplete data on all SEP indicators were included in LCA using FIML which gives
unbiased results under the missing at random assumption. However, if this assumption does
not hold, this can produce bias and make the model selection criteria less reliable. We found
that only a few SEP indicators explained most of the variation between SEP latent classes
therefore, future studies might want to compare LCA to the conventional approach of using
one SEP indicator. The Nightingale NMR platform used here primarily covers lipoproteins
and therefore we have not assessed other classes of metabolites in detail.
Conclusions
We found widespread and sizeable socioeconomic differences in metabolic traits in pregnant
White European and South Asian women characterized by more adverse levels of metabolic
traits in lower SEP subgroups, with statistical evidence of stronger associations for some of
the metabolic traits in White European than South Asian women. Our findings suggest that,
in the context of limited resources, supporting all pregnant women in lowest SEP groups
might provide the greatest benefit for pregnancy and perinatal health.
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
17
BiB: Born in Bradford
IMD: Index of Multiple Deprivation
LCA: Latent class analysis
NMR: Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
SEP: Socioeconomic position
DECLARATIONS
Ethics approval and consent to participate
BiB had ethical approval from Bradford Research Ethics Committee (07/H1302/112), YFS:
Hospital District of Southwest Finland (ETMK:68/1801/2017). All BiB participants provided
informed consent or assent to participate in the study and secondary data analyses.
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Availability of data and materials
The data used during the current study are available to researchers by request from the BiB
Executive Group
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
18
Competing interests
DAL reported grants from national and international government and charity funders, Roche
Diagnostics, and Medtronic Ltd for work unrelated to this publication. DAL also declares that
she is an editor for BMC Medicine. The other authors report no conflicts.
Funding
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and
innovation programme under grant agreements No. 874583 (ATHLETE), and No. 874739
(LongITools). AE received part of his salary from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 101021566 (ART-
HEALTH). AE, GLC, AGS, KT, and DAL work in a unit that is supported by the University
of Bristol and UK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00011/6). BiB has received funding
from the Wellcome Trust (101597), a joint grant from the UK Medical Research Council and
UK Economic and Social Science Research Council (MR/N024391/1), and a British Heart
Foundation Clinical Study grant (CS/16/4/32482). ISGlobal acknowledges support from the
grant CEX2018-000806-S funded by MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033, and support from
the Generalitat de Catalunya through the CERCA Program. The funders had no role in the
design and conduct of the study; management, analysis, and interpretation of data;
preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for
publication.
Authors' contributions
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
19
AE developed the idea for this study with initial input from MV and LM. AE developed the
analysis plan with input from all authors. AE undertook all analysis and wrote the first draft
of the manuscript. GLC, AGS, KT, LM, GS, NJT, JW, DAL, and MV provided feedback on
the draft and approved the final manuscript for submission.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to everyone involved in the Born in Bradford study. This includes the
families who kindly participated, as well as the practitioners and researchers all of whom
made Born in Bradford happen. Sample processing and NMR analysis were carried out at the
Bristol Bioresource Laboratory and the NMR Metabolomics facility at University of Bristol.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Additional File 1: Data Set 1. Metabolic traits included in this study.
Additional File 2: Table S1. Results of latent class models with 2 to 6 classes.
Additional File 3: Table S2. Comparison of study participants with those excluded due to
missing data on metabolic traits and gestational age.
Additional File 4: Figure S1. Distribution of metabolic traits by ethnicity group
Additional File 5: Data Set 2. P-values and FDR-adjusted P-values for SEP and for SEP by
ethnicity interaction term for each metabolic trait.
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
20
Additional File 6: Data Set 3. Associations between combined SEP latent class sub-groups
and standardized pregnancy metabolic trait, presented as mean difference by SEP sub-group
(vs. Highest SEP) in the combined sample of White European and South Asian women.
Additional File 7: Data Set 4. Associations between combined SEP latent class sub-groups
and standardized pregnancy metabolic trait, presented as mean difference by SEP sub-group
(vs. Highest SEP) separately in White European and South Asian women.
Additional File 8: Data Set 5. Associations between ethnicity-specific SEP latent class sub-
groups and standardized pregnancy metabolic trait in White European, White British, South
Asian, and Pakistani women.
Additional File 9: Figure S2. Estimated mean probabilities for each SEP indicator variable
in each ethnicity-specific SEP latent class sub-group in White British and Pakistani women.
References
1. Mills HL, Patel N, White SL, et al. The effect of a lifestyle intervention in obese
pregnant women on gestational metabolic profiles: findings from the UK Pregnancies Better
Eating and Activity Trial (UPBEAT) randomised controlled trial. BMC medicine 2019; 17(1):
15.
2. Liang L, Rasmussen M-LH, Piening B, et al. Metabolic Dynamics and Prediction of
Gestational Age and Time to Delivery in Pregnant Women. Cell 2020; 181(7): 1680-92.e15.
3. Wang Q, Würtz P, Auro K, et al. Metabolic profiling of pregnancy: cross-sectional
and longitudinal evidence. BMC medicine 2016; 14(1): 205-.
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
21
4. Sovio U, Clayton GL, Cook E, et al. Metabolomic Identification of a Novel,
Externally Validated Predictive Test for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. The Journal of
Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 2022; 107(8): e3479-e86.
5. McBride N, Yousefi P, Sovio U, et al. Do Mass Spectrometry-Derived Metabolomics
Improve the Prediction of Pregnancy-Related Disorders? Findings from a UK Birth Cohort
with Independent Validation. Metabolites 2021; 11(8).
6. McBride N, Yousefi P, White SL, et al. Do nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based
metabolomics improve the prediction of pregnancy-related disorders? Findings from a UK
birth cohort with independent validation. BMC medicine 2020; 18(1): 366.
7. Joseph KS, Liston RM, Dodds L, Dahlgren L, Allen AC. Socioeconomic status and
perinatal outcomes in a setting with universal access to essential health care services. Cmaj
2007; 177(6): 583-90.
8. Blumenshine P, Egerter S, Barclay CJ, Cubbin C, Braveman PA. Socioeconomic
Disparities in Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review. American Journal of
Preventive Medicine 2010; 39(3): 263-72.
9. Jardine J, Walker K, Gurol-Urganci I, et al. Adverse pregnancy outcomes attributable
to socioeconomic and ethnic inequalities in England: a national cohort study. Lancet 2021;
398(10314): 1905-12.
10. Robinson O, Carter AR, Ala-Korpela M, et al. Metabolic profiles of socio-economic
position: a multi-cohort analysis. Int J Epidemiol 2021; 50(3): 768-82.
11. Bryant AS, Worjoloh A, Caughey AB, Washington AE. Racial/ethnic disparities in
obstetric outcomes and care: prevalence and determinants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;
202(4): 335-43.
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
22
12. Farrar D, Fairley L, Santorelli G, et al. Association between hyperglycaemia and
adverse perinatal outcomes in south Asian and white British women: analysis of data from
the Born in Bradford cohort. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2015; 3(10): 795-804.
13. Farrar D, Santorelli G, Lawlor DA, et al. Blood pressure change across pregnancy in
white British and Pakistani women: analysis of data from the Born in Bradford cohort.
Scientific reports 2019; 9(1): 13199.
14. Taylor K, Ferreira DLS, West J, Yang T, Caputo M, Lawlor DA. Differences in
Pregnancy Metabolic Profiles and Their Determinants between White European and South
Asian Women: Findings from the Born in Bradford Cohort. Metabolites 2019; 9(9): 190.
15. Fairley L, Cabieses B, Small N, et al. Using latent class analysis to develop a model
of the relationship between socioeconomic position and ethnicity: cross-sectional analyses
from a multi-ethnic birth cohort study. BMC Public Health 2014; 14(1): 835.
16. Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor DA, Lynch JW, Davey SG. Indicators of
socioeconomic position (part 1). J Epidemiol Community Health 2006; 60.
17. Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor DA, Lynch JW, Davey Smith G. Indicators of
socioeconomic position (part 2). J Epidemiol Community Health 2006; 60(2): 95-101.
18. Elhakeem A. Socioeconomic position and metabolic profile in pregnant South Asian
and White European women: findings from the Born in Bradford cohort. 20 February 2023
2023. https://osf.io/xrf8s/
.
19. Wright J, Small N, Raynor P, et al. Cohort Profile: the Born in Bradford multi-ethnic
family cohort study. Int J Epidemiol 2013; 42(4): 978-91.
20. Cable N, Sacker A. Validating overcrowding measures using the UK Household
Longitudinal Study. SSM - population health 2019; 8: 100439-.
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
23
21. Taylor K, McBride N, J Goulding N, et al. Metabolomics datasets in the Born in
Bradford cohort [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations].
Wellcome open research 2021; 5(264).
22. Soininen P, Kangas AJ, Würtz P, Suna T, Ala-Korpela M. Quantitative Serum
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Metabolomics in Cardiovascular Epidemiology and Genetics.
Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics 2015; 8(1): 192-206.
23. Ussher JR, Elmariah S, Gerszten RE, Dyck JR. The Emerging Role of Metabolomics
in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Cardiovascular Disease. Journal of the American College
of Cardiology 2016; 68(25): 2850-70.
24. McLachlan GJ, Lee SX, Rathnayake SI. Finite Mixture Models. Annual Review of
Statistics and Its Application 2019; 6(1): 355-78.
25. Elhakeem A, Ronkainen J, Mansell T, et al. Effect of common pregnancy and
perinatal complications on offspring metabolic traits across the life course: a multi-cohort
study. BMC medicine 2023; 21(1): 23.
26. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and
Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B
(Methodological) 1995; 57(1): 289-300.
27. Keenan-Devlin LS, Smart BP, Grobman W, et al. The intersection of race and
socioeconomic status is associated with inflammation patterns during pregnancy and adverse
pregnancy outcomes. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology 2022; 87(3): e13489.
28. Marmot M. Social determinants of health inequalities. Lancet 2005; 365(9464): 1099-
104.
29. Braveman P, Gottlieb L. The social determinants of health: it's time to consider the
causes of the causes. Public Health Rep 2014; 129 Suppl 2(Suppl 2): 19-31.
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
24
30. Bann D, Wright L, Hughes A, Chaturvedi N. Socioeconomic inequalities in
cardiovascular disease: a causal perspective. Nat Rev Cardiol 2023.
31. Stringhini S, Carmeli C, Jokela M, et al. Socioeconomic status and the 25 /i2 ×/i2 25 risk
factors as determinants of premature mortality: a multicohort study and meta-analysis of 1·7
million men and women. Lancet 2017; 389(10075): 1229-37.
32. Bann D, Johnson W, Li L, Kuh D, Hardy R. Socioeconomic Inequalities in Body
Mass Index across Adulthood: Coordinated Analyses of Individual Participant Data from
Three British Birth Cohort Studies Initiated in 1946, 1958 and 1970. PLoS medicine 2017;
14(1): e1002214-e.
33. Kramer MS, Séguin L, Lydon J, Goulet L. Socio-economic disparities in pregnancy
outcome: why do the poor fare so poorly? Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology 2000;
14(3): 194-210.
34. Pampel FC KP, Denney JT. Socioeconomic Disparities in Health Behaviors. Annu
Rev Sociol 2010; 36: 349–70.
35. Rogne T, Gill D, Liew Z, et al. Mediating Factors in the Association of Maternal
Educational Level With Pregnancy Outcomes: A Mendelian Randomization Study. JAMA
Network Open 2024; 7(1): e2351166-e.
36. Robinson O, Tamayo I, de Castro M, et al. The Urban Exposome during Pregnancy
and Its Socioeconomic Determinants. Environmental health perspectives 2018; 126 (7):
077005.
37. Torres Toda M, Avraam D, James Cadman T, et al. Exposure to natural environments
during pregnancy and birth outcomes in 11 European birth cohorts. Environment
international 2022; 170: 107648.
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
25
38. Dadvand P, Wright J, Martinez D, et al. Inequality, green spaces, and pregnant
women: Roles of ethnicity and individual and neighbourhood socioeconomic status.
Environment international 2014; 71: 101-8.
39. Maitre L, Bustamante M, Hernández-Ferrer C, et al. Multi-omics signatures of the
human early life exposome. Nature communications 2022; 13(1): 7024.
40. Lu MC, Halfon N. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Birth Outcomes: A Life-Course
Perspective. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2003; 7(1): 13-30.
41. Chowbey P, Harrop Deborah. Healthy eating in UK minority ethnic households :
influences and way forward. Race Equality Foundation, 2016.
42. LeCroy MN, Stevens J. Dietary intake and habits of South Asian immigrants living in
Western countries. Nutr Rev 2017; 75(6): 391-404.
43. Clifford Astbury C, Penney TL, Adams J. Home-prepared food, dietary quality and
socio-demographic factors: a cross-sectional analysis of the UK National Diet and nutrition
survey 2008–16. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2019;
16(1): 82.
44. Mathur R, Schofield P, Smith D, Gilkes A, White P, Hull S. Is individual smoking
behaviour influenced by area-level ethnic density? A cross-sectional electronic health
database study of inner south-east London. ERJ Open Res 2017; 3(1).
45. Bhopal R, Hayes L, White M, et al. Ethnic and socio
/i2 economic inequalities in
coronary heart disease, diabetes and risk factors in Europeans and South Asians. Journal of
Public Health 2002; 24(2): 95-105.
46. Bhopal RS. Migration, ethnicity, race, and health in multicultural societies. Second
edition ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press Oxford; 2014.
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
26
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
27
Table 1. SEP indicators used to derive the composite SEP latent class sub-groups.
Socioeconomic indicator White European
(n = 3,905)
South Asian
(n = 4,404)
Index of Multiple Deprivation [No. (%)]
Q1 (least deprived) 1947 (49.9) 960 (21.8)
Q2 1118 (28.6) 1638 (37.2)
Q3 (most deprived) 839 (21.5) 1805 (41.0)
Woman’s education [No. (%)]
<5 GCSE equivalent 733 (21.0) 1057 (25.3)
5 GCSE equivalent 1308 (37.5) 1296 (31.0)
A-level equivalent 675 (19.3) 568 (13.6)
Higher than A-level 776 (22.2) 1254 (30.0)
Baby’s father’s education [No. (%)]
<5 GCSE equivalent 663 (24.1) 650 (18.9)
5 GCSE equivalent 1000 (36.4) 1016 (29.5)
A-level equivalent 470 (17.1) 418 (12.1)
Higher than A-level 615 (22.4) 1365 (39.6)
Woman’s employment status [No. (%)]
Currently employed 2572 (65.9) 1211 (27.6)
Previously employed 989 (25.3) 1269 (28.9)
Never employed 342 (8.8) 1915 (43.6)
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
28
Baby’s father’s employment status [No. (%)]
Non-manual 1824 (50.8) 1433 (34.5)
Manual 1068 (29.7) 1622 (39.0)
Self-employed 368 (10.2) 825 (19.8)
Unemployed 332 (9.2) 279 (6.7)
Means tested benefit [No. (%)]
Yes 1383 (35.5) 1911 (43.5)
No 2508 (64.5) 2478 (56.5)
How well mother and partner managing financially
[No. (%)]
Living comfortably 1036 (26.7) 1213 (27.7)
Doing alright 1607 (41.3) 1847 (42.2)
Just about getting by 973 (25.0) 981 (22.4)
Quite difficult or very difficult 272 (7.0) 333 (7.6)
Financial circumstance compared to year ago [No.
(%)]
Better off 1101 (28.3) 1308 (30.1)
Worse off 1007 (25.9) 717 (16.5)
About the same 1778 (45.8) 2315 (53.3)
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
29
Able to afford two pairs of all-weather shoes [No.
(%)]
Yes 3611 (96.1) 4269 (99.3)
No 145 (3.9) 33 (0.8)
Able to afford a small amount of money to spend on
yourself each week [No. (%)]
Yes 2966 (79.8) 3614 (86.5)
No 751 (20.2) 565 (13.5)
Able to afford to make regular savings of £10 a
month [No. (%)]
Yes 2697 (74.3) 3294 (80.8)
No 932 (25.7) 783 (19.2)
Housing tenure
Owns outright 152 (4.2) 1068 (27.9)
Mortgage 1845 (50.7) 2020 (52.7)
Private landlord 1050 (28.9) 484 (12.6)
Social housing 590 (16.3) 261 (6.8)
Overcrowding (person per room) ([No. (%)]
Q1 2548 (65.4) 1547 (35.2)
Q2 849 (21.8) 1393 (31.7)
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
30
Q3 500 (12.8) 1454 (33.1)
Up to date with bills [No. (%)]
Yes 3369 (88.1) 3854 (91.4)
No 454 (11.9) 363 (8.6)
Able to afford to replace or repair major electrical
goods [No. (%)]
Yes 2485 (70.2) 3096 (79.2)
No 1057 (29.8) 813 (20.8)
Able to keep home warm enough in winter [No.
(%)]
Yes 3761 (97.8) 4175 (96.0)
No 84 (2.2) 172 (4.0)
Able to afford to replace any worn out furniture
[No. (%)]
Yes 2437 (69.1) 2830 (72.8)
No 1088 (30.9) 1059 (27.2)
Able to afford household contents insurance [No.
(%)]
Yes 2407 (84.6) 2184 (82.2)
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
31
No 438 (15.4) 474 (17.8)
Able to afford to keep home in decent state of
decoration [No. (%)]
Yes 3581 (94.3) 3743 (88.3)
No 215 (5.7) 497 (11.7)
Numbers shown for those with data on metabolic traits and gestational age at blood sample
collection). IMD and overcrowding groups were generated in the combined sample.
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
32
Figure 1. Study flowchart.
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
33
Figure 2. Estimated mean probabilities and the proportions of White European and South
Asian women in each SEP sub-group from the combined SEP latent class analysis.
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
34
Figure 3. Mean difference in cholesterol, fatty acids, triglycerides, glycolysis-related
metabolites, ketone bodies, and fluid balance traits by SEP sub-groups in the combined
sample of White European and South Asian women, shown for traits without statistical
evidence of SEP by ethnicity interaction (reference: Highest SEP sub-group).
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
35
Figure 4. Mean difference in lipoprotein particle concentration, amino acids, other lipids,
inflammation, and apolipoproteins by SEP sub-groups in the combined sample of White
European and South Asian women, shown for traits without statistical evidence of SEP by
ethnicity interaction (reference: Highest SEP sub-group).
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
36
Figure 5. Mean difference in cholesterol, phospholipids, and triglycerides in lipoprotein
subclasses by SEP sub-groups in the combined sample of White European and South Asian
women, shown for traits without statistical evidence of SEP by ethnicity interaction
(reference: Highest SEP sub-group).
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
37
Figure 6. Mean difference in pregnancy metabolic traits by SEP sub-groups in combined
sample of White European and South Asian women, presented for top 24 metabolic traits
with evidence of SEP by ethnicity interaction (all FDR adjusted Pinteraction < 0. 05).
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
38
Figure 7. Estimated mean probabilities in each ethnicity-specific SEP sub-group for White
European and South Asian women from ethnicity-specific latent class analysis.
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
39
Figure 8. Mean difference in cholesterol, fatty acids, triglycerides, and other lipids by
ethnicity-specific SEP sub-groups in White European and South Asian women.
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335doi: medRxiv preprint
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.