Strengthening the Healthcare System in Bangladesh: Progress, Persistent Challenges, and Policy Priorities

2024 · doi:10.32388/a8l5m4.3
preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

This manuscript examines the multifaceted healthcare system of Bangladesh, characterized by its decentralized and unregulated nature, with diverse control spanning for-profit entities, NGOs, the national government, and international welfare organizations. Despite substantial challenges, including inadequate public health facilities, a scarcity of skilled healthcare professionals, and significant healthcare inequity, Bangladesh has made commendable progress in health-related Millennium Development Goals. The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the system’s shortcomings, notably in testing, national coordination, and treatment equity. This study explores these challenges in detail, alongside potential solutions aimed at improving healthcare financing, enhancing healthcare worker training, and promoting public-private partnerships. Recommendations for overcoming barriers include increasing government healthcare funding, improving rural healthcare facilities, and addressing healthcare inequity through a dynamic and visionary policy approach. This analysis seeks to contribute to the discourse on advancing healthcare in Bangladesh towards Universal Health Coverage.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00