Questionable necessity effects of positive affect on life satisfaction: A comment on Yang et al. (2026)
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Yang et al. conducted analyses with necessary condition analysis (NCA) and concluded that positive affect is a necessary condition for life satisfaction. However, it has been established that necessity effects in NCA may be spurious due to correlations between the variables. Here, we found that necessity effects reported by Yang et al. fell within “ranges of spuriousness”, meaning that they could be accounted for by correlations between the variables. Hence, the findings by Yang et al. may have been spurious and their conclusion of positive affect being necessary for life satisfaction premature. It is important for users of NCA to be aware that necessity effects in NCA do not prove necessity any more than correlations prove causality. For increased rigor, we recommend users of NCA to estimate, as we did here, ranges of spuriousness and to require that estimated necessity effects are above the range before concluding necessity.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00