The Place of the Posterior Surgical Approach for Lesions of the Rectum

Digestive surgery · 2005 · vol. 22(1-2) , pp. 86–90 · doi:10.1159/000085298 · PMID:15849468 · W2037664548
article OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although there are many advantages of a posterior approach to rectal disease, these procedures are not widely accepted because many surgeons fear the postoperative complications. METHODS: The medical records were reviewed of 57 patients who underwent a posterior approach to the rectum between January 1980 and December 2002. RESULTS: Twenty-eight men and 29 women with a mean age of 70.5 (range 47-83) years underwent either a posterior transsacral (n = 52) or a transsphincteric (n = 5) procedure. Indications for surgery were benign lesions (n = 33), e.g. villous adenoma, rectal prolapse and endometriosis as well as invasive adenocarcinoma (n = 24). All patients with an invasive adenocarcinoma were classified as ASA grade III or IV. Postoperative morbidity occurred in 12 patients (21%), consisting of temporary incontinence, anastomotic leakage, wound infection, and hemorrhage. There was no mortality. During a mean follow-up of 29 (range 2-86) months, 3 patients with a villous adenoma and 2 patients who were treated for a malignant lesion had a locally recurrent lesion. CONCLUSION: We believe that a posterior approach to the rectum should be considered for various benign and selected malignant diseases, especially in case of elderly patients or patients with a compromised general condition, and has to be a part of the surgeon's armamentarium.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Digestive System Surgical Procedures Rectal Neoplasms Adenoma, Villous Adenoma, Villous Aged Aged, 80 and over Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Humans Male Middle Aged Prolapse Rectal Diseases Rectal Diseases Rectal Neoplasms

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

References (27)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:15:41.664291+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK