St. Louis Enhancing Engagement and Retention in HIV/AIDS Care (STEER): a participatory intersectional needs assessment for intervention and implementation planning

St. Louis Enhancing Engagement and Retention in HIV/AIDS Care (STEER): a participatory intersectional needs assessment for intervention and implementation planning | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article St. Louis Enhancing Engagement and Retention in HIV/AIDS Care (STEER): a participatory intersectional needs assessment for intervention and implementation planning Debbie Humphries, Phillip Marotta, Yue Hu, Victor Wang, Greg Gross, and 6 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4225131/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background Missouri is one of seven priority states identified by the Ending the HIV Epidemic Initiative, and St. Louis contains almost half of the people living with HIV (PLWH) in Missouri. As St. Louis has a marked history of structural racism and economic inequities, we utilized the Intersectionality Based Policy Analysis (IBPA) framework to guide a participatory needs assessment for planning and program development. Methods The planning team included researchers, the lead implementer from our community partner, and two community representatives, and had biweekly 60-90 minute meetings for 18 months. The planning team discussed and approved all research materials, reviewed and interpreted results, and made decisions about outreach, recruitment, conduct of the needs assessment and development of the planned intervention. The needs assessment integrated information from existing data, (1) interviews with (a) PLWH (n=12), (b) community leaders (n=5), (c) clinical leaders (n=4), and (d) community health workers (CHWs) (n=3) and (e) CHW supervisors (n=3) who participated in a Boston University-led demonstration project on CHWs in the context of HIV and (2) focus groups (2 FG, 12 participants) with front line health workers such as peer specialists, health coaches and outreach workers. A rapid qualitative analysis approach was used for all interviews and focus groups. Results The IBPA was used to guide team discussions of team values, definition and framing of the problem, questions and topics in the key informant interviews, and implementation strategies. Applying the IBPA framework contributed to a focus on intersectional drivers of inequities in HIV services. The effective management of HIV faces significant challenges from high provider turnover, insufficient integration of CHWs into care teams, and organizational limitations in tailoring treatment plans. Increasing use of CHWs for HIV treatment and prevention also faces challenges. People living with HIV (PLWH) encounter multiple barriers such as stigma, lack of social support, co-morbidities, medication side effects and difficulties in meeting basic needs. Conclusions Addressing intersectional drivers of health inequities may require multi-level, structural approaches. We see the IBPA as a valuable tool for participatory planning while integrating community engagement principles in program and implementation design for improving HIV outcomes. Participatory Planning Intersectional Needs Assessment Intersectionality Implementation Planning Ending the HIV Epidemic Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Contributions to the literature We report here on an innovative process for conducting a participatory intersectional needs assessment as an initial phase of intervention mapping and implementation mapping. The intersectionality-based policy analysis framework provided a structured approach for identifying structural and systemic barriers to effective management of HIV. Barriers to effective management of HIV were identified at multiple levels, and included high staff turnover, insufficient numbers of CHWs and insufficient integration of CHWs at the clinic and institutional levels. The participatory team developed two complementary logic models in order to capture the intersectional and systemic nature of the problem. BACKGROUND Ending the HIV epidemic is a critical priority for global public health.( 1 – 3 ) Despite progress in the prevention and treatment of HIV over the past decades, new infections occur daily in the United States and are highest among Black men, particularly those who have sex with men.( 4 ) A significant number of people living with HIV (PLWH) in the United States are not receiving adequate care, with an estimated 21% being unaware of their HIV status, 25% not linked to care within 6–12 months of diagnosis, 50% not engaged in routine care/follow-up, and 25% not receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART).( 4 ) Inequities in access to HIV treatment persist among young adults, people of color, and the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ) communities, highlighting the importance of an intersectional lens in developing and improving interventions to mitigate the complex web of inequities.( 5 – 7 ) To tackle these challenges, the Ending the HIV Epidemic Initiative (EHE) was launched in 2019 with the goal of a 90% reduction in new HIV infections in the U.S. by 2030.( 1 ) The EHE prioritizes early diagnosis, rapid and effective treatment, prevention strategies such as pre-exposure prophylaxis, and quick response to potential outbreaks to make HIV a rare infection. Missouri is one of seven priority states under the EHE initiative due to higher rates of rural infections and presents unique challenges with a history of socioeconomic and racial inequities. In St. Louis black men and women are three to eight times more likely to be diagnosed with HIV than their white counterparts,( 8 – 11 ) and high rates of HIV infection and lower engagement along the continuum of care are seen among young adults, people of color, and LGBTQ communities.( 5 – 7 ) There are notable gaps in understanding the complex and overlapping dynamics that influence engagement and retention in HIV/AIDS care. The lack of an intersectional lens has obscured the structural vulnerabilities created by systemic responses to race, gender, sexual identities, and socioeconomic status, hindering comprehensive solutions for diverse communities.( 9 – 11 ) Applying an intersectional lens to understand social and structural determinants of health through a participatory community approach can inform the adaptation and implementation of targeted interventions, such as Community Health Workers (CHWs) to address the complex and interconnected factors contributing to HIV inequities. Intersectionality-based policy analysis (IBPA) conceptual framework We used the intersectionality-based policy analysis (IBPA) framework( 12 ) to adapt a multilevel intervention and develop implementation strategies for a CHW-centered program to reduce inequities along the HIV care cascade. Intersectionality theory focuses on moving beyond examining individual factors, such as biology, socioeconomic status, sex, gender, and race, and elucidates the relationships and interactions among multiple interlocking systems across all levels of society for an individual or group.( 13 – 15 ) The IBPA framework (Fig. 1 ) employs principles of social justice, power, and diversity of knowledge to interrogate overlapping systems and structures that affect policy and programmatic issues.( 16 ) IBPA has been applied in various case studies and settings, including maternity care, HIV prevention strategies for gay men, and the criminalization of HIV nondisclosure in Canada, generating equity-focused perspectives that incorporate diverse viewpoints in both defining problems and seeking sustainable solutions ( 12 , 17 – 19 ). The IBPA framework has also been used to identify intersectional drivers of inequities in access to HIV treatment services.( 16 ) We selected this framework to guide intervention adaptation and implementation planning based on the explicit emphasis on discussing values and creating a participatory and equity-based space for leading the project, as well as an emphasis on praxis – using an intersectional lens to change systems.( 20 – 22 ) Recent studies have demonstrated the value of the IBPA framework,( 22 – 24 ) exemplified by its application to the U.S. COVID-19 policy response;( 20 ) which underscores the growing significance of considerations of intersectionality in public health and highlights the transformative shift from analysis to actionable strategies. [Insert Fig. 1 about here] The deployment of Community Health Workers (CHWs) to provide enhanced client support and strengthen client trust has been shown to be an effective strategy for enhancing client engagement,( 25 ) providing acute treatment( 26 ) and overcoming social and structural barriers that burden hard-to-reach populations.( 27 ) CHWs are trusted members of the local community who deliver critical health promotion interventions, characterized by racial, socioeconomic and ethnic backgrounds, as well as lived experiences, that align with those of their client population.( 28 – 31 ) This strategy has improved health outcomes for chronic conditions such as diabetes( 32 ) and has been a valuable tool in responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.( 33 ) In addition, CHWs have demonstrated a remarkable capacity to bridge gaps in the provision of HIV treatment as PLWH working with trained CHWs have higher rates of engagement along the treatment cascade and better health outcomes.( 34 – 37 ) Enhanced personal contact between lay health workers and PLWH strengthens continuity of care for HIV clients by developing closer bonds with healthcare providers and reducing distrust of the medical system.( 38 ) Integrating CHW roles into HIV treatment settings increases engagement in HIV treatment and care, although more implementation research is needed to understand the best ways to implement and scale up integration of CHWs into medical systems of care for PLWH.( 34 , 39 ) Participatory Planning and Needs Assessment Participatory approaches to intervention adaptation and implementation increase community buy-in and enhance the viability, effectiveness and sustainability of interventions.( 40 – 43 ) Participatory planning involves active participation and input from healthcare providers, community members, and other stakeholders to increase the likelihood that systems, service delivery and implementation are tailored to the community, leading to better health outcomes and improved quality of life.( 44 – 48 ) Participatory planning is critical for offering patient-centered HIV care that is responsive to the unique needs and preferences of the community.( 49 , 50 ) By including PLWH in the process of adapting programs and implementation planning, teams can formulate more effective implementation strategies to strengthen the ability of CHWs and their organizations to reduce stigma and discrimination, increase adherence to treatment, and enhance the ownership by PLWH for their own care.( 49 , 51 ) Participatory planning can help identify and address barriers and facilitators to care, such as lack of access to transportation, concerns about confidentiality and levels of client-provider trust.( 44 ) By integrating an intersectional approach with participatory planning in conducting a needs assessment, we enhanced our ability to accurately capture and respond to the community’s needs. The inclusion of participatory approaches not only acknowledges the unique insights and experiences of those directly affected by HIV but also cultivates a sense of investment and collaboration within communities. Intervention Mapping and Implementation Mapping (IntMap and ImpMap)( 52 ) provide a process for systematically developing an intervention and an implementation plan, beginning with a needs assessment.( 53 – 57 ) The St. Louis Enhancing Engagement and Retention in HIV/AIDS Care (STEER) project conducted a participatory intersectional needs assessment to adapt a CHW intervention to enhance management of HIV/AIDS care and prioritize implementation strategies. We describe here a novel application of the IBPA within a participatory needs assessment that integrated community leaders into the research team to lay the groundwork for adapting and implementing a CHW-centered multi-level intervention to address the needs of PLWH in St. Louis. METHODS Setting The study took place in St. Louis, Missouri (9.2021 through 5.2023), which has a high burden of HIV among historically marginalized communities. St. Louis residents comprised almost half (6,320 of the 13,109) of persons living with HIV in Missouri in 2018. In 2020, the population of St. Louis (300,576 people) was 46.4% Black, 46.5% White, 4.0% Hispanic or Latino, 0.3% Native American, and 3.4% Asian.( 8 ) Approximately one in five people in St. Louis live below the poverty line. Research Aims and Design The project utilized intervention mapping (IntMap) and implementation mapping (ImpMap)( 52 , 58 ) to adapt a CHW intervention and plan for its implementation. We report here on the initial phase, a participatory intersectional needs assessment utilizing the IBPA and development of a logic model of the problem of HIV care management and engagement. Research Process Building the research team. The research team developed organically and intentionally by connecting with potential partners in St. Louis through existing networks of trust. Two academic partners and a community-based organization (CBO) leader with decades of experience in the St. Louis HIV treatment and prevention community jointly agreed to investigate how best to strengthen the implementation of CHW services in the context of HIV treatment. The CBO leader identified two trusted and innovative leaders in the PLWH community, and both met first with one of the academic leads to discuss the research plan, including the IBPA framework and participatory planning approach, and to address any questions. Both chose to join the bi-weekly planning team meetings as consultants. The nested team structure included a planning team consisting of CBO leadership, community leaders, and university-based faculty and research assistants who met bi-weekly to develop research materials, review progress, address ongoing needs, and guide decision-making. The full research team, including experts in community health worker health program design, geographic modeling, and qualitative and quantitative research, were consulted to help synthesize insights from the research and plan the implementation. Local leaders in the St. Louis response to HIV on the St. Louis Fast Track Cities (FTC-STL) Steering Committee also provided a strong community perspective during the project. The team shared initial findings with the FTC-STL Steering committee to gather feedback. Applying the IBPA . There are two primary components of the IBPA: guiding principles and questions.( 12 , 17 ) Eight guiding principles are provided to consider and integrate into the analytical process, along with 12 analysis questions. The first set of questions (Q1-5) are descriptive and focus on the team, the problem to be addressed, how the problem is framed, the impacts of the problem, and current policy responses. The subsequent questions (Q6-12) are transformative, addressing inequities in current impacts of the problem, potential solutions, ensuring implementation, metrics of success, and the team’s reflections on the use of the IBPA. Definitions of guiding principles were adapted from Humphries et al.,( 20 ) and the planning team identified examples of how each principle was applied in the planning and analysis process (Table 2 ). Draft answers to the IBPA analysis questions were developed by members of the planning team, and draft answers were presented to the full planning team for discussion and eventual approval. Planning Team Activities . Early in the timeline (9.2021–5.2023) the planning team devoted a session to each planning team member sharing their knowledge, values, and experiences that contributed to their interest in this project (IBPA Q1: What knowledge, values, and experiences do you bring to the area of analysis? ). Results were synthesized, reviewed, and approved by the planning team. Other activities included reviewing timelines, draft materials (such as IBPA responses, interview guides, recruiting materials and potential participants, analysis results, problem logic model), providing feedback on results, providing insights into community history and current community activities, as well as strategies to strengthen the implementation of CHWs in the HIV care system in St. Louis. IBPA principles were involved at each step to ensure that intersectional principles of power, structure, and social justice were incorporated throughout. Data Collection and analyses . We conducted virtual interviews and focus groups via Zoom to identify barriers and facilitators to HIV care, as well as challenges and opportunities for integrating CHWs in the response to HIV in St. Louis. The planning team was responsible for interview materials and participant identification. St. Louis participants were identified through professional networks and personal contacts of the planning team to represent different clinical contexts and expertise. We interviewed CHWs and CHW supervisors who participated in a Boston University-led CHW HIV demonstration project (n = 6),( 39 , 46 , 59 ) clinicians (n = 4), community leaders (n = 5), and people living with HIV (n = 12). We also conducted two focus groups (12 participants) with front line staff working in the field of HIV, such as peer specialists, health coaches and outreach workers. Demographic information for interview and focus group participants are included in Table 1 . Interviewers and focus group moderators were inclusively trained, aiming to probe key points such as less socially accepted beliefs and perspectives. Analysis and coding were conducted via rapid qualitative analysis methods( 60 , 61 ) and mapped to the IBPA framework.( 12 , 17 , 62 ) Interviews were transcribed either internally or by a professional transcription service, with transcripts checked by the interviewers. Each interview or focus group was summarized in a pre-designed template specific to each interviewee category (Appendix A). Templates were completed by one team member based on the interview transcript and then reviewed by the interviewer. The results within participant categories were compiled into separate matrices and summarized within the participant categories (A blank matrix is available as Appendix B). Two researchers developed and approved each summary, and all qualitative team members discussed and agreed on the final synthesized results. Once results were summarized for each participant group, a final matrix synthesizing results across interviewee categories was completed. Similar template categories across interviewee categories were aligned in the matrix, and those results were summarized. Draft findings and interview data were shared with the planning team, who reviewed conclusions, challenged interpretations, and helped to frame all final results. Based on the interviews and focus groups, and oriented around the IBPA, a logic model of the problem of engagement and retention in HIV care was developed. Multiple drafts with different visualizations were developed before the planning team agreed on two frameworks that together embody the non-linearity and complexity of the problem. We followed the STROBE reporting guidelines, and the checklist is attached as a supplemental file. Ethical Review The study was reviewed and determined exempt by the Institutional Review Boards at Yale University and Washington University in St. Louis. Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to data collection. RESULTS Results of the intersectional needs assessment are presented through the application of the IBPA, the identified barriers to effective management of HIV, and the problem logic model. IBPA Values; Planning Team Values (Table 2, Table 3 Q1) The guiding principles of IBPA include: recognizing the limitations of singular social categories, considering multi-level relationships in analyzing policy impacts, addressing power dynamics across various levels, practicing reflexivity for self-awareness, acknowledging the temporal and spatial dimensions of societal structures, valuing diverse sources and types knowledge, and striving for social justice and equity in policy formulation and analysis (see Table 2). Applications of these guiding principles in the needs assessment and intervention planning are detailed in Table 2. Each guiding principle manifested in multiple ways. For example, the team addressed the issue of power, including the awareness of differential power across care systems and within the planning team, by incorporating a structure for sharing leadership during planning team meetings. Part way through the project two planning team members proposed intentional inclusion of an open ‘unmeeting’[1] time during the regular biweekly meetings, to encourage all team members to raise questions, additional agenda items, thoughts, and broader systemic concerns. As the initiative progressed the unmeeting space evolved to ensure that everyone had a chance to participate and was eventually stewarded by a community leader and researcher together. IBPA Table (Table 3) Our team emphasized values such as self-awareness, deep listening and reflection, and a commitment to actively engage in changing oneself and systems (Table 3 Q1: What knowledge, values, and experiences do you bring to this area of analysis? ). In addressing Question 2 (Q2: What is the ‘problem’ under consideration? ) we defined the problem as “structural oppression and systemic barriers create and perpetuate challenges for PLWH in their care management that then lead to inequities in HIV outcomes across intersectional categories.” The problem definition was extensively discussed in multiple planning team meetings until a consensus was reached. The team’s vision was to direct efforts towards systemic and structural changes to better support PLWH. In responding to Q3 we redefined the problem from the PLWH’s perspective, applying an equity lens to our analysis (Table 3 Q3: How has our representation of the ‘problem’ come about? ). The response to Q4 highlighted how this problem representation differentially affects groups, with a focus on the structural and systemic issues faced by people with low income, people of color, and LGBTQ individuals, all of whom experience inequities in HIV outcomes (Table 3 Q4: How are groups differentially affected by this representation of the ‘problem’? ). Q5 completes the descriptive part of the analysis by providing examples of current policy responses to HIV in the St. Louis area, such as the efforts of the Ryan White program, the FTSTL Steering Committee, and other CDC-funded programs for specific target populations (Table 3 Q5: What are the current policy responses to the ‘problems’? ). The second set of IBPA questions are transformative, bringing other lenses to the problem and encouraging a wider range of questions. We utilized existing publicly available data to identify current inequities, including higher rates of diagnosis and lower rates of care among Black gay and bisexual men, younger individuals, and people living below the poverty line (Q6: What inequalities actually exist in relation to the ‘problem’? ). The planning team identified potential immediate interventions, such as providing resources to front line organizations to help PLWH meet basic needs and actively repurposing public spaces to be more welcoming and inclusive (Q7: Where and how can (immediate) interventions be made to improve the problems in St. Louis? ). The short-, medium- and long-term solutions identified drew upon published literature, the experiences and ideas of key informants, and the collective knowledge and experiences of the planning team. Short-term solutions focus on meeting basic human needs through social supports, deployment of CHWs, improved alignment of state and federal funds with needs, and increased distribution of support funds through front line organizations closely connected to communities with greater needs (Q8: What are feasible short-, medium- and long-term solutions? ). Medium-term solutions include actively creating community spaces to process and heal historic trauma, increasing access to home testing, maintaining the social supports identified in immediate and short-term solutions, and integrating HIV services into primary care settings. These medium-term solutions aim to support individuals by making private and anonymous testing available and increasing the availability of routine care through standard health care channels. Long-term solutions involve addressing historic trauma, continuing biomedical research to develop a vaccine, and undertaking multipronged efforts to change the priorities and approaches of funding organizations, strengthening multidimensional measurement of health inequities, increasing representation of minorities in healthcare professions, and prioritizing work and funding through organizations that prioritize responding to impacts of race and racism more than emphasis on individual behavior change. The next three questions address how the program will reduce inequities, ensure implementation and uptake, and measure changes in inequalities. We expect the program will most immediately reduce inequities by enhancing organizational capacity to integrate CHWs with lived experience from the local community, training them, innovating care team implementation, and promoting cooperation across multiple organizations (Q9: How will proposed program reduce inequities? ). Regarding implementation and uptake, we have engaged with community leaders and groups through key informant interviews and other outreach activities to gather feedback, ideas and input on the intervention design and implementation strategies (Q10: How will implementation and uptake be assured?) . Demonstrating that inequalities have been reduced will involve process measures (such as the availability of culturally appropriate medical information), outcome measures (such as reductions in inequities of HIV care engagement and viral suppression), and longer-term systemic change measures (such as reductions in stigma and medical mistrust) (Q11: How will you know if inequalities have been reduced? ). The final question of the IBPA reflects on the process, with planning team members noting that the IBPA framework facilitated dialogue and learning that shifted power dynamics and promoted social justice (Q12). Utilizing the IBPA led to deeper engagement and understanding of interlocking issues and identities, focused the conversation on structural and systemic issues within both the research process and the planned intervention (Q12: How has the process of engaging in an intersectionality-based program analysis transformed: your thinking about relation and structures of power and inequity; the ways in which you and others engage in the work of policy development, implementation and evaluation; broader conceptualizations, relations and effects of power asymmetry in the everyday world ). Barriers to Effective Management of HIV for PLWH Across key informants, barriers to care for PLWH were identified at multiple levels, including the clinic/institutional level, provider level, CHW level and individual level (see Figure 2). [Figure 2 about here] Clinic/Institutional Barriers . High provider turnover, lack of sustainable funding for CHWs and other front line staff, insufficient pay and benefits for CHWs and front line staff, limited integration of CHWs into care teams, and limited organizational capacity for personalized treatment plans were all identified as barriers to effective management of HIV. “[W]e saw a great turnover with the providers at this office, like if you look back over the last eight years there's probably been 12 providers that have worked here, so people's level of engagement often times was quite low and their follow through. So as clinicians picked up patients, they didn't really have a good handle on the patient's history, both from a social perspective or medical perspective… so I think if I put myself in a patient's situation, I would have over time like decreased interest in my health care if I’m constantly experiencing clinician turnover. And I think because providers were here for such a short period of time they only touch on very superficial issues as they develop rapport with the patients, so like the deeper issues that affect their long-term care, I never really addressed.” [62-66] [Clinical Lead #2] Adequate compensation for CHWs and similar front line staff, sustainability of funding, and availability of comprehensive training programs were noted as significant factors impacting organizational ability to provide effective assistance to PLWH. As one community leader noted, “Most of our CHWs, and this is a nationwide thing, are supplied by grants, which means that their scope of service is then indicated by what that grant will allow, but also they don't have long term viability for their career…. [What] I’ve learned is that the region, the state, and the nation value them, but it's short lived when it comes to the operationality as well as the true infrastructure to support those workforces.” [130-133] [Community Lead #5] Provider level Barriers . Provider barriers that impact HIV management include challenges such as high workloads and limited time for providers to meet with each patient, as well as issues arising from provider knowledge and behaviors, such as limited awareness of CHWs and other front line staff. Clinical leaders reported being burdened with multiple responsibilities and having limited capacity to support clients in need. I think most physicians that I work with… have a lot of other responsibilities, and they'll see patients every two, three months. If people are doing less well, they might see him every three or four weeks. But I certainly think, and I have an expectation that if someone's really struggling, a health coach is someone that could … contact the patient once or twice a week. I’ve had some health coaches that text patients every day to remind them to take their meds …This is something I certainly couldn't do. [Clinical Lead #4] In addition, clinical leaders noted challenges in understanding the responsibilities of new types of support staff as innovative roles are introduced to the team. [O]ne of the problems with … Ryan White funded clinics, is that it provides money for a lot of type of roles like a health coach, but as soon as you get beyond the minimal office staff of your front desk person who handles taking in patients, and your medical assistants, the nurse, and the doctor, [nurse practitioner], you start adding people and you add people with more finely described roles. I think getting that information out so people understand who these people are and what they can offer is not easy…. [Clinical Lead #4] CHW and Front line Staff Barriers . Similar to clinical providers, CHWs and other front line staff encounter their own set of challenges that impact the care they provide to PLWH. These challenges include limited trust from the community, a lack of self-efficacy and confidence, insufficient knowledge and skills related to HIV, high caseloads, and scope of work limited by organizations. “[T]he distrust and the disconnect between medical care is so vast, if you come with a prescriptive posture it's over before it starts, you have to do something different.” [Clinical Lead #1] Front-line health workers highlighted the importance of dedicating time to earn their clients’ trust. “[Y]ou have to win their trust before you can test them [for HIV] because you have to … earn their trust, so they can open up and you can talk…. And when they trust you they can open up and they'll talk to you, and you can have that one on one relationship where you can say hey let's try this and then we talk in a week you let me know how you like that, and if you don't like that then we'll try something else.” [FG1-Prevention Specialist] Front Line health workers also noted the importance of having time to discuss various approaches and the necessity of offering training and skill-building opportunities. “I think we did more home visits back then, and we were able to spend a little more time with our clients doing some skill training and stuff like that. I think now we're so focused on trying to get progress notes done that we're not be able, you know we got so many clients that you can’t spend as much time with them as you used to.” [FG2-Supervisor] PLWH Barriers . Participants from all stakeholder groups identified challenges that impact the ability of PLWH to manage their HIV. Key themes included racial stigma, diagnosis denial, lack of social support, comorbidities, medication side effects, lack of time and opportunity to access health plans, and the inability to address basic needs. “There's always going to be a stigma attached to being HIV positive, and I think part of that is in the African American community, and I think the community health workers would have to ask that population why they drop out of care to actually get a real sense of why they're not staying in care and take their meds, whether it be the other things that we've discussed already or if there's some other reason why they're not in care or staying in care.”] [Clinical Lead 3] Addressing comorbidities such as mental health and chronic disease as well as challenges in meeting basic needs is crucial for supporting effective management of HIV by PLWH. “We try to help people stay in care, but sometimes our clients have severe and persistent mental illnesses, they are not ready to be in care so sometimes they don't follow up with services, it’s too regimented. So we kind of leave them on the fringe, but we still talk to them and try to say, well, when you need me call me…And so six months down the road they're like … I need emergency housing, let me call [participant’s name].… So we get them back into care. (FG2-Supervisor)” PLWH need access to a range of services, and may have multiple specialist care needs. “[W]ith our clients and patients that we work with you know, besides going to their medical appointments, dental appointments, and the other specialist appointments they might have, they don't have transportation, you know, they don't feel well, you know they're in a really difficult spot in their life and they feel alone.…” (FG1-Health Coach2) Logic Model of the Problem Drawing on the results of the needs assessment and the HIV literature we developed two models of the problem (Figure 2), each highlighting different dimensions. The team decided both versions of the problem logic model were necessary to incorporate the complexity and external factors that influence the success or failure of future interventions. The first model (Figure 2a) adopts a nodal approach, emphasizing the mutually reinforcing challenges that affect management of HIV. The second model (Figure 2b) employs a linear approach, focusing on the pathways of influence between various barriers to HIV management. In Figure 2a, the team positioned CHWs in a distinct node to draw attention to their role as intermediaries between institutions and individuals, while also highlighting their unique resource constraints. Although structural oppression and systemic barriers were specifically mentioned in the statement of the problem, Figure 2a also acknowledges that poverty, racism, stigma, legislation and rural/urban issues are important external influences. In Figure 2b, the arrows illustrate the multiple pathways through which clinical and institutional challenges impact providers (arrows 1, 2, 6 and 11) and CHWs (arrows 4, 5, 12 and 15), as well as the pathways by which challenges at the provider and CHW level impact clients. Supporting documentation for the arrows in Figure 2b is provided in Appendix C. Discussion This study conducted an innovative participatory intersectional needs assessment to facilitate the adaptation and implementation planning of an intervention integrating CHWs into the HIV care system. While prior applications of the IBPA have focused on policy change,( 12 , 63 ) this project represents the first use to our knowledge of the IBPA as a framework for conducting a participatory needs assessment. The IBPA fostered a focus on intersectional challenges, ensuring we paid explicit attention to less heard from voices. A recent meta-analysis on stigma and intersectionality further supports the approach, showing that intersectionality deepens the understanding of stigma experienced across social identities.( 64 ) During the IBPA process the research team encountered several challenges, including ensuring that both community and academic partners understood the IBPA and its role in informing the research. Balancing the need to complete the IBPA process with the priority of reviewing qualitative and quantitative documents in a timely manner required allocating purposeful time in meetings and creating working documents to track themes and discussions. Valuing the expertise while navigating the priorities of community partners without overburdening them, required careful planning. Barriers to effective HIV management for PLWH, consistent with existing literature, were identified at the clinic/institutional, provider, CHW and client levels. Specific barriers reported at the clinic/institutional level included high turnover, insufficient funding for CHWs, limited integration of CHWs in care teams, and restricted organizational capacity for personalized treatment. Provider barriers reported encompassed high workloads, limited time, and inadequate awareness of CHWs skills. CHWs and front line staff reported facing challenges, including community distrust, low self-efficacy and confidence, insufficient HIV knowledge and skills, high caseloads, and a restricted scope of work. Client-level barriers reported included stigma, diagnosis denial, lack of social support, co-morbidities and medication side effects, healthcare access difficulties, and unmet basic needs. Previous studies have identified similar client-level barriers to HIV treatment engagement, including competing life activities, poor transportation, stigma, lack of insurance coverage, poverty, and beliefs about HIV care.( 65 – 74 ) Among Black women living with HIV, HIV-related stigmas expressed by healthcare providers to them and poor quality HIV services have been identified as key barriers to treatment engagement.( 65 , 75 , 76 ) At the organizational level, although research is limited, studies have identified challenges such as finding providers who speak the same language as patients and treat them with respect, providing team-based care, managing the cost of services, and navigating the logistics of the care system.( 77 , 78 ) Previously identified clinic and provider-level facilitators include patient friendly services and positive, trusting relationships with providers.( 68 , 79 , 80 ) The logic model of the problem employed two complementary formats: a nodal model and a linear pathways model, to capture the intersectional and systemic issues. While problem logic models typically offer a focused representation of a problem’s components, the planning team found it challenging to agree on a singular linear model. Utilizing two models allows for the incorporation of extensive chains of drivers and influences on HIV outcomes. We report here on the initial steps of the IntMap and ImpMap protocols, with the needs assessment results intended to inform the future adaptation of the CHW approach. Results identifying implementation strategies and the development of an implementation plan to address identified barriers and enhance implementation outcomes( 81 – 84 ) will be presented elsewhere. Limitations This study was centered on St. Louis, and while its processes are relevant to other settings, specific barriers require validation in other populations. Due to challenges in recruiting younger PLWH and transgender individuals for interviews, future activities will include structured community conversations at St. Louis locations frequented by these groups to gather their input. Conclusions Use of an intersectional framework contributed to identification of systemic and structural barriers to effective HIV management. The systemic and structural perspective was also apparent in the two complementary logic models of the problem developed by the team. Barriers to effective HIV management were identified across multiple levels, including organizations, providers, CHWs, front line staff and clients. Emphasizing an intersectional approach highlighted similar barriers as previous research to HIV management at the individual, provider and front line staff levels. At the clinic and institutional level additional barriers were identified such as high staff turnover, insufficient CHWs and insufficient CHW integration. This participatory intersectional needs assessment has identified local challenges and priorities to be addressed in the adapted intervention and implementation strategies. Abbreviations HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus PLWH People Living with HIV IBPA Intersectionality Based Policy/Program Analysis CHW Community Health Worker LGBTQ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer EHE Ending the HIV Epidemic IntMap Intervention Mapping ImpMap Implementation Mapping STEER St. Louis Enhancing Engagement and Retention in HIV CARE CBO Community Based Organization FTSTL Fast Track St. Louis CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Declarations Ethical Review . The study was reviewed and determined exempt by the Institutional Review Boards at Yale University and Washington University in St. Louis. Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to data collection. Availability of data and materials. The template used to analyze the interviews and focus groups is provided as supplemental Table 1; data collection materials and qualitative data generated and analyzed during the study are not publicly available but may be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. All requests for data should be made to the corresponding author at [email protected] . Competing interests. The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Funding . The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was a public health-academic partnership funded as part of the 2021 NIH AIDS Research Centers (ARC) Ending the HIV Epidemic administrative supplement awarded to Yale ARC (3P30MH062294-19S2). The funder had no role in the conduct of the study. Authors' contributions . DLH, PM, TB and DS designed the study and obtained funding; DLH, YH, and VW developed the data collection guide in consultation with DR, JJ, GG, TB, PM; DLH, YH, VW, GG and CC collected the qualitative data; DLH, YH, VW, GG and CC conducted the analysis in iterative discussion and consultation with PM, TB, DR, and JJ; FA was responsible for data visualization; DLH drafted the manuscript; all authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript. Acknowledgements. We thank all of the people who talked with us and provided their thoughts and feedback for this project, whether informally or formally. We thank Faiad Alam for his work in developing the visualizations for the logic models and the supporting materials in Appendix C. We thank Parul Kodan Hooda for her review of an earlier draft of the manuscript, and Prajakta Adsul for her careful review and comments on the semi-final manuscript. Consent for publication Not applicable. References Fauci AS, Redfield RR, Sigounas G, Weahkee MD, Giroir BP. Ending the HIV Epidemic: A Plan for the United States. JAMA. 2019;321(9):844-5. Giroir BP. The time is now to end the HIV epidemic. American Journal of Public Health. 2020;110(1):22-4. Nosyk B, Zang X, Krebs E, Enns B, Min JE, Behrends CN, et al. Ending the HIV epidemic in the USA: an economic modelling study in six cities. Lancet HIV. 2020;7(7):e491-e503. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimated HIV incidence and prevalence in the United States, 2017-2021: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2023 [updated May 2023. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/hiv-surveillance.html. Bowleg L. The problem with the phrase women and minorities: intersectionality-an important theoretical framework for public health. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(7):1267-73. Chenneville T, Gabbidon K, Brinson A, Capobianco J, Cario A, Rodriguez C. Lived Experiences of Racism and Intersectional Stigma Among Black Youth Living With HIV in the Deep South. Stigma and Health. 2022. Quinn KG. Applying an intersectional framework to understand syndemic conditions among young Black gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. Soc Sci Med. 2022;295:112779. Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services. Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) 2021 [Available from: https://health.mo.gov/living/healthcondiseases/communicable/hivaids/pdf/ending-draft-plan.pdf. Baugher AR, Whiteman A, Jeffries WLt, Finlayson T, Lewis R, Wejnert C, Group NS. Black men who have sex with men living in states with HIV criminalization laws report high stigma, 23 U.S. cities, 2017. AIDS. 2021;35(10):1637-45. Quinn KG, John SA, Hirshfield S, Algiers O, O'Neil A, Petroll AE, Walsh JL. Challenges to meeting the HIV care needs of older adults in the rural South. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health. 2022;2:100113. Gilbert KL, Ray R, Siddiqi A, Shetty S, Baker EA, Elder K, Griffith DM. Visible and Invisible Trends in Black Men's Health: Pitfalls and Promises for Addressing Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Inequities in Health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2016;37:295-311. Hankivsky O, editor. An Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis Framework. Vancouver, BC: Institute for Intersectionality Research and Policy, Simon Fraser University; 2012. Kapilashrami A, Hankivsky O. Intersectionality and why it matters to global health. Lancet. 2018;391(10140):2589-91. Collins PH. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment: routledge; 2022. Crenshaw K. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum. 1989;1989(1):139. Watkins-Hayes C. Intersectionality and the sociology of HIV/AIDS: Past, present, and future research directions. Annual Review of Sociology. 2014;40:431-57. Hankivsky O, Grace D, Hunting G, Giesbrecht M, Fridkin A, Rudrum S, et al. An intersectionality-based policy analysis framework: critical reflections on a methodology for advancing equity. Int J Equity Health. 2014;13:119. Hankivsky O. Women's health, men's health, and gender and health: implications of intersectionality. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(11):1712-20. Hankivsky O, Reid C, Cormier R, Varcoe C, Clark N, Benoit C, Brotman S. Exploring the promises of intersectionality for advancing women's health research. Int J Equity Health. 2010;9:5. Humphries DL, Sodipo M, Jackson SD. The intersectionality-based policy analysis framework: demonstrating utility through application to the pre-vaccine U.S. COVID-19 policy response. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1040851. Bowleg L. Evolving Intersectionality Within Public Health: From Analysis to Action. Am J Public Health. 2021;111(1):88-90. McBride K, Carlson M, Everett B. Using the Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis Framework to Evaluate a Policy Supporting Sexual Health and Intimacy in Long-Term Care, Assisted Living, Group Homes & Supported Housing. J Appl Gerontol. 2022;41(9):1992-2001. Isiwele A, Rivas C, Stokes G. Nigerian and Ghanaian Young People's Experiences of Care for Common Mental Disorders in Inner London: Protocol for a Multimethod Investigation. JMIR Res Protoc. 2022;11(12):e42575. Kehoe MacLeod K, Flores KN, Chandra K. Identifying facilitators and barriers to integrated and equitable care for community-dwelling older adults with high emergency department use from historically marginalized groups. Int J Equity Health. 2023;22(1):97. Ingram M, Doubleday K, Bell ML, Lohr A, Murrieta L, Velasco M, et al. Community Health Worker Impact on Chronic Disease Outcomes Within Primary Care Examined Using Electronic Health Records. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(10):1668-74. Patel MI, Kapphahn K, Dewland M, Aguilar V, Sanchez B, Sisay E, et al. Effect of a Community Health Worker Intervention on Acute Care Use, Advance Care Planning, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Adults With Advanced Stages of Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8(8):1139-48. Perry HB, Zulliger R, Rogers MM. Community health workers in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: an overview of their history, recent evolution, and current effectiveness. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:399-421. Islam N, Nadkarni SK, Zahn D, Skillman M, Kwon SC, Trinh-Shevrin C. Integrating community health workers within Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act implementation. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2015;21(1):42-50. Daniels AS, Bergeson S, Myrick KJ. Defining Peer Roles and Status Among Community Health Workers and Peer Support Specialists in Integrated Systems of Care. Psychiatr Serv. 2017;68(12):1296-8. Pinto D, Carroll-Scott A, Christmas T, Heidig M, Turchi R. Community health workers: improving population health through integration into healthcare systems. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2020;32(5):674-82. Mistry SK, Harris E, Harris M. Community Health Workers as Healthcare Navigators in Primary Care Chronic Disease Management: a Systematic Review. Journal of general internal medicine. 2021. Kamanda A, Embleton L, Ayuku D, Atwoli L, Gisore P, Ayaya S, et al. Harnessing the power of the grassroots to conduct public health research in sub-Saharan Africa: a case study from western Kenya in the adaptation of community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches. BMC public health. 2013;13:1-10. Peretz PJ, Islam N, Matiz LA. Community Health Workers and Covid-19 - Addressing Social Determinants of Health in Times of Crisis and Beyond. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(19):e108. Wolfe HL, Baughman A, Davoust M, Sprague Martinez LS, Rajabiun S, Drainoni ML. Client Satisfaction with Community Health Workers in HIV Care Teams. J Community Health. 2021. Davoust M, Drainoni M-L, Baughman A, Campos Rojo M, Estes T, Rajabiun S, et al. “He Gave Me Spirit and Hope”: Client Experiences with the Implementation of Community Health Worker Programs in HIV Care. AIDS patient care and STDs. 2021;35(8):318-26. Kenya S, Jones J, Arheart K, Kobetz E, Chida N, Baer S, et al. Using Community Health Workers to Improve Clinical Outcomes Among People Living with HIV: A Randomized Controlled Trial. AIDS and Behavior. 2013;17(9):2927-34. Kenya S, Chida N, Symes S, Shor-Posner G. Can community health workers improve adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy in the USA? A review of the literature. HIV medicine. 2011;12(9):525-34. Shaghaghi A, Bhopal RS, Sheikh A. Approaches to Recruiting 'Hard-To-Reach' Populations into Re-search: A Review of the Literature. Health Promot Perspect. 2011;1(2):86-94. Drainoni M-L, Baughman AL, Bachman SS, Bowers-Sword R, Davoust M, Fortu K, et al. Integrating community health workers into HIV care teams: Impact on HIV care outcomes. Journal of HIV/AIDS Social Services. 2020;19(3):204-19. Center for Community Health and Development. Community Tool Box Kansas: University of Kansas; 1994-2023 [Community-building skills tool box]. Available from: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/analyze/where-to-start/participatory-approaches/main. Suen JJ, Marrone N, Han HR, Lin FR, Nieman CL. Translating Public Health Practices: Community-Based Approaches for Addressing Hearing Health Care Disparities. Semin Hear. 2019;40(1):37-48. Yang KI, Chung-Do JJ, Fujitani L, Foster A, Mark S, Okada Y, et al. Advancing Community-Based Participatory Research to Address Health Disparities in Hawai'i: Perspectives from Academic Researchers. Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2019;78(3):83-8. Burgess R, Dedios Sanguineti MC, Maldonado-Carrizosa D, Fonseca L, Vera San Juan N, Lucumi D, et al. Using participatory action research to reimagine community mental health services in Colombia: a mixed-method study protocol. BMJ Open. 2022;12(12):e069329. Douglas JA, Subica AM, Franks L, Johnson G, Leon C, Villanueva S, Grills CT. Using Participatory Mapping to Diagnose Upstream Determinants of Health and Prescribe Downstream Policy-Based Interventions. Prev Chronic Dis. 2020;17:E138. Mann-Jackson L, Alonzo J, Garcia M, Trent S, Bell J, Horridge DN, Rhodes SD. Using community-based participatory research to address STI/HIV disparities and social determinants of health among young GBMSM and transgender women of colour in North Carolina, USA. Health & Social Care in the Community. 2021;29(5):e192-e203. Rajabiun S, Baughman A, Sullivan M, Poteet B, Downes A, Davich JAW, et al. A Participatory Curricula for Community Health Workers and Supervisors to Increase HIV Health Outcomes. Front Public Health. 2021;9(964). Rhodes SD, Kelley C, Simán F, Cashman R, Alonzo J, McGuire J, et al. Using Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) to Develop a Community-Level HIV Prevention Intervention for Latinas: A Local Response to a Global Challenge. Women's Health Issues. 2012;22(3):e293-e301. Mwamba C, Beres LK, Mukamba N, Jere L, Foloko M, Lumbo K, et al. Provider perspectives on patient-centredness: participatory formative research and rapid analysis methods to inform the design and implementation of a facility-based HIV care improvement intervention in Zambia. J Int Aids Soc. 2023;26 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e26114. Holliday RC, Phillips R, Akintobi TH. A Community-Based Participatory Approach to the Development and Implementation of an HIV Health Behavior Intervention: Lessons Learned in Navigating Research and Practice Systems from Project HAPPY. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(2). Rajabiun S, Lennon-Dearing R, Hirschi M, Davis B, Williams B, Sprague Martinez L, Campos M. Ending the HIV Epidemic: One Southern Community Speaks. Social Work in Public Health. 2021;36(6):647-64. Oliver B, Pearl C, John EF-, Norris D, Olaniyan FE, Samson K, et al. Understanding Lived Experiences of Stigma for People Living with HIV: A Community Based Participatory Research Study. The Qualitative Report. 2023;28(2):623-43. Fernandez ME, Ten Hoor GA, van Lieshout S, Rodriguez SA, Beidas RS, Parcel G, et al. Implementation Mapping: Using Intervention Mapping to Develop Implementation Strategies. Front Public Health. 2019;7:158. Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G. Intervention mapping: a process for developing theory- and evidence-based health education programs. Health Educ Behav. 1998;25(5):545-63. Eldredge LKB, Markham CM, Ruiter RA, Fernández ME, Kok G, Parcel GS. Planning health promotion programs: an intervention mapping approach: John Wiley & Sons; 2016. Bauer MS, Damschroder L, Hagedorn H, Smith J, Kilbourne AM. An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychol. 2015;3:32. Leeman J, Birken SA, Powell BJ, Rohweder C, Shea CM. Beyond "implementation strategies": classifying the full range of strategies used in implementation science and practice. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):125. Damschroder LJ. Clarity out of chaos: Use of theory in implementation research. Psychiatry Res. 2020;283:112461. Fernandez ME, Ruiter RAC, Markham CM, Kok G. Intervention Mapping: Theory- and Evidence-Based Health Promotion Program Planning: Perspective and Examples. Front Public Health. 2019;7:209. Sprague Martinez L, Davoust M, Rajabiun S, Baughman A, Bachman SS, Bowers-Sword R, et al. "Part of getting to where we are is because we have been open to change" integrating community health workers on care teams at ten Ryan White HIV/AIDS program recipient sites. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):922. McNall M, Foster-Fishman PG. Methods of rapid evaluation, assessment, and appraisal. J American Journal of Evaluation. 2007;28(2):151-68. Vindrola-Padros C, Johnson GA. Rapid Techniques in Qualitative Research: A Critical Review of the Literature. Qual Health Res. 2020;30(10):1596-604. Damschroder LJ, Reardon CM, Widerquist MAO, Lowery J. The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback. Implement Sci. 2022;17(1):75. Hankivsky O, Cormier R. Intersectionality and public policy: Some lessons from existing models. Political Research Quarterly. 2011;64(1):217-29. Jackson-Best F, Edwards N. Stigma and intersectionality: a systematic review of systematic reviews across HIV/AIDS, mental illness, and physical disability. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):919. Algarin AB, Sheehan DM, Varas-Diaz N, Fennie KP, Zhou Z, Spencer EC, et al. Health Care-Specific Enacted HIV-Related Stigma's Association with Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence and Viral Suppression Among People Living with HIV in Florida. AIDS patient care and STDs. 2020;34(7):316-26. Chang EJ, Fleming M, Nunez A, Dombrowski JC. Predictors of Successful HIV Care Re-engagement Among Persons Poorly Engaged in HIV Care. AIDS Behav. 2019;23(9):2490-7. Krentz HB, McPhee P, Arbess G, Jackson L, Stewart AM, Bois D, Rourke SB. Reporting on patients living with HIV "disengaging from care". Who is actually "lost to follow-up"? AIDS care. 2021;33(1):114-20. Yehia BR, Stewart L, Momplaisir F, Mody A, Holtzman CW, Jacobs LM, et al. Barriers and facilitators to patient retention in HIV care. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:246. Bulsara SM, Wainberg ML, Newton-John TRO. Predictors of Adult Retention in HIV Care: A Systematic Review. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(3):752-64. Sheehan DM, Fennie KP, Mauck DE, Maddox LM, Lieb S, Trepka MJ. Retention in HIV Care and Viral Suppression: Individual- and Neighborhood-Level Predictors of Racial/Ethnic Differences, Florida, 2015. AIDS patient care and STDs. 2017;31(4):167-75. Hall BJ, Sou KL, Beanland R, Lacky M, Tso LS, Ma Q, et al. Barriers and Facilitators to Interventions Improving Retention in HIV Care: A Qualitative Evidence Meta-Synthesis. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(6):1755-67. Lee H, Wu XK, Genberg BL, Mugavero MJ, Cole SR, Lau B, et al. Beyond binary retention in HIV care: predictors of the dynamic processes of patient engagement, disengagement, and re-entry into care in a US clinical cohort. AIDS. 2018;32(15):2217-25. Nijhawan AE, Liang Y, Vysyaraju K, Munoz J, Ketchum N, Saber J, et al. Missed Initial Medical Visits: Predictors, Timing, and Implications for Retention in HIV Care. AIDS patient care and STDs. 2017;31(5):213-21. Swann M. Economic strengthening for HIV prevention and risk reduction: a review of the evidence. AIDS care. 2018;30(sup3):37-84. Geter A, Sutton MY, Hubbard McCree D. Social and structural determinants of HIV treatment and care among black women living with HIV infection: a systematic review: 2005-2016. AIDS care. 2018;30(4):409-16. Geter A, Sutton MY, Armon C, Durham MD, Palella FJ, Jr., Tedaldi E, et al. Trends of racial and ethnic disparities in virologic suppression among women in the HIV Outpatient Study, USA, 2010-2015. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0189973. Gelaude DJ, Hart J, Carey JW, Denson D, Erickson C, Klein C, et al. HIV Provider Experiences Engaging and Retaining Patients in HIV Care and Treatment: "A Soft Place to Fall". The Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care : JANAC. 2017;28(4):491-503. Byrd KK, Hardnett F, Clay PG, Delpino A, Hazen R, Shankle MD, et al. Retention in HIV Care Among Participants in the Patient-Centered HIV Care Model: A Collaboration Between Community-Based Pharmacists and Primary Medical Providers. AIDS patient care and STDs. 2019;33(2):58-66. Mimiaga MJ, August Oddleifson D, Meersman SC, Silvia A, Hughto JMW, Landers S, et al. Multilevel Barriers to Engagement in the HIV Care Continuum Among Residents of the State of Rhode Island Living with HIV. AIDS Behav. 2020;24(4):1133-50. Wessinger MH, Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Mangal JP, Gokhale RH, Ruchin L, et al. Retention in HIV care depends on patients' perceptions of the clinic experience. AIDS care. 2017;29(10):1212-7. Powell BJ, Beidas RS, Lewis CC, Aarons GA, McMillen JC, Proctor EK, Mandell DS. Methods to Improve the Selection and Tailoring of Implementation Strategies. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2017;44(2):177-94. Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, Damschroder LJ, Smith JL, Matthieu MM, et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci. 2015;10:21. Garba RM, Gadanya MA. The role of intervention mapping in designing disease prevention interventions: A systematic review of the literature. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0174438. Durks D, Fernandez-Llimos F, Hossain LN, Franco-Trigo L, Benrimoj SI, Sabater-Hernandez D. Use of Intervention Mapping to Enhance Health Care Professional Practice: A Systematic Review. Health Educ Behav. 2017;44(4):524-35. Footnotes An unmeeting is an intentional creation of an unstructured space for informal discussions without the rules, format or constraints of a formal meeting. Tables Tables 1-3 are available in the Supplementary Files section. Supplementary Files PlanningandProcesstables4.2024.docx AppendixARAPsheettemplates.docx AppendixBmatrixformat.xlsx AppendixCLinearmodelsupportingmaterials4.5a.2024.docx STROBEchecklistcrosssectional.docx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4225131","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":291359267,"identity":"05cd8b85-4922-40c1-80a5-2f794fb2940f","order_by":0,"name":"Debbie Humphries","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5979-3717","institution":"Yale University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Debbie","middleName":"","lastName":"Humphries","suffix":""},{"id":291359268,"identity":"a112a1ce-f751-4f28-8288-335dba4b0ff6","order_by":1,"name":"Phillip Marotta","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Washington University In St Louis: Washington University in St Louis","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Phillip","middleName":"","lastName":"Marotta","suffix":""},{"id":291359269,"identity":"a60863d6-ec11-4302-98e1-bd3aeaf9083c","order_by":2,"name":"Yue Hu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Yale University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yue","middleName":"","lastName":"Hu","suffix":""},{"id":291359270,"identity":"53fd7775-787e-40e5-a8a8-576dd0b0b9dd","order_by":3,"name":"Victor Wang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Yale University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Victor","middleName":"","lastName":"Wang","suffix":""},{"id":291359271,"identity":"274bc1a4-003e-45da-bb0d-6b5a55e72219","order_by":4,"name":"Greg Gross","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Washington University In St Louis: Washington University in St Louis","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Greg","middleName":"","lastName":"Gross","suffix":""},{"id":291359272,"identity":"e91e0982-884f-469f-8efa-727dc760ef58","order_by":5,"name":"Darius Rucker","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Keys to Knowledge \u0026 Action Consulting","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Darius","middleName":"","lastName":"Rucker","suffix":""},{"id":291359273,"identity":"0b16f322-01d2-49dd-9483-a4521c4cb63b","order_by":6,"name":"Johnnie Jones","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"St. Louis Ryan White Planning Council","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Johnnie","middleName":"","lastName":"Jones","suffix":""},{"id":291359274,"identity":"54a2ad7b-944a-4b93-b1ec-5518945764e0","order_by":7,"name":"Faiad Alam","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Yale University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Faiad","middleName":"","lastName":"Alam","suffix":""},{"id":291359275,"identity":"f9592430-158e-404b-bf52-ee92a88f4245","order_by":8,"name":"Tawnya Brown","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Vivent Health","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Tawnya","middleName":"","lastName":"Brown","suffix":""},{"id":291359276,"identity":"af97bf3d-b1b4-4a8f-a69d-de24adc38c10","order_by":9,"name":"Chelsey R. Carter","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Yale University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Chelsey","middleName":"R.","lastName":"Carter","suffix":""},{"id":291359277,"identity":"786ed26e-e1dd-43d5-abf0-79d09d6d3eff","order_by":10,"name":"Donna Spiegelman","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Yale University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Donna","middleName":"","lastName":"Spiegelman","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-04-05 23:57:01","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4225131/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4225131/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":55063517,"identity":"d8ba1a65-3a6b-4b4a-9dbe-b224f30b7a89","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-04-22 03:10:27","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":293600,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eIntersectionality-Based Policy Analysis Framework. \u0026nbsp;The descriptive and transformative questions are shown surrounded by the guiding principles to highlight the complex interaction of the two key components of the framework, and the importance of addressing both questions and guiding principles simultaneously. [Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis Framework© 2021 by Debbie Humphries, Michelle Sodipo, Skyler Jackson; based on ideas of Olivia Hankivsky is licensed under Attribution 4.0 International.39]\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4225131/v1/0f5961817ef5e33fef1c3277.png"},{"id":55063518,"identity":"cadb7951-4f4d-4af7-b7a8-5be7c7f9ec07","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-04-22 03:10:28","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":904506,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ea: \u003c/strong\u003eNodal model showing systemic and contextual influences on problem\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eb: \u003c/strong\u003eLinear model of problem pathways based on relevant literature, interviews and focus groups\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4225131/v1/ad587fb1de821667ed0b8bcd.png"},{"id":77938120,"identity":"1ed89fd9-7b40-44dc-8042-bfdec4b1819b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-07 04:52:07","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1959919,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4225131/v1/d2e6d958-b87a-43e5-90bc-ccc0dbd94749.pdf"},{"id":55062967,"identity":"42cfd25c-ab83-4ae4-84d8-1e1937cfc071","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-04-22 03:02:28","extension":"docx","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":40277,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"PlanningandProcesstables4.2024.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4225131/v1/c378c01bfcb457e263af3379.docx"},{"id":55062962,"identity":"21cd125e-de8a-47c8-97ff-811c1ba0ae50","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-04-22 03:02:27","extension":"docx","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":18751,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"AppendixARAPsheettemplates.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4225131/v1/991a94a7c43cde0c8e7ee35d.docx"},{"id":55062965,"identity":"a2965758-0efb-45c2-b5c8-10f0a7e3711c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-04-22 03:02:28","extension":"xlsx","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":48465,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"AppendixBmatrixformat.xlsx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4225131/v1/ffc763b4f316842674eed667.xlsx"},{"id":55062968,"identity":"9751fbcf-3748-46c4-ac62-be092726533d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-04-22 03:02:28","extension":"docx","order_by":4,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":20161,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"AppendixCLinearmodelsupportingmaterials4.5a.2024.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4225131/v1/09b1e39b50ebf179f19b774f.docx"},{"id":55062964,"identity":"5e908bc8-6029-41d5-b56a-b376905b182b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-04-22 03:02:28","extension":"docx","order_by":5,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":33100,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"STROBEchecklistcrosssectional.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4225131/v1/a3cbc37dcd61c2f52ffb2a4d.docx"}],"financialInterests":"","formattedTitle":"St. Louis Enhancing Engagement and Retention in HIV/AIDS Care (STEER): a participatory intersectional needs assessment for intervention and implementation planning","fulltext":[{"header":"Contributions to the literature","content":"\u003cul\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eWe report here on an innovative process for conducting a participatory intersectional needs assessment as an initial phase of intervention mapping and implementation mapping.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eThe intersectionality-based policy analysis framework provided a structured approach for identifying structural and systemic barriers to effective management of HIV.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBarriers to effective management of HIV were identified at multiple levels, and included\u0026nbsp;high staff turnover, insufficient numbers of CHWs and insufficient integration of CHWs at the clinic and institutional levels.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eThe participatory team developed two complementary logic models in order to capture the intersectional and systemic nature of the problem.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e"},{"header":"BACKGROUND","content":"\u003cp\u003eEnding the HIV epidemic is a critical priority for global public health.(\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR2\" citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e) Despite progress in the prevention and treatment of HIV over the past decades, new infections occur daily in the United States and are highest among Black men, particularly those who have sex with men.(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e) A significant number of people living with HIV (PLWH) in the United States are not receiving adequate care, with an estimated 21% being unaware of their HIV status, 25% not linked to care within 6\u0026ndash;12 months of diagnosis, 50% not engaged in routine care/follow-up, and 25% not receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART).(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e) Inequities in access to HIV treatment persist among young adults, people of color, and the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ) communities, highlighting the importance of an intersectional lens in developing and improving interventions to mitigate the complex web of inequities.(\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR6\" citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo tackle these challenges, the Ending the HIV Epidemic Initiative (EHE) was launched in 2019 with the goal of a 90% reduction in new HIV infections in the U.S. by 2030.(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e) The EHE prioritizes early diagnosis, rapid and effective treatment, prevention strategies such as pre-exposure prophylaxis, and quick response to potential outbreaks to make HIV a rare infection. Missouri is one of seven priority states under the EHE initiative due to higher rates of rural infections and presents unique challenges with a history of socioeconomic and racial inequities. In St. Louis black men and women are three to eight times more likely to be diagnosed with HIV than their white counterparts,(\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR9 CR10\" citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e) and high rates of HIV infection and lower engagement along the continuum of care are seen among young adults, people of color, and LGBTQ communities.(\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR6\" citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e) There are notable gaps in understanding the complex and overlapping dynamics that influence engagement and retention in HIV/AIDS care. The lack of an intersectional lens has obscured the structural vulnerabilities created by systemic responses to race, gender, sexual identities, and socioeconomic status, hindering comprehensive solutions for diverse communities.(\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR10\" citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e) Applying an intersectional lens to understand social and structural determinants of health through a participatory community approach can inform the adaptation and implementation of targeted interventions, such as Community Health Workers (CHWs) to address the complex and interconnected factors contributing to HIV inequities.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec2\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eIntersectionality-based policy analysis (IBPA) conceptual framework\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eWe used the intersectionality-based policy analysis (IBPA) framework(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e) to adapt a multilevel intervention and develop implementation strategies for a CHW-centered program to reduce inequities along the HIV care cascade. Intersectionality theory focuses on moving beyond examining individual factors, such as biology, socioeconomic status, sex, gender, and race, and elucidates the relationships and interactions among multiple interlocking systems across all levels of society for an individual or group.(\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR14\" citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e) The IBPA framework (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e) employs principles of social justice, power, and diversity of knowledge to interrogate overlapping systems and structures that affect policy and programmatic issues.(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e) IBPA has been applied in various case studies and settings, including maternity care, HIV prevention strategies for gay men, and the criminalization of HIV nondisclosure in Canada, generating equity-focused perspectives that incorporate diverse viewpoints in both defining problems and seeking sustainable solutions (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR18\" citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e). The IBPA framework has also been used to identify intersectional drivers of inequities in access to HIV treatment services.(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e) We selected this framework to guide intervention adaptation and implementation planning based on the explicit emphasis on discussing values and creating a participatory and equity-based space for leading the project, as well as an emphasis on praxis \u0026ndash; using an intersectional lens to change systems.(\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR21\" citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e) Recent studies have demonstrated the value of the IBPA framework,(\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR23\" citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e) exemplified by its application to the U.S. COVID-19 policy response;(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e) which underscores the growing significance of considerations of intersectionality in public health and highlights the transformative shift from analysis to actionable strategies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e[Insert Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e about here]\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe deployment of Community Health Workers (CHWs) to provide enhanced client support and strengthen client trust has been shown to be an effective strategy for enhancing client engagement,(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e) providing acute treatment(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e) and overcoming social and structural barriers that burden hard-to-reach populations.(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e) CHWs are trusted members of the local community who deliver critical health promotion interventions, characterized by racial, socioeconomic and ethnic backgrounds, as well as lived experiences, that align with those of their client population.(\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR29 CR30\" citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e) This strategy has improved health outcomes for chronic conditions such as diabetes(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e) and has been a valuable tool in responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e) In addition, CHWs have demonstrated a remarkable capacity to bridge gaps in the provision of HIV treatment as PLWH working with trained CHWs have higher rates of engagement along the treatment cascade and better health outcomes.(\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR35 CR36\" citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e37\u003c/span\u003e) Enhanced personal contact between lay health workers and PLWH strengthens continuity of care for HIV clients by developing closer bonds with healthcare providers and reducing distrust of the medical system.(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e) Integrating CHW roles into HIV treatment settings increases engagement in HIV treatment and care, although more implementation research is needed to understand the best ways to implement and scale up integration of CHWs into medical systems of care for PLWH.(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eParticipatory Planning and Needs Assessment\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eParticipatory approaches to intervention adaptation and implementation increase community buy-in and enhance the viability, effectiveness and sustainability of interventions.(\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR41 CR42\" citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e) Participatory planning involves active participation and input from healthcare providers, community members, and other stakeholders to increase the likelihood that systems, service delivery and implementation are tailored to the community, leading to better health outcomes and improved quality of life.(\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR45 CR46 CR47\" citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e48\u003c/span\u003e) Participatory planning is critical for offering patient-centered HIV care that is responsive to the unique needs and preferences of the community.(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e49\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e50\u003c/span\u003e) By including PLWH in the process of adapting programs and implementation planning, teams can formulate more effective implementation strategies to strengthen the ability of CHWs and their organizations to reduce stigma and discrimination, increase adherence to treatment, and enhance the ownership by PLWH for their own care.(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e49\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e51\u003c/span\u003e) Participatory planning can help identify and address barriers and facilitators to care, such as lack of access to transportation, concerns about confidentiality and levels of client-provider trust.(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e) By integrating an intersectional approach with participatory planning in conducting a needs assessment, we enhanced our ability to accurately capture and respond to the community\u0026rsquo;s needs. The inclusion of participatory approaches not only acknowledges the unique insights and experiences of those directly affected by HIV but also cultivates a sense of investment and collaboration within communities.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntervention Mapping and Implementation Mapping (IntMap and ImpMap)(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e52\u003c/span\u003e) provide a process for systematically developing an intervention and an implementation plan, beginning with a needs assessment.(\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR54 CR55 CR56\" citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e53\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR57\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e57\u003c/span\u003e) The St. Louis Enhancing Engagement and Retention in HIV/AIDS Care (STEER) project conducted a participatory intersectional needs assessment to adapt a CHW intervention to enhance management of HIV/AIDS care and prioritize implementation strategies. We describe here a novel application of the IBPA within a participatory needs assessment that integrated community leaders into the research team to lay the groundwork for adapting and implementing a CHW-centered multi-level intervention to address the needs of PLWH in St. Louis.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"METHODS","content":"\u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eSetting\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe study took place in St. Louis, Missouri (9.2021 through 5.2023), which has a high burden of HIV among historically marginalized communities. St. Louis residents comprised almost half (6,320 of the 13,109) of persons living with HIV in Missouri in 2018. In 2020, the population of St. Louis (300,576 people) was 46.4% Black, 46.5% White, 4.0% Hispanic or Latino, 0.3% Native American, and 3.4% Asian.(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e) Approximately one in five people in St. Louis live below the poverty line.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eResearch Aims and Design\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe project utilized intervention mapping (IntMap) and implementation mapping (ImpMap)(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e52\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR58\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e58\u003c/span\u003e) to adapt a CHW intervention and plan for its implementation. We report here on the initial phase, a participatory intersectional needs assessment utilizing the IBPA and development of a logic model of the problem of HIV care management and engagement.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eResearch Process\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eBuilding the research team.\u003c/span\u003e The research team developed organically and intentionally by connecting with potential partners in St. Louis through existing networks of trust. Two academic partners and a community-based organization (CBO) leader with decades of experience in the St. Louis HIV treatment and prevention community jointly agreed to investigate how best to strengthen the implementation of CHW services in the context of HIV treatment. The CBO leader identified two trusted and innovative leaders in the PLWH community, and both met first with one of the academic leads to discuss the research plan, including the IBPA framework and participatory planning approach, and to address any questions. Both chose to join the bi-weekly planning team meetings as consultants.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe nested team structure included a planning team consisting of CBO leadership, community leaders, and university-based faculty and research assistants who met bi-weekly to develop research materials, review progress, address ongoing needs, and guide decision-making. The full research team, including experts in community health worker health program design, geographic modeling, and qualitative and quantitative research, were consulted to help synthesize insights from the research and plan the implementation. Local leaders in the St. Louis response to HIV on the St. Louis Fast Track Cities (FTC-STL) Steering Committee also provided a strong community perspective during the project. The team shared initial findings with the FTC-STL Steering committee to gather feedback.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eApplying the IBPA\u003c/span\u003e. There are two primary components of the IBPA: guiding principles and questions.(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e) Eight guiding principles are provided to consider and integrate into the analytical process, along with 12 analysis questions. The first set of questions (Q1-5) are descriptive and focus on the team, the problem to be addressed, how the problem is framed, the impacts of the problem, and current policy responses. The subsequent questions (Q6-12) are transformative, addressing inequities in current impacts of the problem, potential solutions, ensuring implementation, metrics of success, and the team\u0026rsquo;s reflections on the use of the IBPA. Definitions of guiding principles were adapted from Humphries et al.,(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e) and the planning team identified examples of how each principle was applied in the planning and analysis process (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). Draft answers to the IBPA analysis questions were developed by members of the planning team, and draft answers were presented to the full planning team for discussion and eventual approval.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003ePlanning Team Activities\u003c/span\u003e. Early in the timeline (9.2021\u0026ndash;5.2023) the planning team devoted a session to each planning team member sharing their knowledge, values, and experiences that contributed to their interest in this project (IBPA Q1: \u003cem\u003eWhat knowledge, values, and experiences do you bring to the area of analysis?\u003c/em\u003e). Results were synthesized, reviewed, and approved by the planning team. Other activities included reviewing timelines, draft materials (such as IBPA responses, interview guides, recruiting materials and potential participants, analysis results, problem logic model), providing feedback on results, providing insights into community history and current community activities, as well as strategies to strengthen the implementation of CHWs in the HIV care system in St. Louis. IBPA principles were involved at each step to ensure that intersectional principles of power, structure, and social justice were incorporated throughout.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eData Collection and analyses\u003c/span\u003e. We conducted virtual interviews and focus groups via Zoom to identify barriers and facilitators to HIV care, as well as challenges and opportunities for integrating CHWs in the response to HIV in St. Louis. The planning team was responsible for interview materials and participant identification. St. Louis participants were identified through professional networks and personal contacts of the planning team to represent different clinical contexts and expertise. We interviewed CHWs and CHW supervisors who participated in a Boston University-led CHW HIV demonstration project (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;6),(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e46\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR59\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e59\u003c/span\u003e) clinicians (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;4), community leaders (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;5), and people living with HIV (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;12). We also conducted two focus groups (12 participants) with front line staff working in the field of HIV, such as peer specialists, health coaches and outreach workers. Demographic information for interview and focus group participants are included in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e. Interviewers and focus group moderators were inclusively trained, aiming to probe key points such as less socially accepted beliefs and perspectives. Analysis and coding were conducted via rapid qualitative analysis methods(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e60\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e61\u003c/span\u003e) and mapped to the IBPA framework.(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e62\u003c/span\u003e) Interviews were transcribed either internally or by a professional transcription service, with transcripts checked by the interviewers. Each interview or focus group was summarized in a pre-designed template specific to each interviewee category (Appendix A). Templates were completed by one team member based on the interview transcript and then reviewed by the interviewer. The results within participant categories were compiled into separate matrices and summarized within the participant categories (A blank matrix is available as Appendix B). Two researchers developed and approved each summary, and all qualitative team members discussed and agreed on the final synthesized results. Once results were summarized for each participant group, a final matrix synthesizing results across interviewee categories was completed. Similar template categories across interviewee categories were aligned in the matrix, and those results were summarized. Draft findings and interview data were shared with the planning team, who reviewed conclusions, challenged interpretations, and helped to frame all final results.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBased on the interviews and focus groups, and oriented around the IBPA, a logic model of the problem of engagement and retention in HIV care was developed. Multiple drafts with different visualizations were developed before the planning team agreed on two frameworks that together embody the non-linearity and complexity of the problem.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e We followed the STROBE reporting guidelines, and the checklist is attached as a supplemental file.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eEthical Review\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e The study was reviewed and determined exempt by the Institutional Review Boards at Yale University and Washington University in St. Louis. Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to data collection.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"RESULTS","content":"\u003cp\u003eResults of the intersectional needs assessment are presented through the application of the IBPA, the identified barriers to effective management of HIV, and the problem logic model.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIBPA Values; Planning Team Values (Table 2, Table 3 Q1)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe guiding principles of IBPA include: recognizing the limitations of singular social categories, considering multi-level relationships in analyzing policy impacts, addressing power dynamics across various levels, practicing reflexivity for self-awareness, acknowledging the temporal and spatial dimensions of societal structures, valuing diverse sources and types knowledge, and striving for social justice and equity in policy formulation and analysis (see Table 2). Applications of these guiding principles in the needs assessment and intervention planning are detailed in Table 2. Each guiding principle manifested in multiple ways. For example, the team addressed the issue of power, including the awareness of differential power across care systems and within the planning team, by incorporating a structure for sharing leadership during planning team meetings. Part way through the project two planning team members proposed intentional inclusion of an open \u0026lsquo;unmeeting\u0026rsquo;[1] time during the regular biweekly meetings, to encourage all team members to raise questions, additional agenda items, thoughts, and broader systemic concerns. As the initiative progressed the unmeeting space evolved to ensure that everyone had a chance to participate and was eventually stewarded by a community leader and researcher together.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIBPA Table (Table 3)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOur team emphasized values such as self-awareness, deep listening and reflection, and a commitment to actively engage in changing oneself and systems (Table 3 Q1: \u003cem\u003eWhat knowledge, values, and experiences do you bring to this area of analysis?\u003c/em\u003e). In addressing Question 2 (Q2: \u003cem\u003eWhat is the \u0026lsquo;problem\u0026rsquo; under consideration?\u003c/em\u003e) we defined the problem as \u0026ldquo;structural oppression and systemic barriers create and perpetuate challenges for PLWH in their care management that then lead to inequities in HIV outcomes across intersectional categories.\u0026rdquo; The problem definition was extensively discussed in multiple planning team meetings until a consensus was reached. The team\u0026rsquo;s vision was to direct efforts towards systemic and structural changes to better support PLWH. In responding to Q3 we redefined the problem from the PLWH\u0026rsquo;s perspective, applying an equity lens to our analysis (Table 3 Q3: \u003cem\u003eHow has our representation of the \u0026lsquo;problem\u0026rsquo; come about?\u003c/em\u003e). The response to Q4 highlighted how this problem representation differentially affects groups, with a focus on the structural and systemic issues faced by people with low income, people of color, and LGBTQ individuals, all of whom experience inequities in HIV outcomes (Table 3 Q4: \u003cem\u003eHow are groups differentially affected by this representation of the \u0026lsquo;problem\u0026rsquo;?\u003c/em\u003e). Q5 completes the descriptive part of the analysis by providing examples of current policy responses to HIV in the St. Louis area, such as the efforts of the Ryan White program, the FTSTL Steering Committee, and other CDC-funded programs for specific target populations (Table 3 Q5: \u003cem\u003eWhat are the current policy responses to the \u0026lsquo;problems\u0026rsquo;?\u003c/em\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe second set of IBPA questions are transformative, bringing other lenses to the problem and encouraging a wider range of questions. We utilized existing publicly available data to identify current inequities, including higher rates of diagnosis and lower rates of care among Black gay and bisexual men, younger individuals, and people living below the poverty line (Q6: \u003cem\u003eWhat inequalities actually exist in relation to the \u0026lsquo;problem\u0026rsquo;?\u003c/em\u003e). The planning team identified potential immediate interventions, such as providing resources to front line organizations to help PLWH meet basic needs and actively repurposing public spaces to be more welcoming and inclusive (Q7: \u003cem\u003eWhere and how can (immediate) interventions be made to improve the problems in St. Louis?\u003c/em\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe short-, medium- and long-term solutions identified drew upon published literature, the experiences and ideas of key informants, and the collective knowledge and experiences of the planning team. Short-term solutions focus on meeting basic human needs through social supports, deployment of CHWs, improved alignment of state and federal funds with needs, and increased distribution of support funds through front line organizations closely connected to communities with greater needs (Q8: \u003cem\u003eWhat are feasible short-, medium- and long-term solutions?\u003c/em\u003e). Medium-term solutions include actively creating community spaces to process and heal historic trauma, increasing access to home testing, maintaining the social supports identified in immediate and short-term solutions, and integrating HIV services into primary care settings. These medium-term solutions aim to support individuals by making private and anonymous testing available and increasing the availability of routine care through standard health care channels. Long-term solutions involve addressing historic trauma, continuing biomedical research to develop a vaccine, and undertaking multipronged efforts to change the priorities and approaches of funding organizations, strengthening multidimensional measurement of health inequities, increasing representation of minorities in healthcare professions, and prioritizing work and funding through organizations that prioritize responding to impacts of race and racism more than emphasis on individual behavior change.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe next three questions address how the program will reduce inequities, ensure implementation and uptake, and measure changes in inequalities. We expect the program will most immediately reduce inequities by enhancing organizational capacity to integrate CHWs with lived experience from the local community, training them, innovating care team implementation, and promoting cooperation across multiple organizations (Q9: \u003cem\u003eHow will proposed program reduce inequities?\u003c/em\u003e). Regarding implementation and uptake, we have engaged with community leaders and groups through key informant interviews and other outreach activities to gather feedback, ideas and input on the intervention design and implementation strategies (Q10: \u003cem\u003eHow will implementation and uptake be assured?)\u003c/em\u003e. Demonstrating that inequalities have been reduced will involve process measures (such as the availability of culturally appropriate medical information), outcome measures (such as reductions in inequities of HIV care engagement and viral suppression), and longer-term systemic change measures (such as reductions in stigma and medical mistrust) (Q11: \u003cem\u003eHow will you know if inequalities have been reduced?\u003c/em\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe final question of the IBPA reflects on the process, with planning team members noting that the IBPA framework facilitated dialogue and learning that shifted power dynamics and promoted social justice (Q12). Utilizing the IBPA led to deeper engagement and understanding of interlocking issues and identities, focused the conversation on structural and systemic issues within both the research process and the planned intervention (Q12: \u003cem\u003eHow has the process of engaging in an intersectionality-based program analysis transformed: your thinking about relation and structures of power and inequity; the ways in which you and others engage in the work of policy development, implementation and evaluation; broader conceptualizations, relations and effects of power asymmetry in the everyday world\u003c/em\u003e).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBarriers to Effective Management of HIV for PLWH\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAcross key informants, barriers to care for PLWH were identified at multiple levels, including the clinic/institutional level, provider level, CHW level and individual level (see Figure 2).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[Figure 2 about here]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cu\u003eClinic/Institutional Barriers\u003c/u\u003e. High provider turnover, lack of sustainable funding for CHWs and other front line staff, insufficient pay and benefits for CHWs and front line staff, limited integration of CHWs into care teams, and limited organizational capacity for personalized treatment plans were all identified as barriers to effective management of HIV.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;[W]e saw a great turnover with the providers at this office, like if you look back over the last eight years there\u0026apos;s probably been 12 providers that have worked here, so people\u0026apos;s level of engagement often times was quite low and their follow through. So as clinicians picked up patients, they didn\u0026apos;t really have a good handle on the patient\u0026apos;s history, both from a social perspective or medical perspective\u0026hellip; so I think if I put myself in a patient\u0026apos;s situation, I would have over time like decreased interest in my health care if I\u0026rsquo;m constantly experiencing clinician turnover. And I think because providers were here for such a short period of time they only touch on very superficial issues as they develop rapport with the patients, so like the deeper issues that affect their long-term care, I never really addressed.\u0026rdquo; [62-66] [Clinical Lead #2]\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdequate compensation for CHWs and similar front line staff, sustainability of funding, and availability of comprehensive training programs were noted as significant factors impacting organizational ability to provide effective assistance to PLWH. As one community leader noted,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;Most of our CHWs, and this is a nationwide thing, are supplied by grants, which means that their scope of service is then indicated by what that grant will allow, but also they don\u0026apos;t have long term viability for their career\u0026hellip;. [What] I\u0026rsquo;ve learned is that the region, the state, and the nation value them, but it\u0026apos;s short lived when it comes to the operationality as well as the true infrastructure to support those workforces.\u0026rdquo; [130-133] \u0026nbsp;[Community Lead #5]\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cu\u003eProvider level Barriers\u003c/u\u003e. Provider barriers that impact HIV management include challenges such as high workloads and limited time for providers to meet with each patient, as well as issues arising from provider knowledge and behaviors, such as limited awareness of CHWs and other front line staff. Clinical leaders reported being burdened with multiple responsibilities and having limited capacity to support clients in need.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eI think most physicians that I work with\u0026hellip; have a lot of other responsibilities, and they\u0026apos;ll see patients every two, three months. If people are doing less well, they might see him every three or four weeks. But I certainly think, and I have an expectation that if someone\u0026apos;s really struggling, a health coach is someone that could \u0026hellip; contact the patient once or twice a week. I\u0026rsquo;ve had some health coaches that text patients every day to remind them to take their meds \u0026hellip;This is something I certainly couldn\u0026apos;t do. [Clinical Lead #4]\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition, clinical leaders noted challenges in understanding the responsibilities of new types of support staff as innovative roles are introduced to the team.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e[O]ne of the problems with \u0026hellip; Ryan White funded clinics, is that it provides money for a lot of type of roles like a health coach, but as soon as you get beyond the minimal office staff of your front desk person who handles taking in patients, and your medical assistants, the nurse, and the doctor, [nurse practitioner], you start adding people and you add people with more finely described roles. I think getting that information out so people understand who these people are and what they can offer is not easy\u0026hellip;. [Clinical Lead #4]\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cu\u003eCHW and Front line Staff Barriers\u003c/u\u003e. Similar to clinical providers, CHWs and other front line staff encounter their own set of challenges that impact the care they provide to PLWH. These challenges include limited trust from the community, a lack of self-efficacy and confidence, insufficient knowledge and skills related to HIV, high caseloads, and scope of work limited by organizations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026ldquo;[T]he distrust and the disconnect between medical care is so vast, if you come with a prescriptive posture it\u0026apos;s over before it starts, you have to do something different.\u0026rdquo; [Clinical Lead #1]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFront-line health workers highlighted the importance of dedicating time to earn their clients\u0026rsquo; trust.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026ldquo;[Y]ou have to win their trust before you can test them [for HIV] because you have to \u0026hellip; earn their trust, so they can open up and you can talk\u0026hellip;. And when they trust you they can open up and they\u0026apos;ll talk to you, and you can have that one on one relationship where you can say hey let\u0026apos;s try this and then we talk in a week you let me know how you like that, and if you don\u0026apos;t like that then we\u0026apos;ll try something else.\u0026rdquo; \u0026nbsp;[FG1-Prevention Specialist]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFront Line health workers also noted the importance of having time to discuss various approaches and the necessity of offering training and skill-building opportunities.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026ldquo;I think we did more home visits back then, and we were able to spend a little more time with our clients doing some skill training and stuff like that. I think now we\u0026apos;re so focused on trying to get progress notes done that we\u0026apos;re not be able, you know we got so many clients that you can\u0026rsquo;t spend as much time with them as you used to.\u0026rdquo; [FG2-Supervisor]\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cu\u003ePLWH Barriers\u003c/u\u003e. Participants from all stakeholder groups identified challenges that impact the ability of PLWH to manage their HIV. Key themes included racial stigma, diagnosis denial, lack of social support, comorbidities, medication side effects, lack of time and opportunity to access health plans, and the inability to address basic needs.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;There\u0026apos;s always going to be a stigma attached to being HIV positive, and I think part of that is in the African American community, and I think the community health workers would have to ask that population why they drop out of care to actually get a real sense of why they\u0026apos;re not staying in care and take their meds, whether it be the other things that we\u0026apos;ve discussed already or if there\u0026apos;s some other reason why they\u0026apos;re not in care or staying in care.\u0026rdquo;]\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e[Clinical Lead 3]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAddressing comorbidities such as mental health and chronic disease as well as challenges in meeting basic needs is crucial for supporting effective management of HIV by PLWH.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;We try to help people stay in care, but sometimes our clients have severe and persistent mental illnesses, they are not ready to be in care so sometimes they don\u0026apos;t follow up with services, it\u0026rsquo;s too regimented. So we kind of leave them on the fringe, but we still talk to them and try to say, well, when you need me call me\u0026hellip;And so six months down the road they\u0026apos;re like \u0026hellip; I need emergency housing, let me call [participant\u0026rsquo;s name].\u0026hellip; So we get them back into care. (FG2-Supervisor)\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePLWH need access to a range of services, and may have multiple specialist care needs.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;[W]ith our clients and patients that we work with you know, besides going to their medical appointments, dental appointments, and the other specialist appointments they might have, they don\u0026apos;t have transportation, you know, they don\u0026apos;t feel well, you know they\u0026apos;re in a really difficult spot in their life and they feel alone.\u0026hellip;\u0026rdquo; (FG1-Health Coach2)\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLogic Model of the Problem\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDrawing on the results of the needs assessment and the HIV literature we developed two models of the problem (Figure 2), each highlighting different dimensions. The team decided both versions of the problem logic model were necessary to incorporate the complexity and external factors that influence the success or failure of future interventions. The first model (Figure 2a) adopts a nodal approach, emphasizing the mutually reinforcing challenges that affect management of HIV. The second model (Figure 2b) employs a linear approach, focusing on the pathways of influence between various barriers to HIV management.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn Figure 2a, the team positioned CHWs in a distinct node to draw attention to their role as intermediaries between institutions and individuals, while also highlighting their unique resource constraints. Although structural oppression and systemic barriers were specifically mentioned in the statement of the problem, Figure 2a also acknowledges that poverty, racism, stigma, legislation and rural/urban issues are important external influences.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn Figure 2b, the arrows illustrate the multiple pathways through which clinical and institutional challenges impact providers (arrows 1, 2, 6 and 11) and CHWs (arrows 4, 5, 12 and 15), as well as the pathways by which challenges at the provider and CHW level impact clients. Supporting documentation for the arrows in Figure 2b is provided in Appendix C.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"ftn1\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study conducted an innovative participatory intersectional needs assessment to facilitate the adaptation and implementation planning of an intervention integrating CHWs into the HIV care system. While prior applications of the IBPA have focused on policy change,(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR63\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e63\u003c/span\u003e) this project represents the first use to our knowledge of the IBPA as a framework for conducting a participatory needs assessment. The IBPA fostered a focus on intersectional challenges, ensuring we paid explicit attention to less heard from voices. A recent meta-analysis on stigma and intersectionality further supports the approach, showing that intersectionality deepens the understanding of stigma experienced across social identities.(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e64\u003c/span\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDuring the IBPA process the research team encountered several challenges, including ensuring that both community and academic partners understood the IBPA and its role in informing the research. Balancing the need to complete the IBPA process with the priority of reviewing qualitative and quantitative documents in a timely manner required allocating purposeful time in meetings and creating working documents to track themes and discussions. Valuing the expertise while navigating the priorities of community partners without overburdening them, required careful planning.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBarriers to effective HIV management for PLWH, consistent with existing literature, were identified at the clinic/institutional, provider, CHW and client levels. Specific barriers reported at the clinic/institutional level included high turnover, insufficient funding for CHWs, limited integration of CHWs in care teams, and restricted organizational capacity for personalized treatment. Provider barriers reported encompassed high workloads, limited time, and inadequate awareness of CHWs skills. CHWs and front line staff reported facing challenges, including community distrust, low self-efficacy and confidence, insufficient HIV knowledge and skills, high caseloads, and a restricted scope of work. Client-level barriers reported included stigma, diagnosis denial, lack of social support, co-morbidities and medication side effects, healthcare access difficulties, and unmet basic needs. Previous studies have identified similar client-level barriers to HIV treatment engagement, including competing life activities, poor transportation, stigma, lack of insurance coverage, poverty, and beliefs about HIV care.(\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR66 CR67 CR68 CR69 CR70 CR71 CR72 CR73\" citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e65\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR74\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e74\u003c/span\u003e) Among Black women living with HIV, HIV-related stigmas expressed by healthcare providers to them and poor quality HIV services have been identified as key barriers to treatment engagement.(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e65\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR75\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e75\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR76\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e76\u003c/span\u003e) At the organizational level, although research is limited, studies have identified challenges such as finding providers who speak the same language as patients and treat them with respect, providing team-based care, managing the cost of services, and navigating the logistics of the care system.(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR77\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e77\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR78\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e78\u003c/span\u003e) Previously identified clinic and provider-level facilitators include patient friendly services and positive, trusting relationships with providers.(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR68\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e68\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR79\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e79\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR80\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e80\u003c/span\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe logic model of the problem employed two complementary formats: a nodal model and a linear pathways model, to capture the intersectional and systemic issues. While problem logic models typically offer a focused representation of a problem\u0026rsquo;s components, the planning team found it challenging to agree on a singular linear model. Utilizing two models allows for the incorporation of extensive chains of drivers and influences on HIV outcomes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWe report here on the initial steps of the IntMap and ImpMap protocols, with the needs assessment results intended to inform the future adaptation of the CHW approach. Results identifying implementation strategies and the development of an implementation plan to address identified barriers and enhance implementation outcomes(\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR82 CR83\" citationid=\"CR81\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e81\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR84\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e84\u003c/span\u003e) will be presented elsewhere.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eLimitations\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study was centered on St. Louis, and while its processes are relevant to other settings, specific barriers require validation in other populations. Due to challenges in recruiting younger PLWH and transgender individuals for interviews, future activities will include structured community conversations at St. Louis locations frequented by these groups to gather their input.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusions","content":"\u003cp\u003eUse of an intersectional framework contributed to identification of systemic and structural barriers to effective HIV management. The systemic and structural perspective was also apparent in the two complementary logic models of the problem developed by the team. Barriers to effective HIV management were identified across multiple levels, including organizations, providers, CHWs, front line staff and clients. Emphasizing an intersectional approach highlighted similar barriers as previous research to HIV management at the individual, provider and front line staff levels. At the clinic and institutional level additional barriers were identified such as high staff turnover, insufficient CHWs and insufficient CHW integration. This participatory intersectional needs assessment has identified local challenges and priorities to be addressed in the adapted intervention and implementation strategies.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Abbreviations","content":"\u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionList\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eHIV\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHuman Immunodeficiency Virus\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003ePLWH\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePeople Living with HIV\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eIBPA\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntersectionality Based Policy/Program Analysis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eCHW\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCommunity Health Worker\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eLGBTQ\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eEHE\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnding the HIV Epidemic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eIntMap\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntervention Mapping\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eImpMap\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eImplementation Mapping\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eSTEER\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSt. Louis Enhancing Engagement and Retention in HIV CARE\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eCBO\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCommunity Based Organization\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eFTSTL\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFast Track St. Louis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eCDC\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCenters for Disease Control and Prevention\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthical Review\u003c/strong\u003e. The study was reviewed and determined exempt by the Institutional Review Boards at Yale University and Washington University in St. Louis. Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to data collection.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAvailability of data and materials.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThe template used to analyze the interviews and focus groups is provided as supplemental Table 1; data collection materials and qualitative data generated and analyzed during the study are not publicly available but may be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. All requests for data should be made to the corresponding author at [email protected].\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting interests.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u003c/strong\u003e. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was a public health-academic partnership funded as part of the 2021 NIH AIDS Research Centers (ARC) Ending the HIV Epidemic administrative supplement awarded to Yale ARC (3P30MH062294-19S2). The funder had no role in the conduct of the study.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthors\u0026apos; contributions\u003c/strong\u003e. DLH, PM, TB and DS designed the study and obtained funding; DLH, YH, and VW developed the data collection guide in consultation with DR, JJ, GG, TB, PM; DLH, YH, VW, GG and CC collected the qualitative data; DLH, YH, VW, GG and CC conducted the analysis in iterative discussion and consultation with PM, TB, DR, and JJ; FA was responsible for data visualization; DLH drafted the manuscript; all authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgements.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eWe thank all of the people who talked with us and provided their thoughts and feedback for this project, whether informally or formally. \u0026nbsp; We thank Faiad Alam for his work in developing the visualizations for the logic models and the supporting materials in Appendix C. \u0026nbsp;We thank Parul Kodan Hooda for her review of an earlier draft of the manuscript, and Prajakta Adsul for her careful review and comments on the semi-final manuscript.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent for publication\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFauci AS, Redfield RR, Sigounas G, Weahkee MD, Giroir BP. Ending the HIV Epidemic: A Plan for the United States. JAMA. 2019;321(9):844-5.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGiroir BP. The time is now to end the HIV epidemic. American Journal of Public Health. 2020;110(1):22-4.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNosyk B, Zang X, Krebs E, Enns B, Min JE, Behrends CN, et al. Ending the HIV epidemic in the USA: an economic modelling study in six cities. Lancet HIV. 2020;7(7):e491-e503.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimated HIV incidence and prevalence in the United States, 2017-2021: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2023 [updated May 2023. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/hiv-surveillance.html.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBowleg L. The problem with the phrase women and minorities: intersectionality-an important theoretical framework for public health. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(7):1267-73.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChenneville T, Gabbidon K, Brinson A, Capobianco J, Cario A, Rodriguez C. Lived Experiences of Racism and Intersectional Stigma Among Black Youth Living With HIV in the Deep South. Stigma and Health. 2022.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eQuinn KG. Applying an intersectional framework to understand syndemic conditions among young Black gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. Soc Sci Med. 2022;295:112779.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMissouri Department of Health and Senior Services. Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) 2021 [Available from: https://health.mo.gov/living/healthcondiseases/communicable/hivaids/pdf/ending-draft-plan.pdf.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBaugher AR, Whiteman A, Jeffries WLt, Finlayson T, Lewis R, Wejnert C, Group NS. Black men who have sex with men living in states with HIV criminalization laws report high stigma, 23 U.S. cities, 2017. AIDS. 2021;35(10):1637-45.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eQuinn KG, John SA, Hirshfield S, Algiers O, O\u0026apos;Neil A, Petroll AE, Walsh JL. Challenges to meeting the HIV care needs of older adults in the rural South. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health. 2022;2:100113.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGilbert KL, Ray R, Siddiqi A, Shetty S, Baker EA, Elder K, Griffith DM. Visible and Invisible Trends in Black Men\u0026apos;s Health: Pitfalls and Promises for Addressing Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Inequities in Health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2016;37:295-311.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHankivsky O, editor. An Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis Framework. Vancouver, BC: Institute for Intersectionality Research and Policy, Simon Fraser University; 2012.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKapilashrami A, Hankivsky O. Intersectionality and why it matters to global health. Lancet. 2018;391(10140):2589-91.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCollins PH. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment: routledge; 2022.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCrenshaw K. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum. 1989;1989(1):139.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWatkins-Hayes C. Intersectionality and the sociology of HIV/AIDS: Past, present, and future research directions. Annual Review of Sociology. 2014;40:431-57.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHankivsky O, Grace D, Hunting G, Giesbrecht M, Fridkin A, Rudrum S, et al. An intersectionality-based policy analysis framework: critical reflections on a methodology for advancing equity. Int J Equity Health. 2014;13:119.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHankivsky O. Women\u0026apos;s health, men\u0026apos;s health, and gender and health: implications of intersectionality. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(11):1712-20.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHankivsky O, Reid C, Cormier R, Varcoe C, Clark N, Benoit C, Brotman S. Exploring the promises of intersectionality for advancing women\u0026apos;s health research. Int J Equity Health. 2010;9:5.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHumphries DL, Sodipo M, Jackson SD. The intersectionality-based policy analysis framework: demonstrating utility through application to the pre-vaccine U.S. COVID-19 policy response. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1040851.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBowleg L. Evolving Intersectionality Within Public Health: From Analysis to Action. Am J Public Health. 2021;111(1):88-90.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMcBride K, Carlson M, Everett B. Using the Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis Framework to Evaluate a Policy Supporting Sexual Health and Intimacy in Long-Term Care, Assisted Living, Group Homes \u0026amp;amp; Supported Housing. J Appl Gerontol. 2022;41(9):1992-2001.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIsiwele A, Rivas C, Stokes G. Nigerian and Ghanaian Young People\u0026apos;s Experiences of Care for Common Mental Disorders in Inner London: Protocol for a Multimethod Investigation. JMIR Res Protoc. 2022;11(12):e42575.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKehoe MacLeod K, Flores KN, Chandra K. Identifying facilitators and barriers to integrated and equitable care for community-dwelling older adults with high emergency department use from historically marginalized groups. Int J Equity Health. 2023;22(1):97.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIngram M, Doubleday K, Bell ML, Lohr A, Murrieta L, Velasco M, et al. Community Health Worker Impact on Chronic Disease Outcomes Within Primary Care Examined Using Electronic Health Records. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(10):1668-74.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePatel MI, Kapphahn K, Dewland M, Aguilar V, Sanchez B, Sisay E, et al. Effect of a Community Health Worker Intervention on Acute Care Use, Advance Care Planning, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Adults With Advanced Stages of Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8(8):1139-48.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePerry HB, Zulliger R, Rogers MM. Community health workers in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: an overview of their history, recent evolution, and current effectiveness. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:399-421.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIslam N, Nadkarni SK, Zahn D, Skillman M, Kwon SC, Trinh-Shevrin C. Integrating community health workers within Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act implementation. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2015;21(1):42-50.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDaniels AS, Bergeson S, Myrick KJ. Defining Peer Roles and Status Among Community Health Workers and Peer Support Specialists in Integrated Systems of Care. Psychiatr Serv. 2017;68(12):1296-8.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePinto D, Carroll-Scott A, Christmas T, Heidig M, Turchi R. Community health workers: improving population health through integration into healthcare systems. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2020;32(5):674-82.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMistry SK, Harris E, Harris M. Community Health Workers as Healthcare Navigators in Primary Care Chronic Disease Management: a Systematic Review. Journal of general internal medicine. 2021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKamanda A, Embleton L, Ayuku D, Atwoli L, Gisore P, Ayaya S, et al. Harnessing the power of the grassroots to conduct public health research in sub-Saharan Africa: a case study from western Kenya in the adaptation of community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches. BMC public health. 2013;13:1-10.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePeretz PJ, Islam N, Matiz LA. Community Health Workers and Covid-19 - Addressing Social Determinants of Health in Times of Crisis and Beyond. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(19):e108.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWolfe HL, Baughman A, Davoust M, Sprague Martinez LS, Rajabiun S, Drainoni ML. Client Satisfaction with Community Health Workers in HIV Care Teams. J Community Health. 2021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDavoust M, Drainoni M-L, Baughman A, Campos Rojo M, Estes T, Rajabiun S, et al. \u0026ldquo;He Gave Me Spirit and Hope\u0026rdquo;: Client Experiences with the Implementation of Community Health Worker Programs in HIV Care. AIDS patient care and STDs. 2021;35(8):318-26.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKenya S, Jones J, Arheart K, Kobetz E, Chida N, Baer S, et al. Using Community Health Workers to Improve Clinical Outcomes Among People Living with HIV: A Randomized Controlled Trial. AIDS and Behavior. 2013;17(9):2927-34.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKenya S, Chida N, Symes S, Shor-Posner G. Can community health workers improve adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy in the USA? A review of the literature. HIV medicine. 2011;12(9):525-34.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShaghaghi A, Bhopal RS, Sheikh A. Approaches to Recruiting \u0026apos;Hard-To-Reach\u0026apos; Populations into Re-search: A Review of the Literature. Health Promot Perspect. 2011;1(2):86-94.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDrainoni M-L, Baughman AL, Bachman SS, Bowers-Sword R, Davoust M, Fortu K, et al. Integrating community health workers into HIV care teams: Impact on HIV care outcomes. Journal of HIV/AIDS Social Services. 2020;19(3):204-19.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCenter for Community Health and Development. Community Tool Box Kansas: University of Kansas; 1994-2023 [Community-building skills tool box]. Available from: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/analyze/where-to-start/participatory-approaches/main.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSuen JJ, Marrone N, Han HR, Lin FR, Nieman CL. Translating Public Health Practices: Community-Based Approaches for Addressing Hearing Health Care Disparities. Semin Hear. 2019;40(1):37-48.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYang KI, Chung-Do JJ, Fujitani L, Foster A, Mark S, Okada Y, et al. Advancing Community-Based Participatory Research to Address Health Disparities in Hawai\u0026apos;i: Perspectives from Academic Researchers. Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2019;78(3):83-8.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBurgess R, Dedios Sanguineti MC, Maldonado-Carrizosa D, Fonseca L, Vera San Juan N, Lucumi D, et al. Using participatory action research to reimagine community mental health services in Colombia: a mixed-method study protocol. BMJ Open. 2022;12(12):e069329.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDouglas JA, Subica AM, Franks L, Johnson G, Leon C, Villanueva S, Grills CT. Using Participatory Mapping to Diagnose Upstream Determinants of Health and Prescribe Downstream Policy-Based Interventions. Prev Chronic Dis. 2020;17:E138.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMann-Jackson L, Alonzo J, Garcia M, Trent S, Bell J, Horridge DN, Rhodes SD. Using community-based participatory research to address STI/HIV disparities and social determinants of health among young GBMSM and transgender women of colour in North Carolina, USA. Health \u0026amp; Social Care in the Community. 2021;29(5):e192-e203.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRajabiun S, Baughman A, Sullivan M, Poteet B, Downes A, Davich JAW, et al. A Participatory Curricula for Community Health Workers and Supervisors to Increase HIV Health Outcomes. Front Public Health. 2021;9(964).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRhodes SD, Kelley C, Sim\u0026aacute;n F, Cashman R, Alonzo J, McGuire J, et al. Using Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) to Develop a Community-Level HIV Prevention Intervention for Latinas: A Local Response to a Global Challenge. Women\u0026apos;s Health Issues. 2012;22(3):e293-e301.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMwamba C, Beres LK, Mukamba N, Jere L, Foloko M, Lumbo K, et al. Provider perspectives on patient-centredness: participatory formative research and rapid analysis methods to inform the design and implementation of a facility-based HIV care improvement intervention in Zambia. J Int Aids Soc. 2023;26 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e26114.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHolliday RC, Phillips R, Akintobi TH. A Community-Based Participatory Approach to the Development and Implementation of an HIV Health Behavior Intervention: Lessons Learned in Navigating Research and Practice Systems from Project HAPPY. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(2).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRajabiun S, Lennon-Dearing R, Hirschi M, Davis B, Williams B, Sprague Martinez L, Campos M. Ending the HIV Epidemic: One Southern Community Speaks. Social Work in Public Health. 2021;36(6):647-64.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOliver B, Pearl C, John EF-, Norris D, Olaniyan FE, Samson K, et al. Understanding Lived Experiences of Stigma for People Living with HIV: A Community Based Participatory Research Study. The Qualitative Report. 2023;28(2):623-43.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFernandez ME, Ten Hoor GA, van Lieshout S, Rodriguez SA, Beidas RS, Parcel G, et al. Implementation Mapping: Using Intervention Mapping to Develop Implementation Strategies. Front Public Health. 2019;7:158.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G. Intervention mapping: a process for developing theory- and evidence-based health education programs. Health Educ Behav. 1998;25(5):545-63.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEldredge LKB, Markham CM, Ruiter RA, Fern\u0026aacute;ndez ME, Kok G, Parcel GS. Planning health promotion programs: an intervention mapping approach: John Wiley \u0026amp; Sons; 2016.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBauer MS, Damschroder L, Hagedorn H, Smith J, Kilbourne AM. An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychol. 2015;3:32.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLeeman J, Birken SA, Powell BJ, Rohweder C, Shea CM. Beyond \u0026quot;implementation strategies\u0026quot;: classifying the full range of strategies used in implementation science and practice. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):125.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDamschroder LJ. Clarity out of chaos: Use of theory in implementation research. Psychiatry Res. 2020;283:112461.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFernandez ME, Ruiter RAC, Markham CM, Kok G. Intervention Mapping: Theory- and Evidence-Based Health Promotion Program Planning: Perspective and Examples. Front Public Health. 2019;7:209.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSprague Martinez L, Davoust M, Rajabiun S, Baughman A, Bachman SS, Bowers-Sword R, et al. \u0026quot;Part of getting to where we are is because we have been open to change\u0026quot; integrating community health workers on care teams at ten Ryan White HIV/AIDS program recipient sites. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):922.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMcNall M, Foster-Fishman PG. Methods of rapid evaluation, assessment, and appraisal. J American Journal of Evaluation. 2007;28(2):151-68.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVindrola-Padros C, Johnson GA. Rapid Techniques in Qualitative Research: A Critical Review of the Literature. Qual Health Res. 2020;30(10):1596-604.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDamschroder LJ, Reardon CM, Widerquist MAO, Lowery J. The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback. Implement Sci. 2022;17(1):75.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHankivsky O, Cormier R. Intersectionality and public policy: Some lessons from existing models. Political Research Quarterly. 2011;64(1):217-29.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJackson-Best F, Edwards N. Stigma and intersectionality: a systematic review of systematic reviews across HIV/AIDS, mental illness, and physical disability. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):919.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAlgarin AB, Sheehan DM, Varas-Diaz N, Fennie KP, Zhou Z, Spencer EC, et al. Health Care-Specific Enacted HIV-Related Stigma\u0026apos;s Association with Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence and Viral Suppression Among People Living with HIV in Florida. AIDS patient care and STDs. 2020;34(7):316-26.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChang EJ, Fleming M, Nunez A, Dombrowski JC. Predictors of Successful HIV Care Re-engagement Among Persons Poorly Engaged in HIV Care. AIDS Behav. 2019;23(9):2490-7.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKrentz HB, McPhee P, Arbess G, Jackson L, Stewart AM, Bois D, Rourke SB. Reporting on patients living with HIV \u0026quot;disengaging from care\u0026quot;. Who is actually \u0026quot;lost to follow-up\u0026quot;? AIDS care. 2021;33(1):114-20.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYehia BR, Stewart L, Momplaisir F, Mody A, Holtzman CW, Jacobs LM, et al. Barriers and facilitators to patient retention in HIV care. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:246.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBulsara SM, Wainberg ML, Newton-John TRO. Predictors of Adult Retention in HIV Care: A Systematic Review. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(3):752-64.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSheehan DM, Fennie KP, Mauck DE, Maddox LM, Lieb S, Trepka MJ. Retention in HIV Care and Viral Suppression: Individual- and Neighborhood-Level Predictors of Racial/Ethnic Differences, Florida, 2015. AIDS patient care and STDs. 2017;31(4):167-75.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHall BJ, Sou KL, Beanland R, Lacky M, Tso LS, Ma Q, et al. Barriers and Facilitators to Interventions Improving Retention in HIV Care: A Qualitative Evidence Meta-Synthesis. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(6):1755-67.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLee H, Wu XK, Genberg BL, Mugavero MJ, Cole SR, Lau B, et al. Beyond binary retention in HIV care: predictors of the dynamic processes of patient engagement, disengagement, and re-entry into care in a US clinical cohort. AIDS. 2018;32(15):2217-25.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNijhawan AE, Liang Y, Vysyaraju K, Munoz J, Ketchum N, Saber J, et al. Missed Initial Medical Visits: Predictors, Timing, and Implications for Retention in HIV Care. AIDS patient care and STDs. 2017;31(5):213-21.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSwann M. Economic strengthening for HIV prevention and risk reduction: a review of the evidence. AIDS care. 2018;30(sup3):37-84.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGeter A, Sutton MY, Hubbard McCree D. Social and structural determinants of HIV treatment and care among black women living with HIV infection: a systematic review: 2005-2016. AIDS care. 2018;30(4):409-16.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGeter A, Sutton MY, Armon C, Durham MD, Palella FJ, Jr., Tedaldi E, et al. Trends of racial and ethnic disparities in virologic suppression among women in the HIV Outpatient Study, USA, 2010-2015. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0189973.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGelaude DJ, Hart J, Carey JW, Denson D, Erickson C, Klein C, et al. HIV Provider Experiences Engaging and Retaining Patients in HIV Care and Treatment: \u0026quot;A Soft Place to Fall\u0026quot;. The Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care : JANAC. 2017;28(4):491-503.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eByrd KK, Hardnett F, Clay PG, Delpino A, Hazen R, Shankle MD, et al. Retention in HIV Care Among Participants in the Patient-Centered HIV Care Model: A Collaboration Between Community-Based Pharmacists and Primary Medical Providers. AIDS patient care and STDs. 2019;33(2):58-66.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMimiaga MJ, August Oddleifson D, Meersman SC, Silvia A, Hughto JMW, Landers S, et al. Multilevel Barriers to Engagement in the HIV Care Continuum Among Residents of the State of Rhode Island Living with HIV. AIDS Behav. 2020;24(4):1133-50.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWessinger MH, Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Mangal JP, Gokhale RH, Ruchin L, et al. Retention in HIV care depends on patients\u0026apos; perceptions of the clinic experience. AIDS care. 2017;29(10):1212-7.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePowell BJ, Beidas RS, Lewis CC, Aarons GA, McMillen JC, Proctor EK, Mandell DS. Methods to Improve the Selection and Tailoring of Implementation Strategies. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2017;44(2):177-94.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePowell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, Damschroder LJ, Smith JL, Matthieu MM, et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci. 2015;10:21.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGarba RM, Gadanya MA. The role of intervention mapping in designing disease prevention interventions: A systematic review of the literature. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0174438.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDurks D, Fernandez-Llimos F, Hossain LN, Franco-Trigo L, Benrimoj SI, Sabater-Hernandez D. Use of Intervention Mapping to Enhance Health Care Professional Practice: A Systematic Review. Health Educ Behav. 2017;44(4):524-35.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"},{"header":"Footnotes","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAn unmeeting is an intentional creation of an unstructured space for informal discussions without the rules, format or constraints of a formal meeting.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"},{"header":"Tables","content":"\u003cp\u003eTables 1-3 are available in the Supplementary Files section.\u003c/p\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":true,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Participatory Planning, Intersectional Needs Assessment, Intersectionality, Implementation Planning, Ending the HIV Epidemic","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4225131/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4225131/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"Background\n\nMissouri is one of seven priority states identified by the Ending the HIV Epidemic Initiative, and St. Louis contains almost half of the people living with HIV (PLWH) in Missouri. As St. Louis has a marked history of structural racism and economic inequities, we utilized the Intersectionality Based Policy Analysis (IBPA) framework to guide a participatory needs assessment for planning and program development.\n\nMethods\n\nThe planning team included researchers, the lead implementer from our community partner, and two community representatives, and had biweekly 60-90 minute meetings for 18 months. The planning team discussed and approved all research materials, reviewed and interpreted results, and made decisions about outreach, recruitment, conduct of the needs assessment and development of the planned intervention. The needs assessment integrated information from existing data, (1) interviews with (a) PLWH (n=12), (b) community leaders (n=5), (c) clinical leaders (n=4), and (d) community health workers (CHWs) (n=3) and (e) CHW supervisors (n=3) who participated in a Boston University-led demonstration project on CHWs in the context of HIV and (2) focus groups (2 FG, 12 participants) with front line health workers such as peer specialists, health coaches and outreach workers. A rapid qualitative analysis approach was used for all interviews and focus groups.\n\nResults\n\nThe IBPA was used to guide team discussions of team values, definition and framing of the problem, questions and topics in the key informant interviews, and implementation strategies. Applying the IBPA framework contributed to a focus on intersectional drivers of inequities in HIV services. The effective management of HIV faces significant challenges from high provider turnover, insufficient integration of CHWs into care teams, and organizational limitations in tailoring treatment plans. Increasing use of CHWs for HIV treatment and prevention also faces challenges. People living with HIV (PLWH) encounter multiple barriers such as stigma, lack of social support, co-morbidities, medication side effects and difficulties in meeting basic needs.\n\nConclusions\n\nAddressing intersectional drivers of health inequities may require multi-level, structural approaches. We see the IBPA as a valuable tool for participatory planning while integrating community engagement principles in program and implementation design for improving HIV outcomes.","manuscriptTitle":"St. Louis Enhancing Engagement and Retention in HIV/AIDS Care (STEER): a participatory intersectional needs assessment for intervention and implementation planning","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-04-22 03:02:23","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4225131/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"b57d0ed3-f296-449c-8ded-c9f47c1b282b","owner":[],"postedDate":"April 22nd, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-03-07T04:44:00+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2024-04-22 03:02:23","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4225131","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4225131","identity":"rs-4225131","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}