Enhancement of SBR’s treatment under organic shock load

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Organic shock loads often hinder biological wastewater treatment systems from meeting discharge standards, as a result, these systems frequently fail to achieve the required level of treatment so, the potential impact of these loads was investigated using laboratory-scale sequencing batch reactors (SBRs). Short-term (4.5 h) exposure to 721.25 - 1515.36 mg COD/L shock loads reduced the removal ratios of COD by 3.48 % – 31.73 % compared with the control. A mathematical model was developed for COD decomposition and the results obtained from the model were approximately close to the experimental data, and the maximum difference between the experimental and the theoretical removal rates was 3.36 % at a shock organic load of 1019.20 mg COD/L. In addition, the reactor performance was evaluated under successive organic shock loads so, a constant influent COD value of 1249.5 mg/L was applied for eight successive batch cycles and the results indicated that the removal ratio gradually improved with successive loading. As well, to enhance treatment efficiency under organic shock loads the performance of the reactor was evaluated for different MLSS concentrations of 2000, 2600, 3200, 3900, 4200, 4600, 4825, and 5250 mg/L. Three different organic shock loads with COD concentrations of 1043.04, 1205.36, and 1560 mg/L. COD removal ratios of 96.23 %, 86.18 %, and 75.81 % were achieved for the first, second, and third shock loads respectively at a MLSS concentration of 4825 mg/L however, it dropped when MLSS concentration increased to 5250 mg/L.
Full text 10,585 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Enhancement of SBR’s treatment under organic shock load | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Enhancement of SBR’s treatment under organic shock load Dalia Ahmed, Hesham M. ELKaramany, Ahmed Alged This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4477767/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Organic shock loads often hinder biological wastewater treatment systems from meeting discharge standards, as a result, these systems frequently fail to achieve the required level of treatment so, the potential impact of these loads was investigated using laboratory-scale sequencing batch reactors (SBRs). Short-term (4.5 h) exposure to 721.25 - 1515.36 mg COD/L shock loads reduced the removal ratios of COD by 3.48 % – 31.73 % compared with the control. A mathematical model was developed for COD decomposition and the results obtained from the model were approximately close to the experimental data, and the maximum difference between the experimental and the theoretical removal rates was 3.36 % at a shock organic load of 1019.20 mg COD/L. In addition, the reactor performance was evaluated under successive organic shock loads so, a constant influent COD value of 1249.5 mg/L was applied for eight successive batch cycles and the results indicated that the removal ratio gradually improved with successive loading. As well, to enhance treatment efficiency under organic shock loads the performance of the reactor was evaluated for different MLSS concentrations of 2000, 2600, 3200, 3900, 4200, 4600, 4825, and 5250 mg/L. Three different organic shock loads with COD concentrations of 1043.04, 1205.36, and 1560 mg/L. COD removal ratios of 96.23 %, 86.18 %, and 75.81 % were achieved for the first, second, and third shock loads respectively at a MLSS concentration of 4825 mg/L however, it dropped when MLSS concentration increased to 5250 mg/L. Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) municipal wastewater Synthetic organic shock load MLSS Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4477767","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":310693012,"identity":"a022d869-e1d5-4e15-9bea-e3892a0338e6","order_by":0,"name":"Dalia Ahmed","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Zagazig University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Dalia","middleName":"","lastName":"Ahmed","suffix":""},{"id":310693013,"identity":"7d6f26b7-78d2-4951-b74b-c7b9f41dee10","order_by":1,"name":"Hesham M. ELKaramany","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Zagazig University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Hesham","middleName":"M.","lastName":"ELKaramany","suffix":""},{"id":310693014,"identity":"1d8a4cf1-6422-432b-bf3d-c1e4a56a0b93","order_by":2,"name":"Ahmed Alged","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Zagazig University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ahmed","middleName":"","lastName":"Alged","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-05-25 18:09:14","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4477767/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4477767/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":59811873,"identity":"6655b2dd-4c7d-4277-baba-fda18654df7c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-07-07 21:20:36","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":504036,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Enhancement2ofSBRstreatmentunderorganicshockload2.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4477767/v1_covered_17657010-8512-4e26-8bb5-88e22bcab8c5.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Enhancement of SBR’s treatment under organic shock load","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR), municipal wastewater, Synthetic organic shock load, MLSS","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4477767/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4477767/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eOrganic shock loads often hinder biological wastewater treatment systems from meeting discharge standards, as a result, these systems frequently fail to achieve the required level of treatment so, the potential impact of these loads was investigated using laboratory-scale sequencing batch reactors (SBRs). Short-term (4.5 h) exposure to 721.25 - 1515.36 mg COD/L shock loads reduced the removal ratios of COD by 3.48 % – 31.73 % compared with the control. A mathematical model was developed for COD decomposition and the results obtained from the model were approximately close to the experimental data, and the maximum difference between the experimental and the theoretical removal rates was 3.36 % at a shock organic load of 1019.20 mg COD/L. In addition, the reactor performance was evaluated under successive organic shock loads so, a constant influent COD value of 1249.5 mg/L was applied for eight successive batch cycles and the results indicated that the removal ratio gradually improved with successive loading. As well, to enhance treatment efficiency under organic shock loads the performance of the reactor was evaluated for different MLSS concentrations of 2000, 2600, 3200, 3900, 4200, 4600, 4825, and 5250 mg/L. Three different organic shock loads with COD concentrations of 1043.04, 1205.36, and 1560 mg/L. COD removal ratios of 96.23 %, 86.18 %, and 75.81 % were achieved for the first, second, and third shock loads respectively at a MLSS concentration of 4825 mg/L however, it dropped when MLSS concentration increased to 5250 mg/L.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Enhancement of SBR’s treatment under organic shock load","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-06-10 14:56:18","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4477767/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"80c71e9f-679a-4d71-8ed7-bcb901648399","owner":[],"postedDate":"June 10th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-07-07T21:12:29+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2024-06-10 14:56:18","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4477767","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4477767","identity":"rs-4477767","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00