Average local nucleosome motion remains constant during interphase in living human cells

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Background Dynamic chromatin behavior, which is related to chromatin accessibility, plays a critical role in various genome DNA functions such as RNA transcription and DNA replication/repair. Previous studies using highly synchronized cells showed that average local chromatin motion, captured by single-nucleosome imaging and tracking on a second time scale, remained almost constant throughout G1, S, and G2 phases in living human cells, although possible effects of prolonged drug treatments for cell-cycle synchronization could not be excluded. Results To avoid possible effects of prolonged drug treatment, we combined single-nucleosome imaging with Fucci probes to visualize cell-cycle progression through G1, S, and G2. Using HeLa and HCT116 cells expressing H2B-HaloTag and Fucci probes, we found that local nucleosome motion remained similar on average throughout interphase, except for elevated motion in early G1. Transcription inhibition similarly increased nucleosome motion throughout interphase. Local nucleosome motion also increased following replication stress or DNA damage. Conclusion Our findings suggest that near-constant chromatin motion supports housekeeping functions under similar physical conditions during interphase. Our findings also suggest that cells can transiently change chromatin motion to perform ad hoc tasks in response to signals from inside and outside the cell, such as DNA damage.
Full text 1,511 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 3 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Dynamic chromatin behavior, which is related to chromatin accessibility, plays a critical role in various genome DNA functions such as RNA transcription and DNA replication/repair. Previous studies using highly synchronized cells showed that average local chromatin motion, captured by single-nucleosome imaging and tracking on a second time scale, remained almost constant throughout G1, S, and G2 phases in living human cells, although possible effects of prolonged drug treatments for cell-cycle synchronization could not be excluded.

Results

To avoid possible effects of prolonged drug treatment, we combined single-nucleosome imaging with Fucci probes to visualize cell-cycle progression through G1, S, and G2. Using HeLa and HCT116 cells expressing H2B-HaloTag and Fucci probes, we found that local nucleosome motion remained similar on average throughout interphase, except for elevated motion in early G1. Transcription inhibition similarly increased nucleosome motion throughout interphase. Local nucleosome motion also increased following replication stress or DNA damage.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that near-constant chromatin motion supports housekeeping functions under similar physical conditions during interphase. Our findings also suggest that cells can transiently change chromatin motion to perform ad hoc tasks in response to signals from inside and outside the cell, such as DNA damage. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00