Horizontal transfer of a 180-kbp genomic fraction among the largest viral genomes

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Viruses are generally considered tiny biological entities with small genomes; however, some dsDNA viruses, known as giant viruses, have large genomes that are comparable to those of small bacteria. Previous studies indicated that the genomes of giant viruses expanded from a small ancestor by a combination of gene duplication, de novo gene creation, and horizontal gene transfer (HGT). Among them, virus-to-virus HGTs are recently recognized as an important mechanism for disseminating functional genes between giant viruses. In this study, we isolated a giant virus of a member of pandoraviruses, which have the largest genome sizes reaching 2.5 Mbp. Based on the average nucleotide identity of known pandoraviruses, this new pandoravirus belongs to an existing viral species. However, its genome was approximately 200 kbp larger than those of the other strains from the same species. A genome-wide comparison identified a 180-kbp region with 168 genes missing from the other strains but found in phylogenetically distant pandoraviruses. The GC ratio and homology of the deduced amino acid sequences in this 180-kbp region suggest that the new virus horizontally acquired this region from a distantly related pandoravirus. The gene composition in the 180-kbp region further indicates that this region was already large at the time of the horizontal transfer. Our findings suggest that pandoraviruses can horizontally exchange a large portion of their genomes. This event presumably represents one mechanism for accelerating genomic evolution and gigantism in giant viruses.
Full text 49,687 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Horizontal transfer of a 180-kbp genomic fraction among the largest viral genomes | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results Horizontal transfer of a 180-kbp genomic fraction among the largest viral genomes View ORCID Profile Hiroyuki Hikida , View ORCID Profile Ruixuan Zhang , Jingjie Chen , Yusuke Okazaki , View ORCID Profile Hiroyuki Ogata doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.28.650931 Hiroyuki Hikida 1 Chemical Life Science, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University , Uji, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Hiroyuki Hikida For correspondence: hhikida{at}niid.go.jp Ruixuan Zhang 1 Chemical Life Science, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University , Uji, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Ruixuan Zhang Jingjie Chen 1 Chemical Life Science, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University , Uji, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Yusuke Okazaki 1 Chemical Life Science, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University , Uji, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Hiroyuki Ogata 1 Chemical Life Science, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University , Uji, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Hiroyuki Ogata Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Preview PDF Abstract Viruses are generally considered tiny biological entities with small genomes; however, some dsDNA viruses, known as giant viruses, have large genomes that are comparable to those of small bacteria. Previous studies indicated that the genomes of giant viruses expanded from a small ancestor by a combination of gene duplication, de novo gene creation, and horizontal gene transfer (HGT). Among them, virus-to-virus HGTs are recently recognized as an important mechanism for disseminating functional genes between giant viruses. In this study, we isolated a giant virus of a member of pandoraviruses, which have the largest genome sizes reaching 2.5 Mbp. Based on the average nucleotide identity of known pandoraviruses, this new pandoravirus belongs to an existing viral species. However, its genome was approximately 200 kbp larger than those of the other strains from the same species. A genome-wide comparison identified a 180-kbp region with 168 genes missing from the other strains but found in phylogenetically distant pandoraviruses. The GC ratio and homology of the deduced amino acid sequences in this 180-kbp region suggest that the new virus horizontally acquired this region from a distantly related pandoravirus. The gene composition in the 180-kbp region further indicates that this region was already large at the time of the horizontal transfer. Our findings suggest that pandoraviruses can horizontally exchange a large portion of their genomes. This event presumably represents one mechanism for accelerating genomic evolution and gigantism in giant viruses. Introduction Viruses were considered to be tiny biological agents until the discovery of giant viruses that have large particles and genome sizes comparable to those of small bacteria ( La Scola et al. 2003 ; Raoult et al. 2004 ; Lwoff 1957 ). These giant viruses primarily infect unicellular eukaryotes and are currently classified into the viral phylum Nucleocytoviricota along with some animal viruses (e.g., poxviruses) ( Aylward et al. 2021 ). Recent studies discovered giant viruses in large metagenomic data and revealed their vast diversity and broad distribution in various environments ( Endo et al. 2020 ; Schulz et al. 2020 ). In these environments, giant viruses modulate nutrient cycles not only by killing the hosts but also by reprogramming host metabolism using a large repertoire of genes related to cellular machinery ( Moniruzzaman et al. 2020a ; Rosenwasser et al. 2016 ; Suttle 2007 ). Previous studies indicated that giant viruses have evolved from a small ancestor ( Iyer et al. 2006 ; Yutin et al. 2014 ), acquiring genes by a combination of gene duplication ( Suhre 2005 ; Machado et al. 2023 ), de novo gene creation ( Legendre et al. 2018 ; Forterre and Gaïa 2016 ), and horizontal gene transfer (HGT) ( Irwin et al. 2022 ; Wu et al. 2024 ). HGT has a prominent role in expanding the viral gene repertoire and increasing viral fitness, as known for cellular organisms ( Keeling 2009 ; Soucy et al. 2015 ). Giant viruses have experienced a massive number of HGTs from host organisms and acquired genes related to cellular functions ( Kijima et al. 2024 ; Irwin et al. 2022 ). At the same time, giant viruses contribute to the evolution of host eukaryotes by providing functional genes that evolved in viral genomes ( Da Cunha et al. 2022 ; Guglielmini et al. 2019 ). In addition to these host-virus interactions, HGTs among viruses have played a pivotal role in giant virus evolution to disseminate genes acquired from hosts within the viruses ( Wu et al. 2024 ; Kijima et al. 2024 ). Pandoraviruses are one of the largest members of the phylum Nucleocytoviricota with 1-µm amphora-shaped virions and 1.5–2.5 Mbp genomes ( Legendre et al. 2018 ; Philippe et al. 2013 ; Aherfi et al. 2018 ). Their genomes encode 1,000–2,000 genes, most of which are functionally uncharacterized proteins ( Abergel et al. 2015 ). Similar to other nucleocytoviruses, pandoraviruses encode genes involved in cellular functions and viral replication; however, they lack some hallmark genes (e.g., major capsid proteins) ( Aherfi et al. 2022 ; Philippe et al. 2013 ). Phylogenetically, pandoraviruses are related to phycodnaviruses that infect eukaryotic algae but are highly divergent in terms of genome sizes and morphology ( Yutin and Koonin 2013 ; Aylward et al. 2021 ). A previous study suggested that another virion protein was substituted for the major capsid proteins, allowing their distinct morphology and genome sizes ( Krupovic et al. 2020 ). In this study, we isolated a new pandoravirus strain from freshwater lake sediment. This virus was classified into an existing species; however, its genome was 200 kbp larger than other strains of the species. Genome-wide comparisons identified a 180-kbp region with 168 genes, which is missing from the closely related viruses but found in distantly related viruses. Further analysis suggested that this region was horizontally transferred from another virus. Our results suggest that the pandoravirus genomes are highly flexible and can horizontally transfer large genomic factions, which accelerate genomic evolution in giant viruses. Results Isolation and phylogenetic analysis of a pandoravirus We isolated a virus from a sediment sample of a Japanese freshwater lake (Lake Biwa) by a co-culture method using a free-living amoeba, Acanthamoeba castellanii . The isolated virus had amphora-shaped virions (∼1 µm), which were morphologically similar to that of pandoraviruses ( Fig. 1A ). The whole genome sequences were determined by a hybrid assembly of short- and long-read sequences, which yielded a 1,970,084-bp contiguous genomic sequence of the virus ( Fig. 1B ). The newly isolated viruses exhibited 97.2% and 98.3% average nucleotide identity (ANI) to pandoravirus japonicus (PanV-jap) ( Hosokawa et al. 2021 ) and pandoravirus pampulha strain 8.5 (PanV-pam) ( Pereira Andrade et al. 2019 ), respectively. Two tRNA and 1,777 protein-coding genes were predicted. Similar to other pandoaviruses, most of these protein-coding genes were homologous to pandoravirus proteins that are unique to these viruses or ORFans ( Fig. 1B and Table S1). Phylogenetically, pandoraviruses are divided into two clades (i.e., A and B) ( Legendre et al. 2018 ). We found that Clade A can be further divided into two subclades (A-I and A-II). The nucleotide identity indicated that the newly isolated virus belongs to Clade A-I ( Fig. 1C ). A phylogenetic tree based on the concatenated genes conserved in the phylum Nucleocytovirivota (i.e., AA18 helicase and RNA polymerase beta subunit 1) confirmed that the newly isolated virus is closely related to PanV-jap and PanV-pam in Clade A-I ( Fig. 1D ). Current frameworks for giant virus taxonomy often use 95% ANI as a species boundary ( Aylward et al. 2021 ). On the basis of ANI-based clustering and gene trees, PanV-jap, PanV-pam, and the newly isolated virus appeared to form a species. Thus, we considered the newly isolated virus a new strain of Pandoravirus pampulha (the name of the first isolate among these three viruses) and designated it pandoravirus pampulha Biwa (PanV-biw). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Isolation and phylogenetic analysis of a pandoravirus (A) Negative stain image of a pandoravirus newly isolated from a Japanese freshwater lake, Lake Biwa (PanV-biw). Bar = 500 nm. (B) Genomic structure of PanV-biw. Red and blue indicate genes located on the leading or complementary strands, respectively. The locations of tRNA genes are indicated by arrowheads. The tRNA Ala gene was predicted as a pseudogene. (C) Comparison of the average nucleotide identity (ANI) between pandoravirus genomes. Viruses were clustered based on pairwise ANI. The order in the columns is the same as that in the rows. (D) A concatenated tree of AA18 helicase and RNA polymerase B subunit 1. The substitution model was Q.plant+F+I+G4. Blue dots indicate the branch that was statistically supported (SH-aLRT >80 and UFB >95). PanV-biw contains a 180-kbp region missing from its close relatives but found in its distant relatives Despite the close phylogenetic relationship, PanV-biw has a genome approximately 200 kbp larger than that of PanV-jap (1,798,487 bp) and PanV-pam (1,676,110 bp). This suggests rapid genome expansion or a reduction among these three viruses (Fig. S1). Genome-wide comparisons between pairs of the pandoraviruses identified a 180-kbp region encoding 168 genes in the PanV-biw genome, which is missing from PanV-pam and PanV-jap ( Figs. 2A and S2A). This region was located from 1,107,212 to 1,286,311 nt of PanV-biw and was missing in genomes of other Clade A-I viruses (Fig. S2A). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. The 180-kbp region missing from close relatives of PanV-biw Genomic comparison between PanV-biw and (A) pandoraviruses belonging to Clade A-I and (B– D) those belonging to Clade A-II based on BLASTN. X- and Y-axes represent the genomic position in PanV-biw and other pandoraviruses, respectively. The viruses are designated at the top left. (A–D) Red boxes indicate the 180-kbp region missing from other Clade A-I viruses. To examine the possibility that this 180-kbp region resulted from any artifact in the assembly process, we mapped the raw sequence reads that were used to assemble PanV-jap to the PanV-biw genome. Because these two viruses exhibit high nucleotide identity, most reads were mapped to the PanV-biw genome. However, the 180-kbp region was not covered by the reads from PanV-jap (Fig. S3A). Some PanV-jap reads bridged the 5′ and 3′ flanking regions of the 180-kbp region, confirming the absence of the 180-kbp region in PanV-jap (Fig. S3B). We also mapped the raw long reads from PanV-biw to the PanV-biw genome and identified reads covering the junctions between the 180-kbp and flanking regions (Fig. S3C, D). These results exclude the possibility of artifacts in the assembly process of the genomes. Further genome-wide comparisons between PanV-biw and other pandoraviruses identified regions homologous to this 180-kbp region (hereafter referred to as “the homologous region”) in phylogenetically distant pandoraviruses ( Figs. 2B and S2B). Two viruses from Clade A-II, pandoravirus salinus (PanV-sal) and pandoravirus inopinatum, conserved almost the entire region, although their homologous regions were inverted. Other Clade A-II viruses (pandoravirus quercus and pandoravirus celtis) conserved a part of the region ( Figs. 2C and S2C). In the genome of another Clade A-II virus, pandoravirus talik, the region was missing as in the Clade A-I viruses ( Fig. 2D ). A comparison with the Clade B viruses revealed that the 5′ half flanking region of the 180-kbp region was relatively well conserved, whereas the 3′ half flanking region was not conserved in the Clade B viruses (Fig. S2D), suggesting that this 180-kbp region was located at the boundary of the bipartite structure of the pandoravirus genome described in a previous study ( Legendre et al. 2018 ). These results propose two major possibilities: this region was present in the common ancestor of the Clade A viruses but was lost in most Clade A-I viruses and pandoravirus talik, or the region was horizontally transferred from a Clade A-II virus to PanV-biw. The protein and nucleotide similarity suggests a horizontal transfer of the 180-kbp region The proteins encoded in the 180-kbp region of PanV-biw showed higher identity to those in PanV-sal than the proteins encoded in the remainder of the PanV-biw genome did ( Fig. 3A, C ). This result suggests that the 180-kb region of PanV-biw has different evolutionary origins from the remainder of the genome. We also examined the genomic GC ratio, which is associated with each lineage of pandoraviruses (Fig. S1). The GC ratio of the 180-kb region was 59.8%, which was lower than 63.5% for the remainder of the PanV-biw genome ( Fig. 3B, D ). The ratio was also lower than 61.7% of the entire genome of PanV-sal ( Fig. 3D ). However, the homologous region in PanV-sal showed 59.6% GC, which was close to the ratio of the 180-kbp region of PanV-biw ( Fig. 3D ). This suggests a shared evolutionary origin of the 180-kbp region of PanV-biw and its homologous region of PanV-sal. These results support the horizontal transfer of the 180-kbp region to PanV-biw rather than the vertical inheritance in Clade A-I. Of note, the deviation of the GC ratio in the homologous region in PanV-sal implies that the region in PanV-sal was also horizontally acquired. Thus, an alternative scenario would be that the 180-kbp region and its homologous region both originated from an unknown entity. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3. The protein similarity and GC ratio suggest the horizontal transfer of the 180-kbp region to PanV-biw. (A) Identity of proteins encoded in the PanV-biw genome compared with those encoded in the pandoravirus salinus (PanV-sal) genome. The color indicates the coverage of the BLAST alignment. The position of the genes in PanV-sal is shown in Figure S4. (B) The GC ratio within a 500-bp window in the genome of PanV-biw. (A, B) Red boxes indicate the 180-kbp region of PanV-biw. (C) Kernel-density estimate for the distribution of the identity of proteins encoded in the PanV-biw genome to those encoded in the PanV-sal genome. Blue, orange, and green indicate the proteins encoded in the entire genome, the 180-kbp region, and the remainder of the genome, respectively. (D) The GC ratio of PanV-biw and PanV-sal. GC ratio in the entire genome and that within the 180-kbp region (180-kbp) of the PanV-biw genome or the homologous region of the PanV-sal genome (HR) are shown. The gene composition of the 180-kbp region suggests genome expansion before the horizontal transfer Although our results support that the 180-kbp region of PanV-biw was horizontally acquired, it is unclear whether this region was already large at the time of the horizontal transfer or expanded from a small fragment after the transfer. To infer whether the 180-kbp region of PanV-biw was expanded before or after the horizontal transfer to PanV-biw, we examined the gene composition of the 180-kbp region based on the orthologous groups (OGs) shared by the pandoraviruses. Of the 168 genes encoded in the 180-kbp region, 119 genes were assigned to 83 OGs ( Fig. 4A ). Twenty OGs have more than one copy of the genes in the 180-kbp region of the PanV-biw genome, suggesting that the gene duplication contributed to the expansion of this region. In the phylogenetic tree of a highly duplicated OG (i.e., one of the proteins with the morn-repeat domain), the genes encoded in the 180-kbp region exhibited a phylogenetically distant relationship, which suggests ancient duplication of the OG before the horizontal transfer ( Fig. 4B ). The genes encoded in the 180-kbp region were grouped with the PanV-sal or PanV-ino genes. These groupings were statistically supported, indicating that they were duplicated in the common ancestral region of these pandoraviruses ( Fig. 4B ). Of the other 63 OGs encoded in the 180-kbp region of PanV-biw, 56 have homologs in other homologous regions of the Clade A-II pandoraviruses ( Fig. 4A ). Most of the genes are conserved in PanV-biw, PanV-sal, and PanV-ino, suggesting that their ancestral region already contained a substantial gene repertoire. Collectively, our results suggest that the 180-kbp region was already expanded before the horizontal transfer to PanV-biw with a combination of gene duplication and other mechanisms. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 4. Genome expansions before horizontal transfer. (A) Orthologous groups (OGs) of genes encoded in the 180-kbp region of PanV-biw and its homologous regions in the Clade A-II pandoraviruses. Rows and columns represent genomes and OGs, respectively. Colors indicate the number of genes belonging to each OG, and empty circles indicate that no OGs are encoded in the genome. OGs are ordered by the total number of genes assigned to each OG. An annotation was provided for some OGs. DHFR and v-ubi indicate the dihydrofolate reductase incomplete domain-containing protein and viral ubiquitin, respectively. (B) A phylogenetic tree of the OG of morn-repeat domain proteins. Branch colors indicate the viral clades. The shape and color of the outer nodes represent the origins of the sequences. (C) Genome structure of the corresponding regions in the Clade A-I pandoraviruses. Each box represents genes with direction in the genome. The same numbers and colors indicate genes belonging to the same OGs. Genes homologous to those encoded in the 180-kbp region are marked by an asterisk and shown as filled boxes. Clade A-I pandoraviruses have a region missing in PanV-biw To infer possible mechanisms underlying the horizontal transfer, we investigated the flanking ends of the 180-kbp region of PanV-biw and their corresponding regions in the other Clade A-I pandoraviruses. Although the other Clade A-I pandoraviruses appeared to lack the corresponding region to the 180-kbp region in the dot plots ( Figs. 2 and S2), enlarged dot plots identified several kilobase regions in the genomes of Clade A-I viruses that were missing from PanV-biw (hereafter referred to as “the corresponding region”) (Fig. S5). This result suggests that the acquisition of the 180-kbp region was not an insertion but a replacement of the corresponding region by the 180-kbp region. Because a previous study showed that pandoraviruses are capable of recombining their genomic DNA with exogenous elements ( Bisio et al. 2023 ), the putative genomic replacement likely occurred by homologous recombination. The corresponding regions encoded genes homologous to those encoded in the 180-kbp region of PanV-biw ( Fig. 4C ). This result suggests that the 180-kbp region of PanV-biw, its homologous region in the Clade A-II pandoraviruses, and its corresponding regions in the Clade A-I pandoraviruses are evolutionarily related. The length of the corresponding regions varied from ∼5 kb in PanV-bel to ∼11 kb in PanV-dul. PanV-dul encoded duplicated genes and more homologous genes to those in the 180-kbp region of PanV-biw than the other Clade A-I viruses. These results indicate that the Clade A-I viruses also experienced expansion and reduction in this region. The function of the 180-kbp region is elusive In the 180-kbp region, most genes encode hypothetical proteins, repeat-containing proteins (i.e., ankyrin-repeat proteins), and genes annotated by their domain structures (i.e., F-box, morn-repeat, and ring domain). Only a few genes had functional annotations. One of these genes contains a dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) incomplete domain-containing protein ( Fig. 4A ). DHFR is involved in the synthesis of thymidine ( Blaney et al. 1984 ), which might be beneficial for maintaining the slightly AT-rich sequences of the 180-kbp region. Another example is viral ubiquitin ( Fig. 4A ), but its function is currently unclear in giant viruses. Discussion In the present study, we isolated a pandoravirus from freshwater lake sediment. This virus represented a new strain of an existing viral species but harbored a 180-kbp region missing from other closely related viruses. The genomic comparison suggests a scenario in which a large genomic fraction was horizontally transferred to the new pandoravirus. Our results suggested that giant viruses are capable of transferring large genomic fractions to other viruses horizontally. Recent studies identified large integrations of giant virus genomes into host chromosomes, which facilitate the transfer of a large proportion of genes from viruses to their hosts ( Moniruzzaman et al. 2020b ; Zhao et al. 2023 ). Our results indicated that such large-scale HGTs were also possible among viruses, which may have contributed to their genomic evolution. This study revealed that closely related pandoravirus strains within the same species exhibited a 200-kbp difference in their genome size, accounting for approximately 10% of their genome size. This finding highlights the high flexibility of the pandoravirus genomes. Pandoraviruses have lost the double-jerry role-type major capsid proteins, which are typical of nucleocytoviruses. Instead, they use other proteins to form virions. This morphological innovation is a potential driver for the development of large virions and genomes ( Philippe et al. 2013 ; Krupovic et al. 2020 ; Bisio et al. 2023 ). However, the resulting large genomes apparently contain a lot of unnecessary components and are invaded by mobile genetic elements, such as introns, inteins, and transposable elements ( Philippe et al. 2013 ; Akashi and Takemura 2019 ; Sun et al. 2015 ). An experimental study showed that a 600-kbp region is dispensable for viral replication, supporting the large capacity of pandoraviruses to encode nonessential genes ( Bisio et al. 2023 ). Consistent with these previous findings, our discovery of a 180-kbp horizontally transferred region supports that the pandoravirus genomes have high flexibility, which may increase their coding capacity. Currently, the precise evolutionary trajectory of this region is unknown. Its related regions were found in a wide range of the Clade A pandoraviruses, but their size and gene content are highly diverse. These results suggest frequent genomic expansions and reductions in these regions. Moreover, the GC ratio of the homologous region in PanV-sal implies that these regions have mobility. Pandoraviruses have bipartite genomic structures, which separate the region encoding the core genes and that encoding accessory ones ( Legendre et al. 2018 ). The 180-kbp region of PanV-biw and its homologous or corresponding regions are closely located at the junction of the bipartite structures. Therefore, this region might have distinct properties from the remainder of viral genomes and particularly high flexibility. Recently, the diversity of giant viruses was largely expanded by metagenomic studies. However, metagenomic approaches often miss this type of region because of technical challenges associated with intra-species diversity. Our study indicates that isolation studies are still important to provide a broader overview of the genomic evolution in giant viruses. The ecological or biological benefits of these regions remain elusive because of limited functional information. One small clue is the DHFR homologs found in the 180-kbp region, which appear beneficial for this region rather than the entire genome. These genes indicate that this region might have selfish properties, although additional functional analyses are required. Recently, a reverse-genetics system for pandoravirus was developed ( Bisio et al. 2023 ; Philippe et al. 2024 ). Further studies with such experimental systems may reveal the functional importance of these regions and provide novel insights into the role of virus-to-virus HGT in giant virus evolution. Methods Virus isolation Virus isolation and purification were performed as described previously ( Hikida et al. 2023 ). Briefly, a top layer of sediment was previously collected from the north basin of a freshwater lake, Lake Biwa, Japan (35.13.2152 N, 135.59.7862 E). The collected sample was resuspended in Page’s amoeba saline, and large particles were removed by filtration. A. castellanii (Douglas) Page, strain Neff (ATCC 30010) was cultured in peptone-yeast extract-glucose (PYG) medium and seeded in a 96-well plate. The filtrated sample was inoculated into the amoeba culture with PYG medium supplemented with an antibiotic mix. A well that showed a cytopathic effect was collected and purified by the end-point dilution method. The presence of viruses was confirmed by negative staining as described previously ( Fig. 1A ) ( Hikida et al. 2023 ). Genomic DNA extraction The purified viruses were cultured in a 10-cm cell culture dish with the amoeba culture, and the supernatant was collected. The cultured viruses were collected by centrifugation at 9,000 rpm for 1 hour at 4°C (Sorvall ST8FR, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and resuspended in Tris-EDTA buffer (pH 8.0). The collected viruses were incubated overnight with 2 mg/mL of proteinase K and 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate. DNA was extracted by treatment with phenol twice and chloroform twice, followed by ethanol precipitation. Genome sequencing Genomic DNA concentration was measured using a Qubit 4 fluorometer using Qubit dsDNA BR Assay Kits (Invitrogen). A sequencing library for long-read sequencing was prepared from 504 ng of the genomic DNA using the Ligation Sequencing Kit (SQK-LSK109, Oxford Nanopore Technologies), following the manufacturer’s protocol. The library was sequenced using an R9.4.1 Flongle flow cell (FLO-FLG001, Oxford Nanopore Technologies) on a MinION Mk1C with MinKNOW v22.05.08 software (Oxford Nanopore Technologies). A total of 291.2 Mb of data was obtained. The genomic DNA was also sequenced using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 system in 150-bp paired-end mode. A total of 1 Gb of data was obtained. Quality control of the genomic DNA, library preparation, and sequencing were performed by Rhelixa, Inc. (Japan). Genome assembly The raw long reads were assembled into contigs using miniasm v0.3 and minipolish v0.1.3 with default parameters ( Li 2016 ). Source organisms for the assembled contigs were predicted by BLASTN implemented in BLAST+ v2.14.0 ( Camacho et al. 2009 ) against the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Nucleotide collection (nt/nr) database. Contigs likely derived from host organisms were removed. Based on long-read mapping to the assembled contigs using Minimap2 v2.22, the first assembly included an approximately 8-kbp region at the 5’ end of the putative genomic contig that showed higher coverage than the other region. In addition, no long reads connected this 8-kbp region to the putative viral genomic region. A BLASTN search revealed that the 5′ region likely originated from bacteriophage contamination. Therefore, we removed the raw long reads mapped to this phage-like region using Samtools v1.14 ( Li et al. 2009 ). Reads mapped to the putative host contigs were also removed at this step. The remaining long reads were used for assembly as described above. Two contigs were constructed: one contig with 1,969,476 bp in length was typical for pandoravirus genomes, and the other 6,833 bp contigs were likely to be a part of the host mitochondrial genome based on a BLASTX search. Thus, we considered the 1,969,476-bp contig as the genomic sequence of the isolated virus. The Illumina short reads were mapped to this genomic contig by BWA v0.7.17 ( Li 2013 ) and converted to a BAM format using Samtools, from which the sequence was polished with short reads using Pilon v1.23 ( Walker et al. 2014 ). The possibility of artifacts in the assembly process was examined by mapping the long reads used to assemble PanV-jap and PanV-biw to the PanV-biw genome. The long reads used for the PanV-jap assembly were retrieved from the DDBJ Sequence Read Archive. Mapping was performed using Minimap2, and the resulting SAM files were converted and sorted by Samtools. The mapping results were visualized by custom Python scripts. Genome annotation Coding sequences in the genomic sequence were predicted by Prodigal v2.6.3 ( Hyatt et al. 2010 ) with default parameters. The predicted amino acid sequences were further annotated by top hits from a BLASTP search against the NCBI non-redundant protein sequence (nr) database at the E-value threshold of 10 −4 (Table. S1), followed by manual curation. tRNA was annotated using tRNAscan-SE v2.0.12 ( Chan and Lowe 2019 ). Comparative genomics The genomic sequences of the isolated pandoraviruses were retrieved from the NCBI Virus database (Table S2). ANI was calculated using fastANI v1.33 ( Jain et al. 2018 ). Genomic regions similar to the newly isolated pandoravirus were identified by BLASTN search. Calculation of the GC ratio of each genome and visualization of the genome-wide comparison (e.g., dot plots) were performed using custom Python scripts. Phylogenetic analysis Marker genes used for phylogenetic analysis of nucleocytoviruses were searched against coding sequences of the examined pandoraviruses using those encoded in PanV-sal as queries ( Philippe et al. 2013 ). Because some genes were split into fragments, probably due to the insertion of introns or merely sequencing error, we selected RNA polymerase subunit B and AA18 helicase for inferring species trees. The protein sequences of these genes were aligned using MAFFT v7.520 ( Katoh and Standley 2013 ) with the “auto” option. Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using IQ-TREE 2 v 2.2.2.6 ( Minh et al. 2020 ) with 1,000 replicates of the ultrafast bootstrap and Simodaira-Hasegawa approximate likelihood ratio test. Substitution models were determined using ModelFinder ( Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017 ). The reconstructed trees were visualized using the iTOL web server ( Letunic and Bork 2024 ). Orthologous groups were identified from the pandoravirus genomes listed in Table S2 using Orthofinder v2.5.5 (Emms and Kelly 2019) with default parameters. In some pandoravirus genomic sequences, the protein-coding sequences are not available. For these genomes, we predicted protein-coding genes de novo using Prodigal with default parameters. Protein sequences belonging to an OG of morn-repeat domain proteins were aligned, and a phylogenetic tree was built and visualized, as described above. Data access The short- and long-read sequencing data were deposited in DDBJ with the accession numbers DRR641321 and DRR641322, respectively. The genomic sequence was deposited in DDBJ with the accession number LC870878 . Competing interest statement The authors declare no competing interests. Acknowledgments Field sampling was supported by the Center for Ecological Research, Kyoto University, a Joint Usage/Research Center. The electron microscopy study was supported by the Division of Electron Microscopic Study, Center for Anatomical Studies, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University. Computation time was provided by the SuperComputer System, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University. This study was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI grant numbers 22K15175, 21J00174 to HH, and 22H00384 to HO. Funding Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, https://ror.org/00hhkn466 , 22K15175 , 21J00174 , 22H00384 References ↵ Abergel C , Legendre M , Claverie J-M. 2015 . The rapidly expanding universe of giant viruses: Mimivirus, Pandoravirus, Pithovirus and Mollivirus ed. A. Filloux . FEMS Microbiol Rev 39 : 779 – 796 . doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuv037 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Aherfi S , Andreani J , Baptiste E , Oumessoum A , Dornas FP , Andrade ACDSP , Chabriere E , Abrahao J , Levasseur A , Raoult D , et al. 2018 . A large open pangenome and a small core genome for giant pandoraviruses . Front Microbiol 9 : 1486 . doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01486 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Aherfi S , Brahim Belhaouari D , Pinault L , Baudoin J-P , Decloquement P , Abrahao J , Colson P , Levasseur A , Lamb DC , Chabriere E , et al. 2022 . Incomplete tricarboxylic acid cycle and proton gradient in Pandoravirus massiliensis: is it still a virus? ISME J 16 : 695 – 704 . doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01117-3 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Akashi M , Takemura M. 2019 . Co-Isolation and Characterization of Two Pandoraviruses and a Mimivirus from a Riverbank in Japan . Viruses 11 : 1123 . doi: 10.3390/v11121123 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Aylward FO , Moniruzzaman M , Ha AD , Koonin E V. 2021 . A phylogenomic framework for charting the diversity and evolution of giant viruses ed. C. Suttle . PLoS Biol 19 : e3001430 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001430 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Bisio H , Legendre M , Giry C , Philippe N , Alempic J-M , Jeudy S , Abergel C. 2023 . Evolution of giant pandoravirus revealed by CRISPR/Cas9 . Nat Commun 14 : 428 . doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36145-4 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Blaney JM , Hansch C , Silipo C , Vittoria A. 1984 . Structure-activity relationships of dihydrofolated reductase inhibitors . Chem Rev 84 : 333 – 407 . doi: 10.1021/cr00062a002 . OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Camacho C , Coulouris G , Avagyan V , Ma N , Papadopoulos J , Bealer K , Madden TL . 2009 . BLAST+: architecture and applications . BMC Bioinformatics 10 : 421 . doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ M. Kollmar Chan PP , Lowe TM . 2019 . tRNAscan-SE: Searching for tRNA Genes in Genomic Sequences . In Gene Prediction: Methods and Protocols (ed. M. Kollmar ), pp. 1 – 14 , Springer New York , New York, NY doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9173-0_1 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Da Cunha V , Gaia M , Ogata H , Jaillon O , Delmont TO , Forterre P. 2022 . Giant Viruses Encode Actin-Related Proteins ed. E. Teeling . Mol Biol Evol 39 : 1 – 6 . doi: 10.1093/molbev/msac022 . OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Endo H , Blanc-Mathieu R , Li Y , Salazar G , Henry N , Labadie K , de Vargas C , Sullivan MB , Bowler C , Wincker P , et al. 2020 . Biogeography of marine giant viruses reveals their interplay with eukaryotes and ecological functions . Nat Ecol Evol 4 : 1639 – 1649 . doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-01288-w . OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Forterre P , Gaïa M. 2016 . Giant viruses and the origin of modern eukaryotes . Curr Opin Microbiol 31 : 44 – 49 . doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2016.02.001 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Guglielmini J , Woo AC , Krupovic M , Forterre P , Gaia M. 2019 . Diversification of giant and large eukaryotic dsDNA viruses predated the origin of modern eukaryotes . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116 : 19585 – 19592 . doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912006116 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Hikida H , Okazaki Y , Zhang R , Nguyen TT , Ogata H. 2023 . A rapid genome-wide analysis of isolated giant viruses using MinION sequencing . Environ Microbiol 25 : 2621 – 2635 . doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.16476 . OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Hosokawa N , Takahashi H , Aoki K , Takemura M. 2021 . Draft genome sequence of Pandoravirus japonicus isolated from the Sabaishi River, Niigata, Japan . Microbiol Resour Announc 10 . doi: 10.1128/mra.00365-21 . OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Hyatt D , Chen G-LL , LoCascio PF , Land ML , Larimer FW , Hauser LJ . 2010 . Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification . BMC Bioinformatics 11 : 119 . doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Irwin NAT , Pittis AA , Richards TA , Keeling PJ . 2022 . Systematic evaluation of horizontal gene transfer between eukaryotes and viruses . Nat Microbiol 7 : 327 – 336 . doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-01026-3 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Iyer LM , Balaji S , Koonin E V , Aravind L. 2006 . Evolutionary genomics of nucleo-cytoplasmic large DNA viruses . Virus Res 117 : 156 – 84 . doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2006.01.009 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Jain C , Rodriguez-R LM , Phillippy AM , Konstantinidis KT , Aluru S. 2018 . High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries . Nat Commun 9 : 1 – 8 . doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Kalyaanamoorthy S , Minh BQ , Wong TKF , von Haeseler A , Jermiin LS . 2017 . ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates . Nat Methods 14 : 587 – 589 . doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4285 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Katoh K , Standley DM . 2013 . MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability . Mol Biol Evol 30 : 772 – 780 . doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Keeling PJ . 2009 . Functional and ecological impacts of horizontal gene transfer in eukaryotes . Curr Opin Genet Dev 19 : 613 – 619 . doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2009.10.001 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Kijima S , Hikida H , Delmont TO , Gaïa M , Ogata H. 2024 . Complex Genomes of Early Nucleocytoviruses Revealed by Ancient Origins of Viral Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases . Mol Biol Evol 41 : msae149 . doi: 10.1093/molbev/msae149 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Krupovic M , Yutin N , Koonin E. 2020 . Evolution of a major virion protein of the giant pandoraviruses from an inactivated bacterial glycoside hydrolase . Virus Evol 6 : veaa059 . doi: 10.1093/ve/veaa059 . OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ La Scola B , Audic S , Robert C , Jungang L , de Lamballerie X , Drancourt M , Birtles R , Claverie J-M , Raoult D. 2003 . A giant virus in amoebae . Science (1979) 299 : 2033 . doi: 10.1126/science.1081867 . OpenUrl FREE Full Text ↵ Legendre M , Fabre E , Poirot O , Jeudy S , Lartigue A , Alempic J-M , Beucher L , Philippe N , Bertaux L , Christo-Foroux E , et al. 2018 . Diversity and evolution of the emerging Pandoraviridae family . Nat Commun 9 : 2285 . doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04698-4 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Letunic I , Bork P. 2024 . Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool . Nucleic Acids Res 52 : W78 – W82 . doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae268 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Li H. 2013 . Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM . ArXiv 00 : 1 – 3 . doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1303.3997 . OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Li H. 2016 . Minimap and miniasm: fast mapping and de novo assembly for noisy long sequences . Bioinformatics 32 : 2103 – 2110 . doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw152 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Li H , Handsaker B , Wysoker A , Fennell T , Ruan J , Homer N , Marth G , Abecasis G , Durbin R. 2009 . The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools . Bioinformatics 25 : 2078 – 2079 . doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Lwoff A. 1957 . The Concept of Virus . Microbiology (N Y) 17 : 239 – 253 . doi: 10.1099/00221287-17-2-239 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Machado TB , Picorelli ACR , Azevedo BL de , Aquino ILM de , Queiroz VF , Rodrigues RAL , João Pessoa Araújo Jr , Ullmann LS , Santos TM dos , Marques RE , et al. 2023 . Gene duplication as a major force driving the genome expansion in some giant viruses ed. C.R. Parrish . J Virol 97 : e01309 – 23 . doi: 10.1128/jvi.01309-23 . OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Minh BQ , Schmidt HA , Chernomor O , Schrempf D , Woodhams MD , von Haeseler A , Lanfear R. 2020 . IQ-TREE 2: New models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era ed. E. Teeling . Mol Biol Evol 37 : 1530 – 1534 . doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa015 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Moniruzzaman M , Martinez-Gutierrez CA , Weinheimer AR , Aylward FO . 2020a . Dynamic genome evolution and complex virocell metabolism of globally-distributed giant viruses . Nat Commun 11 : 1710 . doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15507-2 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Moniruzzaman M , Weinheimer AR , Martinez-Gutierrez CA , Aylward FO . 2020b . Widespread endogenization of giant viruses shapes genomes of green algae . Nature 588 : 141 – 145 . doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2924-2 . OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Pereira Andrade ACDS , Victor de Miranda Boratto P , Rodrigues RAL , Bastos TM , Azevedo BL , Dornas FP , Oliveira DB , Drumond BP , Kroon EG , Abrahão JS. 2019 . New isolates of pandoraviruses: contribution to the study of replication cycle steps . J Virol 93 : doi: 10.1128/jvi.01942-18 . 10.1128/jvi.01942-18. OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Philippe N , Legendre M , Doutre G , Couté Y , Poirot O , Lescot M , Arslan D , Seltzer V , Bertaux L , Bruley C , et al. 2013 . Pandoraviruses: amoeba viruses with genomes up to 2.5 Mb reaching that of parasitic Eukaryotes . Science (1979) 341 : 281 – 286 . doi: 10.1126/science.1239181 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Philippe N , Shukla A , Abergel C , Bisio H. 2024 . Genetic manipulation of giant viruses and their host, Acanthamoeba castellanii . Nat Protoc 19 : 3 – 29 . doi: 10.1038/s41596-023-00910-y . OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Raoult D , Audic SS , Robert C , Abergel C , Renesto P , Ogata H , La Scola B , Suzan M , Claverie J-MM. 2004 . The 1.2-megabase genome sequence of mimivirus . Science (1979) 306 : 1344 – 1350 . doi: 10.1126/science.1101485 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Rosenwasser S , Ziv C , Creveld SG van , Vardi A. 2016 . Virocell metabolism: metabolic innovations during host–virus interactions in the ocean . Trends Microbiol 24 : 821 – 832 . doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.06.006 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Schulz F , Roux S , Paez-Espino D , Jungbluth S , Walsh DA , Denef VJ , McMahon KD , Konstantinidis KT , Eloe-Fadrosh EA , Kyrpides NC , et al. 2020 . Giant virus diversity and host interactions through global metagenomics . Nature 578 : 432 – 436 . doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-1957-x . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Soucy SM , Huang J , Gogarten JP . 2015 . Horizontal gene transfer: building the web of life . Nat Rev Genet 16 : 472 – 82 . doi: 10.1038/nrg3962 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Suhre K. 2005 . Gene and Genome Duplication in Acanthamoeba polyphaga Mimivirus . J Virol 79 . doi: 10.1128/jvi.79.22.14095-14101.2005 . OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Sun C , Feschotte C , Wu Z , Mueller RL . 2015 . DNA transposons have colonized the genome of the giant virus Pandoravirus salinus . BMC Biol 13 : 1 – 12 . doi: 10.1186/s12915-015-0145-1 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Suttle CA . 2007 . Marine viruses — major players in the global ecosystem . Nat Rev Microbiol 5 : 801 – 12 . doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1750 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Walker BJ , Abeel T , Shea T , Priest M , Abouelliel A , Sakthikumar S , Cuomo CA , Zeng Q , Wortman J , Young SK , et al. 2014 . Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement ed. J. Wang . PLoS One 9 : e112963 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Wu J , Meng L , Gaïa M , Hikida H , Okazaki Y , Endo H , Ogata H. 2024 . Gene Transfer Among Viruses Substantially Contributes to Gene Gain of Giant Viruses . Mol Biol Evol 41 : msae161 . doi: 10.1093/molbev/msae161 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Yutin N , Koonin E V. 2013 . Pandoraviruses are highly derived phycodnaviruses . Biol Direct 8 : 25 . doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-8-25 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Yutin N , Wolf YI , Koonin E V. 2014 . Origin of giant viruses from smaller DNA viruses not from a fourth domain of cellular life . Virology 466–467 : 38 – 52 . doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2014.06.032 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Zhao H , Zhang R , Wu J , Meng L , Okazaki Y , Hikida H , Ogata H. 2023 . A 1.5-Mb continuous endogenous viral region in the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis . Virus Evol 9 : vead064 . doi: 10.1093/ve/vead064 . OpenUrl CrossRef View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted April 28, 2025. Download PDF Supplementary Material Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Horizontal transfer of a 180-kbp genomic fraction among the largest viral genomes Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Horizontal transfer of a 180-kbp genomic fraction among the largest viral genomes Hiroyuki Hikida , Ruixuan Zhang , Jingjie Chen , Yusuke Okazaki , Hiroyuki Ogata bioRxiv 2025.04.28.650931; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.28.650931 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Horizontal transfer of a 180-kbp genomic fraction among the largest viral genomes Hiroyuki Hikida , Ruixuan Zhang , Jingjie Chen , Yusuke Okazaki , Hiroyuki Ogata bioRxiv 2025.04.28.650931; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.28.650931 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Microbiology Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7642) Biochemistry (17708) Bioengineering (13904) Bioinformatics (41992) Biophysics (21466) Cancer Biology (18618) Cell Biology (25531) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13387) Ecology (19924) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24337) Genetics (15615) Genomics (22521) Immunology (17749) Microbiology (40424) Molecular Biology (17194) Neuroscience (88673) Paleontology (667) Pathology (2839) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4827) Physiology (7650) Plant Biology (15160) Scientific Communication and Education (2046) Synthetic Biology (4302) Systems Biology (9826) Zoology (2271)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00