Nitrogen fertilization outweighs plant species loss in shaping bacterial belowground diversity in an alpine meadow on the central Tibetan Plateau

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Plant species loss and nitrogen fertilization affect grassland biodiversity. However, their interactive effects on plant communities, soil properties, and the soil microbiome remain insufficiently understood. We analyzed how the removal of plant species, with and without urea addition, influenced plant diversity, soil properties, and soil bacterial communities in a Tibetan Plateau grassland. Continuous plant species removal and urea addition over seven years modified plant beta-diversity equally strong, while urea exerted a stronger negative effect on plant alpha-diversity. Both, plant species removal and urea addition caused soil acidification and an increase in NO₂⁻/NO₃⁻, while dynamics in TOC, TON and TOC: TON were mainly driven by the growing season. Structural equation modeling identified soil acidification via urea addition as the most important indirect driver that negatively affected bacterial alpha-diversity and shifted bacterial beta-diversity. Urea addition also exerted direct negative effects on bacterial alpha- and beta-diversity, causing repression of oligotrophic ( Acidobacteriota , Chloroflexota , Planctomycetota , Gemmatimonadota ) and stimulation of copiotrophic ( Bacillota , Bacteroidota , Pseudomonadota ) bacterial taxa. Plant species removal caused slight increases in bacterial alpha-diversity, paralleled by less diverse but more even plant communities. We show that soil acidification by urea fertilization outweighs plant species loss in its negative effect on bacterial soil biodiversity in Tibetan grasslands.
Full text 1,634 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Plant species loss and nitrogen fertilization affect grassland biodiversity. However, their interactive effects on plant communities, soil properties, and the soil microbiome remain insufficiently understood. We analyzed how the removal of plant species, with and without urea addition, influenced plant diversity, soil properties, and soil bacterial communities in a Tibetan Plateau grassland. Continuous plant species removal and urea addition over seven years modified plant beta-diversity equally strong, while urea exerted a stronger negative effect on plant alpha-diversity. Both, plant species removal and urea addition caused soil acidification and an increase in NO₂⁻/NO₃⁻, while dynamics in TOC, TON and TOC: TON were mainly driven by the growing season. Structural equation modeling identified soil acidification via urea addition as the most important indirect driver that negatively affected bacterial alpha-diversity and shifted bacterial beta-diversity. Urea addition also exerted direct negative effects on bacterial alpha- and beta-diversity, causing repression of oligotrophic (Acidobacteriota, Chloroflexota, Planctomycetota, Gemmatimonadota) and stimulation of copiotrophic (Bacillota, Bacteroidota, Pseudomonadota) bacterial taxa. Plant species removal caused slight increases in bacterial alpha-diversity, paralleled by less diverse but more even plant communities. We show that soil acidification by urea fertilization outweighs plant species loss in its negative effect on bacterial soil biodiversity in Tibetan grasslands. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00