Evaluating the impact of the Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology's Excellence and Resilience in Obstetric Skills courses: the perceptions of Ugandan Master Trainers and UK-based stakeholders - a qualitative study

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Objective: To explore the perceptions of Ugandan Master Trainers (MTs) and UK-based stakeholders on the wider impact, benefits, and sustainability of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists' Excellence in Obstetric Skills (EOS) and Resilience in Obstetric Skills (ROS) courses. Design: Descriptive, cross-sectional qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Setting: Five health facilities in Masaka District, Uganda, and UK-based institutional settings. Population or Sample: Seven participants (five Ugandan MTs and two UK-based stakeholders) identified through purposive sampling. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted via Zoom, transcribed, anonymised, and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Main Outcome Measures: Participants' perceptions of the courses' impact on clinical practice, professional development, patient care, challenges encountered, and sustainability of the training model. Results: Four overarching themes were identified: expected outcomes (improved clinical knowledge, appropriate escalation, knowledge sharing), unexpected outcomes (career development, improved patient communication, enhanced physical environments), challenges (variable skills uptake, short course duration, funding constraints, staff attrition), and sustainability considerations. Participants reported enhanced confidence in managing obstetric emergencies, with anecdotal reductions in maternal mortality in participating facilities. Key barriers included lack of formal accreditation, inconsistent funding, and understaffing. Conclusions: The EOS/ROS courses improved clinical knowledge, professional development, and patient care in Uganda. Sustainable impact requires formal government accreditation, dedicated funding, and integration into continuing professional development programmes.
Full text 8,447 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Evaluating the impact of the Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology's Excellence and Resilience in Obstetric Skills courses: the perceptions of Ugandan Master Trainers and UK-based stakeholders - a qualitative study | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 12 May 2026 V1 Latest version Share on Evaluating the impact of the Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology's Excellence and Resilience in Obstetric Skills courses: the perceptions of Ugandan Master Trainers and UK-based stakeholders - a qualitative study Authors : Rebecca Aida Hakim 0000-0003-2673-3651 [email protected] , Helen Bailey [email protected] , Nishel Shah 0000-0002-5694-9915 [email protected] , and John Dalton [email protected] Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/authorea.15003208/v1 14 views 7 downloads Contents Abstract Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract Objective: To explore the perceptions of Ugandan Master Trainers (MTs) and UK-based stakeholders on the wider impact, benefits, and sustainability of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists' Excellence in Obstetric Skills (EOS) and Resilience in Obstetric Skills (ROS) courses. Design: Descriptive, cross-sectional qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Setting: Five health facilities in Masaka District, Uganda, and UK-based institutional settings. Population or Sample: Seven participants (five Ugandan MTs and two UK-based stakeholders) identified through purposive sampling. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted via Zoom, transcribed, anonymised, and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Main Outcome Measures: Participants' perceptions of the courses' impact on clinical practice, professional development, patient care, challenges encountered, and sustainability of the training model. Results: Four overarching themes were identified: expected outcomes (improved clinical knowledge, appropriate escalation, knowledge sharing), unexpected outcomes (career development, improved patient communication, enhanced physical environments), challenges (variable skills uptake, short course duration, funding constraints, staff attrition), and sustainability considerations. Participants reported enhanced confidence in managing obstetric emergencies, with anecdotal reductions in maternal mortality in participating facilities. Key barriers included lack of formal accreditation, inconsistent funding, and understaffing. Conclusions: The EOS/ROS courses improved clinical knowledge, professional development, and patient care in Uganda. Sustainable impact requires formal government accreditation, dedicated funding, and integration into continuing professional development programmes. Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 12 May 2026 Keywords DELIVERY: CAESAREAN SECTION FETAL MEDICINE: UTEROPLACENTAL INSUFFICIENCY HAEMATOLOGY: COAGULATION IMMUNOLOGY MEDICAL DISORDERS IN PREGNANCY MISCARRIAGE MISCARRIAGE: RECURRENT OBSTETRIC HAEMORRHAGE PRE-ECLAMPSIA: CLINICAL RESEARCH PRETERM LABOUR: CLINICAL RESEARCH PRETERM LABOUR: BASIC SCIENCE EPIDEMIOLOGY: PERINATAL FETAL MEDICINE: ALLOIMMUNISATION MATERNAL MORTALITY HEALTH ECONOMISTS DELIVERY: CAESAREAN SECTION MEDICAL DISORDERS IN PREGNANCY PRE-ECLAMPSIA: BASIC SCIENCE OBSTETRIC HAEMORRHAGE DELIVERY: CAESAREAN SECTION FETAL MEDICINE: UTEROPLACENTAL INSUFFICIENCY HAEMATOLOGY: COAGULATION IMMUNOLOGY MEDICAL DISORDERS IN PREGNANCY MISCARRIAGE MISCARRIAGE: RECURRENT OBSTETRIC HAEMORRHAGE PRE-ECLAMPSIA: CLINICAL RESEARCH PRETERM LABOUR: CLINICAL RESEARCH PRETERM LABOUR: BASIC SCIENCE EPIDEMIOLOGY: PERINATAL FETAL MEDICINE: ALLOIMMUNISATION ADENOMYOSIS: BASIC SCIENCE Authors Affiliations Rebecca Aida Hakim 0000-0003-2673-3651 [email protected] View all articles by this author Helen Bailey [email protected] View all articles by this author Nishel Shah 0000-0002-5694-9915 [email protected] Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, SW10 9NH View all articles by this author John Dalton [email protected] Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, SW10 9NH View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 14 views 7 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Rebecca Aida Hakim, Helen Bailey, Nishel Shah, et al. Evaluating the impact of the Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology's Excellence and Resilience in Obstetric Skills courses: the perceptions of Ugandan Master Trainers and UK-based stakeholders - a qualitative study. Authorea . 12 May 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/authorea.15003208/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/authorea.15003208/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9fe5df0a0ea752ad',t:'MTc3OTIyMjc0OQ=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00