Abstract
Limestone quarrying is a major economic activity across the globe. While the air quality and sediment transport implications of limestone quarries are well described, the effects on streamflow and runoff processes remain poorly understood. Using a paired catchment approach (natural and quarried watersheds), we measured rainfall characteristics and the hydrograph response to examine the changes in runoff generation, while a geochemical approach using stable water isotope and ions were used to estimate the stream transit time and source water contributions. The runoff response of the quarried watershed was substantially different from the natural watershed. The mean R/P (0.13) and peak discharge rates in the quarried watershed were two – three times higher than the natural watershed, while the response lag (26.3 min) and lag to peak (179.4 min) in the quarried watershed was significantly shorter than the natural watershed. The mean transit time (MTT) in the quarried watershed was 0.46 years and was substantially shorter than the MTT of 3.04 years in the natural watershed. The young water fraction in the quarry was 20% and was greater than the 5.2% observed in the natural watershed. These observations suggest that limestone quarry development resulted in changes to runoff and streamflow processes. The data suggests that limestone quarrying led to the higher contributions from surface or shallow subsurface flow paths during storm events while also reducing the overall catchment storage and contributions to streamflow from groundwater/deep subsurface sources. While the study sheds important light on limestone quarry impact on hydrological processes, a more detailed and long term investigation is needed where the use of other geochemical tracers and identification of more endmembers will provide more information on the processes.
Full text
7,284 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Impact of Limestone Quarrying on Runoff and Stream Transit Times in a Tropical Watershed: A paired catchment study | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 24 January 2026 V1 Latest version Share on Impact of Limestone Quarrying on Runoff and Stream Transit Times in a Tropical Watershed: A paired catchment study Authors : Nicola Mathura and Kegan K. Farrick [email protected] Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176924370.04201970/v1 285 views 101 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract Limestone quarrying is a major economic activity across the globe. While the air quality and sediment transport implications of limestone quarries are well described, the effects on streamflow and runoff processes remain poorly understood. Using a paired catchment approach (natural and quarried watersheds), we measured rainfall characteristics and the hydrograph response to examine the changes in runoff generation, while a geochemical approach using stable water isotope and ions were used to estimate the stream transit time and source water contributions. The runoff response of the quarried watershed was substantially different from the natural watershed. The mean R/P (0.13) and peak discharge rates in the quarried watershed were two – three times higher than the natural watershed, while the response lag (26.3 min) and lag to peak (179.4 min) in the quarried watershed was significantly shorter than the natural watershed. The mean transit time (MTT) in the quarried watershed was 0.46 years and was substantially shorter than the MTT of 3.04 years in the natural watershed. The young water fraction in the quarry was 20% and was greater than the 5.2% observed in the natural watershed. These observations suggest that limestone quarry development resulted in changes to runoff and streamflow processes. The data suggests that limestone quarrying led to the higher contributions from surface or shallow subsurface flow paths during storm events while also reducing the overall catchment storage and contributions to streamflow from groundwater/deep subsurface sources. While the study sheds important light on limestone quarry impact on hydrological processes, a more detailed and long term investigation is needed where the use of other geochemical tracers and identification of more endmembers will provide more information on the processes. Supplementary Material File (mathura and farrick 2025 - with figures.docx) Download 3.70 MB File (table 1 catchment characteristics.docx) Download 16.55 KB File (table 2 runoff response.docx) Download 25.66 KB File (table 3 hydrograph response.docx) Download 25.83 KB File (table 4 ion source.docx) Download 16.43 KB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 24 January 2026 Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License. Keywords land-use change source water contribution storm flow generation stream flow generation tracers tropics Authors Affiliations Nicola Mathura The University of the West Indies at St Augustine View all articles by this author Kegan K. Farrick [email protected] The University of the West Indies at St Augustine View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 285 views 101 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Nicola Mathura, Kegan K. Farrick. Impact of Limestone Quarrying on Runoff and Stream Transit Times in a Tropical Watershed: A paired catchment study. Authorea . 24 January 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176924370.04201970/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.176924370.04201970/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9fe5dc178b584193',t:'MTc3OTIyMjYyOQ=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.