STUDY OFADNEXAL MASSES: USG, CLINICAL AND IT'S HISTOPATHOLOGICAL A RETROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

Introduction: An adnexal mass is an abnormal growth that develops near the uterus, most commonly arising from ovaries, fallopian tubes, or connective tissues. It is common gynecological problem. The prevalence of adnexal masses in the general population is 0.17% to 5.9% in asymptomatic women and 7.1% to 12% in symptomatic women. The Materials And Methods: present study was conducted at gynaecology department. This study contains 52 patients of benign adnexal mass diagnosed clinically, with/without ultrasonography and operated for same. This was retrospective study. Data was collected from indoor case papers of the patients with due consent of authority. In present study out of 52 patients,22 patients (42.2%) was Result: having simple ovarian cyst, Chocolate cyst with 08 patients (9.6%) having Dermoid cyst, hemorrhagic /corpus luteal cyst with 11 patients (21.1%),1 patient (1.9%) with hydrosalpinx ,03 patients(5.7%) with ovarian mass with(5.7%) and 2 patients (3.8%) having mucinous cyst. Out of 52 patient 13 patient (25%) was operated by laparoscopic cystectomy.22 patient (42.3%) had laparotomy for cystectomy.07 patient (13.4%) had salphingoopherectomy. 08 patients (15.3%) had TAH with BSO who have completed their family. 02(3.84%) cyst wall removal for chocolate cyst was done. In histopathological reports serous cyst adenoma was found in 26 patients contributing 50% of total patients. Follicular cyst was found in 02 patients contributing 3.8%. Endometriotic/chocolate cyst in09 patients contributing 17.3%,7 patients with Dermoid cyst contributing 13.46%,1 patient with Hydrosalpinx contributing1.92%, Granulosa cell tumour and dysgerminoma found in 1 patient each. Mucinous cyst adenoma in 03 patient contributing 5.76% and with Mixed (serous with mucinous) 02 patient contributing 3.84%. Intra operative and his Discussion: topathological ndings were correlated or discrepancies between intra operative and histopathological ndings were not statistically signicant. No signicant difference between USG ndings and Histopathological ndings or discrepancies were not statistically signicant.