Fertility after discontinuation of treatment with an oral contraceptive containing 30 μg of ethinyl estradiol and 2 mg of dienogest
article
OA: bronze
CC0
⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This paper examined the return of fertility in women after stopping an oral contraceptive containing 30 μg ethinyl estradiol and 2 mg dienogest.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
ObjectiveTo examine the conception rate after cessation of a combination of 30 microg ethinyl E2 and 2 mg dienogest (EE/DNG).DesignProspective observational study.SettingPopulation-based cohort in Germany.Patient(s)Women who wished to become pregnant after cessation of an oral contraceptive (EE/DNG).Intervention(s)None.Main outcome measure(s)Cumulative conception rate within 1 year after termination of EE/DNG and time to pregnancy.Result(s)After 1 year of follow-up, the cumulative pregnancy rate was 86.6% (full analysis set; n = 706). When all participants with complete data were analyzed (n = 652), the cumulative pregnancy rate was 94.0%. More than 15% of the patients conceived in each of the first three cycles after termination of EE/DNG; the mean time to pregnancy was 3.5 cycles. The preceding duration of treatment with EE/DNG did not influence the conception rate. Except in the youngest age group (16-18 years), a certain delay was observed in the other age groups.Conclusion(s)The present prospective study revealed only a slight delay in regaining fertility during the first three cycles after cessation of EE/DNG. Thereafter, the cumulative rate of conception did not differ from that observed in fertile women who attempted to become pregnant without prior contraception.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cited by (2)
References (33)
- doi:10.1093/ije/29.5.856 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0010-7824(92)90122-a via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/17.10.2754 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/aje/152.6.565 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/09513590400021011 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0010-7824(85)90048-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/0470011815.b2a11077 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00075.x via openalex
- doi:10.1017/s0021932000010890 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/deg366 via openalex
- W2864138 via openalex
- W217889844 via openalex
- doi:10.1136/bmj.1.6108.265 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136353 via openalex
- W2223536596 via openalex
- W2287889664 via openalex
- W6608674384 via openalex
- W6696265543 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009261 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00001648-200011000-00019 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jama.1982.03320300033018 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0010-7824(82)90105-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/10.6.1397 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)36246-x via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1979.tb10808.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.11.085 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000100153.24061.45 via openalex
- doi:10.1056/nejm197709012970903 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00006254-198605000-00020 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53808-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1976.tb00897.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53210-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/deh058 via openalex
Cited by (2)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-14T06:08:44.784461+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK