Integrating Biological Principles into Observational Entropy

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

The second law of thermodynamics is grounded in our empirical experiences in which the total entropy of a physical system must always either increase or remain constant during any spontaneous process. This notion of entropy is classically described as a measure of the randomness or uncertainty concerning a system’s state and represents the degree to which the details of the system are unknowable and therefore unavailable to be converted into an identifiable activity or useful work. This uncertainty is a result of an observer’s inability to exactly discern, know, and predict the state of the system as a condition of indeterminacy. Recently, the concepts of entropy have been reconstituted as _observational entropy_ corresponding to the observer’s lack of knowledge about the system. If the observer is to hold a central place in our modern understanding of entropy, then it is important to incorporate the biological principles for the processing of information as knowledge acquisition into the determination of these measures.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00