Perioperative sexual interest in women with suspected gynecologic malignancies
article
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
Younger women and those diagnosed with cancer experienced a greater decrease in sexual interest one month after gynecologic surgery compared to older women and those with benign disease.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
ObjectivesFor women with gynecologic cancer, the impact of surgery on sexual interest and desire in the immediate and later postoperative period is not well characterized. The objective of this study was to report the perioperative trends of changing sexual interest and desire in a cohort of women undergoing surgery for suspected gynecologic malignancies.MethodsThis is an ancillary analysis of a cohort study analyzing health-related outcomes in women who underwent primary surgical management of a suspected gynecologic malignancy between 10/2013 and 10/2014. Subjects completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sexual Function and Satisfaction Questionnaire (PROMIS-SFQ) preoperatively and questions on sexual interest and desire at one, three, and six months postoperatively. Bivariate tests and multiple linear regression were used to analyze data.ResultsOf 231 women who completed a baseline PROMIS-SFQ, 187 (81%) completed one-month, 170 (74%) three-month, and 174 (75%) six-month follow-up interviews. Following surgery, 71% of enrolled subjects were diagnosed with a malignancy. Women age 55 (-5.5±1.0 vs -2.3±0.9, p=0.02). In a multivariable analysis, age <55 remained associated with a larger decrease in sexual interest at one month postoperatively (-4.6, 95% CI: -1.8, -7.4), as did having cancer vs benign disease for women of all ages (-5.6, 95% CI: -9.6, -1.5).ConclusionsThis study provides new data regarding the timing and magnitude of changes in sexual interest following gynecologic oncology procedures.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (19)
- doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02995.x via openalex
- doi:10.1002/cncr.25832 via openalex
- doi:10.1159/000100521 via openalex
- doi:10.1046/j.1525-1438.2001.01051.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.08.018 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/coc.0b013e318248d89d via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00833-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.02.001 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.03.003 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.025 via openalex
- doi:10.1056/nejm199905063401802 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.11.030 via openalex
- doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600799 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00006250-200006001-00016 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.07.016 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.039 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.soncn.2008.02.001 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00002820-199912000-00007 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/igc.0000000000000468 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T06:38:17.545654+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK