INVESTIGATING TRAIT IMPULSIVITY IN OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE DISORDER: A SCOPING REVIEW

preprint OA: closed

Abstract

Background/Aims While obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is specifically characterised by compulsivity, considerable literature suggests impulsivity also plays an important role in the disorder. However, impulsivity is a multi-faceted construct and the exact relationship of trait impulsivity to OCD remains unclear. Therefore, this scoping review aimed to collate and review studies of trait impulsivity in OCD by an investigation of: 1. How trait impulsivity in OCD is measured in the research literature; 2. How people with OCD perform on these measures and compare to healthy and other psychiatric groups; and 3. What correlations with trait impulsivity are observed in OCD. Methods This study was pre-registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023481781). Electronic search of PubMed, Scopus, and PsycINFO databases using keywords ‘(impuls*) AND (OCD)’ was undertaken without date restrictions for peer-reviewed articles available in English. After exclusion of duplicates and screening of 1476 abstracts, 114 articles were identified for full-text review. Results 54 articles were reviewed after excluding studies assessing neurocognitive impulsivity only (i.e. no inclusion of trait impulsivity), sub-clinical OCD symptoms, and review articles. The literature reports cross-sectional clinician-rated and self-rated trait impulsivity data, with the Barratt Impulsivity Scale (BIS) being used most frequently. Broadly, people with OCD scored higher than healthy controls on at least one aspect of trait impulsivity. However, comparisons of OCD groups to other psychiatric groups demonstrated equal or lower trait impulsivity in OCD. Individuals with OCD with comorbid diagnoses (ADHD, behavioural addictions, tic disorder, borderline personality disorder, bipolar disorder) had relatively higher levels of trait impulsivity than those without. In OCD, trait impulsivity scores were associated with various psychiatric symptomatology (OCD severity, anxiety, depression, compulsivity, hoarding levels, behavioural addictions, anhedonia, aggressive and sexual impulses). Trait impulsivity did not correlate with neurocognitive measures of impulsivity. Conclusions Key findings are that trait impulsivity research in OCD was predominantly observational, with cross-sectional studies using the BIS. While higher levels of trait impulsivity were seen in patients with OCD compared to healthy controls, this finding was not specific to OCD. OCD demonstrated equal or lower trait impulsivity than other psychiatric groups that the literature had examined to date; trait impulsivity in OCD was positively correlated with a number of psychiatric factors; and neurocognitive measures of impulsivity did not correlate with trait impulsivity. Future work on OCD should include interventional and neuroimaging methods that utilise several different measures of impulsivity.
Full text 4,670 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background/Aims While obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is specifically characterised by compulsivity, considerable literature suggests impulsivity also plays an important role in the disorder. However, impulsivity is a multi-faceted construct and the exact relationship of trait impulsivity to OCD remains unclear. Therefore, this scoping review aimed to collate and review studies of trait impulsivity in OCD by an investigation of: 1. How trait impulsivity in OCD is measured in the research literature; 2. How people with OCD perform on these measures and compare to healthy and other psychiatric groups; and 3. What correlations with trait impulsivity are observed in OCD.

Methods

This study was pre-registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023481781). Electronic search of PubMed, Scopus, and PsycINFO databases using keywords ‘(impuls*) AND (OCD)’ was undertaken without date restrictions for peer-reviewed articles available in English. After exclusion of duplicates and screening of 1476 abstracts, 114 articles were identified for full-text review.

Results

54 articles were reviewed after excluding studies assessing neurocognitive impulsivity only (i.e. no inclusion of trait impulsivity), sub-clinical OCD symptoms, and review articles. The literature reports cross-sectional clinician-rated and self-rated trait impulsivity data, with the Barratt Impulsivity Scale (BIS) being used most frequently. Broadly, people with OCD scored higher than healthy controls on at least one aspect of trait impulsivity. However, comparisons of OCD groups to other psychiatric groups demonstrated equal or lower trait impulsivity in OCD. Individuals with OCD with comorbid diagnoses (ADHD, behavioural addictions, tic disorder, borderline personality disorder, bipolar disorder) had relatively higher levels of trait impulsivity than those without. In OCD, trait impulsivity scores were associated with various psychiatric symptomatology (OCD severity, anxiety, depression, compulsivity, hoarding levels, behavioural addictions, anhedonia, aggressive and sexual impulses). Trait impulsivity did not correlate with neurocognitive measures of impulsivity.

Conclusions

Key findings are that trait impulsivity research in OCD was predominantly observational, with cross-sectional studies using the BIS. While higher levels of trait impulsivity were seen in patients with OCD compared to healthy controls, this finding was not specific to OCD. OCD demonstrated equal or lower trait impulsivity than other psychiatric groups that the literature had examined to date; trait impulsivity in OCD was positively correlated with a number of psychiatric factors; and neurocognitive measures of impulsivity did not correlate with trait impulsivity. Future work on OCD should include interventional and neuroimaging methods that utilise several different measures of impulsivity. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Funding Statement This review was made possible (in part) by a grant from Carnegie Corporation of New York (MJB, grant number G-21-58838). The statements made and views expressed are solely the responsibility of the author. CL and DJS are supported by the SAMRC. SRC and CL receive a stipend from Elsevier for journal editorial work. DJS has received consultancy honoraria from Discovery Vitality, Johnson & Johnson, Kanna, L'Oreal, Lundbeck, Orion, Sanofi, Servier, Takeda and Vistagen. Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Data Availability All data produced in the present study is included in Appendix A.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00