Full text
38,110 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Emergence and Circulation of a Recombinant Enterovirus D68 Identified by Genomic Surveillance, The Johns Hopkins Health System, Maryland, 2025 | medRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P4HH5NV'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search Emergence and Circulation of a Recombinant Enterovirus D68 Identified by Genomic Surveillance, The Johns Hopkins Health System, Maryland, 2025 Amary Fall , C. Paul Morris , Omar Elgazayerly , Andy Wu , Omar Abdullah , Julie M. Norton , Andrew Pekosz , Eili Klein , View ORCID Profile Heba H. Mostafa doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.22.25340766 Amary Fall 1 Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Division of Medical Microbiology , Baltimore, MD, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site C. Paul Morris 2 Integrated Research Facility, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health , Frederick, Maryland, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Omar Elgazayerly 3 Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University , Alexandria, Egypt Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Andy Wu 1 Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Division of Medical Microbiology , Baltimore, MD, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Omar Abdullah 1 Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Division of Medical Microbiology , Baltimore, MD, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Julie M. Norton 1 Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Division of Medical Microbiology , Baltimore, MD, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Andrew Pekosz 4 W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, MD, USA 5 Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Eili Klein 5 Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD, USA 6 Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics, and Policy , Washington, DC 20005, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Heba H. Mostafa 1 Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Division of Medical Microbiology , Baltimore, MD, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Heba H. Mostafa For correspondence: hmostaf2{at}jhmi.edu Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract Background Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) is an important respiratory pathogen occasionally linked to acute flaccid myelitis. While recombination drives enterovirus evolution, recombinant EV-D68 strains have been rarely documented. Methods As part of 2025 genomic surveillance in Maryland, 115 EV-D68 genomes were sequenced using an amplicon-based approach. Consensus genomes were aligned with global references and analyzed with IQ-TREE3 and SimPlot to assess phylogeny and recombination. Results Complete genomes were obtained from 78% (90/115) of specimens, all belonging to subclade A2. Five genomes formed a distinct cluster with discordant phylogenies across genomic regions: P1 grouped with A2, whereas P2–P3 clustered with B3. SimPlot and BootScan analyses identified a recombination breakpoint near the 2A/2B junction (∼nt 3,700), consistent with an A2(P1)/B3(P2–P3) recombinant. BAM alignment review excluded co-infection. Conclusions We report a novel EV-D68 A2/B3 recombinant circulating locally in 2025, highlighting the need for continued whole-genome surveillance. 1. Introduction Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68), a member of the Picornaviridae family, has re-emerged as a significant human pathogen over the past decade. In contrast to most enteroviruses, EV-D68 primarily targets the respiratory tract, leading to disease manifestations from mild upper-respiratory infection to severe respiratory distress requiring hospitalization ( 1 - 3 ). Of public-health concern is its established association with acute flaccid myelitis (AFM), a neurological disease characterized by acute limb weakness and paralysis, predominantly in children ( 3 - 6 ). The evolution of EV-D68 is marked by the global co-circulation of multiple genetic clades. Following the major 2014 outbreak driven by subclade B1, subsequent epidemic waves have shown diversification within clades A and B, with subclades B2 and B3 predominating in recent years ( 1 , 5 , 7 - 10 ). This diversification is fueled by two principal evolutionary forces: the accumulation of point mutations and genetic recombination ( 11 - 15 ). Recombination is a well-recognized mechanism of enterovirus evolution, allowing exchange of genomic fragments between related viruses during co-infection of a host cell ( 16 - 18 ). Such events can give rise to novel lineages or subclades with altered pathogenicity and fitness or antigenic characteristics that could pose challenges for both surveillance and outbreak control ( 19 - 22 ). Although recombination reportedly contributes to enterovirus evolution, only rare sporadic recombinant events have been reported for EV-D68 ( 23 - 27 ). Identification and characterization of these recombinant genomes are critical for understanding the full scope of the virus’s evolutionary dynamics and adaptive potential. During our ongoing genomic surveillance of enteroviruses in Maryland in 2025, we identified a cluster of EV-D68 sequences that could not be definitively assigned to established subclades based on whole-genome analysis, suggesting a recombinant origin. Here, we describe the genomic detection and confirmation of a novel recombinant EV-D68 strain. 2. Methods 2.1. Sample Collection, Nucleic Acid Extraction and EV-D68 screening Clinical specimens were obtained through the Johns Hopkins Health System (JHHS) enterovirus genomic surveillance research in 2025. Remnant respiratory samples that tested positive for rhinovirus/enterovirus (RV/EV) using the ePlex respiratory pathogen panels were collected for further analysis (approved IRB protocol IRB00221396). Viral RNA extraction was performed with the Chemagic Viral DNA/RNA 300 Kit. Samples were screened for EV-D68 by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction as described previously ( 7 , 28 , 29 ). 2.2. Whole Genome Sequencing and sequences analysis Whole-genome sequencing was performed as previously described ( 1 , 10 ). Amplicons from two overlapping PCR reactions yielding fragments of approximately 4,380 bp and 3,200 bp respectively were pooled and barcoded using the Native Barcoding Genomic DNA Kit (EXP-NBD196; Oxford Nanopore Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing was conducted on a PromethION 2 Solo (P2) (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) device equipped with R10.4.1 flow cells. Raw FASTQ files for each sample were generated directly by the P2 and processed using a custom in-house pipeline. Primer sequences were trimmed with cutadapt (version 3.5)( 30 ), and the closest reference genome was identified by BLASTn ( 31 ) against a curated Enterovirus database. Reads were aligned to the reference genome using minimap2 (version 2.30)( 32 ), then sorted and indexed with Samtools (version 1.10)( 33 ). Consensus genomes were generated and polished with medaka (Version 2.1.1)( 34 ) . Variants were filtered with ARTIC tools using custom versions of artic_vcf_filter, artic_make_depth_mask, and artic_mask ( 35 ). Final consensus sequences were generated using bcftools ( 36 ). 2.3. Phylogenetic analysis Complete genomes were aligned with reference genomes from GenBank using Mafft (version 7.450). Maximum likelihood trees for complete genomes were carried out using IQ-TREE3 (version 3.0.0), with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The ModelFinder, implemented in IQ-TREE3, was used to select the best-fitted nucleotide substitution model. 2.4. Recombination analysis Recombination detection was performed using multiple complementary approaches to ensure reliability. Whole-genome alignments of representative Enterovirus D68 strains were generated with MAFFT (v7). Phylogenetic incongruence between the P1, P2 and P3 regions was further assessed using maximum-likelihood trees constructed in IQ-TREE3 with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. To visualize recombination breakpoints and confirm parental relationships, SimPlot (v3.5.1) was used to perform similarity and Bootscan analyses using a 200-bp sliding window and 20-bp step size. In addition, BAM alignment files were inspected in Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) (V2.19.6) to assess possible co-infections or mixed subclade signals within the samples analyzed. Sequencing of two samples was repeated to confirm the reproducibility of our results. 3. Results A total of 977 samples positive for RV/EV collected between June and October 2025 were screened for EV-D68. Among these, 115 tested positive for EV-D68 with a cycle threshold (Ct) value ≤35 and were selected for sequencing. Complete genomes were successfully recovered from 78% (90/115) of samples, while partial genomes were obtained from an additional 6% (7/115) of specimens. Phylogenetic analysis of complete genomes confirmed the exclusive circulation of the A2 subclade in Maryland during 2025, with all sequences clustering within this lineage ( Figure 1 ) . Notably, five genomes formed a distinct, monophyletic cluster that branched near A2 references. This emerging cluster was named A2-Re and exhibited shorter branch lengths relative to contemporary A2 sequences, a signature of reduced genetic divergence that often may point to a recent recombination event. These five sequences were also detected in different geographic areas. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationships of EV-D68 strains identified from the Johns Hopkins Health system in 2025. Complete genome sequences from other countries were included. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using complete genomes, employing the maximum likelihood method in IQ-TREE2 with 1,000 bootstrap replicates and rooted by the Fermon strain. To investigate this possibility, we constructed subgenomic trees for the P1 (structural), P2, and P3 (non-structural) regions. We supplemented each dataset with closely related sequences identified via BLAST. These analyses revealed clear topological incongruence. In the P1 tree, the cluster grouped tightly with 2024 and 2025 A2 viruses, consistent with the whole-genome phylogeny ( Figure 2 ). In contrast, the P2 and P3 trees placed these same genomes within the B3 subclade, forming a well-supported cluster with viruses that circulated in Canada and the United States in 2022 ( Figure 2 ). Within the P2 tree, the cluster exhibited longer branch lengths than typical B3 sequences, suggesting this region may be a chimera derived partly from an A2 lineage or has accumulated unique mutations. This shift in phylogenetic placement between the structural and non-structural regions indicates a recombination event, in which the P1 region was derived from an A2 parental strain, whereas part of the P2 region and the entire P3 region originated from a B3 lineage. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of the P1, P2, and P3 coding regions of EV-D68 strains from this study and globally available reference sequences. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic trees were inferred using IQ-TREE3 from alignments of approximately 2,586 nt (P1, blue), 1,728 nt (P2, green), and 2,256 nt (P3, red). To further confirm the recombination event and precisely locate the breakpoint, SimPlot analysis revealed a recombinant genome structure characterized by alternating regions of high sequence similarity to A2 and B3 reference strains ( Figure 3A ) . The plot displayed a sharp transition in similarity profiles near nucleotide position 3,700, corresponding to the 2A/2B junction Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3. Recombination analysis of EV-D68 A2/B3 recombinant genomes using SimPlot and BootScan. Similarity (A) and bootstrap support (B) plots were generated with SimPlot v3.5.1 using a 200-bp sliding window and a 20-bp step size. The recombinant Maryland sequences (A2-Re_2025) show high similarity to A2 strains from Maryland (2025) in the P1 (structural) region and to B3 strains from Canada and Maryland (2022) in the P2–P3 (non-structural) regions, with a clear recombination breakpoint near nucleotide position 3,700. This pattern was corroborated by BootScan analysis ( Figure 3B ) , which demonstrated a distinct crossover between parental lineages: the recombinant strain showed high similarity to A2 strains sequences across the P1 region and to B3 reference sequences across a part of the P2 region and the entire P3 region. Visual inspection of the alignment in IGV confirmed uniform read coverage across the genome and no evidence of mixed populations or contamination, excluding co-infection as a potential cause for the observed mosaic signal. 4. Discussion The ongoing evolution of Enterovirus D68, particularly through recombination, represents a critical area of study for understanding its epidemiology, pathogenicity, and potential to cause outbreaks. In this study, we report on the genomic identification and characterization of a novel recombinant EV-D68 strain, A2-Re, detected through genomic surveillance in Maryland in 2025. Our analysis provides compelling evidence that this strain occurred from a recombination event between co-circulating contemporary A2 and historical B3 parental lineages, resulting in a mosaic genome with a P1 region derived from an A2 virus and the P2-P3 regions originating from a B3 virus. The first indication of this recombinant subclade emerged from a notable phylogenetic inconsistency, while whole-genome analysis placed all 2025 Maryland sequences within the A2 subclade, a distinct monophyletic cluster (A2-Re) displayed shorter branch lengths and formed a separate, well-supported group within A2. These shorter branches indicated reduced genetic divergence, consistent with a recent emergence following a recombination event between A2 and B3 parental lineages, rather than accelerated genetic drift. Such a pattern is characteristic of recombinant viruses, in which different genomic regions follow distinct evolutionary trajectories ( 37 , 38 ). Our subgenomic phylogenetic analyses confirmed this pattern, the A2-Re cluster grouped with A2 viruses in the P1 region, but with B3 viruses from Canada and the United States (2022) in the P2–P3 regions. The SimPlot and BootScan analyses supported this topological incongruence, identifying a recombination breakpoint near the 2A/2B junction (∼nt 3,700), a well-known recombination hotspot in enteroviruses ( 39 - 41 ). The recombinant subclade’s limited divergence, together with its tight clustering, suggests a recent origin and localized transmission following the recombination event. The emergence of A2-Re underscores that recombination remains an active driver of EV-D68 evolution. While previous reports of EV-D68 recombinants have been sporadic ( 23 - 26 ), our detection of a cluster of five nearly identical recombinant genomes in a single season suggests this variant may possess a degree of fitness, allowing for successful transmission and local circulation. At the same time, the detection of only five cases, each identified in different geographic areas, is consistent with silent transmission, low-level community spread that escaped routine clinical detection, likely because infections were mild, asymptomatic, or clinically indistinguishable from other respiratory pathogens. Notably, most previously reported EV-D68 recombination events have occurred in the 5′ untranslated region (5′UTR) ( 24 , 25 , 42 ). A recent global study on the evolution and transmission dynamics of EV-D68 ( 27 ) reported limited recombination events, primarily among Canadian B-genotype, and did not confirm the more frequent recombination patterns described in earlier studies. According to that analysis, the few Canadian sequences showing possible recombination did not exhibit clear phylogenetic signals across the P1, P2, and P3 regions, unlike what was observed in this study. The functional implications of A2-Re recombination event are substantial. The P1 region encodes the capsid proteins, which are the primary determinants of cell receptor binding, tissue tropism, and antigenicity. Therefore, the A2-derived P1 region suggests that this recombinant may retain the receptor usage and potentially the transmission characteristics of contemporary A2 strains. Conversely, the P2 and P3 regions encode non-structural proteins, including proteases and the RNA polymerase, which are critical for viral replication, immune evasion, and virulence ( 43 , 44 ). The acquisition of a B3-derived non-structural backbone could potentially alter viral replication kinetics or pathogenicity. Our findings must be considered in light of certain limitations. The surveillance was conducted within a single health system in Maryland, which may not fully represent the geographic diversity of circulating EV-D68 strains. Furthermore, the identified infections with the recombinant strain were limited, preventing a robust analysis of whether infection with the A2-Re correlates with a distinct clinical phenotype or severity of disease compared to other circulating EV-D68 lineages. A comprehensive analysis of the clinical and epidemiological 2025 EV-D68 outbreak in Maryland, including these recombinant cases, is the subject of an ongoing separate investigation. 5. Conclusion In conclusion, our genomic surveillance in 2025 identified the emergence and local circulation of a novel recombinant EV-D68 strain. This finding has several important implications. First, it demonstrates that recombination between distinct EV-D68 clades is an ongoing evolutionary process that can generate novel, viable Subclade or Clade. Second, it emphasizes the critical importance of whole-genome sequencing and recombination-aware phylogenetic analysis for accurate viral classification. Relying solely on partial genomic sequences (e.g., VP1 only) would have misclassified this cluster as a typical A2 strain. Finally, the continued genetic plasticity of EV-D68 poses a potential challenge for public health, as future recombination events could theoretically generate strains with enhanced transmissibility, neurotropism, or antigenic novelty. Maintained and expanded genomic surveillance is therefore essential to monitor the emergence and spread of such recombinant forms and to understand their clinical impact, particularly their association with severe neurological diseases like AFM. Data Availability All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors Funding This work was supported in part by HHS 75N93021C00045 (HM and AP). Disclaimer This research was supported [in part] by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The contributions of the NIH author(s) are considered Works of the United States Government. The findings and conclusions presented in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NIH or the U . S. Department of Health and Human Services . Potential conflicts of interest H. H. M. collaborates for research with Hologic, Qiagen, and Diasorin. H. H. M. received honoraria from Roche Diagnostics, Qiagen, Diasorin, bioMérieux, and BD Diagnostics. All other authors report no potential conflicts. References 1. ↵ Fall A , Abdullah O , Han L , Norton JM , Gallagher N , Forman M , Morris CP , Klein E , Mostafa HH . 2024 . Enterovirus D68: Genomic and Clinical Comparison of 2 Seasons of Increased Viral Circulation and Discrepant Incidence of Acute Flaccid Myelitis-Maryland, USA . Open Forum Infect Dis 11 : ofae656 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 2. Holm-Hansen CC , Midgley SE , Fischer TK . 2016 . Global emergence of enterovirus D68: a systematic review . Lancet Infect Dis 16 : e64 – e75 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 3. ↵ Messacar K , Asturias EJ , Hixon AM , Van Leer-Buter C , Niesters HGM , Tyler KL , Abzug MJ , Dominguez SR . 2018 . Enterovirus D68 and acute flaccid myelitis-evaluating the evidence for causality . Lancet Infect Dis 18 : e239 – e247 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 4. Messacar K , Schreiner TL , Maloney JA , Wallace A , Ludke J , Oberste MS , Nix WA , Robinson CC , Glodé MP , Abzug MJ , Dominguez SR . 2015 . A cluster of acute flaccid paralysis and cranial nerve dysfunction temporally associated with an outbreak of enterovirus D68 in children in Colorado, USA . Lancet 385 : 1662 – 71 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 5. ↵ Shah MM , Perez A , Lively JY , Avadhanula V , Boom JA , Chappell J , Englund JA , Fregoe W , Halasa NB , Harrison CJ , Hickey RW , Klein EJ , McNeal MM , Michaels MG , Moffatt ME , Otten C , Sahni LC , Schlaudecker E , Schuster JE , Selvarangan R , Staat MA , Stewart LS , Weinberg GA , Williams JV , Ng TFF , Routh JA , Gerber SI , McMorrow ML , Rha B , Midgley CM . 2021 . Enterovirus D68-Associated Acute Respiratory Illness horizontal line New Vaccine Surveillance Network, United States, July-November 2018-2020 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 70 : 1623 – 1628 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 6. ↵ Whitehouse ER , Lopez A , English R , Getachew H , Ng TFF , Emery B , Rogers S , Kidd S. 2024 . Surveillance for Acute Flaccid Myelitis - United States, 2018-2022 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 73 : 70 – 76 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 7. ↵ Fall A , Ndiaye N , Messacar K , Kebe O , Jallow MM , Harouna H , Kiori DE , Sy S , Goudiaby D , Dia M , Niang MN , Ndiaye K , Dia N. 2020 . Enterovirus D68 Subclade B3 in Children with Acute Flaccid Paralysis in West Africa, 2016 . Emerg Infect Dis 26 : 2227 – 2230 . OpenUrl PubMed 8. Kramer R , Sabatier M , Wirth T , Pichon M , Lina B , Schuffenecker I , Josset L. 2018 . Molecular diversity and biennial circulation of enterovirus D68: a systematic screening study in Lyon, France, 2010 to 2016 . Euro Surveill 23 . 9. Ma KC , Winn A , Moline HL , Scobie HM , Midgley CM , Kirking HL , Adjemian J , Hartnett KP , Johns D , Jones JM , Lopez A , Lu X , Perez A , Perrine CG , Rzucidlo AE , McMorrow ML , Silk BJ , Stein Z , Vega E , New Vaccine Surveillance Network C , Hall AJ . 2022 . Increase in Acute Respiratory Illnesses Among Children and Adolescents Associated with Rhinoviruses and Enteroviruses, Including Enterovirus D68 - United States, July-September 2022 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 71 : 1265 – 1270 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 10. ↵ Fall A , Norton JM , Abdullah O , Pekosz A , Klein E , Mostafa HH . 2025 . Enhanced genomic surveillance of enteroviruses reveals a surge in enterovirus D68 cases, the Johns Hopkins health system, Maryland, 2024 . J Clin Microbiol 63 : e0046925 . OpenUrl PubMed 11. ↵ Simmonds P , Midgley S. 2005 . Recombination in the genesis and evolution of hepatitis B virus genotypes . J Virol 79 : 15467 – 76 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 12. Pfeiffer JK , Kirkegaard K. 2005 . Increased fidelity reduces poliovirus fitness and virulence under selective pressure in mice . PLoS Pathog 1 : e11 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 13. Domingo E , Sheldon J , Perales C. 2012 . Viral quasispecies evolution . Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 76 : 159 – 216 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 14. Woodman A , Lee KM , Janissen R , Gong YN , Dekker NH , Shih SR , Cameron CE . 2019 . Predicting Intraserotypic Recombination in Enterovirus 71 . J Virol 93 . 15. ↵ Galli A , Bukh J. 2014 . Comparative analysis of the molecular mechanisms of recombination in hepatitis C virus . Trends Microbiol 22 : 354 – 64 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 16. ↵ Perez-Losada M , Arenas M , Galan JC , Palero F , Gonzalez-Candelas F. 2015 . Recombination in viruses: mechanisms, methods of study, and evolutionary consequences . Infect Genet Evol 30 : 296 – 307 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 17. Oprisan G , Combiescu M , Guillot S , Caro V , Combiescu A , Delpeyroux F , Crainic R. 2002 . Natural genetic recombination between co-circulating heterotypic enteroviruses . J Gen Virol 83 : 2193 – 2200 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 18. ↵ Brown DM , Zhang Y , Scheuermann RH . 2020 . Epidemiology and Sequence-Based Evolutionary Analysis of Circulating Non-Polio Enteroviruses . Microorganisms 8 . 19. ↵ Becher P , Tautz N. 2011 . RNA recombination in pestiviruses: cellular RNA sequences in viral genomes highlight the role of host factors for viral persistence and lethal disease . RNA Biol 8 : 216 – 24 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 20. Scheel TK , Galli A , Li YP , Mikkelsen LS , Gottwein JM , Bukh J. 2013 . Productive homologous and non-homologous recombination of hepatitis C virus in cell culture . PLoS Pathog 9 : e1003228 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 21. Jackwood MW , Boynton TO , Hilt DA , McKinley ET , Kissinger JC , Paterson AH , Robertson J , Lemke C , McCall AW , Williams SM , Jackwood JW , Byrd LA . 2010 . Emergence of a group 3 coronavirus through recombination . Virology 398 : 98 – 108 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 22. ↵ Xiao H , Huang K , Li L , Wu X , Zheng L , Wan C , Zhao W , Ke C , Zhang B. 2014 . Complete genome sequence analysis of human echovirus 30 isolated during a large outbreak in Guangdong Province of China, in 2012 . Arch Virol 159 : 379 – 83 . OpenUrl PubMed 23. ↵ Ny NTH , Anh NT , Hang VTT , Nguyet LA , Thanh TT , Ha DQ , Minh NNQ , Ha DLA , McBride A , Tuan HM , Baker S , Tam PTT , Phuc TM , Huong DT , Loi TQ , Vu NTA , Hung NV , Minh TTT , Xang NV , Dong N , Nghia HDT , Chau NVV , Thwaites G , van Doorn HR , Anscombe C , Le Van T , Consortium V. 2017 . Enterovirus D68 in Viet Nam (2009-2015) . Wellcome Open Res 2 : 41 . OpenUrl PubMed 24. ↵ Shi Y , Liu Y , Wu Y , Hu S , Sun B. 2023 . Molecular epidemiology and recombination of enterovirus D68 in China . Infect Genet Evol 115 : 105512 . OpenUrl PubMed 25. ↵ Tan Y , Hassan F , Schuster JE , Simenauer A , Selvarangan R , Halpin RA , Lin X , Fedorova N , Stockwell TB , Lam TT , Chappell JD , Hartert TV , Holmes EC , Das SR . 2016 . Molecular Evolution and Intraclade Recombination of Enterovirus D68 during the 2014 Outbreak in the United States . J Virol 90 : 1997 – 2007 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 26. ↵ Li F , Lu RJ , Zhang YH , Shi P , Ao YY , Cao LF , Zhang YL , Tan WJ , Shen J. 2024 . Clinical and molecular epidemiology of enterovirus D68 from 2013 to 2020 in Shanghai . Sci Rep 14 : 2161 . OpenUrl PubMed 27. ↵ Xiao M , Han Z , Ma X , Ji T , Yan D , Wang D , Zhu S , Lu H , Cong R , Wang X , Yang T , Liu Y , Zhou L , Li F , Liang Y , Zhao L , Fan H , Zhang Y , Xiao J. 2025 . Global Evolution and Transmission Dynamics of Enterovirus D68 . J Med Virol 97 : e70497 . OpenUrl PubMed 28. ↵ Fall A , Jallow MM , Kebe O , Kiori DE , Sy S , Goudiaby D , Boye CSB , Niang MN , Dia N. 2019 . Low Circulation of Subclade A1 Enterovirus D68 Strains in Senegal during 2014 North America Outbreak . Emerg Infect Dis 25 : 1404 – 1407 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 29. ↵ Fall A , Ndiaye N , Jallow MM , Barry MA , Toure CSB , Kebe O , Kiori DE , Sy S , Dia M , Goudiaby D , Ndiaye K , Niang MN , Dia N. 2019 . Enterovirus D68 Subclade B3 Circulation in Senegal, 2016: Detection from Influenza-like Illness and Acute Flaccid Paralysis Surveillance . Sci Rep 9 : 13881 . OpenUrl PubMed 30. ↵ Martin M. 2011 . Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads . 2011 17 : 3 . 31. ↵ Altschul SF , Gish W , Miller W , Myers EW , Lipman DJ . 1990 . Basic local alignment search tool . J Mol Biol 215 : 403 – 10 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 32. ↵ Li H. 2018 . Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences . Bioinformatics 34 : 3094 – 3100 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 33. ↵ Li H , Handsaker B , Wysoker A , Fennell T , Ruan J , Homer N , Marth G , Abecasis G , Durbin R , Genome Project Data Processing S . 2009 . The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools . Bioinformatics 25 : 2078 – 9 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 34. ↵ Anonymous . Oxford Nanopore Technologies. Medaka: sequence correction provided by neural network models. Version X.X.X . Available from: https://github.com/nanoporetech/medaka . 35. ↵ Anonymous . ARTIC Network . ARTIC field bioinformatics tools . https://github.com/artic-network/fieldbioinformatics 36. ↵ Danecek P , Bonfield JK , Liddle J , Marshall J , Ohan V , Pollard MO , Whitwham A , Keane T , McCarthy SA , Davies RM , Li H. 2021 . Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools . Gigascience 10 . 37. ↵ Schierup MH , Hein J. 2000 . Consequences of recombination on traditional phylogenetic analysis . Genetics 156 : 879 – 91 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 38. ↵ Arenas M , Posada D. 2010 . The effect of recombination on the reconstruction of ancestral sequences . Genetics 184 : 1133 – 9 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 39. ↵ Muslin C , Mac Kain A , Bessaud M , Blondel B , Delpeyroux F. 2019 . Recombination in Enteroviruses, a Multi-Step Modular Evolutionary Process . Viruses 11 . 40. Nikolaidis M , Mimouli K , Kyriakopoulou Z , Tsimpidis M , Tsakogiannis D , Markoulatos P , Amoutzias GD . 2019 . Large-scale genomic analysis reveals recurrent patterns of intertypic recombination in human enteroviruses . Virology 526 : 72 – 80 . OpenUrl PubMed 41. ↵ Rakoto-Andrianarivelo M , Gumede N , Jegouic S , Balanant J , Andriamamonjy SN , Rabemanantsoa S , Birmingham M , Randriamanalina B , Nkolomoni L , Venter M , Schoub BD , Delpeyroux F , Reynes JM . 2008 . Reemergence of recombinant vaccine-derived poliovirus outbreak in Madagascar . J Infect Dis 197 : 1427 – 35 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 42. ↵ Imamura T , Suzuki A , Lupisan S , Okamoto M , Aniceto R , Egos RJ , Daya EE , Tamaki R , Saito M , Fuji N , Roy CN , Opinion JM , Santo AV , Macalalad NG , Tandoc A , 3rd, Sombrero L , Olveda R , Oshitani H. 2013 . Molecular evolution of enterovirus 68 detected in the Philippines . PLoS One 8 : e74221 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 43. ↵ Dutkiewicz M , Stachowiak A , Swiatkowska A , Ciesiolka J. 2016 . Structure and function of RNA elements present in enteroviral genomes . Acta Biochim Pol 63 : 623 – 630 . OpenUrl PubMed 44. ↵ Wang M , Zhu L , Fan J , Yan J , Dun Y , Yu R , Liu L , Zhang S. 2020 . Rules governing genetic exchanges among viral types from different Enterovirus A clusters . J Gen Virol 101 : 1145 – 1155 . OpenUrl PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted November 25, 2025. Download PDF Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Emergence and Circulation of a Recombinant Enterovirus D68 Identified by Genomic Surveillance, The Johns Hopkins Health System, Maryland, 2025 Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Emergence and Circulation of a Recombinant Enterovirus D68 Identified by Genomic Surveillance, The Johns Hopkins Health System, Maryland, 2025 Amary Fall , C. Paul Morris , Omar Elgazayerly , Andy Wu , Omar Abdullah , Julie M. Norton , Andrew Pekosz , Eili Klein , Heba H. Mostafa medRxiv 2025.11.22.25340766; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.22.25340766 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Emergence and Circulation of a Recombinant Enterovirus D68 Identified by Genomic Surveillance, The Johns Hopkins Health System, Maryland, 2025 Amary Fall , C. Paul Morris , Omar Elgazayerly , Andy Wu , Omar Abdullah , Julie M. Norton , Andrew Pekosz , Eili Klein , Heba H. Mostafa medRxiv 2025.11.22.25340766; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.22.25340766 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (568) Allergy and Immunology (863) Anesthesia (300) Cardiovascular Medicine (4440) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (444) Dermatology (383) Emergency Medicine (608) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1510) Epidemiology (15229) Forensic Medicine (30) Gastroenterology (1126) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6605) Geriatric Medicine (668) Health Economics (998) Health Informatics (4541) Health Policy (1369) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1613) Hematology (543) HIV/AIDS (1265) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15923) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1103) Medical Education (623) Medical Ethics (147) Nephrology (668) Neurology (6604) Nursing (346) Nutrition (998) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1145) Occupational and Environmental Health (957) Oncology (3334) Ophthalmology (974) Orthopedics (369) Otolaryngology (420) Pain Medicine (436) Palliative Medicine (130) Pathology (663) Pediatrics (1693) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (692) Primary Care Research (711) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5448) Public and Global Health (9235) Radiology and Imaging (2199) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1370) Respiratory Medicine (1196) Rheumatology (594) Sexual and Reproductive Health (712) Sports Medicine (530) Surgery (712) Toxicology (99) Transplantation (289) Urology (265) (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'a0170c8af99a0db4',t:'MTc3OTczODQxNQ=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.