Comparison of the Efficacy of Oral Elagorelix Versus Leuprolide Depot: Optimizing Natural Conception in Women with Endometrioma

In: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India · 2026 · doi:10.1007/s13224-025-02328-w · W7154830185
article OA: closed CC0
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-08

Oral elagolix improved spontaneous conception rates, reduced endometrioma size, alleviated symptoms, and enhanced treatment adherence compared to leuprolide depot in women with endometriomas.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09

This retrospective cohort study compared oral elagorelix (200 mg twice daily for 3 months) versus monthly intramuscular leuprolide depot (3.75 mg) in 100 women with ovarian endometriomas (<3 cm), patent fallopian tubes, normal semen parameters, and both asymptomatic and symptomatic disease. The primary outcome was spontaneous conception within 12 months after treatment cessation, with secondary outcomes including adherence, symptom relief (especially dysmenorrhea), and endometrioma size reduction by transvaginal sonography. Spontaneous conception occurred in 36% with elagorelix versus 12.5% with leuprolide (p = 0.028), and compliance was higher with elagorelix (100% vs 20% lost to follow-up), along with earlier return of regular menstrual cycles. The paper’s main limitations include its retrospective design and potential for differential follow-up. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it directly evaluates elagorelix versus leuprolide for fertility outcomes and cyst/symptom improvements in women with endometrioma.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometrioma

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (4)

References (6)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK