Comparison of intracervical PGE2 to intravaginal PGE2 for preinduction cervical ripening

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · 1995 · vol. 172(1) , pp. 298 · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(95)90821-8 · W4232794963
OA: closed CC0
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-17 ⓘ

This research compares the efficacy of intracervical versus intravaginal prostaglandin E2 administration for preinduction cervical ripening.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK