When Does Mutualism Offer a Competitive Advantage? A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Host-Host Competition in Mutualism

Plants due to their non-motile nature rely heavily on mutualistic interactions to obtain resources and carry out services. One key mutualism is the plant-microbial mutualism in which a plant trades away carbon to a microbial partner for nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorous. Plants show much variation in the use of this partnership from the individual level to entire lineages depending upon ecological, evolutionary, and environmental context. We sought to determine how this context dependency could result in the promotion, exclusion, or coexistence of the microbial mutualism by seeing if and when the partnership provided a competitive advantage to the plant. To that end, we created a simple 2 × 2 evolutionary game in which plants could either be a mutualist and pair with a microbe or a non-mutualist and forgo the partnership. This model included nutrients freely available to the plant, nutrients obtained only through mutualism with microbes, the cost of producing roots, the cost of trade with microbes, and the size of the local competitive neighborhood. Not surprisingly, we found that mutualism could offer a competitive advantage if its net benefit was positive. Coexistence between strategies is possible though due to competition between mutualists over the microbially obtained nutrient. In addition, the greater the size of the local competitive neighborhood, the greater the region of coexistence but only at the expense of mutualist fixation (non-mutualist fixation was unaffected). Our model, though simple, shows that plants can gain a competitive advantage from using a mutualism depending upon the context and points to basic experiments that can be done to verify the results.