Source-space EEG functional connectivity and prediction of cognition in Parkinson’s disease: No added benefit of individualized head models over standard templates

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Introduction Cognitive decline is a major non-motor feature of Parkinson’s disease (PD), but reliable and accessible biomarkers remain limited. Resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) is a promising candidate because it is low-cost, portable, and well suited to repeated assessment. Recent work has increasingly focused on source-space functional connectivity (FC) for the prediction of cognition. However, the influence of source modelling based on an individualized MRI-based head model relative to that based on standard template model is unknown. Methods To compare these two source-space EEG FC methods, we analysed EEG data from the New Zealand Parkinson’s Progression Programme, including 136 people with PD and 51 age-similar controls. Source space resting-state EEG, parcellated with the HCP-MMP1 atlas, was used to derive amplitude envelope correlation (AEC) and debiased weighted phase lag index (dwPLI) across six canonical frequency bands. The resulting twenty-four FC modalities were evaluated using six machine-learning regression algorithms within a nested cross-validation framework. Results Theta-, alpha-, and beta-band FC showed the most consistent prediction of global cognition. The strongest performance was observed for theta- and alpha-band AEC and dwPLI features (max R² = 0.170, 95% CI = 0.067–0.262; max r = 0.439, 95% CI = 0.328–0.537). Standard and individualized head models showed comparable predictive performance across nearly all modalities. The feature-importance neuroanatomical patterns for Cole-Anticevic networks were also similar between the two head-model options. Conclusions We found that source-space resting-state EEG FC can predict cognitive performance in PD. The comparability of the two head models suggests that the more user-friendly and less resource-intensive standard template head model is sufficient for this purpose. This supports feasible, scalable, and clinically accessible EEG-based FC biomarkers of cognition in PD.
Full text 1,963 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Cognitive decline is a major non-motor feature of Parkinson’s disease (PD), but reliable and accessible biomarkers remain limited. Resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) is a promising candidate because it is low-cost, portable, and well suited to repeated assessment. Recent work has increasingly focused on source-space functional connectivity (FC) for the prediction of cognition. However, the influence of source-modelling based on an individualized MRI-based head model relative to that based on standard template model is unknown. To compare these two source-space EEG FC methods, we analysed EEG data from the New Zealand Parkinson’s Progression Programme, including 136 people with PD and 51 age-similar controls. Source reconstructed resting-state EEG was parcellated with the HCP-MMP1 atlas, and used to derive amplitude envelope correlation (AEC) and debiased weighted phase lag index (dwPLI) across six canonical frequency bands. The twenty-four FC modalities were evaluated using six machine-learning regression algorithms within a nested cross-validation framework. Theta-, alpha-, and beta-band FC showed the most consistent prediction of global cognition, with the strongest performance observed for theta- and alpha-band AEC and dwPLI features (maximum R² = 0.170, r = 0.439). Standard and individualized head models showed comparable predictive performance across nearly all modalities. Feature-importance patterns for Cole-Anticevic networks were also highly similar between the two head-model options. These findings show that source-space resting-state EEG FC can predict cognitive performance in PD. The comparability of the two head models suggests that the more user-friendly and less resource intense standard head model template is satisfactory. This supports feasible, scalable, and clinically accessible EEG-based biomarkers of cognition in PD. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00