Transparency, a better camouflage than crypsis in cryptically coloured moths

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

Predation is a ubiquitous and strong selective pressure on living organisms. Transparency is a predation defence widespread in water but rare on land. Some Lepidoptera display transparent patches combined with already cryptic opaque patches. While transparency has recently been shown to reduce detectability in conspicuous prey, we here test whether transparency decreases detectability in already cryptically-coloured terrestrial prey, by conducting field predation experiments with free avian predators and artificial moths. We monitored and compared survival of a fully opaque grey artificial form (cryptic), a form including transparent windows and a wingless artificial butterfly body. Survival of the transparent forms was similar to that of wingless bodies and higher than that of fully opaque forms, suggesting a reduction of detectability conferred by transparency. This is the first evidence that transparency decreases detectability in cryptic terrestrial prey. Future studies should explore the organisation of transparent and opaque patches on the animal body and their interplay on survival, as well as the costs and other potential benefits associated to transparency on land.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00