A case study of differences in brain electrical activity between recall-based mental imagery and a subjective phenomenon of “upsight”

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

Background: This case study investigated differences in brain electrical activity between two laboratory conditions in an individual who reports a subjective experience of a phenomenon he calls “upsight.” The individual describes upsight as the capacity to perceive at will holographic images as though they appear on an inset screen that overlays his ordinary visual field, with eyes open or closed. Methods: The individual alternated 200 times between 30-second epochs of a control condition (recalling mentally an image he had seen previously) and the upsight (seeing the image on the internal “screen”) condition while 64-channel EEG was collected. Each of the epochs began with a randomly selected image being presented to the individual on a computer screen, along with an audio prompt to close his eyes and perform one of the two experimental conditions. Results: Strong significant differences were observed in the scalp EEG signal between the two conditions, most notably in the alpha frequency range (cluster peak at 11 Hz at channel PO8; t = -19.5; p-corrected<0.001). Source reconstruction analysis showed a strong alpha asymmetry in frontoparietal brain regions (cluster peak at 11 hz at the left frontal midline cortex at 11 Hz; t = -17.7; p-corrected<0.001). Conclusions: This finding is interpreted in line with the asymmetric inhibition model, namely that the upsight experience was associated with a strong reduction in inhibition in frontoparietal brain regions, possibly reflecting the participant's intentional suppression of the upsight perceptual stream to successfully perform the control condition. Experimental design strategies for attempting to determine the source and nature of the upsight perceptual stream are discussed.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00