Discussion
Fewer than 50 cases of intestinal tumours associated with
endometriosis have been reported, with endometrioid adeno -
carcinoma being the commonest variant. Most cases occur in
postmenopausal women receiving estrogen therapy following
hysterectomy and double annexectomy for endometriosis. The
clinical picture usually presents with abdominal pain, metror -
rhagia and/or rectorrhagia (3). Tumours are usually found in the
sigmoid colon, upper rectum, and rectovaginal septum, being
exceptional in the extraperitoneal mid-lower rectum.
The etiopathogenesis is unknown, and in most cases endo -
metriotic implants are secondary to retrograde menstruation (4).
Hyperestrogenism is a potential risk factor (5), and genetic pre-
disposition is suggested for cases without it (5). On the other
hand, the neurological hypothesis described by Possover and
Anaf (6,7) correlates endometriotic implants with sympathetic
nervous system distribution; this might account for our patient’s
case since the mid-lower rectum’s location is extraperitoneal and
in intimate contact with the sympathetic plexus.
This case meets all the histological criteria defined by Samp-
son (8) for endometrioid adenocarcinoma, with tumour cells
growing from endometriotic foci within the rectal muscularis
coat, hence not from invasion from the uterus. Furthermore, the
histology of the hysterectomy specimen confirms uterine infil -
tration by contiguity from the rectum, with no endometriotic
sites in the uterus or annexes, and an endometrium with normal
characteristics, which rules out a uterine origin.
There is no consensus protocol regarding the treatment of
choice. At any rate, the need for radical resection of the involved
intestinal segment plus hysterectomy and double annexectomy
is indisputable. Adjuvant therapy is warranted by the presence
of nodal metastases and uterine infiltration.
To conclude, endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the rectum is a
rare tumour that requires a high index of suspicion for diagnosis.
Importantly, it should be differentiated from colorectal tumours
in order to optimize management and for its prognostic value.
Our case is atypical in terms of age at presentation, absence of
relevant history, and tumour location.
Yurena Caballero1, Ángel Turégano1, Eudaldo López-
Tomassetti1, María Soledad Martínez2, Virginia Benito3 and
Juan Ramón Hernández1
Departments of 1General and Digestive Surgery, and
2Pathology. Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria.
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain. 3Department of
Oncological Gynecology. Hospital Universitario Materno
Infantil de Gran Canaria. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
References
1. Petersen VC, Underwood J, Wells M, Sheperd N. Primary endometroid
adenocarcinoma of the large intestine arising in colorectal anastomosis.
Histhopathology 2002;40:171-6.
2. Heaps JM, Nieberg RK, Berek JS. Malignant neoplasm arising in endo-
metriosis. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:1023-8.
3. Yantiss RK, Clement PB, Young RH. Neoplastic and pre-neoplastic
changes in gastrointestinal endometriosis: A study of 17 cases. Am J
Surg Pathol 2000;24:513-24.
4. Bouhmidi A, Sánchez Torres A, Martínez Jiménez T, Sáez Macia R,
Sánchez de la Villa G, Montes Clavero C. Rectosigmoid endometriosis.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2006;98:797-8.
5. Zanetta GM, Webb MJ, Li H, Keeney GL. Hyperestrogenism: A rel -
evant risk factor for the development of cancer from endometriosis.
Gynecol Oncol 2000;79:18-22.
6. Possover M, Rhiem K, Chiantera V . The “neurologic hypothesis”: A
new concept in the pathogenesis if the endometriosis? Gynecol Surgery
2005;2:107-11.
7. Anaf V , El Nakadi I, Simon P, Van de Stadt J, Fayt I, Simonart T, et
al. Preferential infiltration of the large bowel endometriosis along the
nerves of the colon. Hum Reprod 2004;19:996-1002.
8. Sampson JA. Endometrial carcinoma of the ovary arising in endome-
trial tissue in that organ. Arch Surg 1925;10:1-72.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.