Risk Adjusted Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions for the Management of COVID-19 in South Africa
preprint
OA: gold
CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
Abstract
A global analysis of the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) on the dynamics of the spread of the COVID-19 indicates that these can be classified using the stringency index proposed by the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT) team. The world average for the coefficient that linearises the level of transmission with respect to the OxCGRT stringency index is α s = 0.01 ± 0.0017 (95% C.I.). The corresponding South African coefficient is α s = 0.0078 ± 0.00036 (95% C.I.), compatible with the world average. Here, we implement the stringency index for the recently announced 5-tier regulatory alert system. Predictions are made for the spread of the virus for each alert level. Assuming constant rates of recovery and mortality, it is essential to increase α s . For the system to remain sub-critical, the rate with which α s increases should outpace that of the decrease of the stringency index. Monitoring of α s becomes essential to controlling the post-lockdown phase. Data from the Gauteng province obtained in May 2020 has been used to re-calibrate the model, where α s was found increase by 20% with respect to the period before lockdown. Predictions for the province are made in this light.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0