Evaluating the Spidey sense: The metacognition of intuition

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

The notion of intuition is a common phenomenological description of how people feel they make some decisions. Although previous work has demonstrated an objective lab-based method to measure intuition, it remains unknown how such objective data might be related to real-world phenomenology of intuition, such as metacognition. To investigate this, we compared performance in an objective lab-based intuition task and its physiological responses with off-line self-report measures of intuitive thinking. We found that intuitive phenomenology was positively correlated with objective intuition and physiology in the lab-based task. Further, we found that those categorized as ‘intuitive thinkers’ performed better on the lab-based intuition task, relative to ‘rational thinkers’. Interestingly, individuals categorized as neither intuitive nor rational thinkers demonstrated decisional adaptability in their degree of intuition, depending on the availability of conscious evidence. These findings support a link between objective psychophysical lab-based measures, physiology, and subjective phenomenology of intuition in decision making: good metacognition.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00