Abstract
The evolution of biological morphology is critical for understanding the diversity of the natural world, yet traditional analyses often involve subjective biases in the selection and coding of morphological traits. This study employs deep learning techniques, utilizing a pretrained ResNet34 model capable of recognizing over 10,000 bird species, to explore avian morphological evolution. We extracted weights from the model's final fully connected (fc) layer to create vector representations of avian species and assessed their similarities using cosine similarity metrics. The results demonstrated multiple clustering patterns with or without biological meaning. Some clustering results are consistent with traditional classifications based on morphology, some are consistent with modern cladistic classifications, and some show behavioural and ecological similarities. Despite these insights, some clusters indicated the influence of non-biological image features on clustering outcomes. This study underscores the potential and limitations of using deep learning approaches in morphological evolution studies.
Full text
2,046 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 3 of this Preprint.
You must log in to post a comment.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 3 of this Preprint.
Add a Comment
You must log in to post a comment.
Comments
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
The evolution of biological morphology is critical for understanding the diversity of the natural world, yet traditional analyses often involve subjective biases in the selection and coding of morphological traits. This study employs deep learning techniques, utilizing a pretrained ResNet34 model capable of recognizing over 10,000 bird species, to explore avian morphological evolution. We extracted weights from the model's final fully connected (fc) layer to create vector representations of avian species and assessed their similarities using cosine similarity metrics. The results demonstrated multiple clustering patterns with or without biological meaning. Some clustering results are consistent with traditional classifications based on morphology, some are consistent with modern cladistic classifications, and some show behavioural and ecological similarities. Despite these insights, some clusters indicated the influence of non-biological image features on clustering outcomes. This study underscores the potential and limitations of using deep learning approaches in morphological evolution studies.
https://doi.org/10.32942/X20G9V
Biodiversity, Bioinformatics, Computational Engineering, Evolution, Life Sciences, Ornithology, Research Methods in Life Sciences
bird, biodiversity, clustering, Deep learning, Morphological Evolution
Published: 2025-04-10 00:18
Last Updated: 2025-04-15 01:47
CC-By Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Conflict of interest statement:
The author has no conflict of interests.
Data and Code Availability Statement:
https://github.com/sun-jiao/osea_morpho_evo
Language:
English
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.