Distinct foraging goals shape floral resource use in a generalist solitary bee

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

A central challenge in characterizing species’ niches is ensuring that foraging data accurately capture both the resources used and their relative importance, and the role of resource abundance in shaping foraging patterns. Most studies infer diet breadth and resource-use patterns from observational records, yet such data can mask resource-specific decisions when animals forage with different goals. Here, we test this experimentally using individually identifiable bees in controlled resource communities to quantify foraging decisions between nectar (for sustenance) and pollen (for offspring provisioning). Combining observations, pollen DNA metabarcoding, and pollen microscopy, we show that observed visitation patterns misrepresent the floral resources most important for offspring provisioning, which ultimately determines offspring survival and population persistence. We further show that interaction patterns are structured from processes beyond resource abundance. Our results demonstrate that commonly used observational approaches can mischaracterize diet breadth, potentially challenging conclusions about species generalization.
Full text 1,233 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract A central challenge in characterizing species’ niches is ensuring that foraging data accurately capture both the resources used and their relative importance, and the role of resource abundance in shaping foraging patterns. Most studies infer diet breadth and resource-use patterns from observational records, yet such data can mask resource-specific decisions when animals forage with different goals. Here, we test this experimentally using individually identifiable bees in controlled resource communities to quantify foraging decisions between nectar (for sustenance) and pollen (for offspring provisioning). Combining observations, pollen DNA metabarcoding, and pollen microscopy, we show that observed visitation patterns misrepresent the floral resources most important for offspring provisioning, which ultimately determines offspring survival and population persistence. We further show that interaction patterns are structured from processes beyond resource abundance. Our results demonstrate that commonly used observational approaches can mischaracterize diet breadth, potentially challenging conclusions about species generalization. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00