Outcomes Frequently Specified in Cochrane Reviews of Community-based Psychosocial Interventions for Adults with Severe Mental Illness: A Systematic Search and Narrative Synthesis

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Background: Outcome selection in intervention studies is a critical issue for synthesising evidence. This study is aimed to investigate outcomes used in Cochrane reviews assessing community-based psychosocial interventions for adults with severe mental illness. Methods: Cochrane reviews that evaluated a community-based psychosocial intervention for adults with severe mental illness were searched electronically and manually. We extracted all outcomes specified in the Methods section in each Cochrane review. Outcomes that represent the same concept and context were synthesised into an outcome term. Outcome terms were categorised according to the existing taxonomy. Results: We included 31 Cochrane reviews. Of the 214 outcome terms identified, 13 were used in more than half of the reviews: quality of life, mental state, economic outcome, admission to hospital, leaving the study early, social functioning, satisfaction, global state, relapse, adverse events/effects, carer satisfaction, employment, duration of admission. Most outcome terms were categorised into the life impact core area (57%), followed by the resource use area (21%). Conclusions: Our study provides a candidate outcome list for developing a core outcome set for severe mental illness and offers a basis for comparison for future outcome investigation on mental health research.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00