Advanced Manufacturing of Coil-Reinforced Multilayer Vascular Grafts to Optimize Biomechanical Performance

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Small diameter vascular grafts require a complex balance of biomechanical properties to achieve target burst pressure, arterial compliance-matching, and kink resistance to prevent failure. Iterative design of our multilayer vascular was previously used to achieve high compliance while retaining the requisite burst pressure and suture retention strength for clinical use. To impart kink resistance, a custom 3D solution printer was used to add a polymeric coil to the electrospun polyurethane graft to support the graft during bending. The addition of this reinforcing coil increased kink resistance but reduced compliance. A matrix of grafts were fabricated and tested to establish key structure-property relationships between coil parameters (spacing, diameter, modulus) and biomechanical properties (compliance, kink radius). A successful graft design was identified with a compliance similar to saphenous vein grafts (4.1 ± 0.4 %/mmHgx10 -2 ) while maintaining comparable kink resistance to grafts used currently in the clinic. To explore graft combinations that could increase graft compliance to match arterial values while retaining this kink resistance, we utilized finite element (FE) models of compliance and kink radius that simulated experimental testing. The FE-predicted graft compliance agreed well with experimental values. Although the kink model over-predicted the experimental kink radius values, key trends between graft parameters and kink resistance were reproduced. As an initial proof-of-concept, the validated models were then utilized to parse through a targeted graft design space. Although this initial parameter range tested did not yield a graft that improved upon the previous balance of graft properties, this combination of advanced manufacturing and computational framework paves the way for future model-driven design to further optimize graft performance. TOC
Full text 1,977 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Small diameter vascular grafts require a complex balance of biomechanical properties to achieve target burst pressure, arterial compliance-matching, and kink resistance to prevent failure. Iterative design of our multilayer vascular was previously used to achieve high compliance while retaining the requisite burst pressure and suture retention strength for clinical use. To impart kink resistance, a custom 3D solution printer was used to add a polymeric coil to the electrospun polyurethane graft to support the graft during bending. The addition of this reinforcing coil increased kink resistance but reduced compliance. A matrix of grafts were fabricated and tested to establish key structure-property relationships between coil parameters (spacing, diameter, modulus) and biomechanical properties (compliance, kink radius). A successful graft design was identified with a compliance similar to saphenous vein grafts (4.1 ± 0.4 %/mmHgx10-2) while maintaining comparable kink resistance to grafts used currently in the clinic. To explore graft combinations that could increase graft compliance to match arterial values while retaining this kink resistance, we utilized finite element (FE) models of compliance and kink radius that simulated experimental testing. The FE-predicted graft compliance agreed well with experimental values. Although the kink model over-predicted the experimental kink radius values, key trends between graft parameters and kink resistance were reproduced. As an initial proof-of-concept, the validated models were then utilized to parse through a targeted graft design space. Although this initial parameter range tested did not yield a graft that improved upon the previous balance of graft properties, this combination of advanced manufacturing and computational framework paves the way for future model-driven design to further optimize graft performance. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00