Prognostic Significance of the Proximal Margin for Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma With Type II and III Tumors After Surgery

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

Background: The incidence of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (EJA) has increased in recent years, with surgical resection the main choice of treatment. The optimal length of the proximal margin for EJA is still under debate, and the impact of EJA survival and recurrence remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of the optimal length of the proximal margin on EJA.MethodsFrom January 2011 to December 2015, 131 patients who had EJA with type II tumors were included and retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent radical R0 resection. The proximal margin was measured promptly after resection, and the frozen-section pathological examination was negative for the margin.ResultsThere were 3 cases of Siewert type I EJA (2.9 %), 75 cases of Siewert type II EJA (57.9 %), and 53 cases (40.1%) of Siewert type III EJA. The median number of lymph nodes examined was 19 (range: 1–41), and the median number of positive lymph nodes was 2 (range: 0–18). Sixty-three patients underwent total gastrectomy (48.1%), and 68 underwent proximal gastrectomy (51.9%). The median follow-up time was 57.3 months: (range 1.9–174.1); 34 patients (26%) relapsed and 74 (56.5%) died. The 5-year overall survival rate of type II tumor patients was 68.2%, and that of type III tumor patients was 38.5% ( P = 0.02). For patients with a proximal margin 2 cm (log–rank: 0.496). Our data analysis found that a proximal margin length of 2 cm was a prognostic variable for type II and type III tumors.ConclusionsThere are a number of factors associated with recurrence and overall survival at 5 years for patients who have EJA with type II and type III tumors, and a proximal margin >2 cm may indicate better prognosis.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00