Sexual difficulties in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): results of a 2-year study

In: Gastrointestinal Nursing · 2020 · vol. 18(6) , pp. 34–42 · doi:10.12968/gasn.2020.18.6.34 · W3043904469
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-13

This 2-year study found that inflammatory bowel disease patients report persistent moderate sexual difficulties, with age, depressive symptoms, pain, social support, and optimism predicting these issues.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: Sexual difficulties are common in individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Aims: This study aimed to document sexual difficulties in IBD; to investigate longitudinal patterns in these difficulties; and to identify biopsychosocial factors that may serve as predictors of these difficulties. Methods: A longitudinal study was conducted, with IBD outpatients completing three questionnaires across 2 years. Items assessed biopsychosocial variables (e.g., age, PHQ-9, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support) and sexual difficulties (Golombok-Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction). Findings: Patients reported a moderate level of sexual difficulties, with 17.5–74.5% exceeding the threshold of clinical significance across domains. No significant changes in sexual difficulties occurred across the study period. Biopsychosocial factors accounted for up to 25.2% of the variance in sexual difficulties, with age, depressive symptoms, pain-related disability, perceived social support, and optimism associated with these difficulties in the hypothesised directions. Conclusions: Patients reported significant sexual difficulties in several domains, with a high degree of stability over time. Biopsychosocial factors were associated with reported sexual difficulties, particularly older age and lower perceived social support. These factors are suggested as targets for intervention research.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (39)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK