Morphological innovation without gene co-option: the Drosophila sex comb evolved via changes in developmental tempo and energy metabolism

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

The individualization of serially repeated homologs is one route through which novel traits are thought to evolve. Under this model, a repeated character—like a limb, digit, or sensory bristle—is individualized from its homologs by changes in the regulatory apparatus (‘character identity network’, ChIN) that specifies its development. Individualization then enables downstream gene networks that build the repeated character to diverge from one another in different parts of the body, ultimately allowing new phenotypic endpoints to be reached. Despite this model’s intuitive appeal, the genetic mechanisms through which new ChINs rewire trait-building gene networks remain largely uncharacterized. A promising system in which to study this process is the Drosophila sex comb. Found in a sublineage of Drosophila species, the sex comb is a recently evolved, male-specific innovation that evolved from a more evolutionarily ancient precursor—the mechanosensory (MS) bristle—following the gain of a novel ChIN centered on the sex determination gene dsx and HOX gene Scr . Here, we use time-series single-cell RNA-seq to show that rather than co-opting new genes, this new ChIN orchestrates quantitative and heterochronic changes in the ancestral MS bristle transcriptome. These changes affect gene modules that control energy metabolism, endoreplication, and actin dynamics. The net effect of these changes is an organ-specific shift in developmental rate, leading to accelerated growth in sex comb teeth. Collectively, our work suggests that morphological innovation can proceed without the co-option of new genes into downstream trait-building networks and instead through metabolically driven differences in developmental rate between serial homologs.
Full text 1,840 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The individualization of serially repeated homologs is one route through which novel traits are thought to evolve. Under this model, a repeated character—like a limb, digit, or sensory bristle—is individualized from its homologs by changes in the regulatory apparatus (‘character identity network’, ChIN) that specifies its development. Individualization then enables downstream gene networks that build the repeated character to diverge from one another in different parts of the body, ultimately allowing new phenotypic endpoints to be reached. Despite this model’s intuitive appeal, the genetic mechanisms through which new ChINs rewire trait-building gene networks remain largely uncharacterized. A promising system in which to study this process is the Drosophila sex comb. Found in a sublineage of Drosophila species, the sex comb is a recently evolved, male-specific innovation that evolved from a more evolutionarily ancient precursor—the mechanosensory (MS) bristle—following the gain of a novel ChIN centered on the sex determination gene dsx and HOX gene Scr. Here, we use time-series single-cell RNA-seq to show that rather than co-opting new genes, this new ChIN orchestrates quantitative and heterochronic changes in the ancestral MS bristle transcriptome. These changes affect gene modules that control energy metabolism, endoreplication, and actin dynamics. The net effect of these changes is an organ-specific shift in developmental rate, leading to accelerated growth in sex comb teeth. Collectively, our work suggests that morphological innovation can proceed without the co-option of new genes into downstream trait-building networks and instead through metabolically driven differences in developmental rate between serial homologs. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00