Regression-guided computational design of auxetic scaffolds for soft tissue applications

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,482 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The mechanical performance of tissue-engineered scaffolds plays a critical role in their effectiveness for regenerative medicine applications. Auxetic metamaterials, characterized by a negative Poisson’s ratio, offer enhanced conformability and tunable mechanical behavior, making them promising candidates for scaffold design. This study presents a computational framework combining finite element method (FEM) simulations with regression-based predictive modeling to optimize auxetic scaffold architectures. A design of experiments (DOE) strategy enabled the training of FEM-accurate regression models capable of predicting mechanical responses from scaffold microstructural parameters. Sensitivity analysis guided the development of robust optimization strategies for identifying optimal geometries. Validation of the predictive framework was performed using experimentally derived, skin-representative mechanical properties from published literature, demonstrating strong agreement with FEM results. To facilitate broader use, we developed a software tool integrating this pipeline. It includes a manual mode for direct input of design and geometry parameters, and a predictive mode that returns optimized scaffold designs based on target properties. This integrated methodology supports robust, customizable scaffold design, advancing patient-specific approaches in soft tissue engineering. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00